1.
Curran, J., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Media and democracy. Routledge, Oxford (2011).
2.
Davis, A.: Political communication and social theory. Routledge, London (2010).
3.
Esser, F., Pfetsch, B.: Comparing political communication: theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
4.
Graber, D.A.: Media power in politics. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2011).
5.
Kaid, L.L., Holtz-Bacha, C.: Encyclopedia of political communication. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, Calif (2008).
6.
Kuhn, R.: Politics and the media in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2002).
7.
Lilleker, D.G.: Key concepts in political communication. Sage, London (2006).
8.
McNair, B.: An introduction to political communication. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2011).
9.
Negrine, R.M.: The transformation of political communication: continuities and changes in media and politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
10.
Negrine, R.M., Stanyer, J.: The political communication reader. Routledge, New York, NY (2007).
11.
Semetko, H.A., Scammell, M.: The SAGE handbook of political communication. SAGE, London (2012).
12.
Street, J.: Mass media, politics and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
13.
Swanson, D.L., Mancini, P.: Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Praeger, Westport, Conn (1996).
14.
Voltmer, K.: The media in transitional democracies. Polity, Cambridge (2013).
15.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge, New York (2011).
16.
Overholser, G., Jamieson, K.H.: The press. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2005).
17.
Voltmer, K.: The media in transitional democracies. Polity, Cambridge (2013).
18.
Scammell, M.: Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation - draft paper, (2005).
19.
Coronel, S.: Media as Watchdog, http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/WorldBankReport/Chapter%205%20Coronel.pdf.
20.
Zaller, J.: A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication. 20, 109–130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136.
21.
Coronel, S.: The Media as Watchdog, https://ziaruldela5.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/coronel20watchdog.pdf, (2008).
22.
Curran, J., Taylor & Francis Group: Media and power. Routledge, London (2002).
23.
Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A., Salovaara-Moring, I.: Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication. 24, 5–26 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943.
24.
Norris, P.: A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
25.
Scammell, M.: Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation - draft paper, (2005).
26.
Schudson, M.: The power of news. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1995).
27.
Schudson, M.: Why democracies need an unlovable press. Polity Press, Cambridge (2008).
28.
Strömbäck, J.: In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies. 6, 331–345 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950.
29.
Aalberg, T., Curran, J.: How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. Routledge, New York, N.Y. (2012).
30.
Baker, C.E.: Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
31.
Graber, Doris: The Media and Democracy: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science. 6, 139–160 (2003).
32.
Lichtenberg, J.: Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
33.
McQuail, D.: Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Sage Publications, London (1992).
34.
Esser, F., Stromback, J.: Mediatization of politics: understanding the transformation of western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
35.
Siebert, F.S., Peterson, T., Schramm, W.: Four theories of the press. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, Ill (1984).
36.
Street, J.: Mass media, politics and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
37.
Tewksbury, D., Rittenberg, J.: News on the Internet: information and citizenship in the 21st century. Oxford University Press, New York (2012).
38.
Norris, P.: Public sentinel: news media & governance reform. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. (2010).
39.
Voltmer, K.: Mass media and political communication in new democracies. Routledge, London (2006).
40.
Waisbord, S.: Democracy, journalism, and Latin American populism. Journalism. 14, 504–521 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464178.
41.
Barber, B.R.: Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984).
42.
Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1989).
43.
Held, D.: Models of democracy. Polity, Cambridge (2006).
44.
Oates, S.: Glasnost 2.0. Demokratizatsiya. (2014).
45.
Shirk, S.L.: Changing media, changing China. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
46.
Voltmer, K.: The media in transitional democracies. Polity, Cambridge (2013).
47.
Toepfl, F.: Why do pluralistic media systems emerge? Comparing media change in the Czech Republic and in Russia after the collapse of communism. Global Media and Communication. 9, 239–256 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513504176.
48.
Egorov, G., Guriev, S., Sonin, K.: Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. The American Political Science Review. 103, 645–668 (2009).
49.
Freedom House: Freedom of the Press 2013, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2013#.VbjggfnwCex.
50.
Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K.: Government Control of the Media. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2011). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1315882.
51.
Hallin, D.C., Mancini, P.: Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
52.
Norris, P.: Governance and Accountability - Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform. The World Bank (2009).
53.
Waisbord, S.: Democratic Journalism and "Statelessness”. Political Communication. 24, 115–129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312837.
54.
Bandurski, D., Hala, M.: Investigative journalism in China: eight cases in Chinese watchdog journalism. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong (2010).
55.
Jonathan Hassid: Controlling the Chinese Media: An Uncertain Business. Asian Survey. 48, 414–430 (2008).
56.
King, et al, G.: How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review. 107, 326–343 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.
57.
Lei, Y.-W.: The Political Consequences of the Rise of the Internet: Political Beliefs and Practices of Chinese Netizens. Political Communication. 28, 291–322 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.572449.
58.
Lorentzen, P.: China’s Strategic Censorship. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 402–414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12065.
59.
Stockmann, D., Gallagher, M.E.: Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 436–467 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010394773.
60.
Stockmann, D.: Media commercialization and authoritarian rule in china. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
61.
Tang, L., Sampson, H.: The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society. 34, 457–471 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711436358.
62.
Yuezhi, Z.: Watchdogs on Party Leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies. 1, 577–597 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000441312.
63.
Zhu, J., Lu, J., Shi, T.: When Grapevine News Meets Mass Media: Different Information Sources and Popular Perceptions of Government Corruption in Mainland China. Comparative Political Studies. 46, 920–946 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463886.
64.
Beumers, B., Hutchings, S.C., Rulyova, N.: Globalisation, freedom and the media after Communism: the past as future. Routledge, London (2009).
65.
Gross, P., Jakubowicz, K. eds: Media transformations in the post-communist world: Eastern Europe’s tortured path to change. Lexington, Lanham (2013).
66.
Oates, S.: Russian State Narrative in the Digital Age: Rewired Propaganda in Russian Television News Framing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, http://www.media-politics.com/presentationspublications.htm, (2014).
67.
Oates, S., Lokot, T.: Twilight of the Gods?: How the Internet Challenged Russian Television News Frames in the Winter Protests of 2011-12. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286727.
68.
Semetko, H.A., Scammell, M.: The SAGE handbook of political communication. SAGE, London (2012).
69.
Elisabeth Schimpfossl,Ilya Yablokov: Coercion or conformism? Censorship and self-censorship among Russian media personalities and reporters in the 2010s. Demokratizatsiya. 22, (2014).
70.
Toepfl, F.: Making Sense of the News in a Hybrid Regime: How Young Russians Decode State TV and an Oppositional Blog. Journal of Communication. 63, 244–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12018.
71.
Toepfl, F.: Managing public outrage: Power, scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia. New Media & Society. 13, 1301–1319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405021.
72.
Hallin, D.C., Mancini, P.: Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
73.
Curran, J.: Media and power. Routledge, London (2002).
74.
What If There Were No BBC Television? The Net Impact on UK Viewers. Reuters Institue for the Study of Journalism, http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/what-if-there-were-no-bbc-television.
75.
Franklin, B.: Television policy: the MacTaggart lectures. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2005).
76.
The Absence of Trust James Murdoch’s MacTaggart speech, http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/opinion/james-murdochs-mactaggart-speech/5004990.article.
77.
Gardam, T., Levy, D.A.: The Price of Plurality - Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age, http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/reviews-investigations/psb-review/psbplurality.pdf, (2008).
78.
Public Service Broadcasting/ Media | LSE Media Policy Project, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/category/public-service-broadcasting-media/.
79.
Ofcom, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/.
80.
News consumption in the UK - 2013 report | Ofcom, http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/tv-research/news-2013/.
81.
Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism, http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/.
82.
Picard, R.G., Siciliani, P.: Is there Still a Place for Public Service Television?, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/there-still-place-public-service-television.
83.
Mutz, D.C., Young, L.: Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly. 75, 1018–1044 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052.
84.
Prior, M.: Media and Political Polarization. Annual Review of Political Science. 16, 101–127 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242.
85.
Cox, B., Demos (Organization : London, England): Free for all ?: public service television in the digital age. Demos, London (2004).
86.
Curran, J., Seaton, J.: Power without responsibility: the press, broadcasting and the internet in Britain. Routledge, London (2010).
87.
Cushion, S.: The democratic value of news: why public service media matter. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
88.
Debrett, M.: Riding the wave: public service television in the multi-platform era. Media, Culture & Society. 31, 807–827 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709339466.
89.
Freedman, D.: The politics of media policy. Polity Press, Cambridge (2008).
90.
Hallin, D.C., Mancini, P., American Council of Learned Societies: Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004).
91.
Kuhn, R.: Politics and the media in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2002).
92.
Starkey, G.: Balance and bias in journalism: representation, regulation, and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke (2007).
93.
Allern, S., Blach-Ørsten, M.: The News Media as a Political Institution. Journalism Studies. 12, 92–105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.511958.
94.
Aalberg, T., Curran, J.: How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. Routledge, New York, N.Y. (2012).
95.
Ball, T.: The choice revolution. The Guardian. (22)AD.
96.
Blumler, J.G., Broadcasting Standards Council: Television and the public interest: vulnerable values in West European broadcasting. Sage Publications in association with the Broadcasting Standards Council, London (1992).
97.
Cammaerts, B., Carpentier, N.: Reclaiming the media: communication rights and democratic media roles. Intellect Books, Bristol (2007).
98.
Cushion, S., Lewis, J.: Towards a `Foxification’ of 24-hour news channels in Britain?: An analysis of market-driven and publicly funded news coverage. Journalism. 10, 131–153 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884908100598.
99.
Hallin, D.C., Mancini, P.: Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
100.
Holtz-Bacha, C., Norris, P.: ‘To Entertain, Inform, and Educate’: Still the Role of Public Television. Political Communication. 18, 123–140 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322943.
101.
Lowe, G.F., Bardoel, J.: From public service broadcasting to public service media. Nordicom, Göteborg, Sweden (2007).
102.
Media Ownership Reform, http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FULL-PDF.pdf, (2014).
103.
McChesney, R.W.: Rich media, poor democracy: communication politics in dubious times. New Press, New York (2000).
104.
McQuail, D.: McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory. SAGE, London (2002).
105.
McNair, B.: News and journalism in the UK. Routledge, London (2009).
106.
Westminster Media Forum, Nordicity: An international comparison of funding models and performance, https://www3.ebu.ch/contents/publications/presentations/public-service-broadcasting-an-1.html, (22)AD.
107.
Paxman, J.: The James MacTaggart Memorial Lecture, http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/08/the_james_mactaggart_memorial_lecture.html.
108.
Prior, M.: Post-broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
109.
Soroka, S., Andrew, B., Aalberg, T., Iyengar, S., Curran, J., Coen, S., Hayashi, K., Jones, P., Mazzoleni, G., Woong Rhee, J., Rowe, D., Tiffen, R.: Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science. 43, 719–739 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000555.
110.
Curran, J., Coen, S., Soroka, S., Aalberg, T., Hayashi, K., Hichy, Z., Iyengar, S., Jones, P., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rhee, J.W., Rojas, H., Rowe, D., Tiffen, R.: Reconsidering ‘virtuous circle’ and ‘media malaise’ theories of the media: An 11-nation study. Journalism. 15, 815–833 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913520198.
111.
Holbrook, T.M.: Do campaigns matter? Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (1996).
112.
Scammell, M.: Consumer democracy: the marketing of politics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014).
113.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge, New York (2011).
114.
Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Zhuravskaya, E.: Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia. The American Economic Review. 101, 3253–3285 (2011).
115.
Lawson, C., McCann, J.A.: Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 35, 1–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000013.
116.
Porto, M.P.: Framing Controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil. Political Communication. 24, 19–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128705.
117.
Bennett, W.L., Iyengar, S.: A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication. 58, 707–731 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x.
118.
Curran, J.: Media and power. Routledge, London (2002).
119.
Denver, D.T.: Elections and voters in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
120.
Farrell, D.M., Schmitt-Beck, R.: Do political campaigns matter?: campaign effects in elections and referendums. Routledge, London (2002).
121.
Gavin, N.T., Sanders, D.: The Press and Its Influence on British Political Attitudes under New Labour. Political Studies. 51, 573–591 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00442.
122.
Iyengar, S., Kinder, D.R.: News that matters: television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987).
123.
Jamieson, K.H.: Everything you think you know about politics-- and why you’re wrong. Basic Books, New York (2000).
124.
Mutz, D.C.: Impersonal influence: how perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
125.
Mutz, D.C., Young, L.: Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly. 75, 1018–1044 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052.
126.
Newton, K.: May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45, 209–234 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x.
127.
Norris, P.: On message: communicating the campaign. Sage, London (1999).
128.
Sabato, L.: The year of Obama: how Barack Obama won the White House. Longman, New York (2010).
129.
Brandenburg, H., Van Egmond, M.: Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science. 42, 441–463 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000445.
130.
Campbell, J.E.: Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections. PS: Political Science & Politics. 45, 610–613 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000856.
131.
Crewe, I., Gosschalk, B., Bartle, J.: Political communications: why Labour won the general election of 1997. Frank Cass, London (1998).
132.
Just, M.R.: Crosstalk: citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).
133.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., Gaudet, H.: The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press, New York (1965).
134.
Manning, P.: News and news sources: a critical introduction. SAGE, London (2001).
135.
Graber, D.A.: Media power in politics. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2011).
136.
Miller, W.L.: Media and voters: the audience, content and influence of press and television at the 1987 General Election. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991).
137.
Popkin, S.L.: The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991).
138.
Schudson, M.: The power of news. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1995).
139.
Street, J.: Mass media, politics and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
140.
Vavreck, L.: The message matters: the economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009).
141.
Kaid, L.L.: Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2004).
142.
Leduc, L.: Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research. 41, 711–732 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00027.
143.
Schuck, A.R.T., de Vreese, C.H.: Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 14, 40–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208326926.
144.
Vreese, C.H. de, Semetko, H.A.: Political campaigning in referendums: framing the referendum issue. Routledge, London (2004).
145.
Vreese, C.H. de: The dynamics of referendum campaigns: an international perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2007).
146.
Lawson, C., McCann, J.A.: Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 35, 1–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000013.
147.
Voltmer, K.: Mass media and political communication in new democracies. Routledge, London (2006).
148.
Porto, M.P.: Framing Controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil. Political Communication. 24, 19–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128705.
149.
Robinson, P.: Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 16, 523–544 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005.
150.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge, New York (2011).
151.
Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., Livingston, S.: None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication. 56, 467–485 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x.
152.
Entman, R.M.: Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication. 20, 415–432 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176.
153.
Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Wien, C.: What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13, 247–266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319292.
154.
Milne, K.: Manufacturing dissent: single-issue protest, the public and the press. Demos, London (2005).
155.
Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P.: The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication. 56, 88–109 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x.
156.
Iyengar, S., Reeves, R.: Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1997).
157.
Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., Livingston, S.: None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication. 56, 467–485 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x.
158.
Davis, A.: Investigating Journalist Influences on Political Issue Agendas at Westminster. Political Communication. 24, 181–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701313033.
159.
Koch-Baumgarten, S., Voltmer, K.: Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. Routledge/ECPR, London (2010).
160.
Graber, D.A., McQuail, D., Norris, P.: The politics of news: the news of politics. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1998).
161.
Robinson, P.: Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics: Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy. European Journal of Communication. 16, 523–544 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005.
162.
Yanovitzky, I.: Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection. Communication Research. 29, 422–451 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004003.
163.
Aday, S., Livingston, S.: Taking the state out of state--media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press--state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict. 1, 99–107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635207087630.
164.
Bennett, W.L.: Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication. 40, 103–127 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x.
165.
Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., Livingston, S.: When the press fails: political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2007).
166.
Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Wien, C.: What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13, 247–266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319292.
167.
Nacos, B.L., Shapiro, R.Y., Isernia, P.: Decisionmaking in a glass house: mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2000).
168.
Iyengar, S., Reeves, R.: Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1997).
169.
Kennamer, J.D.: Public opinion, the press, and public policy. Praeger, Westport, Conn (1994).
170.
Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman, New York (2003).
171.
Miller, D.: Official sources and `primary definition’: the case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society. 15, 385–406 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015003004.
172.
Page, B.I., Shapiro, R.Y.: The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992).
173.
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., Nuytemans, M.: The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies. 41, 814–836 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098.
174.
Bennett, W.L., Paletz, D.L.: Taken by storm: the media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill (1994).
175.
Gilboa, E.: The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 22, 27–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908429.
176.
Livingston, S.: Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention, http://shorensteincenter.org/clarifying-the-cnn-effect-media-effects-and-military-intervention/.
177.
Robinson, P.: The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. Routledge, London (2002).
178.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Media and political conflict: news from the Middle East. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
179.
Callaghan, K., Schnell, F.: Framing American politics. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA (2005).
180.
Berkeley Media Studies Group: Meta messaging framing your case and reinforcing your allies, http://www.bmsg.org/resources/publications/meta-messaging-framing-your-case-and-reinforcing-your-allies, (2005).
181.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge, New York (2011).
182.
Bell, C.V., Entman, R.M.: The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality: Framing the Bush Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 16, 548–572 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211417334.
183.
Entman, R.M.: Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (2004).
184.
Gamson, W.A., Modigliani, A.: Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 95, 1–37 (1989).
185.
Hänggli, R., Kriesi, H.: Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign. Political Communication. 27, 141–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903501484.
186.
Lawrence, R.G.: Framing Obesity: The Evolution of News Discourse on a Public Health Issue. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 9, 56–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04266581.
187.
Roggeband, C., Vliegenthart, R.: Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics. 30, 524–548 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276352.
188.
Semetko, H., Valkenburg, P.: Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication. 50, 93–109 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
189.
Van Gorp, B.: Where is the Frame?: Victims and Intruders in the Belgian Press Coverage of the Asylum Issue. European Journal of Communication. 20, 484–507 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253.
190.
Johnston, H., Noakes, J.A.: Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, Lanham, MD (2005).
191.
Carragee, K.M., Roefs, W.: The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication. 54, 214–233 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x.
192.
Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 10, 103–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
193.
Semetko, H.A., Scammell, M.: The SAGE handbook of political communication. SAGE, London (2012).
194.
Entman, R.M.: Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43, 51–58 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
195.
Gamson, W.A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., Sasson, T.: Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology. 18, 373–393 (1992).
196.
Gamson, W.A., Ryan, C.: Thinking about Elephants: Toward a Dialogue with George Lakoff. The Public Eye Magazine. 19,.
197.
Goffman, E.: Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press, Boston (1986).
198.
Pan, Z., Kosicki, G.: Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication. 10, 55–75 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
199.
Reese, S.D., Gandy, O.H., Grant, A.E.: Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2003).
200.
Van Gorp, B.: The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication. 57, 60–78 (2007).
201.
Vliegenthart, R., van Zoonen, L.: Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication. 26, 101–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838.
202.
Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. The American Political Science Review. 101, 637–655 (2007).
203.
Crigler, A.N.: The psychology of political communication. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1996).
204.
Iyengar, S.: Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991).
205.
Callaghan, K., Schnell, F.: Framing American politics. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA (2005).
206.
McLeod, D., Detenber, B.: Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication. 49, 3–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02802.x.
207.
Price, V., Nir, L., Cappella, J.N.: Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 69, 179–212 (2005).
208.
Scheufele, D.: Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication. 49, 103–122 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.
209.
Scheufele, D.A., Tewksbury, D.: Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication. 57, 9–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
210.
Schuck, A.R.T.: Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication. 21, 5–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106060987.
211.
Bucy, E.P., Holbert, R.L.: Sourcebook for political communication research: methods, measures, and analytical techniques. Routledge, New York (2011).
212.
Matthes, J., Kohring, M.: The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication. 58, 258–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x.
213.
Davis, A.: Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture & Society. 22, 39–59 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022001003.
214.
Thrall, A.T., Stecula, D., Sweet, D.: May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 19, 135–159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213519132.
215.
Waisbord, S.: Can NGOs Change the News? International Journal of Communication. 5, (2011).
216.
McNair, B.: An introduction to political communication. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2011).
217.
Benton, J.: NGOs and the News: Civil society’s place in the new news ecosystem. Nieman Lab. (10)AD.
218.
Cottle, S.: News, public relations and power. SAGE, London (2003).
219.
Cottle, S., Nolan, D.: Global Humanitarianism and the changing aid-media field. Journalism Studies. 8, 862–878 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701556104.
220.
Dale, S.: McLuhan’s children: the Greenpeace message and the media. Between The Lines, Toronto, Ont (1996).
221.
Jong, W. de, Shaw, M., Stammers, N.: Global activism, global media. Pluto Press, London (2005).
222.
Graeff, E., Stempeck, M., Zuckerman, E.: The battle for ‘Trayvon Martin’: Mapping a media controversy online and off-line. First Monday. 19, (2014). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i2.4947.
223.
Jha, S.: Why they wouldn’t cite from sites: A study of journalists’ perceptions of social movement web sites and the impact on their coverage of social protest. Journalism. 9, 711–732 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884908096242.
224.
Olsen, G.R., Carstensen, N., Høyen, K.: Humanitarian Crises: What Determines the Level of Emergency Assistance? Media Coverage, Donor Interests and the Aid Business. Disasters. 27, 109–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00223.
225.
Ramos, H., Ron, J., Thoms, O.N.T.: Shaping the Northern Media’s Human Rights Coverage, 1986-2000. Journal of Peace Research. 44, 385–406 (2007).
226.
Van Leuven, S., Joye, S.: Civil Society Organizations at the Gates? A Gatekeeping Study of News Making Efforts by NGOs and Government Institutions. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 19, 160–180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213514615.
227.
Aday, S., Livingston, S.: Taking the state out of state--media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press--state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict. 1, 99–107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635207087630.
228.
Bennett, W.L., Lawrence, R.G., Livingston, S.: When the press fails: political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2007).
229.
Cottle, S.: News, public relations and power. SAGE, London (2003).
230.
Davis, A.: Public relations democracy: public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2002).
231.
Davis, A.: Political communication and social theory. Routledge, London (2010).
232.
Davies, N.: Flat Earth news: an award-winning reporter exposes falsehood, distortion and propaganda in the global media. Vintage Books, London (2009).
233.
Fenton, N.: New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2010).
234.
Gamson, W.A., Wolfsfeld, G.: Movements and Media as Interacting Systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 528, 114–125 (1993).
235.
Gitlin, T.: The whole world is watching: mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press, Berkeley (1980).
236.
Beharrell, P., Glasgow University Media Group: Bad news. Routledge & K. Paul, London (1976).
237.
Beharrell, P., Glasgow University Media Group: More Bad News: Bad News Volume 2. Routledge & K. Paul, London (1976).
238.
Lewis, J., Williams, A., Franklin, B.: A Compromised Fourth Estate? Journalism Studies. 9, 1–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701767974.
239.
Manning, P.: News and news sources: a critical introduction. SAGE, London (2001).
240.
O’Neill, D.: From hunky heroes to dangerous dinosaurs. Journalism Studies. 8, 813–830 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701504781.
241.
Powers, M.: The Structural Organization of NGO Publicity Work: Explaining Divergent Publicity Strategies at Humanitarian and Human Rights Organizations. International Journal of Communication. 8, (2014).
242.
Ferguson, M.: Public communication: the new imperatives : future directions for media research. Sage, London (1990).
243.
Ridge-Newman, A.: Cameron’s conservatives and the Internet: change, culture and cyber Toryism. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2014).
244.
Trevor Thrall, A.: The Myth of the Outside Strategy: Mass Media News Coverage of Interest Groups. Political Communication. 23, 407–420 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600976989.
245.
Wolfsfeld, G.: Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge, New York (2011).
246.
Langer, A.I.: The personalisation of politics in the UK: mediated leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2011).
247.
Lichtenberg, J.: The Politics of Character and the Character of Journalism, http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d02_lichtenberg.pdf.
248.
Scammell, M.: Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 611, 176–192 (2007).
249.
Street, J.: Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 6, 435–452 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x.
250.
Salmon, C.: Communication yearbook 34. Routledge, London (2010).
251.
Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., Shenhav, S.R.: Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics. 20, 37–51 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037.
252.
Corner, J., Pels, D.: Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. SAGE, London (2003).
253.
King, A.S.: Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
254.
Kriesi, H.: Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics. 18, 825–844 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643.
255.
Lichtenberg, J.: The Politics of Character and the Character of Journalism, http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d02_lichtenberg.pdf.
256.
Poguntke, T., Webb, P.: The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
257.
Seaton, J.: Public, Private and the Media. The Political Quarterly. 74, 174–183 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00527.
258.
Street, J.: Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 6, 435–452 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00149.x.
259.
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., Stanyer, J.: The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism. 13, 203–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802.
260.
Zoonen, L. van: Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2005).
261.
Coleman, S.: How the other half votes: Big Brother viewers and the 2005 general election. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 9, 457–479 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877906069895.
262.
Foley, M.: The British presidency: Tony Blair and the politics of public leadership. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2000).
263.
Jamieson, K.H.: Eloquence in an electronic age: the transformation of political speechmaking. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1990).
264.
Just, M.R.: Crosstalk: citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).
265.
Karvonen, L.: The personalisation of politics: a study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR Press, Colchester (2010).
266.
Langer, A.I.: A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers (1945-1999). Parliamentary Affairs. 60, 371–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm028.
267.
Langer, A.I.: The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 15, 60–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209351003.
268.
Manin, B.: The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
269.
Miller, A.H., Wattenberg, M.P., Malanchuk, O.: Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review. 80, 521–540 (1986).
270.
Mughan, A.: Media and the presidentialization of parliamentary elections. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2000).
271.
Rahat, G., Sheafer, T.: The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication. 24, 65–80 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739.
272.
Stanyer, J.: Intimate politics: publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media-saturated democracies. Polity Press, Cambridge (2013).
273.
Thompson, J.B.: Political scandal: power and visibility in the media age. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000).
274.
Zoonen, L. van: Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2005).
275.
Wattenberg, M.P.: The rise of candidate-centered politics: presidential elections of the 1980s. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1991).
276.
American Behavioral Scientist: Special issue on ‘Political Scandals & Media, vol 1. 47, 1031–1039.
277.
American Behavioral Scientist: Special issue on ‘Political Scandals & Media’, vol. 2. 47, 1143–1152.
278.
Parliamentary Affairs: Special issue on ‘Public Images, Private Lives’. 57, (2004).
279.
Childs, S.: Women and British party politics: descriptive, substantive and symbolic representation. Routledge, London (2008).
280.
Murray, R.: Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Praeger Publishers, Santa Barbara, Calif (2010).
281.
Miller, M.K., Peake, J.S.: Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender: Coverage of Sarah Palin’s Vice-Presidential Campaign. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 482–507 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213495456.
282.
Perry, S.: Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France. 13, 337–352 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480500177773.
283.
Wasburn, P.C., Wasburn, M.H.: Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society. 33, 1027–1041 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711415744.
284.
Counting Women In - Centre for Women and Democracy, http://www.cfwd.org.uk/current-projects/counting-women-in.
285.
Women and Journalism | Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/women-and-journalism.
286.
Aday, S., Devitt, J.: Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 6, 52–73 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/108118001129172134.
287.
Bystrom, D.G.: Gender and candidate communication: videoStyle, webStyle, newsStyle. Routledge, New York (2004).
288.
Carroll, S.J.: Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic. Politics & Gender. 5, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000014.
289.
Heflick, N.A., Goldenberg, J.L.: Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45, 598–601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008.
290.
Gidengil, E., Everitt, J.: Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage. Political Communication. 20, 209–232 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218869.
291.
Jamieson, K.H.: Beyond the double bind: women and leadership. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1995).
292.
Kahn, K.F.: The political consequences of being a woman: how stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press, New York (1996).
293.
Lawrence, R.G., Rose, M.: Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2010).
294.
Murray, R., Perry, S.: A Right Royal Mess: Why Did the French Say ‘Non’ to the Opportunity to Have a Woman President? authored by Murray, Rainbow. and Perry, Sheila., http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/8/0/4/3/pages280433/p280433-1.php, (2008).
295.
Norris, P.: Women, media, and politics. Oxford University Press, New York (1997).
296.
Perry, S.: Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France. 13, 337–352 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480500177773.
297.
Sreberny, A., Zoonen, L. van: Gender, politics and communication. Hampton Press, Cresskill, N.J. (2000).
298.
Semetko, H.A., Boomgaarden, H.G.: Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 12, 154–171 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07307383.
299.
Zoonen, L. van: Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2005).
300.
Valenzuela, S., Correa, T.: Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates: The Case of Chile’s Michelle Bachelet. International Communication Gazette. 71, 203–223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508100913.
301.
Bruin, M. de, Ross, K.: Gender and newsroom cultures: identities at work. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ (2004).
302.
Kaid, L.L.: Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2004).
303.
Calhoun, C.J.: Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1992).
304.
Gardetto, D.C.: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Symbolic Gender Politics, and the New York Times : January-November 1992. Political Communication. 14, 225–240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199461.
305.
Heflick, N.A., Goldenberg, J.L., Cooper, D.P., Puvia, E.: From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47, 572–581 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020.
306.
Conroy, M., Oliver, S., Breckenridge-Jackson, I., Heldman, C.: From Ferraro to Palin: sexism in coverage of vice presidential candidates in old and new media. Politics, Groups, and Identities. 3, 573–591 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1050412.
307.
Larson, S.G.: American Women and Politics in the Media: A Review Essay. PS: Political Science and Politics. 34, 227–230 (2001).
308.
Jamieson, K.H.: Eloquence in an electronic age: the transformation of political speechmaking. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1990).
309.
Kittilson, M.C., Fridkin, K.: Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender. 4, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000330.
310.
Meeks, L.: Is She "Man Enough”? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication. 62, 175–193 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x.
311.
Ross, K., Byerly, C.M.: Women and media: international perspectives. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2004).
312.
Ross, K.: Women, politics, media: uneasy relations in comparative perspective. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ (2002).
313.
Sreberny, A., Zoonen, L. van: Gender, politics and communication. Hampton Press, Cresskill, N.J. (2000).
314.
van Zoonen, L.: The personal, the political and the popular: A woman’s guide to celebrity politics. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 9, 287–301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406066074.
