[1]
Anthias, F. 2013. Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities. 13, 1 (Feb. 2013), 3–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463547.
[2]
Arat-Koç, S. 2018. Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology. (Mar. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2.
[3]
Arrighi, Giovanni 2010. The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times. Verso.
[4]
Askola, H. 2019. Wind from the North, don’t go forth? Gender equality and the rise of populist nationalism in Finland. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 26, 1 (Feb. 2019), 54–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817748341.
[5]
Aulenbacher, B. et al. 2018. Introduction: Towards a global sociology of care and care work. Current Sociology. 66, 4 (Jul. 2018), 495–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118765245.
[6]
Baert, Patrick and Silva, Filipe Carreira da 2010. Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. Polity.
[7]
BALTHAZAR, A.C. 2017. Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 220–224. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12471.
[8]
Barclay, H.B. 1997. Culture and anarchism. Freedom Press.
[9]
Barclay, H.B. and Comfort, A. 1990. People without government: an anthropology of anarchy. Kahn & Averill.
[10]
Barnard, A. Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan. Social evolution and history. 3, 1.
[11]
Barrett, Michèle and Phillips, Anne 1992. Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Stanford University Press.
[12]
Barrios, R.E. 2017. What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology. 46, 1 (Oct. 2017), 151–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635.
[13]
Basaure, M. 2011. An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory. 14, 3 (Aug. 2011), 361–381. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412350.
[14]
Bauer, A.M. and Bhan, M. 2018. Climate without nature: a critical anthropology of the anthropocene. Cambridge University Press.
[15]
Bhambra, G.K. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (Nov. 2017), S214–S232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
[16]
Bhambra, G.K. 2014. Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic.
[17]
Bhambra, G.K. 2014. Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic.
[18]
Bhambra, G.K. 2016. Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology. Sociology. 50, 5 (Oct. 2016), 960–966. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516647683.
[19]
Bhambra, G.K. and Santos, B. de S. 2017. Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology. Sociology. 51, 1 (Feb. 2017), 3–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674665.
[20]
Bilge, S. 2013. INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 10, 02 (2013), 405–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
[21]
Blim, M. 2000. Capitalisms in Late Modernity. Annual Review of Anthropology. 29, 1 (Oct. 2000), 25–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25.
[22]
Blokker, P. 2011. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory. 14, 3 (Aug. 2011), 251–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412344.
[23]
Bohrer, A. 2018. Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography. Historical Materialism. 26, 2 (Jul. 2018), 46–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001617.
[24]
Boland, T. 2013. Towards an anthropology of critique: The modern experience of liminality and crisis. Anthropological Theory. 13, 3 (Sep. 2013), 222–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613496731.
[25]
Boltanski, L. 2011. On critique: a sociology of emancipation. Polity Press.
[26]
Bonikowski, B. 8AD. Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (8AD), S181–S213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12325.
[27]
Bonneuil, C. et al. 2017. The shock of the anthropocene: the Earth, history, and us. Verso.
[28]
Bourdieu, P. 1989. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 7, 1 (Spring 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/202060.
[29]
Bourdieu, Pierre et al. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Polity.
[30]
Bourdieu, Pierre Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 7, 1, 14–25.
[31]
Bowden, G. 2017. An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie. 54, 1 (Feb. 2017), 48–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12138.
[32]
Brah, A. and Phoenix, A. 2004. Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 5, 3 (2004), 75–86.
[33]
Brenner, R. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review. 104, 25–92.
[34]
Brown, W. and ProQuest (Firm) 2005. Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.
[35]
Brubaker, R. 2017. Why populism? Theory and Society. 46, 5 (Nov. 2017), 357–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7.
[36]
Buier, N. 2014. The promise of an anarchist anthropology: the three burials of the anarchist project -. Studia ubb sociologia. LIX, 1 (2014), 73–90.
[37]
Burawoy, M. 2009. Challenges for a Global Sociology. Contexts. 8, 4 (Nov. 2009), 36–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36.
[38]
Burawoy, M. 2016. The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines. Sociology. 50, 5 (Oct. 2016), 949–959. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516629901.
[39]
Burchell, Graham et al. 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[40]
Burton, S. 2015. The Monstrous ‘White Theory Boy’: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge. Sociological Research Online. 20, 3 (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3746.
[41]
Calhoun, C.J. 2012. Contemporary sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
[42]
Calhoun, C.J. 2012. Contemporary sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
[43]
Calhoun, C.J. 2012. Contemporary sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
[44]
Calhoun, Craig J. 2012. Contemporary sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
[45]
Calhoun, Craig J. 2012. Contemporary sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
[46]
Callinicos, Alex 1999. Social theory: a historical introduction. Polity Press.
[47]
Callinicos, Alex 1999. Social theory: a historical introduction. Polity Press.
[48]
Callinicos, Alex 2006. The resources of critique. Polity.
[49]
Cannon, B. 2018. Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis. New Political Science. 40, 3 (Jul. 2018), 477–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187.
[50]
Carbin, M. and Edenheim, S. 2013. The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women’s Studies. 20, 3 (Aug. 2013), 233–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813484723.
[51]
Catherine E. Walsh 2002. The (Re)articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge. Nepantla: Views from South. 3, 1 (2002), 61–97.
[52]
Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 35, 2 (Jan. 2009), 197–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.
[53]
Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 35, 2 (Jan. 2009), 197–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.
[54]
Chandra Talpade Mohanty 1988. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review. 30 (1988), 61–88.
[55]
Chernilo, D. 2017. The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory. 20, 1 (Feb. 2017), 44–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016651874.
[56]
Chivers, B. et al. 2007. A student’s guide to presentations: making your presentation count. SAGE Publications.
[57]
Clark, N. 2014. Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review. 62, 1_suppl (Jun. 2014), 19–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12122.
[58]
Col, G. da et al. 2017. Why do we read the classics? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 7, 3 (Dec. 2017), 1–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.3.002.
[59]
Collins, R. 1997. A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology. 102, 6 (May 1997), 1558–1564. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/231126.
[60]
Connell, R. 2007. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Allen & Unwin.
[61]
Connell, R. et al. 2017. Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices. International Sociology. 32, 1 (Jan. 2017), 21–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916676913.
[62]
Connell, R.W. 1997. Why Is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology. 102, 6 (May 1997), 1511–1557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/231125.
[63]
Conty, A.F. 2018. The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. (Oct. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891.
[64]
Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989, 1.
[65]
Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 43, 6 (1991), 1241–1299.
[66]
Cronin, A. and King, A. 2010. Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults. Sociology. 44, 5 (Oct. 2010), 876–892. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375738.
[67]
Crutzen, P.J. and Stoermer, E.F. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter. 41, 17–18.
[68]
Davis, K. 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory. 9, 1 (Apr. 2008), 67–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.
[69]
Deem, A. 2018. Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement. Theory, Culture & Society. (Nov. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418807002.
[70]
Degnen, C. and Tyler, K. 2017. Amongst the disciplines: Anthropology, sociology, intersection and intersectionality. The Sociological Review. 65, 1_suppl (Mar. 2017), 35–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917693508.
[71]
Delanty, G. and Mota, A. 2017. Governing the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 20, 1 (Feb. 2017), 9–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535.
[72]
Della Faille, D. and McLaughlin, N. 2008. Sociology’s Global Challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 33, 3 (2008), 485–495.
[73]
Dowding, K. 2012. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power. 5, 1 (Apr. 2012), 119–135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.
[74]
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul 1983. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press.
[75]
Dunaway, W.A. and Clelland, D.A. 2017. Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality. Journal of World-Systems Research. 23, 2 (Aug. 2017), 399–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2017.598.
[76]
Dupuis-Deri, F. 2016. Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry. Anarchist Studies. 24, 1 (2016).
[77]
Dussel, E. 1993. Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). boundary 2. 20, 3 (Autumn 1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/303341.
[78]
EDWARDS, J. et al. 2017. Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 195–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12467.
[79]
Ellis, E.C. 2018. Anthropocene: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[80]
Elmgren, A. 2018. The double-edged sword: the political appropriation of the concept of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies. 23, 3 (Sep. 2018), 320–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940.
[81]
Eribon, Didier 1992. Michel Foucault. Faber and Faber.
[82]
Escobar, A. 2007. WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 179–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506.
[83]
EVANS, G. 2017. Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 215–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12470.
[84]
éZiézek, Slavoj 1999. The ticklish subject: an essay in political ontology. Verso.
[85]
Fabiani, J. 2011. Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De la critique. Precis de sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (pbk). European Journal of Social Theory. 14, 3 (Aug. 2011), 401–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412352.
[86]
Fassin, D. 2017. The endurance of critique. Anthropological Theory. 17, 1 (Mar. 2017), 4–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616688157.
[87]
Fassin, E. 2018. Populism Left and Right. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC.
[88]
Ferguson, J.M. 2018. Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 19, 3 (May 2018), 189–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559.
[89]
Foucault, M. et al. 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press.
[90]
Foucault, Michel and Gordon, Colin 1980. Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Press.
[91]
Foucault, Michel and Rabinow, Paul 1991. The Foucault reader. Penguin.
[92]
Frank, A.G. and American Council of Learned Societies 1998. ReOrient: global economy in the Asian Age. University of California Press.
[93]
Freeden, M. 2017. After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies. 22, 1 (Jan. 2017), 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813.
[94]
Gamper Sachse, D. 2018. Ambivalences of populism: The case of Catalan independentism. Social Science Information. (Nov. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018418811685.
[95]
Garrido, M. 2017. Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology. 123, 3 (Nov. 2017), 647–685. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/694076.
[96]
Go, J. ed. 2013. Decentering social theory. Emerald.
[97]
Go, J. ed. 2013. Decentering social theory. Emerald.
[98]
Go, J. ed. 2013. Decentering social theory. Emerald.
[99]
Go, J. ed. 2013. Decentering social theory. Emerald.
[100]
Go, J. 2013. Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work. Sociological Theory. 31, 1 (Mar. 2013), 49–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113477082.
[101]
Gökarıksel, S. 2017. The ends of revolution: capitalist de-democratization and nationalist populism in the east of Europe. Dialectical Anthropology. 41, 3 (Sep. 2017), 207–224. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7.
[102]
Goldfrank, W.L. 2015. Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method. Journal of World-Systems Research. 6, 2 (Aug. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.223.
[103]
Gordon, L. 2016. ‘Intersectionality’, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist. Gender & History. 28, 2 (Aug. 2016), 340–357. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12211.
[104]
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1973. For sociology: renewal and critique in sociology today. Allen Lane.
[105]
GRAEBER, D. 2014. Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 4, 3 (Dec. 2014), 73–88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.3.007.
[106]
Graeber, D. 2012. Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2, 2 (Sep. 2012), 105–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.007.
[107]
Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: the first 5,000 years. Melville House.
[108]
Graeber, D. 2004. Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC.
[109]
Graeber, D. 2007. Possibilities: essays on hierarchy, rebellion, and desire. AK Press.
[110]
Graeber, D. 2002. The new anarchists. New Left Review. 13, (2002).
[111]
Graeber, D. 2015. The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Melville House.
[112]
Green, S. et al. 2016. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 24, 4 (Nov. 2016), 478–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.
[113]
Green, S. et al. 2016. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 24, 4 (Nov. 2016), 478–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12331.
[114]
Gregory Sandstrom 2008. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 33, 3 (2008), 607–630.
[115]
Grosfoguel, R. 2007. THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 211–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514.
[116]
Grusin, R.A. ed. 2017. Anthropocene feminism. University of Minnesota Press.
[117]
Guillaumin, C. 1995. Racism, sexism, power and ideology. Routledge.
[118]
Gülalp, H. 1981. Frank and Wallerstein revisited: A contribution to Brenner’s critique. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 11, 2 (Jan. 1981), 169–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00472338185390131.
[119]
GUSTERSON, H. 2017. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 209–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12469.
[120]
Hammersley, M. 2005. Should Social Science Be Critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 35, 2 (Jun. 2005), 175–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105275279.
[121]
Hancock, A.-M. 2016. Intersectionality: an intellectual history. Oxford University Press.
[122]
Hann, C. 2017. The Anthropocene and anthropology. European Journal of Social Theory. 20, 1 (Feb. 2017), 183–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016649362.
[123]
Hann, C.M. 1993. Socialism: ideals, ideologies, and local practice. Routledge.
[124]
Haraway, D. et al. 2016. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 81, 3 (May 2016), 535–564. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
[125]
Haraway, D. et al. 2016. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 81, 3 (May 2016), 535–564. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
[126]
Harrison, Faye Venetia and Association of Black Anthropologists 1997. Decolonizing anthropology: moving further toward an anthropology of liberation. Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association.
[127]
Haugaard, M. 2010. Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 13, 4 (Oct. 2010), 419–438. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377152.
[128]
Head, L. 2018. Hope and grief in the anthropocene: re-conceptualising human-nature relations. Routledge.
[129]
Hearn, J. 2014. On the social evolution of power to/over. Journal of Political Power. 7, 2 (May 2014), 175–191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963.
[130]
Hearn, J. 2008. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power. 1, 1 (Apr. 2008), 37–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943406.
[131]
Hearn, Jonathan 2012. Theorizing power. Palgrave Macmillan.
[132]
Hecht, G. 2018. Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence. Cultural Anthropology. 33, 1 (Feb. 2018), 109–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.1.05.
[133]
Herkman, J. 2018. Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica. 61, 4 (Nov. 2018), 341–355. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816.
[134]
Hier, S.P. 2001. The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory. Race & Class. 42, 3 (Jan. 2001), 69–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396801423004.
[135]
High, H. 2012. Anthropology and anarchy: Romance, horror or science fiction? Critique of Anthropology. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 93–108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438426.
[136]
Hill Collins, P. and Bilge, S. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press.
[137]
Hornborg, A. 2017. Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology. 46, 2–3 (Jul. 2017), 61–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023.
[138]
How, A.R. 2011. Hermeneutics and the ‘classic’ problem in the human sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 24, 3 (May 2011), 47–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111405277.
[139]
Ilie, G. 2014. Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis. Revista de Stiinte Politice. 41 (2014), 232–240.
[140]
Ilmonen, K. 2019. Identity politics revisited: On Audre Lorde, intersectionality, and mobilizing writing styles. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 26, 1 (Feb. 2019), 7–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817702410.
[141]
Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher 2012. An invitation to social theory. Polity.
[142]
Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher 2012. An invitation to social theory. Polity.
[143]
Ionescu, G. and Gellner, E. 1970. Populism: its meanings and national characteristics. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[144]
Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie 1998. Contemporary feminist theories. Edinburgh University Press.
[145]
Jacobs, R.N. and Townsley, E. 2008. On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 33, 3 (2008), 497–520.
[146]
Jansen, R.S. 2011. Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory. 29, 2 (Jun. 2011), 75–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x.
[147]
Jones, P.K. 2018. Insights from the infamous. European Journal of Social Theory. (May 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018772507.
[148]
Juteau-Lee, D. 1995. Introduction: (Re)constructing the categories of ‘race’ and ‘sex’: the work of a precursor. Racism, sexism, power and ideology. Routledge.
[149]
Kadir, N. 2016. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press.
[150]
Kadir, N. 2016. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press.
[151]
Kalb, D. Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology. Focaal. 2014, 69, 113–134. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108.
[152]
Kinna, R. 2005. Anarchism: a beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications.
[153]
KNIGHT, D.M. 2017. Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 237–242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12474.
[154]
KOCH, I. 2017. What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 225–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12472.
[155]
Laclau, E. 2007. On populist reason. Verso.
[156]
Latour, B. 2014. Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History. 45, 1 (2014), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0003.
[157]
Latour, B. 2004. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 30, 2 (Jan. 2004), 225–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
[158]
Lawler, S. 2012. White like them: Whiteness and anachronistic space in representations of the English white working class. Ethnicities. 12, 4 (Aug. 2012), 409–426. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812448019.
[159]
Layder, Derek 2006. Understanding social theory. SAGE.
[160]
LEMKE, T. 2007. An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 8, 2 (Jan. 2007), 43–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.
[161]
Lemke, T. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism. 14, 3 (Sep. 2002), 49–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.
[162]
Lever, J. 2011. Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory. Sociology. 45, 1 (Feb. 2011), 86–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387193.
[163]
Levine-Rasky, C. 2011. Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities. 17, 2 (Mar. 2011), 239–253. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.558377.
[164]
Lewis, S.L. and Maslin, M. 2018. The human planet: how we created the anthropocene. Pelican.
[165]
LUGONES, M. 2007. Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia. 22, 1 (Feb. 2007), 186–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x.
[166]
LUGONES, M. 2010. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia. 25, 4 (Oct. 2010), 742–759. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.
[167]
LUGONES, MARÍA 2008. Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish). Tabula Rasa. 9 (2008), 73–102.
[168]
Luke, T.W. 2017. Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 20, 1 (Feb. 2017), 80–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647971.
[169]
Lukes, S. and British Sociological Association 2005. Power: a radical view. Palgrave Macmillan.
[170]
Macdonald, C. 2012. The Anthropology of Anarchy. Indian Journal of Human Development. 6, 1 (Jan. 2012), 49–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020120103.
[171]
Macey, David 1993. The lives of Michel Foucault. Hutchinson.
[172]
Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 240–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.
[173]
Marshall, Barbara L. and Witz, Anne 2004. Engendering the social: feminist encounters with sociological theory. Open University Press.
[174]
Marshall, P.H. 2009. Demanding the impossible: a history of anarchism : be realistic! Demand the impossible!. PM Press.
[175]
Martin, W.G. 2015. Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research. 6, 2 (Aug. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.222.
[176]
McCall, L. 2005. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30, 3 (Mar. 2005), 1771–1800. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.
[177]
McGRANAHAN, C. 2017. An anthropology of lying: Trump and the political sociality of moral outrage. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 243–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12475.
[178]
Menge, T. 2018. The role of power in social explanation. European Journal of Social Theory. 21, 1 (Feb. 2018), 22–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017714426.
[179]
Mignolo, W. and Walsh, C.E. 2018. On decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
[180]
Mignolo, W.D. Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry. 43, 38–45.
[181]
Mignolo, W.D. 2007. DELINKING. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 449–514. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
[182]
Mignolo, W.D. 2007. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 155–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498.
[183]
Mignolo, W.D. 2002. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly. 101, 1 (Jan. 2002), 57–96.
[184]
Mills, C.W. 2000. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
[185]
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade 2003. Feminism without borders: decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
[186]
Moore, A. 2016. Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 22, 1 (Mar. 2016), 27–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12332.
[187]
Moore, J.W. ed. 2016. Anthropocene or capitalocene?: nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
[188]
Moore, J.W. 2003. The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society. 32, 3 (2003), 307–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024404620759.
[189]
Morris, B. 2014. Anthropology, ecology, and anarchism: a Brian Morris reader. PM Press.
[190]
Mouffe, C. 2018. For a left populism. Verso.
[191]
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. 2017. Populism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[192]
Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism?. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[193]
Munck, R. 2016. Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 29, 3 (Sep. 2016), 233–249. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9.
[194]
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2015. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 13, 10 (Oct. 2015), 485–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.
[195]
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2015. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 13, 10 (Oct. 2015), 485–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12264.
[196]
Nugent, S. 2012. Anarchism out West: Some reflections on sources. Critique of Anthropology. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 206–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12437860.
[197]
Onwuzuruigbo, I. 2018. Indigenising Eurocentric sociology: The ‘captive mind’ and five decades of sociology in Nigeria. Current Sociology. 66, 6 (Oct. 2018), 831–848. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117704242.
[198]
Ortner, S.B. 2016. Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 6, 1 (Jun. 2016), 47–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004.
[199]
Palsson, G. et al. 2013. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 28, (Apr. 2013), 3–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.
[200]
Palsson, G. et al. 2013. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 28, (Apr. 2013), 3–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.
[201]
Patel, R. and Moore, J.W. 2017. A history of the world in seven cheap things. Oakland, California.
[202]
Patel, S. 2014. Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges. Current Sociology. 62, 4 (Jul. 2014), 603–613. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524514.
[203]
Patel, S. 2010. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. SAGE.
[204]
Patel, Sujata 2010. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. SAGE.
[205]
Patricia Hill Collins 1998. It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation. Hypatia. 13, 3 (1998), 62–82.
[206]
Pavel Sorokin Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision. Filosofija. Sociologija. 4, 323–330.
[207]
Phoenix, A. 2006. Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 13, 3 (Aug. 2006), 187–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751.
[208]
Pierson, P. 8AD. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (8AD), S105–S119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.
[209]
Pierson, P. 8AD. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (8AD), S105–S119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323.
[210]
Poncelet, L. 2002. Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center). 25, 1 (2002), 47–97.
[211]
Powell, K. 2017. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 41, 3 (Sep. 2017), 225–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.
[212]
Powell, K. 2017. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 41, 3 (Sep. 2017), 225–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.
[213]
Quijano, A. 2007. COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 168–178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.
[214]
Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 15, 2 (Jun. 2000), 215–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.
[215]
Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 15, 2 (Jun. 2000), 215–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.
[216]
Reinecke, J. 2018. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 39, 9 (Mar. 2018), 1299–1321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.
[217]
Reinecke, J. 2018. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 39, 9 (Mar. 2018), 1299–1321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.
[218]
Review by: Theda Skocpol 1977. Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. American Journal of Sociology. 82, 5 (1977), 1075–1090.
[219]
Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry 2001. Handbook of social theory. Sage.
[220]
Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas 1988. The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate. International Studies Quarterly. 32, 1 (1988), 47–65.
[221]
Robinson, A. and Tormey, S. 2012. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 143–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.
[222]
Robinson, A. and Tormey, S. 2012. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 143–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12438779.
[223]
Robinson, W.I. 2011. Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal. International Sociology. 26, 6 (May 2011), 723–745. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393372.
[224]
Romero, M. 2018. Introducing intersectionality. Polity Press.
[225]
ROSA, J. and BONILLA, Y. 2017. Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 201–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12468.
[226]
Rose, N. et al. 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2, 1 (Dec. 2006), 83–104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900.
[227]
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al. eds. 2017. The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
[228]
Russell, Bertrand 1938. Power: a new social analysis. Allen & Unwin.
[229]
Salem, S. 2016. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. (Apr. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.
[230]
Salem, S. 2018. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 25, 4 (Nov. 2018), 403–418. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999.
[231]
Santos, B. de S. 2008. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. Verso.
[232]
Santos, B. de S. 2008. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. Verso.
[233]
Santos, B. de S. 2008. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. Verso.
[234]
Santos, B. de S. 2008. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. Verso.
[235]
Santos, B. de S. 2016. Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
[236]
Sassen, Saskia 2007. Sociology of globalization. W.W. Norton & Company.
[237]
Savransky, M. 2017. A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality. Sociology. 51, 1 (Feb. 2017), 11–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516656983.
[238]
Sayer, A. 2009. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science? Current Sociology. 57, 6 (Nov. 2009), 767–786. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109342205.
[239]
Sayer, A. 2015. Why we can’t afford the rich. Policy Press.
[240]
Sayer, A. 2015. Why we can’t afford the rich. Policy Press.
[241]
Schiller, N.G. et al. 2017. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 17, 2 (Jun. 2017), 261–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.
[242]
Schiller, N.G. et al. 2017. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 17, 2 (Jun. 2017), 261–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617710992.
[243]
Schiller, N.G. 2016. Positioning theory: An introduction. Anthropological Theory. 16, 2–3 (Sep. 2016), 133–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616663792.
[244]
Schulze, F. 2013. Flirting with anarchism: Class, state, and anthropology. Focaal. 2013, 66 (Jan. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.660111.
[245]
Scott, J. 2006. Social theory: central issues in sociology. SAGE Publications.
[246]
Scott, J. 2006. Social theory: central issues in sociology. SAGE Publications.
[247]
Scott, J.C. 2014. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton University Press.
[248]
Seidman, Steven 2008. Contested knowledge: social theory today. Blackwell Pub.
[249]
Seidman, Steven 1996. Queer theory/sociology. Blackwell.
[250]
Shields, S. 2015. Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and its Alternatives. Critical Sociology. 41, 4–5 (Jul. 2015), 659–678. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501349.
[251]
Simon, Z.B. 2018. The limits of Anthropocene narratives. European Journal of Social Theory. (Sep. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018799256.
[252]
Sitas, A. 2014. Rethinking Africa’s sociological project. Current Sociology. 62, 4 (Jul. 2014), 457–471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524505.
[253]
Smith, D.E. 1990. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Northeastern University Press.
[254]
Smith, Dorothy E. 2005. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. AltaMira Press.
[255]
Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Northeastern University Press.
[256]
Sohoni, D. and Petrovic, M. 2010. Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum. Teaching Sociology. 38, 4 (2010), 287–300.
[257]
Sorokin, P. 2016. ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives. Current Sociology. 64, 1 (Jan. 2016), 41–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115601462.
[258]
Sorokin, P. 2018. Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies. Sociological Research Online. 23, 1 (Mar. 2018), 21–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417743873.
[259]
SpringerLink (Online Service) 2015. Understanding the dynamics of global inequality: social exclusion, power shift, and structural changes. Springer.
[260]
Ssorin-Chaikov, N. 2012. Writing power: An anarchist anthropologist in the looking glass of critical theory. Critique of Anthropology. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 189–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12439486.
[261]
Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue 1993. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. Ebooks Corporation Limited.
[262]
Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue 1993. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. Routledge & K. Paul.
[263]
Stavrakakis, Y. and Jäger, A. 2018. Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. European Journal of Social Theory. 21, 4 (Nov. 2018), 547–565. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017723337.
[264]
Steffen, W. et al. 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369, 1938 (Mar. 2011), 842–867. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
[265]
Stinchcombe, A.L. 1982. Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers. The American Sociologist. 17, 1 (1982), 2–11.
[266]
Sulkunen, P. 2010. Agency and power: The contractual illusion. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 13, 4 (Oct. 2010), 495–510. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377156.
[267]
Susen, S. and Turner, B.S. eds. 2014. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. Anthem Press.
[268]
Swyngedouw, E. and Ernstson, H. 2018. Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. 35, 6 (Nov. 2018), 3–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314.
[269]
Tsing, A.L. et al. eds. 2017. Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press.
[270]
VÁZQUEZ, R. 2011. Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence. Journal of Historical Sociology. 24, 1 (Mar. 2011), 27–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x.
[271]
Verloo, M. 2006. Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 13, 3 (Aug. 2006), 211–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753.
[272]
Vintges, K. 2012. Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 19, 3 (Jul. 2012), 283–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443476.
[273]
Walby, S. 2009. Globalization and inequalities: complexities and contested modernities. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[274]
Walby, S. et al. 2012. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology. 46, 2 (Apr. 2012), 224–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.
[275]
Walby, Sylvia 1986. Patriarchy at work: patriarchal and capitalist relations in employment. Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.
[276]
Wallerstein, I. 2003. Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines. Current Anthropology. 44, 4 (Aug. 2003), 453–465. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/375868.
[277]
Wallerstein, I. 2012. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised. International Sociology. 27, 4 (Jul. 2012), 524–528. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912445532.
[278]
Wallerstein, I.M. and Boyarin, D. 2004. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Duke University Press.
[279]
WALLEY, C.J. 2017. Trump’s election and the "white working class”: What we missed. American Ethnologist. 44, 2 (May 2017), 231–236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12473.
[280]
Walsh, C. 2007. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 224–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.
[281]
Walsh, C. 2007. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 224–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162530.
[282]
Ward, C. 2004. Anarchism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[283]
Weiner, M.F. 2018. Decolonial sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s foundational theoretical and methodological contributions. Sociology Compass. 12, 8 (Aug. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12601.
[284]
Welz, F. 2009. 100 Years of Indian Sociology. International Sociology. 24, 5 (Sep. 2009), 635–655. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909339270.
[285]
Werbner, P. 2013. Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between ‘intersectionality’ and ‘multiple identities’. Ethnicities. 13, 4 (Aug. 2013), 401–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813483728.
[286]
Whitworth, L. 2018. Goodbye Gauley Mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Feminist Theory. (Jul. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700118788684.
[287]
Wickham, G. 2006. Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment. Journal of Law and Society. 33, 4 (Dec. 2006), 596–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x.
[288]
Wolf, Eric R. and Silverman, Sydel 2001. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. University of California Press.
[289]
Worsley, P. 1964. The third world. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[290]
Wynter, S. 2003. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument. CR: The New Centennial Review. 3, 3 (2003), 257–337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
[291]
Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 13, 3 (Aug. 2006), 193–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.
[292]
Zander, U. et al. 2010. Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 26, 4 (Dec. 2010), 457–466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011.
[293]
2008. Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today. 18, 2 (2008).
[294]
Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016).
[295]
Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization. Theory, Culture & Society.
[296]
Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies.
