1
Alexander RJ, Cambridge Primary Review (Organization). Children, their world, their education: the final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London: : Routledge 2010.
2
Kelly AV. The curriculum: theory and practice. 6th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2009.
3
Ross A. Curriculum: construction and critique. London: : Falmer Press 2000.
4
Schiro M. Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns. 2nd ed. California: : SAGE Publications 2013.
5
Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
6
Consultation and engagement? The involvement of teachers in 21st century curriculum reform in Scotland. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/311.pdf
7
‘What kind of citizen? What kind of democracy? Citizenship education and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence’. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/102.pdf
8
Carr D, Allison P, Meldrum G. ‘In search of excellence: towards a more coherent Scottish common school curriculum for the twenty-first century’. Scottish educational review;38.https://www.scotedreview.org.uk/media/microsites/scottish-educational-review/documents/211.pdf
9
‘A curriculum for excellence: a question of values’. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/212.pdf
10
Successful learners, confident individuals, responsible citizens and effective contributors to society: exploring the nature of learning and its implications in Curriculum for Excellence’. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/101.pdf
11
Curriculum for Excellence: Transformational change or business as usual?’. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/293.pdf
12
Priestley M, Humes W. The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education 2010;36:345–61. doi:10.1080/03054980903518951
13
Education Scotland. Interdisciplinary learning: some guidance points. https://studylib.net/doc/12992810/interdisciplinary%C2%A0learning%C2%A0
14
Scottish educational review. http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/
15
Sinclair C. Grammar: a friendly approach. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: : McGraw-Hill 2010.
16
Wyse D. The good writing guide for education students. 3rd ed. London: : SAGE 2012.
17
Finley SM. Toward Educational Integration: Interdisciplinary Study as a Vehicle for Meaningful Learning in the 21st Century. 2008.http://discoverarchive.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/1106
18
Mathison S, Freeman M. The Logic of Interdisciplinary Studies. http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf
19
Wiggins RA. Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Music Educator Concerns. Music Educators Journal 2001;87. doi:10.2307/3399707
20
Richards JC, Shea KT. Moving from Separate Subject to Interdisciplinary Teaching: The Complexity of Change in a Preservice Teacher K-1 Early Field Experience. The Qualitative Report 2006;11:1–19.https://online.fliphtml5.com/kfrj/qhnm/#p=1
21
Sicherl-Kafol B, Denac O. The importance of interdisciplinary planning of the learning process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010;2:4695–701. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.752
22
Chanda J. Learning from images: a source of interdisciplinary knowledge. International Journal of Education through Art 2007;3:7–18. doi:10.1386/etar.3.1.7_1
23
Lenoir Y, Larose F, Geoffroy Y. Interdisciplinary Practices in Primary Education in Quebec: Results from Ten Years of Research. Issues in integrative studies 2000;18:89–114.https://wwwp.oakland.edu/Assets/upload/docs/AIS/Issues-in-Interdisciplinary-Studies/2000-Volume-18/09_Vol_18_pp_89_114_Interdisciplinary_Practices_in_Primary_Education_in_Quebec_Results_from_Ten_Years_of_Research_(Yves_Lenoir,_Francois_Larose,_and_Yvon_Geoffroy).pdf
