Bibliography for Current Issues in Social Theory BETA

Anthias, Floya. ‘Intersectional What? Social Divisions, Intersectionality and Levels of Analysis’. Ethnicities, vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2013, pp. 3–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463547.

Arat-Koç, Sedef. ‘Culturalizing Politics, Hyper-Politicizing “Culture”: “White” vs. “Black Turks” and the Making of Authoritarian Populism in Turkey’. Dialectical Anthropology, Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2.

‘Are We Now Living in the Anthropocene?’ GSA Today, vol. 18, no. 2, 2008, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf.

Arrighi, Giovanni. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. New and Updated ed, Verso, 2010.

Askola, Heli. ‘Wind from the North, Don’t Go Forth? Gender Equality and the Rise of Populist Nationalism in Finland’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, Feb. 2019, pp. 54–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817748341.

Aulenbacher, Brigitte, et al. ‘Introduction: Towards a Global Sociology of Care and Care Work’. Current Sociology, vol. 66, no. 4, July 2018, pp. 495–502, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118765245.

Baert, Patrick and Silva, Filipe Carreira da. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. 2nd ed, Polity, 2010.

BALTHAZAR, ANA CAROLINA. ‘Made in Britain: Brexit, Teacups, and the Materiality of the Nation’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 220–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12471.

Barclay, Harold B. Culture and Anarchism. Freedom Press, 1997.

Barclay, Harold B., and Alex Comfort. People without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy. Completely revised edition, Kahn & Averill, 1990.

Barnard, Alan. ‘Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-Reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan’. Social Evolution and History, vol. 3, no. 1, https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/.

Barrett, Michèle and Phillips, Anne. Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Stanford University Press, 1992.

Barrios, Roberto E. ‘What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 1, Oct. 2017, pp. 151–66, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635.

Basaure, M. ‘An Interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the Expansion of Knowledge’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, Aug. 2011, pp. 361–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412350.

Bauer, Andrew M., and Mona Bhan. Climate without Nature: A Critical Anthropology of the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press, 2018, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633.

Bhambra, Gurminder K. ‘Brexit, Trump, and “Methodological Whiteness”: On the Misrecognition of Race and Class’. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, Nov. 2017, pp. S214–32, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.

———. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.

———. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic, 2014, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections.

Bhambra, Gurminder K. ‘Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology’. Sociology, vol. 50, no. 5, Oct. 2016, pp. 960–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516647683.

Bhambra, Gurminder K., and Boaventura de Sousa Santos. ‘Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology’. Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674665.

Bilge, Sirma. ‘INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE’. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, vol. 10, no. 02, 2013, pp. 405–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283.

Blim, Michael. ‘Capitalisms in Late Modernity’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, Oct. 2000, pp. 25–38, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25.

Blokker, P. ‘Pragmatic Sociology: Theoretical Evolvement and Empirical Application’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, Aug. 2011, pp. 251–61, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412344.

Bohrer, Ashley. ‘Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography’. Historical Materialism, vol. 26, no. 2, July 2018, pp. 46–74, https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001617.

Boland, T. ‘Towards an Anthropology of Critique: The Modern Experience of Liminality and Crisis’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 13, no. 3, Sept. 2013, pp. 222–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613496731.

Boltanski, Luc. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Polity Press, 2011, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551.

Bonikowski, Bart. ‘Ethno‐nationalist Populism and the Mobilization of Collective Resentment’. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, 8 AD, pp. S181–213, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12325.

Bonneuil, Christophe, et al. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History, and Us. Paperback edition, Verso, 2017.

Bourdieu, Pierre, et al. Language and Symbolic Power. Polity, 1991.

Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’. Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, Spring 1989, https://doi.org/10.2307/202060.

Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’. Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–25, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060.

Bowden, Gary. ‘An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene’. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, vol. 54, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 48–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12138.

Brah, Avtar, and Ann Phoenix. ‘Ain’t I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’. Journal of International Women’s Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, 2004, pp. 75–86, https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8.

Brenner, Robert. ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’. New Left Review, no. 104, pp. 25–92, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism.

Brown, Wendy and ProQuest (Firm). Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press, 2005, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457. Electronic resource.

Brubaker, Rogers. ‘Why Populism?’ Theory and Society, vol. 46, no. 5, Nov. 2017, pp. 357–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7.

Buier, Natalia. ‘The Promise of an Anarchist Anthropology: The Three Burials of the Anarchist Project -’. Studia Ubb Sociologia, LIX, no. 1, 2014, pp. 73–90, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603.

Burawoy, Michael. ‘Challenges for a Global Sociology’. Contexts, vol. 8, no. 4, Nov. 2009, pp. 36–41, https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36.

———. ‘The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines’. Sociology, vol. 50, no. 5, Oct. 2016, pp. 949–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516629901.

Burchell, Graham, et al. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Burton, Sarah. ‘The Monstrous “White Theory Boy”: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge’. Sociological Research Online, vol. 20, no. 3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3746.

Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

———. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

———. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Callinicos, Alex. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Polity Press, 1999.

———. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Polity Press, 1999.

———. The Resources of Critique. Polity, 2006.

Cannon, Barry. ‘Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis’. New Political Science, vol. 40, no. 3, July 2018, pp. 477–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187.

Carbin, M., and S. Edenheim. ‘The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?’ European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, Aug. 2013, pp. 233–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813484723.

Catherine E. Walsh. ‘The (Re)Articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge’. Nepantla: Views from South, vol. 3, no. 1, 2002, pp. 61–97, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’. Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, Jan. 2009, pp. 197–222, https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.

———. ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’. Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, Jan. 2009, pp. 197–222, https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.

Chandra Talpade Mohanty. ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’. Feminist Review, no. 30, 1988, pp. 61–88, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054.

Chernilo, Daniel. ‘The Question of the Human in the Anthropocene Debate’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 44–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016651874.

Chivers, Barbara, et al. A Student’s Guide to Presentations: Making Your Presentation Count. SAGE Publications, 2007, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910. Electronic resource.

Clark, Nigel. ‘Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene’. The Sociological Review, vol. 62, no. 1_suppl, June 2014, pp. 19–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12122.

Col, Giovanni da, et al. ‘Why Do We Read the Classics?’ HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 7, no. 3, Dec. 2017, pp. 1–38, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.3.002.

Collins, Randall. ‘A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell’. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 102, no. 6, May 1997, pp. 1558–64, https://doi.org/10.1086/231126.

Connell, R. W. ‘Why Is Classical Theory Classical?’ American Journal of Sociology, vol. 102, no. 6, May 1997, pp. 1511–57, https://doi.org/10.1086/231125.

Connell, Raewyn. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Allen & Unwin, 2007, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120.

———. ‘Toward a Global Sociology of Knowledge: Post-Colonial Realities and Intellectual Practices’. International Sociology, vol. 32, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 21–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916676913.

Conty, Arianne Françoise. ‘The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene’. Theory, Culture & Society, Oct. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’. University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, no. 1, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf.

———. ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’. Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, 1991, pp. 1241–99, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039.

Cronin, Ann, and Andrew King. ‘Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults’. Sociology, vol. 44, no. 5, Oct. 2010, pp. 876–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375738.

Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. ‘The “Anthropocene”’. Global Change Newsletter, vol. 41, pp. 17–18, http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf.

Davis, K. ‘Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful’. Feminist Theory, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2008, pp. 67–85, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.

Deem, Alexandra. ‘Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement’. Theory, Culture & Society, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418807002.

Degnen, Cathrine, and Katharine Tyler. ‘Amongst the Disciplines: Anthropology, Sociology, Intersection and Intersectionality’. The Sociological Review, vol. 65, no. 1_suppl, Mar. 2017, pp. 35–53, https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917693508.

Delanty, Gerard, and Aurea Mota. ‘Governing the Anthropocene’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 9–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535.

Della Faille, Dimitri, and Neil McLaughlin. ‘Sociology’s Global Challenge’. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, vol. 33, no. 3, 2008, pp. 485–95, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485.

Dowding, Keith. ‘Why Should We Care about the Definition of Power?’ Journal of Political Power, vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2012, pp. 119–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed, University of Chicago Press, 1983.

Dunaway, Wilma A., and Donald A. Clelland. ‘Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality’. Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 23, no. 2, Aug. 2017, pp. 399–464, https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2017.598.

Dupuis-Deri, Francis. ‘Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry’. Anarchist Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 2016, https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist.

Dussel, Enrique. ‘Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures)’. Boundary 2, vol. 20, no. 3, Autumn 1993, https://doi.org/10.2307/303341.

EDWARDS, JEANETTE, et al. ‘Introduction: The 2016 Brexit Referendum and Trump Election’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 195–200, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12467.

Ellis, Erle C. Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. First edition, vol. 558, Oxford University Press, 2018.

Elmgren, Ainur. ‘The Double-Edged Sword: The Political Appropriation of the Concept of Populism’. Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 23, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 320–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940.

Eribon, Didier. Michel Foucault. Faber and Faber, 1992.

Escobar, Arturo. ‘WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 179–210, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506.

EVANS, GILLIAN. ‘Brexit Britain: Why We Are All Postindustrial Now’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 215–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12470.

éZiézek, Slavoj. The Ticklish Subject: An Essay in Political Ontology. Verso, 1999.

Fabiani, J. ‘Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De La Critique. Precis de Sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 Euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (Pbk)’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, Aug. 2011, pp. 401–06, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412352.

Fassin, Didier. ‘The Endurance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2017, pp. 4–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616688157.

Fassin, Eric. Populism Left and Right. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC, 2018.

Ferguson, Jane M. ‘Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges’. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 19, no. 3, May 2018, pp. 189–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559.

Foucault, Michel, et al. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press, 1991.

Foucault, Michel and Gordon, Colin. Power-Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Press, 1980.

Foucault, Michel and Rabinow, Paul. The Foucault Reader. Penguin, 1991.

Frank, Andre Gunder and American Council of Learned Societies. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. University of California Press, 1998, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038. Electronic resource.

Freeden, Michael. ‘After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology’. Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813.

Gamper Sachse, Daniel. ‘Ambivalences of Populism: The Case of Catalan Independentism’. Social Science Information, Nov. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018418811685.

Garrido, Marco. ‘Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila’. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 123, no. 3, Nov. 2017, pp. 647–85, https://doi.org/10.1086/694076.

Go, Julian, editor. Decentering Social Theory. volume 25, Emerald, 2013, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

Go, Julian, editor. Decentering Social Theory. volume 25, Emerald, 2013, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

Go, Julian, editor. Decentering Social Theory. volume 25, Emerald, 2013, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

Go, Julian, editor. Decentering Social Theory. volume 25, Emerald, 2013, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

Go, Julian. ‘Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work’. Sociological Theory, vol. 31, no. 1, Mar. 2013, pp. 49–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113477082.

Gökarıksel, Saygun. ‘The Ends of Revolution: Capitalist de-Democratization and Nationalist Populism in the East of Europe’. Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 207–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7.

Goldfrank, Walter L. ‘Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method’. Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2015, https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.223.

Gordon, Linda. ‘“Intersectionality”, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist’. Gender & History, vol. 28, no. 2, Aug. 2016, pp. 340–57, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12211.

Gouldner, Alvin W. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Allen Lane, 1973.

GRAEBER, David. ‘Anthropology and the Rise of the Professional-Managerial Class’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 4, no. 3, Dec. 2014, pp. 73–88, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.3.007.

Graeber, David. ‘Dead Zones of the Imagination: On Violence, Bureaucracy, and Interpretive Labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 2, no. 2, Sept. 2012, pp. 105–28, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.007.

———. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Melville House, 2011.

———. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC, 2004.

———. Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. AK Press, 2007.

———. ‘The New Anarchists’. New Left Review, vol. 13, 2002, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists.

———. The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Melville House, 2015.

Green, Sarah, et al. ‘Brexit Referendum: First Reactions from Anthropology’. Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 4, Nov. 2016, pp. 478–502, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.

———. ‘Brexit Referendum: First Reactions from Anthropology’. Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 4, Nov. 2016, pp. 478–502, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.

Gregory Sandstrom. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie. vol. 33, no. 3, 2008, pp. 607–30, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607.

Grosfoguel, Ramón. ‘THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 211–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514.

Grusin, Richard A., editor. Anthropocene Feminism. University of Minnesota Press, 2017, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552.

Guillaumin, Colette. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. Routledge, 1995, http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0.

Gülalp, Haldun. ‘Frank and Wallerstein Revisited: A Contribution to Brenner’s Critique’. Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 11, no. 2, Jan. 1981, pp. 169–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472338185390131.

GUSTERSON, HUGH. ‘From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the Rise of Nationalist Populism’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 209–14, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12469.

Hammersley, M. ‘Should Social Science Be Critical?’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, June 2005, pp. 175–95, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105275279.

Hancock, Ange-Marie. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press, 2016, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001.

Hann, C. M. Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. Routledge, 1993.

Hann, Chris. ‘The Anthropocene and Anthropology’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 183–96, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016649362.

Haraway, Donna, et al. ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’. Ethnos, vol. 81, no. 3, May 2016, pp. 535–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.

———. ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’. Ethnos, vol. 81, no. 3, May 2016, pp. 535–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.

Harrison, Faye Venetia and Association of Black Anthropologists. Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further toward an Anthropology of Liberation. 2nd ed, Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association, 1997.

Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016). https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2.

Haugaard, M. ‘Power: A “family Resemblance” Concept’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 419–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377152.

Head, Lesley. Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene: Re-Conceptualising Human-Nature Relations. Paperback edition, Routledge, 2018.

Hearn, Jonathan. ‘On the Social Evolution of Power to/Over’. Journal of Political Power, vol. 7, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 175–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963.

Hearn, Jonathan. Theorizing Power. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Hearn, Jonathan. ‘What’s Wrong with Domination?’ Journal of Power, vol. 1, no. 1, Apr. 2008, pp. 37–49, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943406.

Hecht, Gabrielle. ‘Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence’. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 33, no. 1, Feb. 2018, pp. 109–41, https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.1.05.

Herkman, Juha. ‘Old Patterns on New Clothes? Populism and Political Scandals in the Nordic Countries’. Acta Sociologica, vol. 61, no. 4, Nov. 2018, pp. 341–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816.

Hier, S. P. ‘The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory’. Race & Class, vol. 42, no. 3, Jan. 2001, pp. 69–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396801423004.

High, Holly. ‘Anthropology and Anarchy: Romance, Horror or Science Fiction?’ Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 93–108, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438426.

Hill Collins, Patricia, and Sirma Bilge. Intersectionality. Polity Press, 2016, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012.

Hornborg, Alf. ‘Dithering While the Planet Burns: Anthropologists’ Approaches to the Anthropocene’. Reviews in Anthropology, vol. 46, nos 2–3, July 2017, pp. 61–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023.

How, A. R. ‘Hermeneutics and the “classic” Problem in the Human Sciences’. History of the Human Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, May 2011, pp. 47–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111405277.

Ilie, Gabriela. ‘Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis’. Revista de Stiinte Politice, no. 41, 2014, pp. 232–40, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540.

Ilmonen, Kaisa. ‘Identity Politics Revisited: On Audre Lorde, Intersectionality, and Mobilizing Writing Styles’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, Feb. 2019, pp. 7–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817702410.

Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher. An Invitation to Social Theory. Polity, 2012.

———. An Invitation to Social Theory. Polity, 2012.

Ionescu, Ghiţa, and Ernest Gellner. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1970, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie. Contemporary Feminist Theories. Edinburgh University Press, 1998.

Jacobs, Ronald N., and Eleanor Townsley. ‘On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology’. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, vol. 33, no. 3, 2008, pp. 497–520, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497.

Jansen, Robert S. ‘Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism’. Sociological Theory, vol. 29, no. 2, June 2011, pp. 75–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x.

Jones, Paul K. ‘Insights from the Infamous’. European Journal of Social Theory, May 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018772507.

Juteau-Lee, Danielle. ‘Introduction: (Re)Constructing the Categories of “Race” and “Sex”: The Work of a Precursor’. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology, Critical studies in racism and migration, Routledge, 1995.

Kadir, Nazima. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press, 2016.

———. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press, 2016.

Kalb, Don. ‘Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the Reunification of Anarchism and Marxism in World Anthropology’. Focaal, vol. 2014, no. 69, pp. 113–34, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108.

Kinna, Ruth. Anarchism: A Beginner’s Guide. Oneworld Publications, 2005, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182.

KNIGHT, DANIEL M. ‘Anxiety and Cosmopolitan Futures: Brexit and Scotland’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 237–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12474.

KOCH, INSA. ‘What’s in a Vote? Brexit beyond Culture Wars’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 225–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12472.

Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. Verso, 2007.

Latour, Bruno. ‘Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene’. New Literary History, vol. 45, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0003.

———. ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’. Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, Jan. 2004, pp. 225–48, https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.

Lawler, S. ‘White like Them: Whiteness and Anachronistic Space in Representations of the English White Working Class’. Ethnicities, vol. 12, no. 4, Aug. 2012, pp. 409–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812448019.

Layder, Derek. Understanding Social Theory. 2nd ed, SAGE, 2006.

LEMKE, THOMAS. ‘An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, Jan. 2007, pp. 43–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.

Lemke, Thomas. ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique’. Rethinking Marxism, vol. 14, no. 3, Sept. 2002, pp. 49–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.

Lever, J. ‘Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory’. Sociology, vol. 45, no. 1, Feb. 2011, pp. 86–101, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387193.

Levine-Rasky, Cynthia. ‘Intersectionality Theory Applied to Whiteness and Middle-Classness’. Social Identities, vol. 17, no. 2, Mar. 2011, pp. 239–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.558377.

Lewis, Simon L., and Mark Maslin. The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene. Pelican, 2018.

LUGONES, MARÍA. ‘Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish)’. Tabula Rasa, no. 9, 2008, pp. 73–102, http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006.

LUGONES, MARÍA. ‘Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System’. Hypatia, vol. 22, no. 1, Feb. 2007, pp. 186–219, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x.

LUGONES, MARÌA. ‘Toward a Decolonial Feminism’. Hypatia, vol. 25, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 742–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.

Luke, Timothy W. ‘Reconstructing Social Theory and the Anthropocene’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 80–94, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647971.

Lukes, Steven and British Sociological Association. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed., Expanded, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503. Electronic resource.

Macdonald, Charles. ‘The Anthropology of Anarchy’. Indian Journal of Human Development, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 49–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020120103.

Macey, David. The Lives of Michel Foucault. Hutchinson, 1993.

Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. ‘ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 240–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.

Marshall, Barbara L. and Witz, Anne. Engendering the Social: Feminist Encounters with Sociological Theory. Open University Press, 2004, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344.

Marshall, Peter H. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism : Be Realistic! Demand the Impossible! PM Press, 2009, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618. Electronic resource.

Martin, William G. ‘Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective’. Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2015, https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.222.

McCall, Leslie. ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 30, no. 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 1771–800, https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.

McGRANAHAN, CAROLE. ‘An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral Outrage’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 243–48, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12475.

Menge, Torsten. ‘The Role of Power in Social Explanation’. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 21, no. 1, Feb. 2018, pp. 22–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017714426.

Mignolo, W. D. ‘The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference’. South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 101, no. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 57–96, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745.

Mignolo, Walter D. ‘Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality’. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, vol. 43, pp. 38–45, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552.

———. ‘DELINKING’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 449–514, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.

———. ‘Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 155–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498.

Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine E. Walsh. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press, 2018, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779.

Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press, 2000, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661.

Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Duke University Press, 2003.

Moore, Amelia. ‘Anthropocene Anthropology: Reconceptualizing Contemporary Global Change’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 22, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 27–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12332.

Moore, Jason W., editor. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM Press, 2016, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Moore, Jason W. ‘The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism’. Theory and Society, vol. 32, no. 3, 2003, pp. 307–77, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024404620759.

Morris, Brian. Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader. PM Press, 2014, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827.

Mouffe, Chantal. For a Left Populism. Verso, 2018.

Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.

Munck, Ronaldo. ‘Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm’. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 29, no. 3, Sept. 2016, pp. 233–49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’. History Compass, vol. 13, no. 10, Oct. 2015, pp. 485–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.

———. ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’. History Compass, vol. 13, no. 10, Oct. 2015, pp. 485–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.

Nugent, Stephen. ‘Anarchism out West: Some Reflections on Sources’. Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 206–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12437860.

Onwuzuruigbo, Ifeanyi. ‘Indigenising Eurocentric Sociology: The “Captive Mind” and Five Decades of Sociology in Nigeria’. Current Sociology, vol. 66, no. 6, Oct. 2018, pp. 831–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117704242.

Ortner, Sherry B. ‘Dark Anthropology and Its Others’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2016, pp. 47–73, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004.

Palsson, Gisli, et al. ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research’. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 28, Apr. 2013, pp. 3–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.

———. ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research’. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 28, Apr. 2013, pp. 3–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.

Patel, Raj, and Jason W. Moore. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things. Oakland, California, 2017.

Patel, Sujata. ‘Afterword: Doing Global Sociology: Issues, Problems and Challenges’. Current Sociology, vol. 62, no. 4, July 2014, pp. 603–13, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524514.

Patel, Sujata. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. SAGE, 2010.

Patel, Sujata. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. SAGE, 2010.

Patricia Hill Collins. ‘It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation’. Hypatia, vol. 13, no. 3, 1998, pp. 62–82, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699.

Pavel Sorokin. ‘Ethically Responsible Global Sociology: Conceptual Framing of a New Vision’. Filosofija. Sociologija, no. 4, pp. 323–30, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183.

Phoenix, A. ‘Intersectionality’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, Aug. 2006, pp. 187–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751.

Pierson, Paul. ‘American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy’. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, 8 AD, pp. S105–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.

———. ‘American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy’. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, 8 AD, pp. S105–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.

Poncelet, Léo. ‘Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis’. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), vol. 25, no. 1, 2002, pp. 47–97, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731.

Powell, Kathy. ‘Brexit Positions: Neoliberalism, Austerity and Immigration—the (Im)Possibilities? Of Political Revolution’. Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 225–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.

———. ‘Brexit Positions: Neoliberalism, Austerity and Immigration—the (Im)Possibilities? Of Political Revolution’. Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 225–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.

Quijano, Aníbal. ‘COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 168–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.

———. ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’. International Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 215–32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

———. ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’. International Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 215–32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

Reinecke, Juliane. ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting Entrenched Inequalities in Occupy London’. Organization Studies, vol. 39, no. 9, Mar. 2018, pp. 1299–321, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.

———. ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting Entrenched Inequalities in Occupy London’. Organization Studies, vol. 39, no. 9, Mar. 2018, pp. 1299–321, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.

Review by: Theda Skocpol. ‘Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique’. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 5, 1977, pp. 1075–90, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814.

Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry. Handbook of Social Theory. Sage, 2001.

Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas. ‘The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate’. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, 1988, pp. 47–65, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412.

Robinson, Andrew, and Simon Tormey. ‘Beyond the State: Anthropology and “Actually-Existing-Anarchism”’. Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 143–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.

———. ‘Beyond the State: Anthropology and “Actually-Existing-Anarchism”’. Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 143–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.

Robinson, W. I. ‘Globalization and the Sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A Critical Appraisal’. International Sociology, vol. 26, no. 6, May 2011, pp. 723–45, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393372.

Romero, Mary. Introducing Intersectionality. Polity Press, 2018, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452.

ROSA, JONATHAN, and YARIMAR BONILLA. ‘Deprovincializing Trump, Decolonizing Diversity, and Unsettling Anthropology’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 201–08, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12468.

Rose, Nikolas, et al. ‘Governmentality’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 1, Dec. 2006, pp. 83–104, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900.

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, et al., editors. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press, 2017, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001.

Russell, Bertrand. Power: A New Social Analysis. Allen & Unwin, 1938.

Salem, Sara. ‘Intersectionality and Its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, Apr. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.

———. ‘Intersectionality and Its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, Nov. 2018, pp. 403–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Verso, 2008.

———. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Verso, 2008.

———. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Verso, 2008.

———. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Verso, 2008.

———. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2016, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876.

Sassen, Saskia. Sociology of Globalization. W.W. Norton & Company, 2007, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Savransky, Martin. ‘A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality’. Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 11–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516656983.

Sayer, A. ‘Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science?’ Current Sociology, vol. 57, no. 6, Nov. 2009, pp. 767–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109342205.

Sayer, Andrew. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Policy Press, 2015, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961.

———. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Policy Press, 2015, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961.

Schiller, Nina Glick, et al. ‘Debate on the Nature and Significance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 261–261, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.

———. ‘Debate on the Nature and Significance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 261–261, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.

———. ‘Positioning Theory: An Introduction’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 16, nos 2–3, Sept. 2016, pp. 133–45, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616663792.

Schulze, Frederick. ‘Flirting with Anarchism: Class, State, and Anthropology’. Focaal, vol. 2013, no. 66, Jan. 2013, https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.660111.

Scott, James C. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton University Press, 2014.

Scott, John. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. SAGE Publications, 2006, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958. Electronic resource.

———. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. SAGE Publications, 2006, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958. Electronic resource.

Seidman, Steven. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. 4th ed, Blackwell Pub, 2008.

———. Queer Theory/Sociology. Blackwell, 1996.

Shields, Stuart. ‘Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and Its Alternatives’. Critical Sociology, vol. 41, nos 4–5, July 2015, pp. 659–78, https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501349.

Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. ‘The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives’. European Journal of Social Theory, Sept. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018799256.

Sitas, Ari. ‘Rethinking Africa’s Sociological Project’. Current Sociology, vol. 62, no. 4, July 2014, pp. 457–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524505.

Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press, 2005.

———. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Northeastern University Press, 1990.

Smith, Dorothy E. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Northeastern University Press, 1990.

Sohoni, Deenesh, and Misha Petrovic. ‘Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum’. Teaching Sociology, vol. 38, no. 4, 2010, pp. 287–300, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545.

Sorokin, Pavel. ‘“Global Sociology” in Different Disciplinary Practices: Current Conditions, Problems and Perspectives’. Current Sociology, vol. 64, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 41–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115601462.

———. ‘Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies’. Sociological Research Online, vol. 23, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 21–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417743873.

‘Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization’. Theory, Culture & Society, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6.

SpringerLink (Online Service). Understanding the Dynamics of Global Inequality: Social Exclusion, Power Shift, and Structural Changes. Edited by Alexander Lenger and Florian Schumacher, Springer, 2015, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6.

Ssorin-Chaikov, Nikolai. ‘Writing Power: An Anarchist Anthropologist in the Looking Glass of Critical Theory’. Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 189–205, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12439486.

Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. Ebooks Corporation Limited, 1993, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541.

———. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. Routledge & K. Paul, 1993, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541.

Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Anton Jäger. ‘Accomplishments and Limitations of the “New” Mainstream in Contemporary Populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.’ European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 21, no. 4, Nov. 2018, pp. 547–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017723337.

Steffen, W., et al. ‘The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 369, no. 1938, Mar. 2011, pp. 842–67, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.

Stinchcombe, Arthur L. ‘Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers’. The American Sociologist, vol. 17, no. 1, 1982, pp. 2–11, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490.

Sulkunen, P. ‘Agency and Power: The Contractual Illusion’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 495–510, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377156.

Susen, Simon, and Bryan S. Turner, editors. The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. Key issues in modern sociology, Anthem Press, 2014.

Swyngedouw, Erik, and Henrik Ernstson. ‘Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-Biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene’. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 35, no. 6, Nov. 2018, pp. 3–30, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, et al., editors. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

VÁZQUEZ, ROLANDO. ‘Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence’. Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 24, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 27–44, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x.

Verloo, M. ‘Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, Aug. 2006, pp. 211–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753.

Vintges, Karen. ‘Muslim Women in the Western Media: Foucault, Agency, Governmentality and Ethics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, July 2012, pp. 283–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443476.

‘Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, https://login.uofglasgow.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality.

Walby, Sylvia. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexities and Contested Modernities. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319.

———. ‘Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory’. Sociology, vol. 46, no. 2, Apr. 2012, pp. 224–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.

Walby, Sylvia. Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment. Polity in association with Basil Blackwell, 1986.

Wallerstein, I. ‘Robinson’s Critical Appraisal Appraised’. International Sociology, vol. 27, no. 4, July 2012, pp. 524–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912445532.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. ‘Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines’. Current Anthropology, vol. 44, no. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 453–65, https://doi.org/10.1086/375868.

Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice, and Daniel Boyarin. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press, 2004, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861.

WALLEY, CHRISTINE J. ‘Trump’s Election and the "white Working Class”: What We Missed’. American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, May 2017, pp. 231–36, https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12473.

Walsh, Catherine. ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 224–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.

———. ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’. Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos 2–3, Mar. 2007, pp. 224–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.

Ward, Colin. Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Weiner, Melissa F. ‘Decolonial Sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s Foundational Theoretical and Methodological Contributions’. Sociology Compass, vol. 12, no. 8, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12601.

Welz, Frank. ‘100 Years of Indian Sociology’. International Sociology, vol. 24, no. 5, Sept. 2009, pp. 635–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909339270.

Werbner, P. ‘Everyday Multiculturalism: Theorising the Difference between “intersectionality” and “Multiple Identities”’. Ethnicities, vol. 13, no. 4, Aug. 2013, pp. 401–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813483728.

Whitworth, Lauran. ‘Goodbye Gauley Mountain, Hello Eco-Camp: Queer Environmentalism in the Anthropocene’. Feminist Theory, July 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700118788684.

Wickham, Gary. ‘Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment’. Journal of Law and Society, vol. 33, no. 4, Dec. 2006, pp. 596–614, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x.

Wolf, Eric R. and Silverman, Sydel. Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. University of California Press, 2001.

Worsley, Peter. The Third World. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1964.

Wynter, Sylvia. ‘Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument’. CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 257–337, https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.

Yuval-Davis, N. ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, Aug. 2006, pp. 193–209, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.

Zander, Udo, et al. ‘Intersectionality as a New Perspective in International Business Research’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 457–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011.