Bibliography for SH25 The Philosophy of David Lewis BETA

1.

Salmon N, Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. The Philosophical Review. 1988;97(2). doi:10.2307/2185263

2.

Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives. 2006;20(1):41-76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x

3.

David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy. 1971;68(7):203-211. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902

4.

David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy. 1968;65(5):113-126. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555

5.

Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy. 2002;99(6):279-315. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585

6.

Lewis DK. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell; 1986.

7.

Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind. 1990;99(395):327-354. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102

8.

Kripke SA. Naming and Necessity. Vol Library of philosophy and logic. Rev. and enl. ed. Blackwell; 1981.

9.

Sider T. Beyond the Humphrey Objection. Published online 2006. https://tedsider.org/papers/counterpart_theory.pdf

10.

Lewis D. Should a materialist believe in Qualia? Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1995;73(1):140-144. doi:10.1080/00048409512346451

11.

Lewis D. What Experience Teaches. Published online 1988. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/247198/Lewis-Experience.pdf?sequence=2

12.

Tye M. Chapter 1 - Knowing What It Is Like: The Ability Hypothesis and the Knowledge Argument. Consciousness, Color, and Content. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://cognet.mit.edu/system/cogfiles/books/9780262285315/pdfs/9780262285315_chap1.pdf

13.

Robinson D. Epiphenomenalism, laws & properties. Philosophical Studies. 1993;69(1):1-34. doi:10.1007/BF00989622

14.

Cath Y. The Ability Hypothesis and the New Knowledge-how. Noûs. 2009;43(1):137-156. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.01699.x

15.

Lewis DK, Oxford University Press. Philosophical Papers: Volume 2. Oxford University Press; 1987. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001

16.

David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind. 1994;103(412):473-490. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396

17.

David Lewis. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs. 1979;13(4):455-476. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215339

18.

Brian Weatherson. Humean Supervenience. In: Loewer B, Schaffer J, eds. A Companion to David Lewis. Vol Blackwell companions to philosophy. Wiley Blackwell; 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118398593

19.

Lewis D. Survival and Identity. In: Philosophical Papers: Volume 1. Oxford University Press; 1983:55-72. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0005

20.

Haslanger S. Humean supervenience and enduring things. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1994;72(3):339-359. doi:10.1080/00048409412346141

21.

Schaffer J. Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis. 2004;64(4):299-309. doi:10.1093/analys/64.4.299

22.

Adam Elga. Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence. Philosophy of Science. 2001;68(3). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080955

23.

Lewis DK. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press; 1969. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=876856

24.

Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1983;61(4):343-377. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131

25.

Lewis D. Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1984;62(3):221-236. doi:10.1080/00048408412340013

26.

Lewis D. Radical interpretation. Synthese. 1974;27(3-4):331-344. doi:10.1007/BF00484599

27.

Lewis D. Languages and Language. In: Philosophical Papers Volume I. Oxford University Press; 1983:163-188. doi:10.1093/0195032047.003.0011

28.

Lewis D. Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1992;70(1):106-110. doi:10.1080/00048408112340093

29.

Guttenplan SD, ed. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Vol 6. Blackwell Publishing; 1995. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781405164597

30.

Hawthorne J. A note on ‘languages and language’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1990;68(1):116-118. doi:10.1080/00048409012340233

31.

O’Leary-Hawthorne J. Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1993;71(2):206-211. doi:10.1080/00048409312345212

32.

Guttenplan SD, ed. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Vol 6. Blackwell Publishing; 1995. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781405164597

33.

H. P. Grice. Meaning. The Philosophical Review. 1957;66(3):377-388. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2182440

34.

David Lewis. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. The Philosophical Review. 1979;88(4):513-543. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2184843

35.

Lewis D. Should a materialist believe in Qualia? Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1995;73(1):140-144. doi:10.1080/00048409512346451

36.

Tye M. Chapter 1 - Knowing What It Is Like: The Ability Hypothesis and the Knowledge Argument. Consciousness, Color, and Content. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://cognet.mit.edu/system/cogfiles/books/9780262285315/pdfs/9780262285315_chap1.pdf

37.

Lewis DK. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell; 1986.

38.

David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy. 1968;65(5):113-126. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555

39.

David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy. 1971;68(7):203-211. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902

40.

Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind. 1990;99(395):327-354. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102

41.

Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy. 2002;99(6):279-315. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585

42.

Stephan Leuenberger. A New Problem of Descriptive Power. The Journal of Philosophy. 2006;103(3):145-162. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655756

43.

Melia J. Modality. Vol Central problems of philosophy. Acumen; 2003.

44.

Willard V. Quine. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics. 1948;2(5):21-38. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117

45.

Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives. 2006;20(1):41-76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x

46.

Tony Roy. In Defense of Linguistic Ersatzism. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 1995;80(3):217-242. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320630

47.

Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman DW. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Vol Contemporary debates in philosophy. Blackwell; 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1204068

48.

Sider T. Beyond the Humphrey Objection. Published online 2006. https://tedsider.org/papers/counterpart_theory.pdf

49.

Lewis DK. Introduction to Philosophical papers: Volume 2. In: Oxford University Press; 1986. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001/acprof-9780195036466-miscMatter-6

50.

David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind. 1994;103(412):473-490. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396

51.

Lewis D. Zimmerman and the spinning sphere. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1999;77(2):209-212. doi:10.1080/00048409912348951

52.

Zimmerman DW. One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1999;77(2):213-215. doi:10.1080/00048409912348961

53.

Robinson D. Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1989;67(4):394-409. doi:10.1080/00048408912343921

54.

Katherine Hawley. Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations. Mind. 1999;108(429):53-67. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2659902

55.

Zimmerman DW. Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1998;76(2):265-288. doi:10.1080/00048409812348401

56.

Craig Callender. Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter. Mind. 2001;110(437):25-44. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2659829

57.

Lewis DK. Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press; 1983.

58.

Lewis DK. Papers in Philosophical Logic. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 1998.

59.

Lewis DK. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 1999.

60.

Lewis DK. Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 2000.

61.

Lewis DK. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press; 1969. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=876856

62.

Lewis DK. Counterfactuals. Vol Library of philosophy and logic. Basil Blackwell; 1973.

63.

Lewis DK. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell; 1986.

64.

Lewis D. Parts of Classes. Basil Blackwell; 1990.

65.

Preyer G, Siebelt F. Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis. Vol Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2001.

66.

Jackson F, Priest G. Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Clarendon Press; 2004.

67.

Loewer B, Schaffer J, eds. A Companion to David Lewis. Vol Blackwell companions to philosophy. Wiley Blackwell; 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118398593

68.

Braddon-Mitchell D, Nola R. Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press; 2009.

69.

Schwarz W. David Lewis: Metaphysik Und Analyse. Mentis; 2009.

70.

Nolan DP. David Lewis. Vol Philosophy now. Acumen; 2005.

71.

Meixner U. David Lewis. Vol NachGedacht-Moderne Klassiker. Mentis; 2006.

72.

Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1983;61(4):343-377. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131

73.

John W. Carroll. Nailed to Hume’s Cross? In: Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman DW, eds. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Wiley; 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/reader.action?docID=1204068&ppg=107

74.

David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind. 1994;103(412):473-490. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396

75.

Loewer, Barry. Humean Supervenience. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics. 24(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1294810875/C2A7DAAE6A7E4EB6PQ/5?accountid=14540

76.

Maudlin T. Why Be Humean? In: The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford University Press; 2007:50-77. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.003.0003

77.

Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives. 2006;20(1):41-76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x