1
Curran J, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Media and democracy. Oxford: : Routledge 2011. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=672443
2
Davis A. Political communication and social theory. London: : Routledge 2010.
3
Esser F, Pfetsch B. Comparing political communication: theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
4
Graber DA. Media power in politics. 6th ed. Washington, DC: : CQ Press 2011.
5
Kaid LL, Holtz-Bacha C. Encyclopedia of political communication. Los Angeles, Calif: : Sage Publications 2008.
6
Kuhn R. Politics and the media in Britain. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2002.
7
Lilleker DG. Key concepts in political communication. London: : Sage 2006.
8
McNair B. An introduction to political communication. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203828694
9
Negrine RM. The transformation of political communication: continuities and changes in media and politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
10
Negrine RM, Stanyer J. The political communication reader. New York, NY: : Routledge 2007.
11
Semetko HA, Scammell M. The SAGE handbook of political communication. London: : SAGE 2012.
12
Street J. Mass media, politics and democracy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
13
Swanson DL, Mancini P. Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Westport, Conn: : Praeger 1996.
14
Voltmer K. The media in transitional democracies. Cambridge: : Polity 2013. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1315630
15
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
16
Overholser G, Jamieson KH. The press. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=84383&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
17
Voltmer K. The media in transitional democracies. Cambridge: : Polity 2013. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1315630
18
Scammell M. Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation - draft paper. 2005.
19
Coronel S. Media as Watchdog. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/WorldBankReport/Chapter%205%20Coronel.pdf
20
Zaller J. A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication 2003;20:109–30. doi:10.1080/10584600390211136
21
Coronel S. The Media as Watchdog. 2008.https://ziaruldela5.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/coronel20watchdog.pdf
22
Curran J, Taylor & Francis Group. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
23
Curran J, Iyengar S, Brink Lund A, et al. Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication 2009;24:5–26. doi:10.1177/0267323108098943
24
Norris P. A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
25
Scammell M. Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation - draft paper. 2005.
26
Schudson M. The power of news. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1995.
27
Schudson M. Why democracies need an unlovable press. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2008.
28
Strömbäck J. In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies 2005;6:331–45. doi:10.1080/14616700500131950
29
Aalberg T, Curran J. How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. New York, N.Y.: : Routledge 2012.
30
Baker CE. Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam021/2001025498.html
31
Graber, Doris. The Media and Democracy: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science 2003;6:139–60.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=10609378&site=ehost-live
32
Lichtenberg J. Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
33
McQuail D. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. London: : Sage Publications 1992.
34
Esser F, Stromback J. Mediatization of politics: understanding the transformation of western democracies. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137275844
35
Siebert FS, Peterson T, Schramm W. Four theories of the press. Chicago, Ill: : University of Illinois Press 1984.
36
Street J. Mass media, politics and democracy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
37
Tewksbury D, Rittenberg J. News on the Internet: information and citizenship in the 21st century. New York: : Oxford University Press 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391961.001.0001
38
Norris P. Public sentinel: news media & governance reform. Washington, D.C.: : The World Bank 2010.
39
Voltmer K. Mass media and political communication in new democracies. London: : Routledge 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203328668
40
Waisbord S. Democracy, journalism, and Latin American populism. Journalism 2013;14:504–21. doi:10.1177/1464884912464178
41
Barber BR. Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984.
42
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1989.
43
Held D. Models of democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: : Polity 2006.
44
Oates S. Glasnost 2.0. Demokratizatsiya Published Online First: 2014.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?ty=as&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=search&s=RELEVANCE&p=EAIM&qt=SN~1074-6846~~TI~Glasnost%202.0~~VO~22~~SP~277~~IU~2&lm=DA~120140322&sw=w
45
Shirk SL. Changing media, changing China. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=602492
46
Voltmer K. The media in transitional democracies. Cambridge: : Polity 2013. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1315630
47
Toepfl F. Why do pluralistic media systems emerge? Comparing media change in the Czech Republic and in Russia after the collapse of communism. Global Media and Communication 2013;9:239–56. doi:10.1177/1742766513504176
48
Egorov G, Guriev S, Sonin K. Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. The American Political Science Review 2009;103:645–68.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798530
49
Freedom House. Freedom of the Press 2013. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2013#.VbjggfnwCex
50
Gehlbach S, Sonin K. Government Control of the Media. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2011. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1315882
51
Hallin DC, Mancini P. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
52
Norris P. Governance and Accountability - Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform. The World Bank 2009. http://go.worldbank.org/ZMCO1WV7Z0
53
Waisbord S. Democratic Journalism and "Statelessness”. Political Communication 2007;24:115–29. doi:10.1080/10584600701312837
54
Bandurski D, Hala M. Investigative journalism in China: eight cases in Chinese watchdog journalism. Hong Kong: : Hong Kong University Press 2010. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622091733.001.0001
55
Jonathan Hassid. Controlling the Chinese Media: An Uncertain Business. Asian Survey 2008;48:414–30.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2008.48.3.414
56
King, et al G. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review 2013;107:326–43. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014
57
Lei Y-W. The Political Consequences of the Rise of the Internet: Political Beliefs and Practices of Chinese Netizens. Political Communication 2011;28:291–322. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.572449
58
Lorentzen P. China’s Strategic Censorship. American Journal of Political Science 2014;58:402–14. doi:10.1111/ajps.12065
59
Stockmann D, Gallagher ME. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies 2011;44:436–67. doi:10.1177/0010414010394773
60
Stockmann D. Media commercialization and authoritarian rule in china. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.
61
Tang L, Sampson H. The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society 2012;34:457–71. doi:10.1177/0163443711436358
62
Yuezhi Z. Watchdogs on Party Leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies 2000;1:577–97. doi:10.1080/146167000441312
63
Zhu J, Lu J, Shi T. When Grapevine News Meets Mass Media: Different Information Sources and Popular Perceptions of Government Corruption in Mainland China. Comparative Political Studies 2013;46:920–46. doi:10.1177/0010414012463886
64
Beumers B, Hutchings SC, Rulyova N. Globalisation, freedom and the media after Communism: the past as future. London: : Routledge 2009.
65
Gross P, Jakubowicz K, editors. Media transformations in the post-communist world: Eastern Europe’s tortured path to change. Lanham: : Lexington 2013.
66
Oates S. Russian State Narrative in the Digital Age: Rewired Propaganda in Russian Television News Framing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. 2014.http://www.media-politics.com/presentationspublications.htm
67
Oates S, Lokot T. Twilight of the Gods?: How the Internet Challenged Russian Television News Frames in the Winter Protests of 2011-12. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2286727
68
Semetko HA, Scammell M. The SAGE handbook of political communication. London: : SAGE 2012.
69
Elisabeth Schimpfossl,Ilya Yablokov. Coercion or conformism? Censorship and self-censorship among Russian media personalities and reporters in the 2010s. Demokratizatsiya 2014;22.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A368073878&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&userGroup=glasuni&authCount=1
70
Toepfl F. Making Sense of the News in a Hybrid Regime: How Young Russians Decode State TV and an Oppositional Blog. Journal of Communication 2013;63:244–65. doi:10.1111/jcom.12018
71
Toepfl F. Managing public outrage: Power, scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia. New Media & Society 2011;13:1301–19. doi:10.1177/1461444811405021
72
Hallin DC, Mancini P. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
73
Curran J. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203417744
74
What If There Were No BBC Television? The Net Impact on UK Viewers. Reuters Institue for the Study of Journalism. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/what-if-there-were-no-bbc-television
75
Franklin B. Television policy: the MacTaggart lectures. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2005. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748617173.001.0001
76
The Absence of Trust James Murdoch’s MacTaggart speech. http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/opinion/james-murdochs-mactaggart-speech/5004990.article
77
Gardam T, Levy DA. The Price of Plurality - Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age. 2008.http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/reviews-investigations/psb-review/psbplurality.pdf
78
Public Service Broadcasting/ Media | LSE Media Policy Project. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/category/public-service-broadcasting-media/
79
Ofcom. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/
80
News consumption in the UK - 2013 report | Ofcom. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/tv-research/news-2013/
81
Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/
82
Picard RG, Siciliani P. Is there Still a Place for Public Service Television? 2013.https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/there-still-place-public-service-television
83
Mutz DC, Young L. Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly 2011;75:1018–44. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr052
84
Prior M. Media and Political Polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 2013;16:101–27. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
85
Cox B, Demos (Organization : London, England). Free for all ?: public service television in the digital age. London: : Demos 2004.
86
Curran J, Seaton J. Power without responsibility: the press, broadcasting and the internet in Britain. 7th ed. London: : Routledge 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203871409
87
Cushion S. The democratic value of news: why public service media matter. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
88
Debrett M. Riding the wave: public service television in the multi-platform era. Media, Culture & Society 2009;31:807–27. doi:10.1177/0163443709339466
89
Freedman D. The politics of media policy. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2008.
90
Hallin DC, Mancini P, American Council of Learned Societies. Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2004. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31807
91
Kuhn R. Politics and the media in Britain. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2002.
92
Starkey G. Balance and bias in journalism: representation, regulation, and democracy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007.
93
Allern S, Blach-Ørsten M. The News Media as a Political Institution. Journalism Studies 2011;12:92–105. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2010.511958
94
Aalberg T, Curran J. How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. New York, N.Y.: : Routledge 2012.
95
Ball T. The choice revolution. The Guardian Published Online First: 22AD.http://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/aug/22/bskyb.broadcasting1
96
Blumler JG, Broadcasting Standards Council. Television and the public interest: vulnerable values in West European broadcasting. London: : Sage Publications in association with the Broadcasting Standards Council 1992.
97
Cammaerts B, Carpentier N. Reclaiming the media: communication rights and democratic media roles. Bristol: : Intellect Books 2007.
98
Cushion S, Lewis J. Towards a `Foxification’ of 24-hour news channels in Britain?: An analysis of market-driven and publicly funded news coverage. Journalism 2009;10:131–53. doi:10.1177/1464884908100598
99
Hallin DC, Mancini P. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
100
Holtz-Bacha C, Norris P. ‘To Entertain, Inform, and Educate’: Still the Role of Public Television. Political Communication 2001;18:123–40. doi:10.1080/105846001750322943
101
Lowe GF, Bardoel J. From public service broadcasting to public service media. Göteborg, Sweden: : Nordicom 2007.
102
Media Ownership Reform. 2014.http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FULL-PDF.pdf
103
McChesney RW. Rich media, poor democracy: communication politics in dubious times. New Press pbk. ed. New York: : New Press 2000.
104
McQuail D. McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory. London: : SAGE 2002.
105
McNair B. News and journalism in the UK. 5th ed. London: : Routledge 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203881415
106
Westminster Media Forum, Nordicity. An international comparison of funding models and performance. 22AD.https://www3.ebu.ch/contents/publications/presentations/public-service-broadcasting-an-1.html
107
Paxman J. The James MacTaggart Memorial Lecture. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/08/the_james_mactaggart_memorial_lecture.html
108
Prior M. Post-broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
109
Soroka S, Andrew B, Aalberg T, et al. Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science 2013;43:719–39. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000555
110
Curran J, Coen S, Soroka S, et al. Reconsidering ‘virtuous circle’ and ‘media malaise’ theories of the media: An 11-nation study. Journalism 2014;15:815–33. doi:10.1177/1464884913520198
111
Holbrook TM. Do campaigns matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: : Sage Publications 1996. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=997003
112
Scammell M. Consumer democracy: the marketing of politics. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046107
113
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
114
Enikolopov R, Petrova M, Zhuravskaya E. Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia. The American Economic Review 2011;101:3253–85.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41408737
115
Lawson C, McCann JA. Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 2005;35:1–30. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000013
116
Porto MP. Framing Controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil. Political Communication 2007;24:19–36. doi:10.1080/10584600601128705
117
Bennett WL, Iyengar S. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication 2008;58:707–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
118
Curran J. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203417744
119
Denver DT. Elections and voters in Britain. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
120
Farrell DM, Schmitt-Beck R. Do political campaigns matter?: campaign effects in elections and referendums. London: : Routledge 2002.
121
Gavin NT, Sanders D. The Press and Its Influence on British Political Attitudes under New Labour. Political Studies 2003;51:573–91. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00442
122
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News that matters: television and American opinion. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
123
Jamieson KH. Everything you think you know about politics-- and why you’re wrong. New York: : Basic Books 2000.
124
Mutz DC. Impersonal influence: how perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
125
Mutz DC, Young L. Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly 2011;75:1018–44. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr052
126
Newton K. May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research 2006;45:209–34. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x
127
Norris P. On message: communicating the campaign. London: : Sage 1999.
128
Sabato L. The year of Obama: how Barack Obama won the White House. New York: : Longman 2010.
129
Brandenburg H, Van Egmond M. Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science 2012;42:441–63. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000445
130
Campbell JE. Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections. PS: Political Science & Politics 2012;45:610–3. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000856
131
Crewe I, Gosschalk B, Bartle J. Political communications: why Labour won the general election of 1997. London: : Frank Cass 1998.
132
Just MR. Crosstalk: citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 1996.
133
Lazarsfeld PF, Berelson B, Gaudet H. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. 3d ed. New York: : Columbia University Press 1965.
134
Manning P. News and news sources: a critical introduction. London: : SAGE 2001. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446265345
135
Graber DA. Media power in politics. 6th ed. Washington, DC: : CQ Press 2011.
136
Miller WL. Media and voters: the audience, content and influence of press and television at the 1987 General Election. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1991.
137
Popkin SL. The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. 2nd ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
138
Schudson M. The power of news. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1995.
139
Street J. Mass media, politics and democracy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
140
Vavreck L. The message matters: the economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: : Princeton University Press 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400830480
141
Kaid LL. Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781410610584
142
Leduc L. Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research 2002;41:711–32. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00027
143
Schuck ART, de Vreese CH. Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008;14:40–66. doi:10.1177/1940161208326926
144
Vreese CH de, Semetko HA. Political campaigning in referendums: framing the referendum issue. London: : Routledge 2004.
145
Vreese CH de. The dynamics of referendum campaigns: an international perspective. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230591189
146
Lawson C, McCann JA. Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 2005;35:1–30. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000013
147
Voltmer K. Mass media and political communication in new democracies. London: : Routledge 2006. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203328668
148
Porto MP. Framing Controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil. Political Communication 2007;24:19–36. doi:10.1080/10584600601128705
149
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication 2001;16:523–44. doi:10.1177/0267323101016004005
150
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
151
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication 2006;56:467–85. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
152
Entman RM. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication 2003;20:415–32. doi:10.1080/10584600390244176
153
Elmelund-Praestekaer C, Wien C. What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008;13:247–66. doi:10.1177/1940161208319292
154
Milne K. Manufacturing dissent: single-issue protest, the public and the press. London: : Demos 2005.
155
Walgrave S, Van Aelst P. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication 2006;56:88–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
156
Iyengar S, Reeves R. Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE Publications 1997.
157
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication 2006;56:467–85. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
158
Davis A. Investigating Journalist Influences on Political Issue Agendas at Westminster. Political Communication 2007;24:181–99. doi:10.1080/10584600701313033
159
Koch-Baumgarten S, Voltmer K. Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. London: : Routledge/ECPR 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=257161&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
160
Graber DA, McQuail D, Norris P. The politics of news: the news of politics. Washington, DC: : CQ Press 1998.
161
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication 2001;16:523–44. doi:10.1177/0267323101016004005
162
Yanovitzky I. Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection. Communication Research 2002;29:422–51. doi:10.1177/0093650202029004003
163
Aday S, Livingston S. Taking the state out of state--media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press--state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict 2008;1:99–107. doi:10.1177/1750635207087630
164
Bennett WL. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 1990;40:103–27. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
165
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. When the press fails: political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2007.
166
Elmelund-Praestekaer C, Wien C. What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008;13:247–66. doi:10.1177/1940161208319292
167
Nacos BL, Shapiro RY, Isernia P. Decisionmaking in a glass house: mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2000.
168
Iyengar S, Reeves R. Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE Publications 1997.
169
Kennamer JD. Public opinion, the press, and public policy. Paperback ed. Westport, Conn: : Praeger 1994.
170
Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: : Longman 2003.
171
Miller D. Official sources and `primary definition’: the case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society 1993;15:385–406. doi:10.1177/016344393015003004
172
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1992.
173
Walgrave S, Soroka S, Nuytemans M. The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies 2007;41:814–36. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
174
Bennett WL, Paletz DL. Taken by storm: the media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1994.
175
Gilboa E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication 2005;22:27–44. doi:10.1080/10584600590908429
176
Livingston S. Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention. http://shorensteincenter.org/clarifying-the-cnn-effect-media-effects-and-military-intervention/
177
Robinson P. The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. London: : Routledge 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=10716&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
178
Wolfsfeld G. Media and political conflict: news from the Middle East. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
179
Callaghan K, Schnell F. Framing American politics. Pittsburgh, PA: : University of Pittsburgh Press 2005.
180
Berkeley Media Studies Group. Meta messaging framing your case and reinforcing your allies. 2005.http://www.bmsg.org/resources/publications/meta-messaging-framing-your-case-and-reinforcing-your-allies
181
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
182
Bell CV, Entman RM. The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality: Framing the Bush Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2011;16:548–72. doi:10.1177/1940161211417334
183
Entman RM. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, Illinois: : University of Chicago Press 2004. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226210735
184
Gamson WA, Modigliani A. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology 1989;95:1–37.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
185
Hänggli R, Kriesi H. Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign. Political Communication 2010;27:141–57. doi:10.1080/10584600903501484
186
Lawrence RG. Framing Obesity: The Evolution of News Discourse on a Public Health Issue. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2004;9:56–75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04266581
187
Roggeband C, Vliegenthart R. Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics 2007;30:524–48. doi:10.1080/01402380701276352
188
Semetko H, Valkenburg P. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 2000;50:93–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
189
Van Gorp B. Where is the Frame?: Victims and Intruders in the Belgian Press Coverage of the Asylum Issue. European Journal of Communication 2005;20:484–507. doi:10.1177/0267323105058253
190
Johnston H, Noakes JA. Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Lanham, MD: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc 2005. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1322109
191
Carragee KM, Roefs W. The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication 2004;54:214–33. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
192
Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2007;10:103–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
193
Semetko HA, Scammell M. The SAGE handbook of political communication. London: : SAGE 2012.
194
Entman RM. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993;43:51–8. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
195
Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, et al. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology 1992;18:373–93.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083459
196
Gamson WA, Ryan C. Thinking about Elephants: Toward a Dialogue with George Lakoff. The Public Eye Magazine;19.http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n2/gamson_elephants.html
197
Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press ed. Boston: : Northeastern University Press 1986.
198
Pan Z, Kosicki G. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 1993;10:55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
199
Reese SD, Gandy OH, Grant AE. Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2003.
200
Van Gorp B. The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication 2007;57:60–78.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x/abstract
201
Vliegenthart R, van Zoonen L. Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication 2011;26:101–15. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
202
Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. The American Political Science Review 2007;101:637–55.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27644476
203
Crigler AN. The psychology of political communication. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1996.
204
Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
205
Callaghan K, Schnell F. Framing American politics. Pittsburgh, PA: : University of Pittsburgh Press 2005.
206
McLeod D, Detenber B. Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication 1999;49:3–23. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02802.x
207
Price V, Nir L, Cappella JN. Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. The Public Opinion Quarterly 2005;69:179–212.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3521577
208
Scheufele D. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 1999;49:103–22. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
209
Scheufele DA, Tewksbury D. Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication 2007;57:9–20. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
210
Schuck ART. Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication 2006;21:5–32. doi:10.1177/0267323106060987
211
Bucy EP, Holbert RL. Sourcebook for political communication research: methods, measures, and analytical techniques. New York: : Routledge 2011.
212
Matthes J, Kohring M. The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication 2008;58:258–79. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
213
Davis A. Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture & Society 2000;22:39–59. doi:10.1177/016344300022001003
214
Thrall AT, Stecula D, Sweet D. May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2014;19:135–59. doi:10.1177/1940161213519132
215
Waisbord S. Can NGOs Change the News? International Journal of Communication 2011;5.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/787/515
216
McNair B. An introduction to political communication. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203828694
217
Benton J. NGOs and the News: Civil society’s place in the new news ecosystem. Nieman Lab Published Online First: 10AD.http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/ngos-and-the-news-civil-societys-place-in-the-new-news-ecosystem/
218
Cottle S. News, public relations and power. London: : SAGE 2003. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781857022773
219
Cottle S, Nolan D. Global Humanitarianism and the changing aid-media field. Journalism Studies 2007;8:862–78. doi:10.1080/14616700701556104
220
Dale S. McLuhan’s children: the Greenpeace message and the media. Toronto, Ont: : Between The Lines 1996.
221
Jong W de, Shaw M, Stammers N. Global activism, global media. London: : Pluto Press 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=175031&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
222
Graeff E, Stempeck M, Zuckerman E. The battle for ‘Trayvon Martin’: Mapping a media controversy online and off-line. First Monday 2014;19. doi:10.5210/fm.v19i2.4947
223
Jha S. Why they wouldn’t cite from sites: A study of journalists’ perceptions of social movement web sites and the impact on their coverage of social protest. Journalism 2008;9:711–32. doi:10.1177/1464884908096242
224
Olsen GR, Carstensen N, Høyen K. Humanitarian Crises: What Determines the Level of Emergency Assistance? Media Coverage, Donor Interests and the Aid Business. Disasters 2003;27:109–26. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00223
225
Ramos H, Ron J, Thoms ONT. Shaping the Northern Media’s Human Rights Coverage, 1986-2000. Journal of Peace Research 2007;44:385–406.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640537
226
Van Leuven S, Joye S. Civil Society Organizations at the Gates? A Gatekeeping Study of News Making Efforts by NGOs and Government Institutions. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2014;19:160–80. doi:10.1177/1940161213514615
227
Aday S, Livingston S. Taking the state out of state--media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press--state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict 2008;1:99–107. doi:10.1177/1750635207087630
228
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. When the press fails: political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2007.
229
Cottle S. News, public relations and power. London: : SAGE 2003. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781857022773
230
Davis A. Public relations democracy: public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2002.
231
Davis A. Political communication and social theory. London: : Routledge 2010.
232
Davies N. Flat Earth news: an award-winning reporter exposes falsehood, distortion and propaganda in the global media. London: : Vintage Books 2009.
233
Fenton N. New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2010.
234
Gamson WA, Wolfsfeld G. Movements and Media as Interacting Systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1993;528:114–25.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1047795
235
Gitlin T. The whole world is watching: mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1980.
236
Beharrell P, Glasgow University Media Group. Bad news. London: : Routledge & K. Paul 1976.
237
Beharrell P, Glasgow University Media Group. More Bad News: Bad News Volume 2. London: : Routledge & K. Paul 1976.
238
Lewis J, Williams A, Franklin B. A Compromised Fourth Estate? Journalism Studies 2008;9:1–20. doi:10.1080/14616700701767974
239
Manning P. News and news sources: a critical introduction. London: : SAGE 2001. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446265345
240
O’Neill D. From hunky heroes to dangerous dinosaurs. Journalism Studies 2007;8:813–30. doi:10.1080/14616700701504781
241
Powers M. The Structural Organization of NGO Publicity Work: Explaining Divergent Publicity Strategies at Humanitarian and Human Rights Organizations. International Journal of Communication 2014;8.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2517
242
Ferguson M. Public communication: the new imperatives : future directions for media research. London: : Sage 1990.
243
Ridge-Newman A. Cameron’s conservatives and the Internet: change, culture and cyber Toryism. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
244
Trevor Thrall A. The Myth of the Outside Strategy: Mass Media News Coverage of Interest Groups. Political Communication 2006;23:407–20. doi:10.1080/10584600600976989
245
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
246
Langer AI. The personalisation of politics in the UK: mediated leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2011.
247
Lichtenberg J. The Politics of Character and the Character of Journalism. http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d02_lichtenberg.pdf
248
Scammell M. Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2007;611:176–92.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25097916
249
Street J. Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2004;6:435–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x
250
Salmon C. Communication yearbook 34. London: : Routledge 2010.
251
Balmas M, Rahat G, Sheafer T, et al. Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics 2014;20:37–51. doi:10.1177/1354068811436037
252
Corner J, Pels D. Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. London: : SAGE 2003.
253
King AS. Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.001.0001
254
Kriesi H. Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics 2012;18:825–44. doi:10.1177/1354068810389643
255
Lichtenberg J. The Politics of Character and the Character of Journalism. http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d02_lichtenberg.pdf
256
Poguntke T, Webb P. The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199252017.001.0001
257
Seaton J. Public, Private and the Media. The Political Quarterly 2003;74:174–83. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00527
258
Street J. Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2004;6:435–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x
259
Van Aelst P, Sheafer T, Stanyer J. The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism 2012;13:203–20. doi:10.1177/1464884911427802
260
Zoonen L van. Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2005.
261
Coleman S. How the other half votes: Big Brother viewers and the 2005 general election. International Journal of Cultural Studies 2006;9:457–79. doi:10.1177/1367877906069895
262
Foley M. The British presidency: Tony Blair and the politics of public leadership. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2000.
263
Jamieson KH. Eloquence in an electronic age: the transformation of political speechmaking. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 1990. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31820
264
Just MR. Crosstalk: citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 1996.
265
Karvonen L. The personalisation of politics: a study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester: : ECPR Press 2010.
266
Langer AI. A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945-1999). Parliamentary Affairs 2007;60:371–87. doi:10.1093/pa/gsm028
267
Langer AI. The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2010;15:60–76. doi:10.1177/1940161209351003
268
Manin B. The principles of representative government. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
269
Miller AH, Wattenberg MP, Malanchuk O. Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review 1986;80:521–40.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958272
270
Mughan A. Media and the presidentialization of parliamentary elections. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2000.
271
Rahat G, Sheafer T. The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication 2007;24:65–80. doi:10.1080/10584600601128739
272
Stanyer J. Intimate politics: publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media-saturated democracies. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2013. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780745676074
273
Thompson JB. Political scandal: power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2000.
274
Zoonen L van. Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2005.
275
Wattenberg MP. The rise of candidate-centered politics: presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1991.
276
American Behavioral Scientist: Special issue on ‘Political Scandals & Media, vol 1. ;47:1031–9.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://abs.sagepub.com/content/47/8.toc
277
American Behavioral Scientist: Special issue on ‘Political Scandals & Media’, vol. 2. ;47:1143–52.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://abs.sagepub.com/content/47/9.toc
278
Parliamentary Affairs: Special issue on ‘Public Images, Private Lives’. 2004;57.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/1.toc
279
Childs S. Women and British party politics: descriptive, substantive and symbolic representation. London: : Routledge 2008. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=332069
280
Murray R. Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara, Calif: : Praeger Publishers 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313382499
281
Miller MK, Peake JS. Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender: Coverage of Sarah Palin’s Vice-Presidential Campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2013;18:482–507. doi:10.1177/1940161213495456
282
Perry S. Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France 2005;13:337–52. doi:10.1080/09639480500177773
283
Wasburn PC, Wasburn MH. Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society 2011;33:1027–41. doi:10.1177/0163443711415744
284
Counting Women In - Centre for Women and Democracy. http://www.cfwd.org.uk/current-projects/counting-women-in
285
Women and Journalism | Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/women-and-journalism
286
Aday S, Devitt J. Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2001;6:52–73. doi:10.1177/108118001129172134
287
Bystrom DG. Gender and candidate communication: videoStyle, webStyle, newsStyle. New York: : Routledge 2004.
288
Carroll SJ. Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic. Politics & Gender 2009;5. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000014
289
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009;45:598–601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
290
Gidengil E, Everitt J. Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage. Political Communication 2003;20:209–32. doi:10.1080/10584600390218869
291
Jamieson KH. Beyond the double bind: women and leadership. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 1995.
292
Kahn KF. The political consequences of being a woman: how stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: : Columbia University Press 1996.
293
Lawrence RG, Rose M. Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2010.
294
Murray R, Perry S. A Right Royal Mess: Why Did the French Say ‘Non’ to the Opportunity to Have a Woman President? authored by Murray, Rainbow. and Perry, Sheila. 2008.http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/8/0/4/3/pages280433/p280433-1.php
295
Norris P. Women, media, and politics. New York: : Oxford University Press 1997.
296
Perry S. Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France 2005;13:337–52. doi:10.1080/09639480500177773
297
Sreberny A, Zoonen L van. Gender, politics and communication. Cresskill, N.J.: : Hampton Press 2000.
298
Semetko HA, Boomgaarden HG. Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2007;12:154–71. doi:10.1177/1081180X07307383
299
Zoonen L van. Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2005.
300
Valenzuela S, Correa T. Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates: The Case of Chile’s Michelle Bachelet. International Communication Gazette 2009;71:203–23. doi:10.1177/1748048508100913
301
Bruin M de, Ross K. Gender and newsroom cultures: identities at work. Creskill, NJ: : Hampton Press 2004.
302
Kaid LL. Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781410610584
303
Calhoun CJ. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1992.
304
Gardetto DC. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Symbolic Gender Politics, and the New York Times : January-November 1992. Political Communication 1997;14:225–40. doi:10.1080/105846097199461
305
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL, Cooper DP, et al. From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011;47:572–81. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
306
Conroy M, Oliver S, Breckenridge-Jackson I, et al. From Ferraro to Palin: sexism in coverage of vice presidential candidates in old and new media. Politics, Groups, and Identities 2015;3:573–91. doi:10.1080/21565503.2015.1050412
307
Larson SG. American Women and Politics in the Media: A Review Essay. PS: Political Science and Politics 2001;34:227–30.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1350209
308
Jamieson KH. Eloquence in an electronic age: the transformation of political speechmaking. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 1990. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31820
309
Kittilson MC, Fridkin K. Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender 2008;4. doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330
310
Meeks L. Is She "Man Enough”? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication 2012;62:175–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x
311
Ross K, Byerly CM. Women and media: international perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2004.
312
Ross K. Women, politics, media: uneasy relations in comparative perspective. Cresskill, NJ: : Hampton Press 2002.
313
Sreberny A, Zoonen L van. Gender, politics and communication. Cresskill, N.J.: : Hampton Press 2000.
314
van Zoonen L. The personal, the political and the popular: A woman’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2006;9:287–301. doi:10.1177/1367549406066074
