1.
Alexander, R.J., Cambridge Primary Review (Organization): Children, their world, their education: the final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. Routledge, London (2010).
2.
Kelly, A.V.: The curriculum: theory and practice. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2009).
3.
Ross, A.: Curriculum: construction and critique. Falmer Press, London (2000).
4.
Schiro, M.: Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns. SAGE Publications, California (2013).
5.
Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
6.
Consultation and engagement? The involvement of teachers in 21st century curriculum reform in Scotland, http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/311.pdf.
7.
‘What kind of citizen? What kind of democracy? Citizenship education and the Scottish  Curriculum for Excellence’, http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/102.pdf.
8.
Carr, D., Allison, P., Meldrum, G.: ‘In search of excellence: towards a more coherent Scottish common school curriculum for the twenty-first century’. Scottish educational review. 38,.
9.
‘A curriculum for excellence: a question of values’, http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/212.pdf.
10.
Successful learners, confident individuals, responsible citizens and effective contributors to society: exploring the nature of learning and its implications in Curriculum for  Excellence’, http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/101.pdf.
11.
Curriculum for Excellence: Transformational change or business as usual?’, http://www.scotedreview.org.uk/pdf/293.pdf.
12.
Priestley, M., Humes, W.: The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education. 36, 345–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903518951.
13.
Education Scotland: Interdisciplinary learning: some guidance points, https://studylib.net/doc/12992810/interdisciplinary%C2%A0learning%C2%A0.
14.
Scottish educational review.
15.
Sinclair, C.: Grammar: a friendly approach. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (2010).
16.
Wyse, D.: The good writing guide for education students. SAGE, London (2012).
17.
Finley, S.M.: Toward Educational Integration: Interdisciplinary Study as a Vehicle for Meaningful Learning in the 21st Century, http://discoverarchive.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/1106.
18.
Mathison, S., Freeman, M.: The Logic of Interdisciplinary Studies, http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf.
19.
Wiggins, R.A.: Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Music Educator Concerns. Music Educators Journal. 87, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/3399707.
20.
Richards, J.C., Shea, K.T.: Moving from Separate Subject to Interdisciplinary Teaching: The Complexity of Change in a Preservice Teacher K-1 Early Field Experience. The Qualitative Report. 11, 1–19 (2006).
21.
Sicherl-Kafol, B., Denac, O.: The importance of interdisciplinary planning of the learning process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2, 4695–4701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.752.
22.
Chanda, J.: Learning from images: a source of interdisciplinary knowledge. International Journal of Education through Art. 3, 7–18 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1386/etar.3.1.7_1.
23.
Lenoir, Y., Larose, F., Geoffroy, Y.: Interdisciplinary Practices in Primary Education in Quebec: Results from Ten Years of Research. Issues in integrative studies. 18, 89–114 (2000).