Allonby v Accrington and Rossendale College [2004] IRLR 224. n.d.
Arabadjieva, Kalina. 2017. ‘Another Disappointment in Strasbourg: Unite the Union v United Kingdom’. Industrial Law Journal 46 (2): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx004.
Aslam and others v Uber BV and others [2017] IRLR 4. n.d.
ASLEF v UK [2007] ECHR 184. n.d.
Associated British Ports v TGWU [1989] ICR 557. n.d.
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41. n.d.
Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] ICR 730. n.d.
Bogg, A., and K. D. Ewing. 2014. ‘The Implications of the RMT Case’. Industrial Law Journal 43 (3): 221–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwu015.
Bogg, A. L. 2005. ‘Employment Relations Act 2004: Another False Dawn for Collectivism?’ Industrial Law Journal 34 (1): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/34.1.72.
———. 2012. ‘Sham Self-Employment in the Supreme Court’. Industrial Law Journal 41 (3): 328–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dws021.
British Airways plc v Unite The Union [2010] EWCA Civ 669. n.d.
Brodie, D. 2005. ‘Employees, Workers and the Self-Employed’. Industrial Law Journal 34 (3): 253–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwi017.
Byrne Brothers Ltd v Baird [2002] ICR 667. n.d.
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] IRLR 354. n.d.
Carmichael v National Power Plc [2000] IRLR 43. n.d.
Carrington v Therm-A-Stor [1983] IRLR 78. n.d.
Collins, Hugh, K. D. Ewing, and Aileen McColgan. 2012a. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012b. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012c. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012d. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012e. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012f. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012g. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2012h. Labour Law. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069.
———. 2019a. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019b. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019c. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019d. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019e. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019f. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019g. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
———. 2019h. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF.
Cornwall CC v Prater [2006] IRLR 362. n.d.
Cotswold Developments Construction Ltd v Williams [2006] IRLR 181. n.d.
Dacas v Brook St Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] IRLR 358. n.d.
Davidov, G. 2005. ‘Who Is a Worker?’ Industrial Law Journal 34 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/34.1.57.
Davies, A.C.L. 2006. ‘Casual Workers and Continuity of Employment’. Industrial Law Journal 35 (2): 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwl015.
Davies, P. L., and M. R. Freedland. 1993. Labour Legislation and Public Policy: A Contemporary History. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Demir and Baykara v Turkey [2008] ECHR 1345. n.d.
Dewhurst v Citysprint [2017] ET. n.d.
Dimbleby v NUJ [1984] 1 WLR 427. n.d.
Dukes, R. 2010. ‘The Right to Strike under UK Law: Not Much More than a Slogan?: Metrobus v Unite The Union’. Industrial Law Journal 39 (1): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwp029.
———. 2011. ‘The Right to Strike under UK Law: Something More than a Slogan?: NURMT v SERCO, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Ltd’. Industrial Law Journal 40 (3): 302–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwr012.
Dukes, Ruth. 2009. ‘Otto Kahn-Freund and Collective Laissez-Faire: An Edifice without a Keystone?’ The Modern Law Review 72 (2): 220–46. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20533240.
Dukes, Ruth, and Nicola Kountouris. 2016a. ‘Pre-Strike Ballots, Picketing and Protest: Banning Industrial Action by the Back Door?’ Industrial Law Journal 45 (3): 337–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww026.
———. 2016b. ‘Pre-Strike Ballots, Picketing and Protest: Banning Industrial Action by the Back Door?’ Industrial Law Journal 45 (3): 337–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww026.
Employment Relations Act 1999. n.d.
———. n.d.
Employment Rights Act 1996. n.d.
———. n.d.
———. n.d.
———. n.d.
Ewing, K.D. 2003. ‘The Implications of Wilson and Palmer’. Industrial Law Journal 32 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/32.1.1.
———. 2005. ‘The Function of Trade Unions’. Industrial Law Journal 34 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/34.1.1.
Ewing, K.D., and J. Hendy. 2010. ‘The Dramatic Implications of Demir and Baykara’. Industrial Law Journal 39 (1): 2–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwp031.
Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton [1999] IRLR 367. n.d.
Express Newspapers Ltd v Keys [1980] IRLR 247. n.d.
Ferguson v John Dawson Ltd. [1976] IRLR 346. n.d.
Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board [1992] ICR 221. n.d.
Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. n.d.
Ford Motor Co. Ltd v AUEFW [1969] 2 QB 303. n.d.
Freedland, M. R., ed. 2016. The Contract of Employment. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.001.0001.
Freedland, Mark, and Nicola Kountouris. 2017. ‘Some Reflections on the “Personal Scope” of Collective Labour Law’. Industrial Law Journal 46 (1): 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww041.
Gallagher v Department of Transport [1994] ICR 967 CA. n.d.
Harrison v Kent [1995] ICR 434. n.d.
Hellyer Brothers v McLeod [1987] 1 WLR 728. n.d.
Hepple, B. 2013. ‘Back to the Future: Employment Law under the Coalition Government’. Industrial Law Journal 42 (3): 203–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwt009.
James v Greenwich LBC [2008] IRLR 302. n.d.
Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40. n.d.
Kahn-Freund, Otto. 1978. Selected Writings [of] Otto Kahn-Freund. London: Stevens & Sons.
Kahn-Freund, Otto, P. L. Davies, M. R. Freedland, and Otto Kahn-Freund. 1983. Kahn-Freund’s Labour and the Law. 3rd ed. Vol. The Hamlyn lectures. London: Stevens & Sons. https://web.archive.org/web/20120119230748/http:/socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/schoolofhumanitiesandsocialsciences/law/pdfs/Labour%20and%20the%20Law.pdf.
Leighton, P., and M. Wynn. 2011. ‘Classifying Employment Relationships - More Sliding Doors or a Better Regulatory Framework?’ Industrial Law Journal 40 (1): 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwq029.
Lewis, Roy. 1976. ‘The Historical Development of Labour Law’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 14 (1): 1–17. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5402395&site=ehost-live.
MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council [2001] IRLR 7. n.d.
Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security [1969] 3 All ER 732. n.d.
Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co. [1978] IRLR 31. n.d.
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment [1995] IRLR 461; [1997] IRLR 353. n.d.
Mercury Communications v Scott-Garner [1984] ICR 74. n.d.
Metrobus v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 829. n.d.
Milford Haven Port Authority v Unite the Union [2010] EWCA Civ 400. n.d.
Mingeley v Pennock [2004] IRLR 373. n.d.
Motorola v Davidson [2001] IRLR 4. n.d.
National Minimum Wage Act 1998. n.d.
NUGSAT v Albury Brothers [1979] ICR 84. n.d.
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] IRLR 369. n.d.
Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1551). n.d.
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith [2017] Court of Appeal. n.d.
Pollert, A. 2005. ‘The Unorganised Worker: The Decline in Collectivism and New Hurdles to Individual Employment Rights’. Industrial Law Journal 34 (3): 217–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwi016.
Quinn v Leatham [1901] AC 495. n.d.
R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51. n.d.
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497. n.d.
RMT v Serco, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 226. n.d.
RMT v UK [2014] ECHR 366. n.d.
———. n.d.
Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129. n.d.
Simpson, B. 1995. ‘Commentary: Freedom of Association and the Right to Organize: The Failure of an Individual Rights Strategy’. Industrial Law Journal 24 (3): 235–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/24.3.235.
Smith, I. T., Aaron Baker, and Owen Warnock. 2017a. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017b. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017c. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017d. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017e. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017f. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017g. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017h. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017i. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stratford v Lindley [1965] AC 269. n.d.
Taff Vale Railway v ASRS [1901] AC 426. n.d.
The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010. n.d.
The Human Rights Act 1998. n.d.
The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). n.d.
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. n.d.
———. n.d.
———. n.d.
———. n.d.
———. n.d.
Unite the Union v UK Application No 65397/13. 3AD.
Wages Act 1986. n.d.
Wedderburn of Charlton, Lord. 1980. ‘Industrial Relations and the Courts’. Industrial Law Journal 9 (1): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/9.1.65.
Wilson and Palmer v UK [2002] ECHR 552. n.d.
Wilson v Associated Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 454. n.d.
Wiltshire County Council v National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education and Guy [1980] IRLR 198. n.d.
