1
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
2
Baert, Patrick, Silva, Filipe Carreira da. Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Polity 2010.
3
Callinicos, Alex. Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: : Polity Press 1999.
4
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: : Polity 2012.
5
Layder, Derek. Understanding social theory. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE 2006.
6
Scott J. Social theory: central issues in sociology. London: : SAGE Publications 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
7
Seidman, Steven. Contested knowledge: social theory today. 4th ed. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Pub 2008.
8
Ritzer, George, Smart, Barry. Handbook of social theory. London: : Sage 2001.
9
Chivers B, Shoolbred M, ProQuest (Firm). A student’s guide to presentations: making your presentation count. Los Angeles: : SAGE Publications 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910
10
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
11
Stinchcombe AL. Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers. The American Sociologist 1982;17:2–11.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490
12
Marshall, Barbara L., Witz, Anne. Engendering the social: feminist encounters with sociological theory. Buckingham: : Open University Press 2004. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344
13
Barrett, Michèle, Phillips, Anne. Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Stanford, CA: : Stanford University Press 1992.
14
Burton S. The Monstrous ‘White Theory Boy’: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge. Sociological Research Online 2015;20. doi:10.5153/sro.3746
15
Callinicos, Alex. Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: : Polity Press 1999.
16
Col G da, Sopranzetti C, Myers F, et al. Why do we read the classics? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2017;7:1–38. doi:10.14318/hau7.3.002
17
Schiller NG. Positioning theory: An introduction. Anthropological Theory 2016;16:133–45. doi:10.1177/1463499616663792
18
Gouldner, Alvin W. For sociology: renewal and critique in sociology today. London: : Allen Lane 1973.
19
Graeber D. Possibilities: essays on hierarchy, rebellion, and desire. Oakland, Calif: : AK Press 2007.
20
Guillaumin C. Racism, sexism, power and ideology. London: : Routledge 1995. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0
21
Harrison, Faye Venetia, Association of Black Anthropologists. Decolonizing anthropology: moving further toward an anthropology of liberation. 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: : Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association 1997.
22
How AR. Hermeneutics and the ‘classic’ problem in the human sciences. History of the Human Sciences 2011;24:47–63. doi:10.1177/0952695111405277
23
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: : Polity 2012.
24
Jackson, Stevi, Jones, Jackie. Contemporary feminist theories. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1998.
25
Mills CW. The sociological imagination. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661
26
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without borders: decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: : Duke University Press 2003.
27
Patel, Sujata. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: : SAGE 2010.
28
Scott J. Social theory: central issues in sociology. London: : SAGE Publications 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
29
Seidman, Steven. Queer theory/sociology. Cambridge, Mass: : Blackwell 1996.
30
Dowding K. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power 2012;5:119–35. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917
31
Hearn J. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power 2008;1:37–49. doi:10.1080/17540290801943406
32
Lukes S, British Sociological Association. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed., expanded. Houndmills: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503
33
Bourdieu, Pierre. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory;7:14–25.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060
34
Bourdieu, Pierre, Bourdieu, Pierre, Thompson, John B. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: : Polity 1991.
35
Dreyfus, Hubert L., Rabinow, Paul. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1983.
36
Eribon, Didier. Michel Foucault. London: : Faber and Faber 1992.
37
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, Miller, Peter, et al. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
38
Foucault, Michel, Gordon, Colin. Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: : Harvester Press 1980.
39
Haugaard M. Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2010;13:419–38. doi:10.1177/1367549410377152
40
Hearn, Jonathan. Theorizing power. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
41
Hearn J. On the social evolution of power to/over. Journal of Political Power 2014;7:175–91. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963
42
LEMKE T. An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 2007;8:43–64. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946
43
Lemke T. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism 2002;14:49–64. doi:10.1080/089356902101242288
44
Lever J. Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory. Sociology 2011;45:86–101. doi:10.1177/0038038510387193
45
Macey, David. The lives of Michel Foucault. London: : Hutchinson 1993.
46
Menge T. The role of power in social explanation. European Journal of Social Theory 2018;21:22–38. doi:10.1177/1368431017714426
47
Foucault, Michel, Rabinow, Paul. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1991.
48
Rose N, O’Malley P, Valverde M. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2006;2:83–104. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
49
Russell, Bertrand. Power: a new social analysis. London: : Allen & Unwin 1938.
50
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
51
Smith, Dorothy E. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, Mass: : Northeastern University Press 1990.
52
Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2005.
53
Sulkunen P. Agency and power: The contractual illusion. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2010;13:495–510. doi:10.1177/1367549410377156
54
Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization. Theory, Culture & Societyhttps://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6
55
Vintges K. Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2012;19:283–98. doi:10.1177/1350506812443476
56
Wickham G. Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment. Journal of Law and Society 2006;33:596–614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x
57
Hammersley M. Should Social Science Be Critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2005;35:175–95. doi:10.1177/0048393105275279
58
Fassin D. The endurance of critique. Anthropological Theory 2017;17:4–29. doi:10.1177/1463499616688157
59
Sayer A. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science? Current Sociology 2009;57:767–86. doi:10.1177/0011392109342205
60
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory 2017;17:261–261. doi:10.1177/1463499617710992
61
Basaure M. An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory 2011;14:361–81. doi:10.1177/1368431011412350
62
Blokker P. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory 2011;14:251–61. doi:10.1177/1368431011412344
63
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: : Verso 2008.
64
Boland T. Towards an anthropology of critique: The modern experience of liminality and crisis. Anthropological Theory 2013;13:222–39. doi:10.1177/1463499613496731
65
Boltanski L. On critique: a sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551
66
Brown W, ProQuest (Firm). Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457
67
Callinicos, Alex. The resources of critique. Cambridge: : Polity 2006.
68
Fabiani J. Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De la critique. Precis de sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (pbk). European Journal of Social Theory 2011;14:401–6. doi:10.1177/1368431011412352
69
Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016). https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2
70
Latour B. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 2004;30:225–48. doi:10.1086/421123
71
Ortner SB. Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2016;6:47–73. doi:10.14318/hau6.1.004
72
Sayer A. Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: : Policy Press 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
73
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. London: : Ebooks Corporation Limited 1993. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
74
Susen S, Turner BS, editors. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: : Anthem Press 2014.
75
éZiézek, Slavoj. The ticklish subject: an essay in political ontology. London: : Verso 1999.
76
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum;1989.https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
77
Hill Collins P, Bilge S. Intersectionality. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012
78
Walby S. Globalization and inequalities: complexities and contested modernities. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319
79
Anthias F. Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities 2013;13:3–19. doi:10.1177/1468796812463547
80
Bilge S. INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 2013;10:405–24. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000283
81
Bohrer A. Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography. Historical Materialism 2018;26:46–74. doi:10.1163/1569206X-00001617
82
Brah A, Phoenix A. Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies 2004;5:75–86.https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8
83
Carbin M, Edenheim S. The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women’s Studies 2013;20:233–48. doi:10.1177/1350506813484723
84
Patricia Hill Collins. It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation. Hypatia 1998;13:62–82.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699
85
Crenshaw K. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 1991;43:1241–99.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
86
Davis K. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 2008;9:67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364
87
Dupuis-Deri F. Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry. Anarchist Studies 2016;24.https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist
88
Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studieshttps://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality
89
Gordon L. ‘Intersectionality’, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist. Gender & History 2016;28:340–57. doi:10.1111/1468-0424.12211
90
Hancock A-M. Intersectionality: an intellectual history. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001
91
Juteau-Lee D. Introduction: (Re)constructing the categories of ‘race’ and ‘sex’: the work of a precursor. In: Racism, sexism, power and ideology. London: : Routledge 1995.
92
Lawler S. White like them: Whiteness and anachronistic space in representations of the English white working class. Ethnicities 2012;12:409–26. doi:10.1177/1468796812448019
93
McCall L. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2005;30:1771–800. doi:10.1086/426800
94
Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review 1988;:61–88.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054
95
Phoenix A. Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2006;13:187–92. doi:10.1177/1350506806065751
96
Romero M. Introducing intersectionality. Malden, Massachusetts: : Polity Press 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452
97
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies Published Online First: 22 April 2016. doi:10.1177/1350506816643999
98
Verloo M. Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2006;13:211–28. doi:10.1177/1350506806065753
99
Walby, Sylvia. Patriarchy at work: patriarchal and capitalist relations in employment. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Basil Blackwell 1986.
100
Walby S, Armstrong J, Strid S. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology 2012;46:224–40. doi:10.1177/0038038511416164
101
Werbner P. Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between ‘intersectionality’ and ‘multiple identities’. Ethnicities 2013;13:401–19. doi:10.1177/1468796813483728
102
Yuval-Davis N. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2006;13:193–209. doi:10.1177/1350506806065752
103
Goldfrank WL. Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method. Journal of World-Systems Research 2015;6. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2000.223
104
Sassen, Saskia. Sociology of globalization. New York, N.Y.: : W.W. Norton & Company 2007. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
105
Wallerstein IM, Boyarin D. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, North Carolina: : Duke University Press 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861
106
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
107
Arrighi, Giovanni. The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times. New and updated ed. London: : Verso 2010.
108
Blim M. Capitalisms in Late Modernity. Annual Review of Anthropology 2000;29:25–38. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25
109
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: : Verso 2008.
110
Brenner R. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review;:25–92.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism
111
Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas. The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate. International Studies Quarterly 1988;32:47–65.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412
112
Frank AG, American Council of Learned Societies. ReOrient: global economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1998. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038
113
Gülalp H. Frank and Wallerstein revisited: A contribution to Brenner’s critique. Journal of Contemporary Asia 1981;11:169–88. doi:10.1080/00472338185390131
114
Hier SP. The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory. Race & Class 2001;42:69–86. doi:10.1177/0306396801423004
115
Martin WG. Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research 2015;6. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2000.222
116
Moore JW. The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society 2003;32:307–77. doi:10.1023/A:1024404620759
117
Poncelet L. Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 2002;25:47–97.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731
118
Robinson WI. Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal. International Sociology 2011;26:723–45. doi:10.1177/0268580910393372
119
Review by: Theda Skocpol. Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. American Journal of Sociology 1977;82:1075–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814
120
Wallerstein I. Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines. Current Anthropology 2003;44:453–65. doi:10.1086/375868
121
Wallerstein I. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised. International Sociology 2012;27:524–8. doi:10.1177/0268580912445532
122
Wolf, Eric R., Silverman, Sydel. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2001.
123
Connell R. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Crows Nest, NSW: : Allen & Unwin 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120
124
Bhambra GK. Connected sociologies. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
125
Patel S. Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges. Current Sociology 2014;62:603–13. doi:10.1177/0011392114524514
126
Aulenbacher B, Lutz H, Riegraf B. Introduction: Towards a global sociology of care and care work. Current Sociology 2018;66:495–502. doi:10.1177/0011392118765245
127
Bhambra GK. Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology. Sociology 2016;50:960–6. doi:10.1177/0038038516647683
128
Bhambra GK, Santos B de S. Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology. Sociology 2017;51:3–10. doi:10.1177/0038038516674665
129
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: : Verso 2008.
130
Burawoy M. Challenges for a Global Sociology. Contexts 2009;8:36–41. doi:10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36
131
Burawoy M. The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines. Sociology 2016;50:949–59. doi:10.1177/0038038516629901
132
Connell RW. Why Is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology 1997;102:1511–57. doi:10.1086/231125
133
Connell R, Collyer F, Maia J, et al. Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices. International Sociology 2017;32:21–37. doi:10.1177/0268580916676913
134
Patel S. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: : SAGE 2010.
135
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory. Bingley: : Emerald 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
136
Della Faille D, McLaughlin N. Sociology’s Global Challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 2008;33:485–95.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485
137
Jacobs RN, Townsley E. On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 2008;33:497–520.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497
138
Munck R. Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 2016;29:233–49. doi:10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9
139
Gregory Sandstrom. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 2008;33:607–30.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607
140
Sohoni D, Petrovic M. Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum. Teaching Sociology 2010;38:287–300.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545
141
Sorokin P. ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives. Current Sociology 2016;64:41–59. doi:10.1177/0011392115601462
142
Pavel Sorokin. Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision. Filosofija Sociologija;:323–30.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183
143
Sorokin P. Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies. Sociological Research Online 2018;23:21–42. doi:10.1177/1360780417743873
144
Welz F. 100 Years of Indian Sociology. International Sociology 2009;24:635–55. doi:10.1177/0268580909339270
145
Mignolo W, Walsh CE. On decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, North Carolina: : Duke University Press 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779
146
Quijano A. COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY. Cultural Studies 2007;21:168–78. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
147
Savransky M. A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality. Sociology 2017;51:11–26. doi:10.1177/0038038516656983
148
Bhambra GK. Connected sociologies. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2014.
149
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: : Verso 2008.
150
Dussel E. Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). boundary 2 1993;20. doi:10.2307/303341
151
Escobar A. WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE. Cultural Studies 2007;21:179–210. doi:10.1080/09502380601162506
152
Grosfoguel R. THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN. Cultural Studies 2007;21:211–23. doi:10.1080/09502380601162514
153
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies 2007;21:240–70. doi:10.1080/09502380601162548
154
Mignolo WD. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly 2002;101:57–96.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745
155
Mignolo WD. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking. Cultural Studies 2007;21:155–67. doi:10.1080/09502380601162498
156
Mignolo WD. DELINKING. Cultural Studies 2007;21:449–514. doi:10.1080/09502380601162647
157
Mignolo WD. Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry;43:38–45.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552
158
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass 2015;13:485–96. doi:10.1111/hic3.12264
159
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 2000;15:215–32. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005
160
Sitas A. Rethinking Africa’s sociological project. Current Sociology 2014;62:457–71. doi:10.1177/0011392114524505
161
VÁZQUEZ R. Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence. Journal of Historical Sociology 2011;24:27–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x
162
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies 2007;21:224–39. doi:10.1080/09502380601162530
163
Catherine E. Walsh. The (Re)articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge. Nepantla: Views from South 2002;3:61–97.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948
164
Weiner MF. Decolonial sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s foundational theoretical and methodological contributions. Sociology Compass 2018;12. doi:10.1111/soc4.12601
165
Wynter S. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument. CR: The New Centennial Review 2003;3:257–337. doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
166
Bauer AM, Bhan M. Climate without nature: a critical anthropology of the anthropocene. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633
167
Luke TW. Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory 2017;20:80–94. doi:10.1177/1368431016647971
168
Moore JW, editor. Anthropocene or capitalocene?: nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland, California: : PM Press 2016. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
169
Barrios RE. What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology 2017;46:151–66. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635
170
Bonneuil C, Fressoz J-B, Fernbach D. The shock of the anthropocene: the Earth, history, and us. Paperback edition. London: : Verso 2017.
171
Bowden G. An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 2017;54:48–68. doi:10.1111/cars.12138
172
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 2009;35:197–222. doi:10.1086/596640
173
Chernilo D. The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory 2017;20:44–60. doi:10.1177/1368431016651874
174
Clark N. Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review 2014;62:19–37. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12122
175
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter;41:17–8.http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf
176
Delanty G, Mota A. Governing the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory 2017;20:9–38. doi:10.1177/1368431016668535
177
Ferguson JM. Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 2018;19:189–96. doi:10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559
178
Grusin RA, editor. Anthropocene feminism. Minneapolis, Minnesota: : University of Minnesota Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552
179
Hann C. The Anthropocene and anthropology. European Journal of Social Theory 2017;20:183–96. doi:10.1177/1368431016649362
180
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, et al. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos 2016;81:535–64. doi:10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838
181
Head L. Hope and grief in the anthropocene: re-conceptualising human-nature relations. Paperback edition. London: : Routledge 2018.
182
Hecht G. Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence. Cultural Anthropology 2018;33:109–41. doi:10.14506/ca33.1.05
183
Hornborg A. Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology 2017;46:61–77. doi:10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023
184
Latour B. Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History 2014;45:1–18. doi:10.1353/nlh.2014.0003
185
Moore A. Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2016;22:27–46. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12332
186
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, et al. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy 2013;28:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
187
Patel R, Moore JW. A history of the world in seven cheap things. University of California Press: : Oakland, California 2017.
188
Tsing AL, Swanson H, Gan E, et al., editors. Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, Minnesota: : University of Minnesota Press 2017.
189
Whitworth L. Goodbye Gauley Mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Feminist Theory Published Online First: 24 July 2018. doi:10.1177/1464700118788684
190
Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 2008;18.https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf
191
Morris B. Anthropology, ecology, and anarchism: a Brian Morris reader. Oakland, California: : PM Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827
192
High H. Anthropology and anarchy: Romance, horror or science fiction? Critique of Anthropology 2012;32:93–108. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438426
193
Macdonald C. The Anthropology of Anarchy. Indian Journal of Human Development 2012;6:49–66. doi:10.1177/0973703020120103
194
Kinna R. Anarchism: a beginner’s guide. Oxford: : Oneworld Publications 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182
195
Marshall PH. Demanding the impossible: a history of anarchism : be realistic! Demand the impossible! Chicago, IL: : PM Press 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618
196
Ward C. Anarchism: a very short introduction. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004.
197
Barclay HB, Comfort A. People without government: an anthropology of anarchy. Completely revised edition. London: : Kahn & Averill 1990.
198
Barclay HB. Culture and anarchism. London: : Freedom Press 1997.
199
Hann CM. Socialism: ideals, ideologies, and local practice. London: : Routledge 1993.
200
Barnard A. Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan. Social evolution and history;3.https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/
201
Buier N. The promise of an anarchist anthropology: the three burials of the anarchist project -. Studia ubb sociologia 2014;LIX:73–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603
202
Graeber D. The new anarchists. New Left Review 2002;13.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists
203
Graeber D. Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Chicago, Il: : Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC 2004.
204
Graeber D. Debt: the first 5,000 years. Brooklyn, NY: : Melville House 2011.
205
Graeber D. Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2012;2:105–28. doi:10.14318/hau2.2.007
206
GRAEBER D. Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2014;4:73–88. doi:10.14318/hau4.3.007
207
Graeber D. The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: : Melville House 2015.
208
Kadir N. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2016.
209
Kalb D. Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology. Focaal;2014:113–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108
210
Nugent S. Anarchism out West: Some reflections on sources. Critique of Anthropology 2012;32:206–16. doi:10.1177/0308275X12437860
211
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies 2018;39:1299–321. doi:10.1177/0170840618759815
212
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology 2012;32:143–57. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438779
213
Schulze F. Flirting with anarchism: Class, state, and anthropology. Focaal 2013;2013. doi:10.3167/fcl.2013.660111
214
Scott JC. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2014.
215
Ssorin-Chaikov N. Writing power: An anarchist anthropologist in the looking glass of critical theory. Critique of Anthropology 2012;32:189–205. doi:10.1177/0308275X12439486
216
GUSTERSON H. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist 2017;44:209–14. doi:10.1111/amet.12469
217
Jones PK. Insights from the infamous. European Journal of Social Theory Published Online First: 31 May 2018. doi:10.1177/1368431018772507
218
Ionescu G, Gellner E. Populism: its meanings and national characteristics. London: : Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1970. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
219
Worsley P. The third world. London: : Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1964.
220
Arat-Koç S. Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology Published Online First: 14 March 2018. doi:10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2
221
BALTHAZAR AC. Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist 2017;44:220–4. doi:10.1111/amet.12471
222
Bhambra GK. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology 2017;68:S214–32. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12317
223
Bonikowski B. Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology 8AD;68:S181–213. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12325
224
Brubaker R. Why populism? Theory and Society 2017;46:357–85. doi:10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
225
EDWARDS J, HAUGERUD A, PARIKH S. Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist 2017;44:195–200. doi:10.1111/amet.12467
226
EVANS G. Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now. American Ethnologist 2017;44:215–9. doi:10.1111/amet.12470
227
Fassin E. Populism Left and Right. Chicago: : Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC 2018.
228
Garrido M. Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology 2017;123:647–85. doi:10.1086/694076
229
Gökarıksel S. The ends of revolution: capitalist de-democratization and nationalist populism in the east of Europe. Dialectical Anthropology 2017;41:207–24. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7
230
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, et al. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology 2016;24:478–502. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12331
231
Jansen RS. Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory 2011;29:75–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
232
Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart PA, Ochoa Espejo P, et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
233
KNIGHT DM. Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland. American Ethnologist 2017;44:237–42. doi:10.1111/amet.12474
234
KOCH I. What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist 2017;44:225–30. doi:10.1111/amet.12472
235
Laclau E. On populist reason. London: : Verso 2007.
236
McGRANAHAN C. An anthropology of lying: Trump and the political sociality of moral outrage. American Ethnologist 2017;44:243–8. doi:10.1111/amet.12475
237
Mouffe C. For a left populism. London: : Verso 2018.
238
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York: : Oxford University Press 2017.
239
Müller J-W. What is populism? Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016.
240
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology 8AD;68:S105–19. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12323
241
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology 2017;41:225–40. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2
242
ROSA J, BONILLA Y. Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist 2017;44:201–8. doi:10.1111/amet.12468
243
Shields S. Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and its Alternatives. Critical Sociology 2015;41:659–78. doi:10.1177/0896920513501349
244
WALLEY CJ. Trump’s election and the "white working class”: What we missed. American Ethnologist 2017;44:231–6. doi:10.1111/amet.12473
245
Onwuzuruigbo I. Indigenising Eurocentric sociology: The ‘captive mind’ and five decades of sociology in Nigeria. Current Sociology 2018;66:831–48. doi:10.1177/0011392117704242
246
Simon ZB. The limits of Anthropocene narratives. European Journal of Social Theory Published Online First: 18 September 2018. doi:10.1177/1368431018799256
247
Lewis SL, Maslin M. The human planet: how we created the anthropocene. UK: : Pelican 2018.
248
Ellis EC. Anthropocene: a very short introduction. First edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
249
Stavrakakis Y, Jäger A. Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. European Journal of Social Theory 2018;21:547–65. doi:10.1177/1368431017723337
250
Degnen C, Tyler K. Amongst the disciplines: Anthropology, sociology, intersection and intersectionality. The Sociological Review 2017;65:35–53. doi:10.1177/0081176917693508
251
Swyngedouw E, Ernstson H. Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 2018;35:3–30. doi:10.1177/0263276418757314
252
Herkman J. Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica 2018;61:341–55. doi:10.1177/0001699317737816
253
Collins R. A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology 1997;102:1558–64. doi:10.1086/231126
254
Conty AF. The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society Published Online First: 11 October 2018. doi:10.1177/0263276418802891
255
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2018;25:403–18. doi:10.1177/1350506816643999
256
LUGONES M. Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia 2007;22:186–219. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x
257
LUGONES, MARÍA. Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish). Tabula Rasa 2008;:73–102.http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006
258
LUGONES M. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia 2010;25:742–59. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
259
Santos B de S. Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. London: : Routledge 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876
260
Go J. Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work. Sociological Theory 2013;31:49–74. doi:10.1177/0735275113477082
261
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, et al. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2011;369:842–67. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
262
Freeden M. After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 2017;22:1–11. doi:10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
263
Cannon B. Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis. New Political Science 2018;40:477–96. doi:10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187
264
Elmgren A. The double-edged sword: the political appropriation of the concept of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 2018;23:320–41. doi:10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940
265
Gamper Sachse D. Ambivalences of populism: The case of Catalan independentism. Social Science Information Published Online First: 16 November 2018. doi:10.1177/0539018418811685
266
Deem A. Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement. Theory, Culture & Society Published Online First: 18 November 2018. doi:10.1177/0263276418807002
267
Askola H. Wind from the North, don’t go forth? Gender equality and the rise of populist nationalism in Finland. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2019;26:54–69. doi:10.1177/1350506817748341
268
Ilmonen K. Identity politics revisited: On Audre Lorde, intersectionality, and mobilizing writing styles. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2019;26:7–22. doi:10.1177/1350506817702410
269
Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory 1989;7. doi:10.2307/202060
270
Foucault M, Burchell G, Gordon C, et al. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago, IL: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
271
Smith DE. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: : Northeastern University Press 1990.
272
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
273
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory 2017;17:261–261. doi:10.1177/1463499617710992
274
Sayer A. Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: : Policy Press 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
275
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. London: : Routledge & K. Paul 1993. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
276
Cronin A, King A. Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults. Sociology 2010;44:876–92. doi:10.1177/0038038510375738
277
Zander U, Zander L, Gaffney S, et al. Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 2010;26:457–66. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011
278
Levine-Rasky C. Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities 2011;17:239–53. doi:10.1080/13504630.2011.558377
279
Dunaway WA, Clelland DA. Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality. Journal of World-Systems Research 2017;23:399–464. doi:10.5195/JWSR.2017.598
280
SpringerLink (Online Service). Understanding the dynamics of global inequality: social exclusion, power shift, and structural changes. Heidelberg: : Springer 2015. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6
281
Ilie G. Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis. Revista de Stiinte Politice 2014;:232–40.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540
282
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory. Bingley: : Emerald 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
283
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory. Bingley: : Emerald 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
284
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory. Bingley: : Emerald 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
285
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass 2015;13:485–96. doi:10.1111/hic3.12264
286
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 2000;15:215–32. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005
287
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies 2007;21:224–39. doi:10.1080/09502380601162530
288
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 2009;35:197–222. doi:10.1086/596640
289
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, et al. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos 2016;81:535–64. doi:10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838
290
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, et al. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy 2013;28:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
291
Kadir N. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2016.
292
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies 2018;39:1299–321. doi:10.1177/0170840618759815
293
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology 2012;32:143–57. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438779
294
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, et al. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology 2016;24:478–502. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12331
295
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology 8AD;68:S105–19. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12323
296
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology 2017;41:225–40. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2
