1
Salmon N, Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. The Philosophical Review 1988;97. doi:10.2307/2185263
2
Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives 2006;20:41–76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x
3
David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy 1971;68:203–11.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902
4
David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy 1968;65:113–26.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555
5
Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy 2002;99:279–315.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585
6
Lewis DK. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
7
Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind 1990;99:327–54.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102
8
Kripke SA. Naming and necessity. Rev. and enl. ed. Oxford: : Blackwell 1981.
9
Sider T. Beyond the Humphrey Objection. Published Online First: 2006.https://tedsider.org/papers/counterpart_theory.pdf
10
Lewis D. Should a materialist believe in Qualia? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1995;73:140–4. doi:10.1080/00048409512346451
11
Lewis D. What Experience Teaches. 1988.https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/247198/Lewis-Experience.pdf?sequence=2
12
Tye M. Chapter 1 - Knowing What It Is Like: The Ability Hypothesis and the Knowledge Argument. Consciousness, Color, and Content. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://cognet.mit.edu/system/cogfiles/books/9780262285315/pdfs/9780262285315_chap1.pdf
13
Robinson D. Epiphenomenalism, laws & properties. Philosophical Studies 1993;69:1–34. doi:10.1007/BF00989622
14
Cath Y. The Ability Hypothesis and the New Knowledge-how. Noûs 2009;43:137–56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.01699.x
15
Lewis DK, Oxford University Press. Philosophical papers: Volume 2. New York: : Oxford University Press 1987. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
16
David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind 1994;103:473–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
17
David Lewis. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs 1979;13:455–76.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215339
18
Brian Weatherson. Humean Supervenience. In: Loewer B, Schaffer J, eds. A companion to David Lewis. Chichester, West Sussex: : Wiley Blackwell 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118398593
19
Lewis D. Survival and Identity. In: Philosophical papers: Volume 1. New York: : Oxford University Press 1983. 55–72.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0005
20
Haslanger S. Humean supervenience and enduring things. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1994;72:339–59. doi:10.1080/00048409412346141
21
Schaffer J. Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis 2004;64:299–309. doi:10.1093/analys/64.4.299
22
Adam Elga. Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence. Philosophy of Science 2001;68.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080955
23
Lewis DK. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1969. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=876856
24
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983;61:343–77. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
25
Lewis D. Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1984;62:221–36. doi:10.1080/00048408412340013
26
Lewis D. Radical interpretation. Synthese 1974;27:331–44. doi:10.1007/BF00484599
27
Lewis D. Languages and Language. In: Philosophical Papers Volume I. Oxford University Press 1983. 163–88. doi:10.1093/0195032047.003.0011
28
Lewis D. Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1992;70:106–10. doi:10.1080/00048408112340093
29
Guttenplan SD, editor. A companion to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 1995. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781405164597
30
Hawthorne J. A note on ‘languages and language’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1990;68:116–8. doi:10.1080/00048409012340233
31
O’Leary-Hawthorne J. Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1993;71:206–11. doi:10.1080/00048409312345212
32
Guttenplan SD, editor. A companion to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 1995. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781405164597
33
H. P. Grice. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 1957;66:377–88.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2182440
34
David Lewis. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. The Philosophical Review 1979;88:513–43.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2184843
35
Lewis D. Should a materialist believe in Qualia? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1995;73:140–4. doi:10.1080/00048409512346451
36
Tye M. Chapter 1 - Knowing What It Is Like: The Ability Hypothesis and the Knowledge Argument. Consciousness, Color, and Content. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://cognet.mit.edu/system/cogfiles/books/9780262285315/pdfs/9780262285315_chap1.pdf
37
Lewis DK. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
38
David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy 1968;65:113–26.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555
39
David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy 1971;68:203–11.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902
40
Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind 1990;99:327–54.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102
41
Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy 2002;99:279–315.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585
42
Stephan Leuenberger. A New Problem of Descriptive Power. The Journal of Philosophy 2006;103:145–62.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655756
43
Melia J. Modality. Chesham, Bucks: : Acumen 2003.
44
Willard V. Quine. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics 1948;2:21–38.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
45
Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives 2006;20:41–76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x
46
Tony Roy. In Defense of Linguistic Ersatzism. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1995;80:217–42.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320630
47
Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman DW. Contemporary debates in metaphysics. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1204068
48
Sider T. Beyond the Humphrey Objection. Published Online First: 2006.https://tedsider.org/papers/counterpart_theory.pdf
49
Lewis DK. Introduction to Philosophical papers: Volume 2. New York: : Oxford University Press 1986. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001/acprof-9780195036466-miscMatter-6
50
David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind 1994;103:473–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
51
Lewis D. Zimmerman and the spinning sphere. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1999;77:209–12. doi:10.1080/00048409912348951
52
Zimmerman DW. One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1999;77:213–5. doi:10.1080/00048409912348961
53
Robinson D. Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1989;67:394–409. doi:10.1080/00048408912343921
54
Katherine Hawley. Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations. Mind 1999;108:53–67.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2659902
55
Zimmerman DW. Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1998;76:265–88. doi:10.1080/00048409812348401
56
Craig Callender. Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter. Mind 2001;110:25–44.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2659829
57
Lewis DK. Philosophical papers. New York: : Oxford University Press 1983.
58
Lewis DK. Papers in philosophical logic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
59
Lewis DK. Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
60
Lewis DK. Papers in ethics and social philosophy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
61
Lewis DK. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1969. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=876856
62
Lewis DK. Counterfactuals. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1973.
63
Lewis DK. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
64
Lewis D. Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell 1990.
65
Preyer G, Siebelt F. Reality and Humean supervenience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2001.
66
Jackson F, Priest G. Lewisian themes: the philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 2004.
67
Loewer B, Schaffer J, editors. A companion to David Lewis. Chichester, West Sussex: : Wiley Blackwell 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118398593
68
Braddon-Mitchell D, Nola R. Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2009.
69
Schwarz W. David Lewis: Metaphysik und Analyse. Paderborn: : Mentis 2009.
70
Nolan DP. David Lewis. Chesham: : Acumen 2005.
71
Meixner U. David Lewis. Paderborn: : Mentis 2006.
72
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983;61:343–77. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
73
John W. Carroll. Nailed to Hume’s Cross? In: Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman DW, eds. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Wiley 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/reader.action?docID=1204068&ppg=107
74
David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind 1994;103:473–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
75
Loewer, Barry. Humean Supervenience. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics;24.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1294810875/C2A7DAAE6A7E4EB6PQ/5?accountid=14540
76
Maudlin T. Why Be Humean? In: The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford University Press 2007. 50–77. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.003.0003
77
Bricker P. ABSOLUTE ACTUALITY AND THE PLURALITY OF WORLDS. Philosophical Perspectives 2006;20:41–76. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x
