1.
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
2.
Baert, Patrick, Silva, Filipe Carreira da. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. 2nd ed. Polity; 2010.
3.
Callinicos, Alex. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Polity Press; 1999.
4.
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An Invitation to Social Theory. Polity; 2012.
5.
Layder, Derek. Understanding Social Theory. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2006.
6.
Scott J. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. SAGE Publications; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
7.
Seidman, Steven. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. 4th ed. Blackwell Pub; 2008.
8.
Ritzer, George, Smart, Barry. Handbook of Social Theory. Sage; 2001.
9.
Chivers B, Shoolbred M, ProQuest (Firm). A Student’s Guide to Presentations: Making Your Presentation Count. SAGE Publications; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910
10.
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
11.
Stinchcombe AL. Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers. The American Sociologist. 1982;17(1):2-11. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490
12.
Marshall, Barbara L., Witz, Anne. Engendering the Social: Feminist Encounters with Sociological Theory. Open University Press; 2004. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344
13.
Barrett, Michèle, Phillips, Anne. Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Stanford University Press; 1992.
14.
Burton S. The Monstrous ‘White Theory Boy’: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge. Sociological Research Online. 2015;20(3). doi:10.5153/sro.3746
15.
Callinicos, Alex. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Polity Press; 1999.
16.
Col G da, Sopranzetti C, Myers F, et al. Why do we read the classics? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2017;7(3):1-38. doi:10.14318/hau7.3.002
17.
Schiller NG. Positioning theory: An introduction. Anthropological Theory. 2016;16(2-3):133-145. doi:10.1177/1463499616663792
18.
Gouldner, Alvin W. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Allen Lane; 1973.
19.
Graeber D. Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. AK Press; 2007.
20.
Guillaumin C. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. Vol Critical studies in racism and migration. Routledge; 1995. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0
21.
Harrison, Faye Venetia, Association of Black Anthropologists. Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further toward an Anthropology of Liberation. 2nd ed. Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association; 1997.
22.
How AR. Hermeneutics and the ‘classic’ problem in the human sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 2011;24(3):47-63. doi:10.1177/0952695111405277
23.
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An Invitation to Social Theory. Polity; 2012.
24.
Jackson, Stevi, Jones, Jackie. Contemporary Feminist Theories. Edinburgh University Press; 1998.
25.
Mills CW. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661
26.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Duke University Press; 2003.
27.
Patel, Sujata. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. Vol Sage studies in international sociology. SAGE; 2010.
28.
Scott J. Social Theory: Central Issues in Sociology. SAGE Publications; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
29.
Seidman, Steven. Queer Theory/Sociology. Vol Twentieth-century social theory. Blackwell; 1996.
30.
Dowding K. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power. 2012;5(1):119-135. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917
31.
Hearn J. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power. 2008;1(1):37-49. doi:10.1080/17540290801943406
32.
Lukes S, British Sociological Association. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed., expanded. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503
33.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 7(1):14-25. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060
34.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Bourdieu, Pierre, Thompson, John B. Language and Symbolic Power. Polity; 1991.
35.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., Rabinow, Paul. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press; 1983.
36.
Eribon, Didier. Michel Foucault. Faber and Faber; 1992.
37.
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, Miller, Peter, Foucault, Michel. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
38.
Foucault, Michel, Gordon, Colin. Power-Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Press; 1980.
39.
Haugaard M. Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2010;13(4):419-438. doi:10.1177/1367549410377152
40.
Hearn, Jonathan. Theorizing Power. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
41.
Hearn J. On the social evolution of power to/over. Journal of Political Power. 2014;7(2):175-191. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963
42.
LEMKE T. An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2007;8(2):43-64. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946
43.
Lemke T. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism. 2002;14(3):49-64. doi:10.1080/089356902101242288
44.
Lever J. Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory. Sociology. 2011;45(1):86-101. doi:10.1177/0038038510387193
45.
Macey, David. The Lives of Michel Foucault. Hutchinson; 1993.
46.
Menge T. The role of power in social explanation. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018;21(1):22-38. doi:10.1177/1368431017714426
47.
Foucault, Michel, Rabinow, Paul. The Foucault Reader. Penguin; 1991.
48.
Rose N, O’Malley P, Valverde M. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2006;2(1):83-104. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
49.
Russell, Bertrand. Power: A New Social Analysis. Allen & Unwin; 1938.
50.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
51.
Smith, Dorothy E. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Vol The Northeastern series in feminist theory. Northeastern University Press; 1990.
52.
Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Vol The gender lens series. AltaMira Press; 2005.
53.
Sulkunen P. Agency and power: The contractual illusion. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2010;13(4):495-510. doi:10.1177/1367549410377156
54.
Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization. Theory, Culture & Society. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6
55.
Vintges K. Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2012;19(3):283-298. doi:10.1177/1350506812443476
56.
Wickham G. Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment. Journal of Law and Society. 2006;33(4):596-614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x
57.
Hammersley M. Should Social Science Be Critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2005;35(2):175-195. doi:10.1177/0048393105275279
58.
Fassin D. The endurance of critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017;17(1):4-29. doi:10.1177/1463499616688157
59.
Sayer A. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science? Current Sociology. 2009;57(6):767-786. doi:10.1177/0011392109342205
60.
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017;17(2):261-261. doi:10.1177/1463499617710992
61.
Basaure M. An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory. 2011;14(3):361-381. doi:10.1177/1368431011412350
62.
Blokker P. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory. 2011;14(3):251-261. doi:10.1177/1368431011412344
63.
Santos B de S. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol v. 3. Verso; 2008.
64.
Boland T. Towards an anthropology of critique: The modern experience of liminality and crisis. Anthropological Theory. 2013;13(3):222-239. doi:10.1177/1463499613496731
65.
Boltanski L. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Polity Press; 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551
66.
Brown W, ProQuest (Firm). Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press; 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457
67.
Callinicos, Alex. The Resources of Critique. Polity; 2006.
68.
Fabiani J. Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De la critique. Precis de sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (pbk). European Journal of Social Theory. 2011;14(3):401-406. doi:10.1177/1368431011412352
69.
Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016). https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2
70.
Latour B. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 2004;30(2):225-248. doi:10.1086/421123
71.
Ortner SB. Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2016;6(1):47-73. doi:10.14318/hau6.1.004
72.
Sayer A. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Policy Press; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
73.
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. Ebooks Corporation Limited; 1993. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
74.
Susen S, Turner BS, eds. The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. Vol Key issues in modern sociology. Anthem Press; 2014.
75.
éZiézek, Slavoj. The Ticklish Subject: An Essay in Political Ontology. Vol Wo es war. Verso; 1999.
76.
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989(1). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
77.
Hill Collins P, Bilge S. Intersectionality. Vol Key Concepts Series. Polity Press; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012
78.
Walby S. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexities and Contested Modernities. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319
79.
Anthias F. Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities. 2013;13(1):3-19. doi:10.1177/1468796812463547
80.
Bilge S. INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2013;10(02):405-424. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000283
81.
Bohrer A. Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography. Historical Materialism. 2018;26(2):46-74. doi:10.1163/1569206X-00001617
82.
Brah A, Phoenix A. Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 2004;5(3):75-86. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8
83.
Carbin M, Edenheim S. The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2013;20(3):233-248. doi:10.1177/1350506813484723
84.
Patricia Hill Collins. It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation. Hypatia. 1998;13(3):62-82. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699
85.
Crenshaw K. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 1991;43(6):1241-1299. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
86.
Davis K. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory. 2008;9(1):67-85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364
87.
Dupuis-Deri F. Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry. Anarchist Studies. 2016;24(1). https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist
88.
Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality
89.
Gordon L. ‘Intersectionality’, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist. Gender & History. 2016;28(2):340-357. doi:10.1111/1468-0424.12211
90.
Hancock AM. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001
91.
Juteau-Lee D. Introduction: (Re)constructing the categories of ‘race’ and ‘sex’: the work of a precursor. In: Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. Vol Critical studies in racism and migration. Routledge; 1995.
92.
Lawler S. White like them: Whiteness and anachronistic space in representations of the English white working class. Ethnicities. 2012;12(4):409-426. doi:10.1177/1468796812448019
93.
McCall L. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2005;30(3):1771-1800. doi:10.1086/426800
94.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review. 1988;(30):61-88. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054
95.
Phoenix A. Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006;13(3):187-192. doi:10.1177/1350506806065751
96.
Romero M. Introducing Intersectionality. Polity Press; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452
97.
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. Published online 22 April 2016. doi:10.1177/1350506816643999
98.
Verloo M. Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006;13(3):211-228. doi:10.1177/1350506806065753
99.
Walby, Sylvia. Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment. Polity in association with Basil Blackwell; 1986.
100.
Walby S, Armstrong J, Strid S. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology. 2012;46(2):224-240. doi:10.1177/0038038511416164
101.
Werbner P. Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between ‘intersectionality’ and ‘multiple identities’. Ethnicities. 2013;13(4):401-419. doi:10.1177/1468796813483728
102.
Yuval-Davis N. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006;13(3):193-209. doi:10.1177/1350506806065752
103.
Goldfrank WL. Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2015;6(2). doi:10.5195/jwsr.2000.223
104.
Sassen, Saskia. Sociology of Globalization. Vol Contemporary societies. W.W. Norton & Company; 2007. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
105.
Wallerstein IM, Boyarin D. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press; 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861
106.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
107.
Arrighi, Giovanni. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. New and updated ed. Verso; 2010.
108.
Blim M. Capitalisms in Late Modernity. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2000;29(1):25-38. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25
109.
Santos B de S. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol v. 3. Verso; 2008.
110.
Brenner R. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review. (104):25-92. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism
111.
Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas. The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate. International Studies Quarterly. 1988;32(1):47-65. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412
112.
Frank AG, American Council of Learned Societies. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. University of California Press; 1998. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038
113.
Gülalp H. Frank and Wallerstein revisited: A contribution to Brenner’s critique. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 1981;11(2):169-188. doi:10.1080/00472338185390131
114.
Hier SP. The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory. Race & Class. 2001;42(3):69-86. doi:10.1177/0306396801423004
115.
Martin WG. Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2015;6(2). doi:10.5195/jwsr.2000.222
116.
Moore JW. The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society. 2003;32(3):307-377. doi:10.1023/A:1024404620759
117.
Poncelet L. Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center). 2002;25(1):47-97. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731
118.
Robinson WI. Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal. International Sociology. 2011;26(6):723-745. doi:10.1177/0268580910393372
119.
Review by: Theda Skocpol. Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. American Journal of Sociology. 1977;82(5):1075-1090. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814
120.
Wallerstein I. Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines. Current Anthropology. 2003;44(4):453-465. doi:10.1086/375868
121.
Wallerstein I. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised. International Sociology. 2012;27(4):524-528. doi:10.1177/0268580912445532
122.
Wolf, Eric R., Silverman, Sydel. Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. University of California Press; 2001.
123.
Connell R. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Allen & Unwin; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120
124.
Bhambra GK. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic; 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
125.
Patel S. Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges. Current Sociology. 2014;62(4):603-613. doi:10.1177/0011392114524514
126.
Aulenbacher B, Lutz H, Riegraf B. Introduction: Towards a global sociology of care and care work. Current Sociology. 2018;66(4):495-502. doi:10.1177/0011392118765245
127.
Bhambra GK. Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology. Sociology. 2016;50(5):960-966. doi:10.1177/0038038516647683
128.
Bhambra GK, Santos B de S. Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology. Sociology. 2017;51(1):3-10. doi:10.1177/0038038516674665
129.
Santos B de S. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol v. 3. Verso; 2008.
130.
Burawoy M. Challenges for a Global Sociology. Contexts. 2009;8(4):36-41. doi:10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36
131.
Burawoy M. The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines. Sociology. 2016;50(5):949-959. doi:10.1177/0038038516629901
132.
Connell RW. Why Is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology. 1997;102(6):1511-1557. doi:10.1086/231125
133.
Connell R, Collyer F, Maia J, Morrell R. Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices. International Sociology. 2017;32(1):21-37. doi:10.1177/0268580916676913
134.
Patel S. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. SAGE; 2010.
135.
Go J, ed. Decentering Social Theory. Vol volume 25. Emerald; 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
136.
Della Faille D, McLaughlin N. Sociology’s Global Challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 2008;33(3):485-495. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485
137.
Jacobs RN, Townsley E. On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 2008;33(3):497-520. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497
138.
Munck R. Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 2016;29(3):233-249. doi:10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9
139.
Gregory Sandstrom. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. 2008;33(3):607-630. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607
140.
Sohoni D, Petrovic M. Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum. Teaching Sociology. 2010;38(4):287-300. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545
141.
Sorokin P. ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives. Current Sociology. 2016;64(1):41-59. doi:10.1177/0011392115601462
142.
Pavel Sorokin. Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision. Filosofija Sociologija. (4):323-330. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183
143.
Sorokin P. Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies. Sociological Research Online. 2018;23(1):21-42. doi:10.1177/1360780417743873
144.
Welz F. 100 Years of Indian Sociology. International Sociology. 2009;24(5):635-655. doi:10.1177/0268580909339270
145.
Mignolo W, Walsh CE. On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press; 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779
146.
Quijano A. COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):168-178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
147.
Savransky M. A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality. Sociology. 2017;51(1):11-26. doi:10.1177/0038038516656983
148.
Bhambra GK. Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury Academic; 2014.
149.
Santos B de S. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Vol v. 3. Verso; 2008.
150.
Dussel E. Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). boundary 2. 1993;20(3). doi:10.2307/303341
151.
Escobar A. WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):179-210. doi:10.1080/09502380601162506
152.
Grosfoguel R. THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):211-223. doi:10.1080/09502380601162514
153.
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):240-270. doi:10.1080/09502380601162548
154.
Mignolo WD. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly. 2002;101(1):57-96. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745
155.
Mignolo WD. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):155-167. doi:10.1080/09502380601162498
156.
Mignolo WD. DELINKING. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):449-514. doi:10.1080/09502380601162647
157.
Mignolo WD. Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry. 43:38-45. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552
158.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 2015;13(10):485-496. doi:10.1111/hic3.12264
159.
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 2000;15(2):215-232. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005
160.
Sitas A. Rethinking Africa’s sociological project. Current Sociology. 2014;62(4):457-471. doi:10.1177/0011392114524505
161.
VÁZQUEZ R. Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence. Journal of Historical Sociology. 2011;24(1):27-44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x
162.
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):224-239. doi:10.1080/09502380601162530
163.
Catherine E. Walsh. The (Re)articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge. Nepantla: Views from South. 2002;3(1):61-97. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948
164.
Weiner MF. Decolonial sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s foundational theoretical and methodological contributions. Sociology Compass. 2018;12(8). doi:10.1111/soc4.12601
165.
Wynter S. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument. CR: The New Centennial Review. 2003;3(3):257-337. doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
166.
Bauer AM, Bhan M. Climate without Nature: A Critical Anthropology of the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633
167.
Luke TW. Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017;20(1):80-94. doi:10.1177/1368431016647971
168.
Moore JW, ed. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. PM Press; 2016. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
169.
Barrios RE. What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2017;46(1):151-166. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635
170.
Bonneuil C, Fressoz JB, Fernbach D. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History, and Us. Paperback edition. Verso; 2017.
171.
Bowden G. An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie. 2017;54(1):48-68. doi:10.1111/cars.12138
172.
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 2009;35(2):197-222. doi:10.1086/596640
173.
Chernilo D. The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017;20(1):44-60. doi:10.1177/1368431016651874
174.
Clark N. Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review. 2014;62(1_suppl):19-37. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12122
175.
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter. 41:17-18. http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf
176.
Delanty G, Mota A. Governing the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017;20(1):9-38. doi:10.1177/1368431016668535
177.
Ferguson JM. Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 2018;19(3):189-196. doi:10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559
178.
Grusin RA, ed. Anthropocene Feminism. University of Minnesota Press; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552
179.
Hann C. The Anthropocene and anthropology. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017;20(1):183-196. doi:10.1177/1368431016649362
180.
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, Olwig K, Tsing AL, Bubandt N. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 2016;81(3):535-564. doi:10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838
181.
Head L. Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene: Re-Conceptualising Human-Nature Relations. Paperback edition. Routledge; 2018.
182.
Hecht G. Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence. Cultural Anthropology. 2018;33(1):109-141. doi:10.14506/ca33.1.05
183.
Hornborg A. Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology. 2017;46(2-3):61-77. doi:10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023
184.
Latour B. Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History. 2014;45(1):1-18. doi:10.1353/nlh.2014.0003
185.
Moore A. Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2016;22(1):27-46. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12332
186.
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, et al. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 2013;28:3-13. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
187.
Patel R, Moore JW. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things. Oakland, California; 2017.
188.
Tsing AL, Swanson H, Gan E, Bubandt N, eds. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press; 2017.
189.
Whitworth L. Goodbye Gauley Mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Feminist Theory. Published online 24 July 2018. doi:10.1177/1464700118788684
190.
Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today. 2008;18(2). https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf
191.
Morris B. Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader. PM Press; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827
192.
High H. Anthropology and anarchy: Romance, horror or science fiction? Critique of Anthropology. 2012;32(2):93-108. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438426
193.
Macdonald C. The Anthropology of Anarchy. Indian Journal of Human Development. 2012;6(1):49-66. doi:10.1177/0973703020120103
194.
Kinna R. Anarchism: A Beginner’s Guide. Oneworld Publications; 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182
195.
Marshall PH. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism : Be Realistic! Demand the Impossible! PM Press; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618
196.
Ward C. Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 116. Oxford University Press; 2004.
197.
Barclay HB, Comfort A. People without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy. Completely revised edition. Kahn & Averill; 1990.
198.
Barclay HB. Culture and Anarchism. Freedom Press; 1997.
199.
Hann CM. Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. Vol 31. Routledge; 1993.
200.
Barnard A. Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan. Social evolution and history. 3(1). https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/
201.
Buier N. The promise of an anarchist anthropology: the three burials of the anarchist project -. Studia ubb sociologia. 2014;LIX(1):73-90. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603
202.
Graeber D. The new anarchists. New Left Review. 2002;13. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists
203.
Graeber D. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Vol 14. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC; 2004.
204.
Graeber D. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Melville House; 2011.
205.
Graeber D. Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2012;2(2):105-128. doi:10.14318/hau2.2.007
206.
GRAEBER D. Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2014;4(3):73-88. doi:10.14318/hau4.3.007
207.
Graeber D. The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Melville House; 2015.
208.
Kadir N. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press; 2016.
209.
Kalb D. Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology. Focaal. 2014(69):113-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108
210.
Nugent S. Anarchism out West: Some reflections on sources. Critique of Anthropology. 2012;32(2):206-216. doi:10.1177/0308275X12437860
211.
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 2018;39(9):1299-1321. doi:10.1177/0170840618759815
212.
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 2012;32(2):143-157. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438779
213.
Schulze F. Flirting with anarchism: Class, state, and anthropology. Focaal. 2013;2013(66). doi:10.3167/fcl.2013.660111
214.
Scott JC. Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton University Press; 2014.
215.
Ssorin-Chaikov N. Writing power: An anarchist anthropologist in the looking glass of critical theory. Critique of Anthropology. 2012;32(2):189-205. doi:10.1177/0308275X12439486
216.
GUSTERSON H. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):209-214. doi:10.1111/amet.12469
217.
Jones PK. Insights from the infamous. European Journal of Social Theory. Published online 31 May 2018. doi:10.1177/1368431018772507
218.
Ionescu G, Gellner E. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1970. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
219.
Worsley P. The Third World. Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1964.
220.
Arat-Koç S. Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology. Published online 14 March 2018. doi:10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2
221.
BALTHAZAR AC. Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):220-224. doi:10.1111/amet.12471
222.
Bhambra GK. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology. 2017;68:S214-S232. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12317
223.
Bonikowski B. Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology. 8AD;68:S181-S213. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12325
224.
Brubaker R. Why populism? Theory and Society. 2017;46(5):357-385. doi:10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
225.
EDWARDS J, HAUGERUD A, PARIKH S. Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):195-200. doi:10.1111/amet.12467
226.
EVANS G. Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):215-219. doi:10.1111/amet.12470
227.
Fassin E. Populism Left and Right. Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC; 2018.
228.
Garrido M. Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology. 2017;123(3):647-685. doi:10.1086/694076
229.
Gökarıksel S. The ends of revolution: capitalist de-democratization and nationalist populism in the east of Europe. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017;41(3):207-224. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7
230.
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, et al. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 2016;24(4):478-502. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12331
231.
Jansen RS. Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory. 2011;29(2):75-96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
232.
Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart PA, Ochoa Espejo P, Ostiguy P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
233.
KNIGHT DM. Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):237-242. doi:10.1111/amet.12474
234.
KOCH I. What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):225-230. doi:10.1111/amet.12472
235.
Laclau E. On Populist Reason. Verso; 2007.
236.
McGRANAHAN C. An anthropology of lying: Trump and the political sociality of moral outrage. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):243-248. doi:10.1111/amet.12475
237.
Mouffe C. For a Left Populism. Verso; 2018.
238.
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 510. Oxford University Press; 2017.
239.
Müller JW. What Is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016.
240.
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology. 8AD;68:S105-S119. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12323
241.
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017;41(3):225-240. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2
242.
ROSA J, BONILLA Y. Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):201-208. doi:10.1111/amet.12468
243.
Shields S. Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and its Alternatives. Critical Sociology. 2015;41(4-5):659-678. doi:10.1177/0896920513501349
244.
WALLEY CJ. Trump’s election and the "white working class”: What we missed. American Ethnologist. 2017;44(2):231-236. doi:10.1111/amet.12473
245.
Onwuzuruigbo I. Indigenising Eurocentric sociology: The ‘captive mind’ and five decades of sociology in Nigeria. Current Sociology. 2018;66(6):831-848. doi:10.1177/0011392117704242
246.
Simon ZB. The limits of Anthropocene narratives. European Journal of Social Theory. Published online 18 September 2018. doi:10.1177/1368431018799256
247.
Lewis SL, Maslin M. The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene. Vol 20. Pelican; 2018.
248.
Ellis EC. Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 558. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
249.
Stavrakakis Y, Jäger A. Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018;21(4):547-565. doi:10.1177/1368431017723337
250.
Degnen C, Tyler K. Amongst the disciplines: Anthropology, sociology, intersection and intersectionality. The Sociological Review. 2017;65(1_suppl):35-53. doi:10.1177/0081176917693508
251.
Swyngedouw E, Ernstson H. Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. 2018;35(6):3-30. doi:10.1177/0263276418757314
252.
Herkman J. Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica. 2018;61(4):341-355. doi:10.1177/0001699317737816
253.
Collins R. A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology. 1997;102(6):1558-1564. doi:10.1086/231126
254.
Conty AF. The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. Published online 11 October 2018. doi:10.1177/0263276418802891
255.
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2018;25(4):403-418. doi:10.1177/1350506816643999
256.
LUGONES M. Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia. 2007;22(1):186-219. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x
257.
LUGONES, MARÍA. Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish). Tabula Rasa. 2008;(9):73-102. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006
258.
LUGONES M. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia. 2010;25(4):742-759. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
259.
Santos B de S. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge; 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876
260.
Go J. Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work. Sociological Theory. 2013;31(1):49-74. doi:10.1177/0735275113477082
261.
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2011;369(1938):842-867. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
262.
Freeden M. After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2017;22(1):1-11. doi:10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
263.
Cannon B. Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis. New Political Science. 2018;40(3):477-496. doi:10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187
264.
Elmgren A. The double-edged sword: the political appropriation of the concept of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2018;23(3):320-341. doi:10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940
265.
Gamper Sachse D. Ambivalences of populism: The case of Catalan independentism. Social Science Information. Published online 16 November 2018. doi:10.1177/0539018418811685
266.
Deem A. Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement. Theory, Culture & Society. Published online 18 November 2018. doi:10.1177/0263276418807002
267.
Askola H. Wind from the North, don’t go forth? Gender equality and the rise of populist nationalism in Finland. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2019;26(1):54-69. doi:10.1177/1350506817748341
268.
Ilmonen K. Identity politics revisited: On Audre Lorde, intersectionality, and mobilizing writing styles. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2019;26(1):7-22. doi:10.1177/1350506817702410
269.
Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 1989;7(1). doi:10.2307/202060
270.
Foucault M, Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality : With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press; 1991.
271.
Smith DE. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Northeastern University Press; 1990.
272.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
273.
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017;17(2):261-261. doi:10.1177/1463499617710992
274.
Sayer A. Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Policy Press; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
275.
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out Again : Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. Routledge & K. Paul; 1993. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
276.
Cronin A, King A. Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults. Sociology. 2010;44(5):876-892. doi:10.1177/0038038510375738
277.
Zander U, Zander L, Gaffney S, Olsson J. Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2010;26(4):457-466. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011
278.
Levine-Rasky C. Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities. 2011;17(2):239-253. doi:10.1080/13504630.2011.558377
279.
Dunaway WA, Clelland DA. Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2017;23(2):399-464. doi:10.5195/JWSR.2017.598
280.
SpringerLink (Online Service). Understanding the Dynamics of Global Inequality: Social Exclusion, Power Shift, and Structural Changes. (Lenger A, Schumacher F, eds.). Springer; 2015. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6
281.
Ilie G. Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis. Revista de Stiinte Politice. 2014;(41):232-240. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540
282.
Go J, ed. Decentering Social Theory. Vol volume 25. Emerald; 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
283.
Go J, ed. Decentering Social Theory. Vol volume 25. Emerald; 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
284.
Go J, ed. Decentering Social Theory. Vol volume 25. Emerald; 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
285.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 2015;13(10):485-496. doi:10.1111/hic3.12264
286.
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 2000;15(2):215-232. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005
287.
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 2007;21(2-3):224-239. doi:10.1080/09502380601162530
288.
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 2009;35(2):197-222. doi:10.1086/596640
289.
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, Olwig K, Tsing AL, Bubandt N. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 2016;81(3):535-564. doi:10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838
290.
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, et al. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 2013;28:3-13. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
291.
Kadir N. The Autonomous Life?: Paradoxes of Hierarchy and Authority in the Squatters Movement in Amsterdam. Manchester University Press; 2016.
292.
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 2018;39(9):1299-1321. doi:10.1177/0170840618759815
293.
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 2012;32(2):143-157. doi:10.1177/0308275X12438779
294.
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, et al. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 2016;24(4):478-502. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12331
295.
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology. 8AD;68:S105-S119. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12323
296.
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017;41(3):225-240. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2
