[1]
Aaron, M. 2004. New queer cinema: a critical reader. Edinburgh University Press.
[2]
Aaron, M. 2006. Spectatorship: the power of looking on. Wallflower.
[3]
Acland, C.R. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2003. Screen traffic: movies, multiplexes, and global culture. Duke University Press.
[4]
Acland, C.R. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2003. Screen traffic: movies, multiplexes, and global culture. Duke University Press.
[5]
Allen, R.C. 1990. From exhibition to reception: reflections on the audience in film history. Screen. 31, 4 (Dec. 1990), 347–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/31.4.347.
[6]
Ang, I. and Dawson Books 1996. Living room wars: rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. Routledge.
[7]
Ang, I. and Dawson Books 1996. Living room wars: rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. Routledge.
[8]
Ashcroft, B. et al. 1998. Key concepts in post-colonial studies. Routledge.
[9]
Austin, T. 2002. Hollywood, hype and audiences: selling and watching popular film in the 1990s. Manchester University Press.
[10]
Barker, J.M. and American Council of Learned Societies 2009. The tactile eye: touch and the cinematic experience. University of California Press.
[11]
Barrett, M. and British Sociological Association 1979. Ideology and cultural production. Croom Helm.
[12]
Baudry, J.-L. and Williams, A. 1974. Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus. Film Quarterly. 28, 2 (Dec. 1974), 39–47.
[13]
Benshoff, H.M. and Griffin, S. 2004. Queer cinema: the film reader. Routledge.
[14]
Bobo, J. 1995. Black women as cultural readers. Columbia University Press.
[15]
Bogle, D. 2003. Toms, coons, mulattoes, mammies, & bucks: an interpretive history of Blacks in American films. Continuum.
[16]
Branston, G. 2000. Cinema and cultural modernity. Open University Press.
[17]
Braudy, L. and Cohen, M. 2009. Film theory and criticism: introductory readings. Oxford University Press.
[18]
Breakwell, I. and Hammond, P. 1990. Seeing in the dark: a compendium of cinemagoing. Serpent’s Tail.
[19]
Brooker, W. and Jermyn, D. 2002. The audience studies reader. Routledge.
[20]
Brooker, W. and Jermyn, D. 2002. The audience studies reader. Routledge.
[21]
Buikema, R. and Smelik, A. 1995. Women’s studies and culture: a feminist introduction. Zed Books.
[22]
Carson, D. et al. 1994. Multiple voices in feminist film criticism. University of Minnesota Press.
[23]
Caughie, J. 2006. Telephilia and Distraction: Terms of Engagement. Journal of British Cinema and Television. 3, 1 (May 2006), 5–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3366/JBCTV.2006.3.1.5.
[24]
Cohan, S. et al. 1992. Screening the male: exploring masculinities in Hollywood cinema. Routledge.
[25]
Cook, P. et al. 1999. The cinema book. British Film Institute Publishing.
[26]
Creekmur, C.K. and Doty, A. 1995. Out in culture: gay, lesbian, and queer essays on popular culture. Cassell.
[27]
Dennison, S. ed. 2013. Contemporary Hispanic cinema: interrogating the transnational in Spanish and Latin American film. Tamesis.
[28]
Donovan, T. 2010. Replay: the history of video games. Yellow Ant.
[29]
Duffett, M. 2013. Understanding fandom: an introduction to the study of media fan culture. Bloomsbury Academic.
[30]
Duke University Press et al. Camera obscura.
[31]
During, S. 2007. The cultural studies reader. Routledge.
[32]
Ďurovičová, N. and Newman, K. 2010. World cinemas, transnational perspectives. Routledge.
[33]
Dyer, R. 1982. Don’t Look Now. Screen. 23, 3–4 (Sep. 1982), 61–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/23.3-4.61.
[34]
Dyer, R. 1997. White. Routledge.
[35]
Dyer, R. 1997. White. Routledge.
[36]
Easthope, A. 1993. Contemporary film theory. Longman.
[37]
Easthope, A. and ebrary, Inc 1990. What a man’s gotta do: the masculine myth in popular culture. Routledge.
[38]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2000. Cinema and nation. Routledge.
[39]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2017. Fandom: identities and communities in a mediated world. New York University Press.
[40]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2017. Introduction: Why still study fans? Fandom: identities and communities in a mediated world. J. Gray et al., eds. New York University Press.
[41]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2011. Television as digital media. Duke University Press.
[42]
Ellis, J. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 1992. Visible fictions: cinema : television : video. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[43]
Elsaesser, T. and Barker, A. 1990. Early cinema: space-frame-narrative. BFI Publishing.
[44]
Ezra, E. and Rowden, T. 2006. Transnational cinema: the film reader. Routledge.
[45]
Fuller-Seeley, K.H. and American Council of Learned Societies 2008. Hollywood in the neighborhood: historical case studies of local moviegoing. University of California Press.
[46]
Gillespie, M. 1995. Television, ethnicity and cultural change. Routledge.
[47]
Grant, B.K. 2011. Shadows of doubt: negotiations of masculinity in American genre films. Wayne State University Press.
[48]
Hansen, M. 1993. Early cinema, late cinema: permutations of the public sphere. Screen. 34, 3 (Sep. 1993), 197–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/34.3.197.
[49]
Hansen, M. and American Council of Learned Societies 1991. Babel and Babylon: spectatorship in American silent film. Harvard University Press.
[50]
Hansen, M. and American Council of Learned Societies 1991. Babel and Babylon: spectatorship in American silent film. Harvard University Press.
[51]
Hargreaves, A.G. and McKinney, M. 1997. Post-colonial cultures in France. Routledge.
[52]
Haskell, M. 1987. From reverence to rape: the treatment of women in the movies. University of Chicago Press.
[53]
Heffelfinger, E. and Wright, L. 2011. Visual difference: postcolonial studies and intercultural cinema. Peter Lang.
[54]
Hemmings, C. 2005. Invoking Affect. Cultural Studies. 19, 5 (Sep. 2005), 548–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473.
[55]
Hill Collins, P. and Bilge, S. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press.
[56]
Hill Collins, P. and Bilge, S. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press.
[57]
Hill, J. and Gibson, P.C. 1998. The Oxford guide to film studies. Oxford University Press.
[58]
Hills, M. and ProQuest (Firm) 2002. Fan cultures. Routledge.
[59]
Hollows, J. et al. 2000. The film studies reader. Arnold.
[60]
hooks, bell 2008. Reel to real: race, sex, and class at the movies. Routledge.
[61]
hooks, bell 2008. Reel to real: race, sex, and class at the movies. Routledge.
[62]
Jancovich, M. et al. 2003. The place of the audience: cultural geographies of film consumption. British Film Institute.
[63]
Jeffords, S. 1994. Hard bodies: Hollywood masculinity in the Reagan era. Rutgers University Press.
[64]
Jenkins, H. 2006. Fans, bloggers, and gamers: exploring participatory culture. New York University Press.
[65]
Jenkins, H. 2015. Textual poachers: television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
[66]
Johnson, D. 2007. INVITING AUDIENCES IN. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 5, 1 (Apr. 2007), 61–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300601140183.
[67]
Juul, J. 2013. The art of failure: an essay on the pain of playing video games. MIT Press.
[68]
Kaplan, E.A. 2000. Feminism and film. Oxford University Press.
[69]
Klinger, B. 1984. ‘Cinema/Ideology/Crititicism’ Revisited: The Progressive Text. Screen. 25, 1 (Jan. 1984), 30–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/25.1.30.
[70]
Klinger, B. 1997. Film history terminable and interminable: recovering the past in reception studies. Screen. 38, 2 (Jun. 1997), 107–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/38.2.107.
[71]
Manovich, L. and American Council of Learned Societies 2002. The language of new media. MIT Press.
[72]
Manovich, L. and American Council of Learned Societies 2002. The language of new media. MIT Press.
[73]
Marks, L.U. 2000. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Duke University Press.
[74]
Marks, L.U. 2000. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Duke University Press.
[75]
Mäyrä, F. 2008. An introduction to game studies: games in culture. SAGE.
[76]
Morley, D. 1986. Family television: cultural power and domestic leisure. Comedia.
[77]
Morley, D. 1992. Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge.
[78]
Morley, D. 1992. Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge.
[79]
Morley, D. 1992. Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge.
[80]
Mulvey, L. 1975. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen. 16, 3 (Sep. 1975), 6–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.
[81]
Murray, S. 2004. ‘Celebrating the story the way it is’: cultural studies, corporate media and the contested utility of fandom. Continuum. 18, 1 (Mar. 2004), 7–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1030431032000180978.
[82]
Musser, C. 1990. The emergence of cinema: the American screen to 1907. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
[83]
Neale, S. 1983. Masculinity as Spectacle. Screen. 24, 6 (Nov. 1983), 2–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/24.6.2.
[84]
Nelmes, J. 2012. Introduction to film studies. Routledge.
[85]
Nelmes, J. 2012. Introduction to film studies. Routledge.
[86]
Nightingale, V. and Ross, K. 2003. Critical readings: media and audiences. Open University Press.
[87]
Norden, M.F. 1994. The cinema of isolation: a history of physical disability in the movies. Rutgers University Press.
[88]
Oria, B. et al. eds. 2016. Global genres, local films: the transnational dimension of Spanish cinema. Bloomsbury.
[89]
Paul, R.W. et al. 2006. R.W. Paul: the collected films, 1895-1908. British Film Institute.
[90]
Peberdy, D. 2011. Masculinity and film performance: Male angst in contemporary American cinema. Palgrave Macmillan.
[91]
Penley, C. and British Film Institute 1988. Feminism and film theory. Methuen in association with the British Film Institute.
[92]
Ponzanesi, S. and Waller, M.R. 2012. Postcolonial cinema studies. Routledge.
[93]
Powrie, P. et al. 2004. The trouble with men: masculinities in European and Hollywood cinema. Wallflower.
[94]
Radner, H. and Stringer, R. 2011. Feminism at the movies: understanding gender in contemporary popular cinema. Routledge.
[95]
Rehling, N. 2009. Extra-ordinary men: white heterosexual masculinity in contemporary popular cinema. Lexington Books.
[96]
Rodowick, D.N. 2007. The virtual life of film. Harvard University Press.
[97]
Rosen, P.T. 1986. Narrative, apparatus, ideology: a film theory reader. Columbia University Press.
[98]
Rosen, P.T. 1986. Narrative, apparatus, ideology: a film theory reader. Columbia University Press.
[99]
Ross, K. and Nightingale, V. 2003. Media and audiences: new perspectives. Open University Press.
[100]
Roy, S. 2016. Beyond Crossover Films: Bride and Prejudice and the Problems of Representing Postcolonial India in a Neoliberal World. The Journal of Popular Culture. 49, 5 (Oct. 2016), 984–1002. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12466.
[101]
Russo, V. 1987. The celluloid closet: homosexuality in the movies. Perennial Library.
[102]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin Books.
[103]
Santaolalla, I. 2012. The cinema of Iciar Bollaín. Manchester University Press.
[104]
Seigworth, G.J. 2010. The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
[105]
Seiter, E. and Universität Tübingen. Abteilung für Amerikanistik 1989. Remote control: television, audiences, and cultural power. Routledge.
[106]
Seiter, E. and Universität Tübingen. Abteilung für Amerikanistik 1989. Remote control: television, audiences, and cultural power. Routledge.
[107]
Sharpe, J. 2005. Gender, Nation, and Globalization in Monsoon Wedding and Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge. Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism. 6, 1 (2005), 58–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/mer.2005.0032.
[108]
Shaviro, S. 2010. Post cinematic affect. Zero Books.
[109]
Shaviro, S. 2010. Post cinematic affect. Zero Books.
[110]
Shohat, E. and Stam, R. 2014. Unthinking Eurocentrism: multiculturalism and the media. Routledge.
[111]
Smit, A. 2010. Broadcasting the body: affect, embodiment and bodily excess on contemporary television.
[112]
Sobchack, V.C. and American Council of Learned Societies 2004. Carnal thoughts: embodiment and moving image culture. University of California Press.
[113]
Stacey, J. 1994. Star gazing: Hollywood cinema and female spectatorship. Routledge.
[114]
Stacey, J. 1994. Star gazing: Hollywood cinema and female spectatorship. Routledge.
[115]
Stam, R. 2000. Film theory: an introduction. Blackwell.
[116]
Stam, R. and Miller, T. 2000. Film and theory: an anthology. Blackwell.
[117]
Stam, R. and Spence, L. 1983. Colonialism, Racism and Representation. Screen. 24, 2 (Mar. 1983), 2–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/24.2.2.
[118]
Stam, R. and Spence, L. 1983. Colonialism, Racism and Representation. Screen. 24, 2 (Mar. 1983), 2–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/24.2.2.
[119]
Subeshini Moodley 2003. Postcolonial Feminisms Speaking through an ‘Accented’ Cinema: The Construction of Indian Women in the Films of Mira Nair and Deepa Mehta. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity. 58 (2003).
[120]
Sutherland, J.-A. and Feltey, K.M. 2016. Here’s looking at her: an intersectional analysis of women, power and feminism in film. Journal of Gender Studies. (Mar. 2016), 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1152956.
[121]
Tasker, Y. 1993. Spectacular bodies: gender, genre, and the action cinema. Routledge.
[122]
Thornham, S. 1999. Feminist film theory: a reader. Edinburgh University Press.
[123]
Thornham, S. 1997. Passionate detachments: an introduction to feminist film theory. Arnold.
[124]
Tulloch, J. 2000. Watching television audiences: cultural theories and methods. Arnold.
[125]
Tulloch, J. 2000. Watching television audiences: cultural theories and methods. Arnold.
[126]
Tyler, I. et al. 2008. Commentary And Criticism. Feminist Media Studies. 8, 1 (Mar. 2008), 85–99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770801899226.
[127]
Waugh, T. 2000. The fruit machine: twenty years of writings on queer cinema. Duke University Press.
[128]
Will Higbee Concepts of transnational cinema: towards a critical transnationalism in film studies. Transnational Cinemas.
[129]
Wolf, M.J.P. 2001. The medium of the video game. University of Texas Press.
[130]
Wolf, M.J.P. and Perron, B. 2003. The video game theory reader. Routledge.
[131]
28AD. BEFORE THE NICKELODEON.
[132]
26AD. Electric Edwardians  The Films of Mitchell & Kenyon.
[133]
2015. Visual Pleasures at 40’ Dossier. Screen. 56, 4 (Dec. 2015), 485–471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjv056.