Bibliography for Current Issues in Social Theory BETA

Anthias, Floya. 2013. ‘Intersectional What? Social Divisions, Intersectionality and Levels of Analysis’. Ethnicities 13 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463547.

Arat-Koç, Sedef. 2018. ‘Culturalizing Politics, Hyper-Politicizing “Culture”: “White” vs. “Black Turks” and the Making of Authoritarian Populism in Turkey’. Dialectical Anthropology, March. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2.

‘Are We Now Living in the Anthropocene?’ 2008. GSA Today 18 (2). https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf.

Arrighi, Giovanni. 2010. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. New and Updated ed. London: Verso.

Askola, Heli. 2019. ‘Wind from the North, Don’t Go Forth? Gender Equality and the Rise of Populist Nationalism in Finland’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 26 (1): 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817748341.

Aulenbacher, Brigitte, Helma Lutz, and Birgit Riegraf. 2018. ‘Introduction: Towards a Global Sociology of Care and Care Work’. Current Sociology 66 (4): 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118765245.

Baert, Patrick and Silva, Filipe Carreira da. 2010. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.

BALTHAZAR, ANA CAROLINA. 2017. ‘Made in Britain: Brexit, Teacups, and the Materiality of the Nation’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 220–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12471.

Barclay, Harold B. 1997. Culture and Anarchism. London: Freedom Press.

Barclay, Harold B., and Alex Comfort. 1990. People without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy. Completely revised edition. London: Kahn & Averill.

Barnard, Alan. n.d. ‘Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-Reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan’. Social Evolution and History 3 (1). https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/.

Barrett, Michèle and Phillips, Anne. 1992. Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Barrios, Roberto E. 2017. ‘What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene’. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1): 151–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635.

Basaure, M. 2011. ‘An Interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the Expansion of Knowledge’. European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 361–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412350.

Bauer, Andrew M., and Mona Bhan. 2018. Climate without Nature: A Critical Anthropology of the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633.

Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2014a. Connected Sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections.

———. 2014b. Connected Sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2016. ‘Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology’. Sociology 50 (5): 960–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516647683.

Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2017. ‘Brexit, Trump, and “Methodological Whiteness”: On the Misrecognition of Race and Class’. The British Journal of Sociology 68 (November): S214–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.

Bhambra, Gurminder K, and Boaventura de Sousa Santos. 2017. ‘Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology’. Sociology 51 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674665.

Bilge, Sirma. 2013. ‘INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE’. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 10 (02): 405–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283.

Blim, Michael. 2000. ‘Capitalisms in Late Modernity’. Annual Review of Anthropology 29 (1): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25.

Blokker, P. 2011. ‘Pragmatic Sociology: Theoretical Evolvement and Empirical Application’. European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 251–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412344.

Bohrer, Ashley. 2018. ‘Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography’. Historical Materialism 26 (2): 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001617.

Boland, T. 2013. ‘Towards an Anthropology of Critique: The Modern Experience of Liminality and Crisis’. Anthropological Theory 13 (3): 222–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613496731.

Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551.

Bonikowski, Bart. 8AD. ‘Ethno‐nationalist Populism and the Mobilization of Collective Resentment’. The British Journal of Sociology 68: S181–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12325.

Bonneuil, Christophe, Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, and David Fernbach. 2017. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History, and Us. Paperback edition. London: Verso.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’. Sociological Theory 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/202060.

Bourdieu, Pierre. n.d. ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’. Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060.

Bourdieu, Pierre, Bourdieu, Pierre, and Thompson, John B. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.

Bowden, Gary. 2017. ‘An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene’. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 54 (1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12138.

Brah, Avtar, and Ann Phoenix. 2004. ‘Ain’t I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’. Journal of International Women’s Studies 5 (3): 75–86. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8.

Brenner, Robert. n.d. ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’. New Left Review, no. 104: 25–92. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism.

Brown, Wendy and ProQuest (Firm). 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457.

Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. ‘Why Populism?’ Theory and Society 46 (5): 357–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7.

Buier, Natalia. 2014. ‘The Promise of an Anarchist Anthropology: The Three Burials of the Anarchist Project -’. Studia Ubb Sociologia LIX (1): 73–90. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603.

Burawoy, Michael. 2009. ‘Challenges for a Global Sociology’. Contexts 8 (4): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36.

———. 2016. ‘The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines’. Sociology 50 (5): 949–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516629901.

Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, Miller, Peter, and Foucault, Michel. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Burton, Sarah. 2015. ‘The Monstrous “White Theory Boy”: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge’. Sociological Research Online 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3746.

Calhoun, Craig J. 2012a. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

———. 2012b. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Calhoun, Craig J. 2012a. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

———. 2012b. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

———. 2012c. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Callinicos, Alex. 1999a. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.

———. 1999b. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.

———. 2006. The Resources of Critique. Cambridge: Polity.

Cannon, Barry. 2018. ‘Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis’. New Political Science 40 (3): 477–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187.

Carbin, M., and S. Edenheim. 2013. ‘The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?’ European Journal of Women’s Studies 20 (3): 233–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813484723.

Catherine E. Walsh. 2002. ‘The (Re)Articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge’. Nepantla: Views from South 3 (1): 61–97. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009a. ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’. Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.

———. 2009b. ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’. Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.

Chandra Talpade Mohanty. 1988. ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’. Feminist Review, no. 30: 61–88. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054.

Chernilo, Daniel. 2017. ‘The Question of the Human in the Anthropocene Debate’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016651874.

Chivers, Barbara, Michael Shoolbred, and ProQuest (Firm). 2007. A Student’s Guide to Presentations: Making Your Presentation Count. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910.

Clark, Nigel. 2014. ‘Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene’. The Sociological Review 62 (1_suppl): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12122.

Col, Giovanni da, Claudio Sopranzetti, Fred Myers, Anastasia Piliavsky, John L. Jackson, Yarimar Bonilla, Adia Benton, and Paul Stoller. 2017. ‘Why Do We Read the Classics?’ HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (3): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.3.002.

Collins, Randall. 1997. ‘A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell’. American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1558–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/231126.

Connell, R. W. 1997. ‘Why Is Classical Theory Classical?’ American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1511–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/231125.

Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120.

Connell, Raewyn, Fran Collyer, João Maia, and Robert Morrell. 2017. ‘Toward a Global Sociology of Knowledge: Post-Colonial Realities and Intellectual Practices’. International Sociology 32 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916676913.

Conty, Arianne Françoise. 2018. ‘The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene’. Theory, Culture & Society, October. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039.

———. n.d. ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf.

Cronin, Ann, and Andrew King. 2010. ‘Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults’. Sociology 44 (5): 876–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375738.

Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. n.d. ‘The “Anthropocene”’. Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18. http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf.

Davis, K. 2008. ‘Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful’. Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.

Deem, Alexandra. 2018. ‘Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement’. Theory, Culture & Society, November. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418807002.

Degnen, Cathrine, and Katharine Tyler. 2017. ‘Amongst the Disciplines: Anthropology, Sociology, Intersection and Intersectionality’. The Sociological Review 65 (1_suppl): 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917693508.

Delanty, Gerard, and Aurea Mota. 2017. ‘Governing the Anthropocene’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535.

Della Faille, Dimitri, and Neil McLaughlin. 2008. ‘Sociology’s Global Challenge’. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 33 (3): 485–95. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485.

Dowding, Keith. 2012. ‘Why Should We Care about the Definition of Power?’ Journal of Political Power 5 (1): 119–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dunaway, Wilma A., and Donald A. Clelland. 2017. ‘Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality’. Journal of World-Systems Research 23 (2): 399–464. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2017.598.

Dupuis-Deri, Francis. 2016. ‘Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry’. Anarchist Studies 24 (1). https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist.

Dussel, Enrique. 1993. ‘Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures)’. Boundary 2 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/303341.

EDWARDS, JEANETTE, ANGELIQUE HAUGERUD, and SHANTI PARIKH. 2017. ‘Introduction: The 2016 Brexit Referendum and Trump Election’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12467.

Ellis, Erle C. 2018. Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. First edition. Vol. 558. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elmgren, Ainur. 2018. ‘The Double-Edged Sword: The Political Appropriation of the Concept of Populism’. Journal of Political Ideologies 23 (3): 320–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940.

Eribon, Didier. 1992. Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber.

Escobar, Arturo. 2007. ‘WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506.

EVANS, GILLIAN. 2017. ‘Brexit Britain: Why We Are All Postindustrial Now’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 215–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12470.

éZiézek, Slavoj. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: An Essay in Political Ontology. Vol. Wo es war. London: Verso.

Fabiani, J. 2011. ‘Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De La Critique. Precis de Sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 Euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (Pbk)’. European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 401–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412352.

Fassin, Didier. 2017. ‘The Endurance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory 17 (1): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616688157.

Fassin, Eric. 2018. Populism Left and Right. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC.

Ferguson, Jane M. 2018. ‘Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges’. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 19 (3): 189–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559.

Foucault, Michel, Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel and Gordon, Colin. 1980. Power-Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Foucault, Michel and Rabinow, Paul. 1991. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Frank, Andre Gunder and American Council of Learned Societies. 1998. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038.

Freeden, Michael. 2017. ‘After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology’. Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813.

Gamper Sachse, Daniel. 2018. ‘Ambivalences of Populism: The Case of Catalan Independentism’. Social Science Information, November. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018418811685.

Garrido, Marco. 2017. ‘Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila’. American Journal of Sociology 123 (3): 647–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/694076.

Go, Julian, ed. 2013a. Decentering Social Theory. Vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

———, ed. 2013b. Decentering Social Theory. Vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

———, ed. 2013c. Decentering Social Theory. Vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

———, ed. 2013d. Decentering Social Theory. Vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912.

———. 2013e. ‘Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work’. Sociological Theory 31 (1): 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113477082.

Gökarıksel, Saygun. 2017. ‘The Ends of Revolution: Capitalist de-Democratization and Nationalist Populism in the East of Europe’. Dialectical Anthropology 41 (3): 207–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7.

Goldfrank, Walter L. 2015. ‘Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method’. Journal of World-Systems Research 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.223.

Gordon, Linda. 2016. ‘“Intersectionality”, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist’. Gender & History 28 (2): 340–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12211.

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1973. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. London: Allen Lane.

Graeber, David. 2002. ‘The New Anarchists’. New Left Review 13. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists.

———. 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Vol. 14. Chicago, Il: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC.

———. 2007. Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. Oakland, Calif: AK Press.

———. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.

———. 2012. ‘Dead Zones of the Imagination: On Violence, Bureaucracy, and Interpretive Labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (2): 105–28. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.007.

GRAEBER, David. 2014. ‘Anthropology and the Rise of the Professional-Managerial Class’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.3.007.

Graeber, David. 2015. The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.

Green, Sarah, Chris Gregory, Madeleine Reeves, Jane K. Cowan, Olga Demetriou, Insa Koch, Michael Carrithers, et al. 2016a. ‘Brexit Referendum: First Reactions from Anthropology’. Social Anthropology 24 (4): 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.

———. 2016b. ‘Brexit Referendum: First Reactions from Anthropology’. Social Anthropology 24 (4): 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.

Gregory Sandstrom. 2008. ‘The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie’ 33 (3): 607–30. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607.

Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2007. ‘THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 211–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514.

Grusin, Richard A., ed. 2017. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552.

Guillaumin, Colette. 1995. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. Vol. Critical studies in racism and migration. London: Routledge. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0.

Gülalp, Haldun. 1981. ‘Frank and Wallerstein Revisited: A Contribution to Brenner’s Critique’. Journal of Contemporary Asia 11 (2): 169–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472338185390131.

GUSTERSON, HUGH. 2017. ‘From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the Rise of Nationalist Populism’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 209–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12469.

Hammersley, M. 2005. ‘Should Social Science Be Critical?’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2): 175–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105275279.

Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001.

Hann, C. M. 1993. Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. Vol. 31. London: Routledge.

Hann, Chris. 2017. ‘The Anthropocene and Anthropology’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 183–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016649362.

Haraway, Donna, Noboru Ishikawa, Scott F. Gilbert, Kenneth Olwig, Anna L. Tsing, and Nils Bubandt. 2016a. ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’. Ethnos 81 (3): 535–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.

———. 2016b. ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’. Ethnos 81 (3): 535–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.

Harrison, Faye Venetia and Association of Black Anthropologists. 1997. Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further toward an Anthropology of Liberation. 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association.

‘Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016)’. n.d. https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2.

Haugaard, M. 2010. ‘Power: A “family Resemblance” Concept’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 13 (4): 419–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377152.

Head, Lesley. 2018. Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene: Re-Conceptualising Human-Nature Relations. Paperback edition. London: Routledge.

Hearn, Jonathan. 2008. ‘What’s Wrong with Domination?’ Journal of Power 1 (1): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943406.

Hearn, Jonathan. 2012. Theorizing Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hearn, Jonathan. 2014. ‘On the Social Evolution of Power to/Over’. Journal of Political Power 7 (2): 175–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963.

Hecht, Gabrielle. 2018. ‘Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence’. Cultural Anthropology 33 (1): 109–41. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.1.05.

Herkman, Juha. 2018. ‘Old Patterns on New Clothes? Populism and Political Scandals in the Nordic Countries’. Acta Sociologica 61 (4): 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816.

Hier, S. P. 2001. ‘The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory’. Race & Class 42 (3): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396801423004.

High, Holly. 2012. ‘Anthropology and Anarchy: Romance, Horror or Science Fiction?’ Critique of Anthropology 32 (2): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438426.

Hill Collins, Patricia, and Sirma Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Vol. Key Concepts Series. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012.

Hornborg, Alf. 2017. ‘Dithering While the Planet Burns: Anthropologists’ Approaches to the Anthropocene’. Reviews in Anthropology 46 (2–3): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023.

How, A. R. 2011. ‘Hermeneutics and the “classic” Problem in the Human Sciences’. History of the Human Sciences 24 (3): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111405277.

Ilie, Gabriela. 2014. ‘Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis’. Revista de Stiinte Politice, no. 41: 232–40. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540.

Ilmonen, Kaisa. 2019. ‘Identity Politics Revisited: On Audre Lorde, Intersectionality, and Mobilizing Writing Styles’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 26 (1): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817702410.

Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher. 2012a. An Invitation to Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

———. 2012b. An Invitation to Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

Ionescu, Ghiţa, and Ernest Gellner. 1970. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie. 1998. Contemporary Feminist Theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Jacobs, Ronald N., and Eleanor Townsley. 2008. ‘On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology’. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 33 (3): 497–520. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497.

Jansen, Robert S. 2011. ‘Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism’. Sociological Theory 29 (2): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x.

Jones, Paul K. 2018. ‘Insights from the Infamous’. European Journal of Social Theory, May. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018772507.

Juteau-Lee, Danielle. 1995. ‘Introduction: (Re)Constructing the Categories of “Race” and “Sex”: The Work of a Precursor’. In Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. Vol. Critical studies in racism and migration. London: Routledge.

Kadir, Nazima. 2016a. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

———. 2016b. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Kalb, Don. n.d. ‘Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the Reunification of Anarchism and Marxism in World Anthropology’. Focaal 2014 (69): 113–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108.

Kinna, Ruth. 2005. Anarchism: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182.

KNIGHT, DANIEL M. 2017. ‘Anxiety and Cosmopolitan Futures: Brexit and Scotland’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 237–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12474.

KOCH, INSA. 2017. ‘What’s in a Vote? Brexit beyond Culture Wars’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 225–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12472.

Laclau, Ernesto. 2007. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Latour, Bruno. 2004. ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.

———. 2014. ‘Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene’. New Literary History 45 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0003.

Lawler, S. 2012. ‘White like Them: Whiteness and Anachronistic Space in Representations of the English White Working Class’. Ethnicities 12 (4): 409–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812448019.

Layder, Derek. 2006. Understanding Social Theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.

Lemke, Thomas. 2002. ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique’. Rethinking Marxism 14 (3): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.

LEMKE, THOMAS. 2007. ‘An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.

Lever, J. 2011. ‘Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory’. Sociology 45 (1): 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387193.

Levine-Rasky, Cynthia. 2011. ‘Intersectionality Theory Applied to Whiteness and Middle-Classness’. Social Identities 17 (2): 239–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.558377.

Lewis, Simon L., and Mark Maslin. 2018. The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene. Vol. 20. UK: Pelican.

LUGONES, MARÍA. 2007. ‘Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System’. Hypatia 22 (1): 186–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x.

LUGONES, MARÍA. 2008. ‘Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish)’. Tabula Rasa, no. 9: 73–102. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006.

LUGONES, MARÌA. 2010. ‘Toward a Decolonial Feminism’. Hypatia 25 (4): 742–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.

Luke, Timothy W. 2017. ‘Reconstructing Social Theory and the Anthropocene’. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647971.

Lukes, Steven and British Sociological Association. 2005. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed., Expanded. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503.

Macdonald, Charles. 2012. ‘The Anthropology of Anarchy’. Indian Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020120103.

Macey, David. 1993. The Lives of Michel Foucault. London: Hutchinson.

Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2007. ‘ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 240–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.

Marshall, Barbara L. and Witz, Anne. 2004. Engendering the Social: Feminist Encounters with Sociological Theory. Buckingham: Open University Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344.

Marshall, Peter H. 2009. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism : Be Realistic! Demand the Impossible! Chicago, IL: PM Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618.

Martin, William G. 2015. ‘Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective’. Journal of World-Systems Research 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.222.

McCall, Leslie. 2005. ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3): 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.

McGRANAHAN, CAROLE. 2017. ‘An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral Outrage’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 243–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12475.

Menge, Torsten. 2018. ‘The Role of Power in Social Explanation’. European Journal of Social Theory 21 (1): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017714426.

Mignolo, W. D. 2002. ‘The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference’. South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (1): 57–96. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2007a. ‘DELINKING’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.

———. 2007b. ‘Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 155–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498.

———. n.d. ‘Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality’. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry 43: 38–45. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552.

Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine E. Walsh. 2018. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779.

Mills, C. Wright. 2000. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661.

Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.

Moore, Amelia. 2016. ‘Anthropocene Anthropology: Reconceptualizing Contemporary Global Change’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22 (1): 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12332.

Moore, Jason W. 2003. ‘The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism’. Theory and Society 32 (3): 307–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024404620759.

———, ed. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, California: PM Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Morris, Brian. 2014. Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader. Oakland, California: PM Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. For a Left Populism. London: Verso.

Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol. 510. New York: Oxford University Press.

Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Munck, Ronaldo. 2016. ‘Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm’. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 29 (3): 233–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. 2015a. ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’. History Compass 13 (10): 485–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.

———. 2015b. ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’. History Compass 13 (10): 485–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.

Nugent, Stephen. 2012. ‘Anarchism out West: Some Reflections on Sources’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (2): 206–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12437860.

Onwuzuruigbo, Ifeanyi. 2018. ‘Indigenising Eurocentric Sociology: The “Captive Mind” and Five Decades of Sociology in Nigeria’. Current Sociology 66 (6): 831–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117704242.

Ortner, Sherry B. 2016. ‘Dark Anthropology and Its Others’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (1): 47–73. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004.

Palsson, Gisli, Bronislaw Szerszynski, Sverker Sörlin, John Marks, Bernard Avril, Carole Crumley, Heide Hackmann, et al. 2013a. ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research’. Environmental Science & Policy 28 (April): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.

———. 2013b. ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research’. Environmental Science & Policy 28 (April): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.

Patel, Raj, and Jason W. Moore. 2017. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things. University of California Press: Oakland, California.

Patel, Sujata. 2010. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. Vol. Sage studies in international sociology. London: SAGE.

Patel, Sujata. 2010. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. London: SAGE.

———. 2014. ‘Afterword: Doing Global Sociology: Issues, Problems and Challenges’. Current Sociology 62 (4): 603–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524514.

Patricia Hill Collins. 1998. ‘It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation’. Hypatia 13 (3): 62–82. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699.

Pavel Sorokin. n.d. ‘Ethically Responsible Global Sociology: Conceptual Framing of a New Vision’. Filosofija. Sociologija, no. 4: 323–30. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183.

Phoenix, A. 2006. ‘Intersectionality’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 187–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751.

Pierson, Paul. 8ADa. ‘American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy’. The British Journal of Sociology 68: S105–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.

———. 8ADb. ‘American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy’. The British Journal of Sociology 68: S105–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.

Poncelet, Léo. 2002. ‘Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis’. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 25 (1): 47–97. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731.

Powell, Kathy. 2017a. ‘Brexit Positions: Neoliberalism, Austerity and Immigration—the (Im)Possibilities? Of Political Revolution’. Dialectical Anthropology 41 (3): 225–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.

———. 2017b. ‘Brexit Positions: Neoliberalism, Austerity and Immigration—the (Im)Possibilities? Of Political Revolution’. Dialectical Anthropology 41 (3): 225–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.

Quijano, Aníbal. 2000a. ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’. International Sociology 15 (2): 215–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

———. 2000b. ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’. International Sociology 15 (2): 215–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

———. 2007. ‘COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.

Reinecke, Juliane. 2018a. ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting Entrenched Inequalities in Occupy London’. Organization Studies 39 (9): 1299–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.

———. 2018b. ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting Entrenched Inequalities in Occupy London’. Organization Studies 39 (9): 1299–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.

Review by: Theda Skocpol. 1977. ‘Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique’. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 1075–90. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814.

Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry. 2001. Handbook of Social Theory. London: Sage.

Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas. 1988. ‘The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate’. International Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 47–65. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412.

Robinson, Andrew, and Simon Tormey. 2012a. ‘Beyond the State: Anthropology and “Actually-Existing-Anarchism”’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (2): 143–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.

———. 2012b. ‘Beyond the State: Anthropology and “Actually-Existing-Anarchism”’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (2): 143–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.

Robinson, W. I. 2011. ‘Globalization and the Sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A Critical Appraisal’. International Sociology 26 (6): 723–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393372.

Romero, Mary. 2018. Introducing Intersectionality. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452.

ROSA, JONATHAN, and YARIMAR BONILLA. 2017. ‘Deprovincializing Trump, Decolonizing Diversity, and Unsettling Anthropology’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 201–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12468.

Rose, Nikolas, Pat O’Malley, and Mariana Valverde. 2006. ‘Governmentality’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (1): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900.

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Paul A. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, eds. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001.

Russell, Bertrand. 1938. Power: A New Social Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.

Salem, Sara. 2016. ‘Intersectionality and Its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, April. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.

———. 2018. ‘Intersectionality and Its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 25 (4): 403–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2008a. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol. v. 3. London: Verso.

———. 2008b. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol. v. 3. London: Verso.

———. 2008c. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol. v. 3. London: Verso.

———. 2008d. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol. v. 3. London: Verso.

———. 2016. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876.

Sassen, Saskia. 2007. Sociology of Globalization. Vol. Contemporary societies. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Company. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Savransky, Martin. 2017. ‘A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality’. Sociology 51 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516656983.

Sayer, A. 2009. ‘Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science?’ Current Sociology 57 (6): 767–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109342205.

Sayer, Andrew. 2015a. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Bristol: Policy Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961.

———. 2015b. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Bristol: Policy Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961.

Schiller, Nina Glick. 2016. ‘Positioning Theory: An Introduction’. Anthropological Theory 16 (2–3): 133–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616663792.

Schiller, Nina Glick, Julia Eckert, and Stephen Reyna. 2017a. ‘Debate on the Nature and Significance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory 17 (2): 261–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.

———. 2017b. ‘Debate on the Nature and Significance of Critique’. Anthropological Theory 17 (2): 261–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.

Schulze, Frederick. 2013. ‘Flirting with Anarchism: Class, State, and Anthropology’. Focaal 2013 (66). https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.660111.

Scott, James C. 2014. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Scott, John. 2006a. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. London: SAGE Publications. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958.

———. 2006b. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. London: SAGE Publications. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958.

Seidman, Steven. 1996. Queer Theory/Sociology. Vol. Twentieth-century social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

———. 2008. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. 4th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub.

Shields, Stuart. 2015. ‘Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and Its Alternatives’. Critical Sociology 41 (4–5): 659–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501349.

Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2018. ‘The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives’. European Journal of Social Theory, September. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018799256.

Sitas, Ari. 2014. ‘Rethinking Africa’s Sociological Project’. Current Sociology 62 (4): 457–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524505.

Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Vol. The Northeastern series in feminist theory. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press.

Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Smith, Dorothy E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Vol. The gender lens series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Sohoni, Deenesh, and Misha Petrovic. 2010. ‘Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum’. Teaching Sociology 38 (4): 287–300. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545.

Sorokin, Pavel. 2016. ‘“Global Sociology” in Different Disciplinary Practices: Current Conditions, Problems and Perspectives’. Current Sociology 64 (1): 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115601462.

———. 2018. ‘Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies’. Sociological Research Online 23 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417743873.

‘Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization’. n.d. Theory, Culture & Society. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6.

SpringerLink (Online Service). 2015. Understanding the Dynamics of Global Inequality: Social Exclusion, Power Shift, and Structural Changes. Edited by Alexander Lenger and Florian Schumacher. Heidelberg: Springer. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6.

Ssorin-Chaikov, Nikolai. 2012. ‘Writing Power: An Anarchist Anthropologist in the Looking Glass of Critical Theory’. Critique of Anthropology 32 (2): 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12439486.

Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue. 1993a. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Ebooks Corporation Limited. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541.

———. 1993b. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge & K. Paul. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541.

Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Anton Jäger. 2018. ‘Accomplishments and Limitations of the “New” Mainstream in Contemporary Populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.’ European Journal of Social Theory 21 (4): 547–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017723337.

Steffen, W., J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. McNeill. 2011. ‘The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369 (1938): 842–67. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.

Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1982. ‘Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers’. The American Sociologist 17 (1): 2–11. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490.

Sulkunen, P. 2010. ‘Agency and Power: The Contractual Illusion’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 13 (4): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377156.

Susen, Simon, and Bryan S. Turner, eds. 2014. The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. Vol. Key issues in modern sociology. London: Anthem Press.

Swyngedouw, Erik, and Henrik Ernstson. 2018. ‘Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-Biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene’. Theory, Culture & Society 35 (6): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, Heather Swanson, Elaine Gan, and Nils Bubandt, eds. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

VÁZQUEZ, ROLANDO. 2011. ‘Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence’. Journal of Historical Sociology 24 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x.

Verloo, M. 2006. ‘Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 211–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753.

Vintges, Karen. 2012. ‘Muslim Women in the Western Media: Foucault, Agency, Governmentality and Ethics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 19 (3): 283–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443476.

‘Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality’. n.d. European Journal of Women’s Studies. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality.

Walby, Sylvia. 1986. Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.

Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexities and Contested Modernities. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319.

Walby, Sylvia, Jo Armstrong, and Sofia Strid. 2012. ‘Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory’. Sociology 46 (2): 224–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.

Wallerstein, I. 2012. ‘Robinson’s Critical Appraisal Appraised’. International Sociology 27 (4): 524–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912445532.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2003. ‘Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines’. Current Anthropology 44 (4): 453–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/375868.

Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice, and Daniel Boyarin. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861.

WALLEY, CHRISTINE J. 2017. ‘Trump’s Election and the "white Working Class”: What We Missed’. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 231–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12473.

Walsh, Catherine. 2007a. ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 224–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.

———. 2007b. ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 224–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.

Ward, Colin. 2004. Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol. 116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weiner, Melissa F. 2018. ‘Decolonial Sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s Foundational Theoretical and Methodological Contributions’. Sociology Compass 12 (8). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12601.

Welz, Frank. 2009. ‘100 Years of Indian Sociology’. International Sociology 24 (5): 635–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909339270.

Werbner, P. 2013. ‘Everyday Multiculturalism: Theorising the Difference between “intersectionality” and “Multiple Identities”’. Ethnicities 13 (4): 401–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813483728.

Whitworth, Lauran. 2018. ‘Goodbye Gauley Mountain, Hello Eco-Camp: Queer Environmentalism in the Anthropocene’. Feminist Theory, July. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700118788684.

Wickham, Gary. 2006. ‘Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment’. Journal of Law and Society 33 (4): 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x.

Wolf, Eric R. and Silverman, Sydel. 2001. Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.

Worsley, Peter. 1964. The Third World. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Wynter, Sylvia. 2003. ‘Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument’. CR: The New Centennial Review 3 (3): 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.

Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.

Zander, Udo, Lena Zander, Seán Gaffney, and Jeanette Olsson. 2010. ‘Intersectionality as a New Perspective in International Business Research’. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26 (4): 457–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011.