1.
Hyland, Ken. English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. New Ed. Abingdon, UK ; New York, NY: Routledge; 2006.
2.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet; 2008.
3.
Bruce, Ian, 1953-. Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
4.
Jordan, R. R. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
5.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman; 2000.
6.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
7.
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 1989 Jul;22(03).
8.
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002 Jan;1(1):1–12.
9.
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002 Jan;1(1):1–12.
10.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2012 Mar;11(1):64–75.
11.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. English for Academic Purposes: Contributions from systemic functional linguistics and Academic Literacies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes [Internet]. 2012 Mar;11(1):1–3. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com./science/article/pii/S147515851100083X
12.
Lea MR, Street BV. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 1998 Jan;23(2):157–172.
13.
BALEAP Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes [Internet]. Available from: https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf
14.
Tudor I. Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal. 1993 Jan 1;47(1):22–31.
15.
Benson P. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2007 Jan;40(01).
16.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet; 2008.
17.
Peacock, Matthew, Flowerdew, John. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
18.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes [Internet]. Available from: http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
19.
Dexter, Phil, Sheerin, Susan, International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Learner independence worksheets 2. Whitstable: IATEFL; 1999.
20.
Ellis, Gail, Sinclair, Barbara. Learning to learn English: a course in learner training : learner’s book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
21.
Flowerdew J, editor. Academic listening: research perspectives [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524612
22.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(2 (Listening in EAP)). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/10/2
23.
Biber, Douglas. University language: a corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins; 2006.
24.
Academic Word List - School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies - Victoria University of Wellington [Internet]. Available from: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/
25.
Hunston S. Corpora in applied linguistics [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773
26.
Nesi, Hilary. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
27.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000 Apr 1;54(2):153–160.
28.
Ferris D. Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 1998 Summer;32(2).
29.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English)(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/2/1
30.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000 Summer;34(2).
31.
Horowitz DM. What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1986 Sep;20(3).
32.
Banerjee J, Wall D. Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006 Jan;5(1):50–69.
33.
Cooper A, Bikowski D. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2007 Jul;6(3):206–221.
34.
Green BA, Andrade MS. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2010 Dec;9(4):322–334.
35.
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment [Internet]. Available from: https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf
36.
Atkinson D. A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 1997 Spring;31(1).
37.
Davidson BW. Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1998 Spring;32(1).
38.
Thompson C. Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011;11(4):15–20. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x/pdf
39.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/8/2
40.
Sun YC. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013 Dec;12(4):264–272.
41.
Hyland K, Bondi M, editors. Academic discourse across disciplines [Internet]. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang AG; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1053948
42.
Hyland K. Disciplinary identities: individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
43.
Groom N. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005 Jul;4(3):257–277.
44.
Nesi H, Gardner S. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
45.
Dr Armin Krishnan. What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate [Internet]. Available from: http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/what_are_academic_disciplines2009.pdf
46.
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008 Oct;7(4):234–249.
47.
Tony Becher and Paul R. Trowler. Academic Tribes and Territories [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206271.pdf
48.
Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines [Internet]. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press; 1989. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335230648
49.
Neumann R. Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 2001 Jun;26(2):135–146.
50.
Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 1994 Jan;19(2):151–161.
51.
Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 1981 Jan;6(2):109–122.
52.
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008 Oct;7(4):234–249.
53.
Yakhontova T. Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006 Apr;5(2):153–167.
54.
Samraj B. Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004 Jan;3(1):5–22.
55.
Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology [Internet]. 1973;57(3):195–203. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1974-01819-001&site=ehost-live
56.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000 Summer;34(2).
57.
Uhrig K. Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 2012;31(2):127–136.
58.
Bruce I. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008 Jan;7(1):38–54.
59.
Bruce I. Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 2009;28(2):105–124.
60.
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2006.
61.
Gillett AJ. Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 1989 Jun;13(2):92–104.
62.
Basturkmen H. Developing courses in English for specific purposes [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
63.
Benesch S. Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 1996 Winter;30(4).
64.
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005 Apr;4(2):135–147.
65.
Breen MP. Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design. Part I. Language Teaching. 1987 Apr;20(02).
66.
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005 Apr;4(2):135–147.
67.
Bell, Roger T. An introduction to applied linguistics: approaches and methods in language teaching. London: Batsford; 1981.
68.
Biber, Douglas, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan. Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman; 2002.
69.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic writing: process and product. Basingstoke: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
70.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, Saint Martin, Monique de, Baudelot, Christian, Vincent, Guy. Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professional power. Cambridge: Polity; 1994.
71.
Byram, Michael, Morgan, Carol. Teaching-and-learning language-and-culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1994.
72.
Gillett A, Weetman C. Investigation of the perceived usefulness of a StudyNet group discussion facility by students in higher education. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching [Internet]. 2005;2(1):36–43. Available from: https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/2597/902908.pdf?sequence=1
73.
Gillett A, Wray L, British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes. Assessing the effectiveness of EAP programmes. London: BALEAP; 2006.
74.
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
75.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman; 2000.
76.
Principles and practices in second language aquisition [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
77.
Lynch, Brian K. Language program evaluation: theory and practice. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
78.
Musumeci, Diane. Breaking tradition: an exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
79.
Nation P. The Four Strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2007 Apr 16;1(1):2–13.
80.
Subject benchmark statements: Languages and related studies [Internet]. Available from: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-languages-cultures-and-societies
81.
Robinson, Pauline C. ESP today: a practitioner’s guide. London: Prentice Hall; 1991.
82.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic writing: process and product. Basingstoke: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
83.
SCHMIDT RW. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics. 1990 Jun 1;11(2):129–158.
84.
Gass SM, Madden CG, Conference on Applied Linguistics. Input in second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House; 1985.
85.
Swales, John M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
86.
Watson Todd R. EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2003 Jan;2(2):147–156.
87.
Weissberg B. The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 1993 Jan;12(1):23–35.
88.
Bloomsbury - Academic Writing [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/academic-writing-9781441112361/
89.
Pecorari D. Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use [Internet]. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1336595
90.
Allwright D. Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 2003 Jun 1;7(2):113–141.
91.
Dick Allwright. Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal [Internet]. Wiley; 89(3):353–366. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588663
92.
Allwright, Dick. The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Houndmills, Basingst: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
93.
Gieve, Simon, Miller, Inés K. Understanding the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
94.
Zhang R. Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research. 2004 Sep 1;8(3):331–345.
95.
de Almeida Soares D. Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research. 2008 Oct;12(4):517–533.
96.
Wright T. Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching. 2010 Jul;43(03):259–296.
97.
Teachers’ beliefs. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/55/2/186/3114052
98.
Borg S. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 2003 Apr;36(2):81–109.
99.
Towards reflective teaching [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tttjournal.co.uk/uploads/File/back_articles/Towards_Reflective_Teaching.pdf
100.
Wajnryb, Ruth. Classroom observation tasks: a resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
101.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet; 2008.
102.
Cottrell, Stella. Teaching study skills and supporting learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2001.
103.
Cottrell S. Critical thinking skills: developing effective analysis and argument [Internet]. Third edition. London: Palgrave; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6234915
104.
Cottrell S. The study skills handbook [Internet]. Fifth edition. London: Red Globe Press; 2019. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6234945
105.
Woodward-Kron R. Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002 Jan;1(2):121–143.
106.
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin [Internet]. Available from: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-where-to-begin/796
107.
The University’s student guide to assessment [Internet]. Available from: http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_106264_en.pdf
108.
UWF - Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment - Assessment of Student Learning: Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy [Internet]. Available from: http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm
109.
Bloom’s taxonomy [Internet]. Available from: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
110.
Hyland, Ken, Hyland, Fiona. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
111.
Tribble, Chris. Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
112.
Weigle, Sara Cushing. Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
113.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet; 2008.
114.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000 Apr 1;54(2):153–160.
115.
Bitchener J, Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics. 2010 May 1;31(2):193–214.
116.
Hyland K, Hyland F. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching. 2006 Apr;39(02).
117.
Muncie J. Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal. 2000 Jan 1;54(1):47–53.
118.
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2004 Jan;37(1):1–28.
119.
Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal. 2005 Jan 1;59(1):23–30.
120.
Wilson JJ. How to teach listening. Harlow: Pearson Longman; 2008.
121.
Nuttall CE. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: Macmillan Education; 2005.
122.
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd; 2008.
123.
Jordan RR. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
124.
Peacock M, Flowerdew J. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
