Bibliography for Politics of Foreign Policy BETA

Abelson, D. E. (2014). Old world, new world: the evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs, 90(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12099

Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, P. (2001). Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour’s ‘Third Way’ in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Studies, 49(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00312

Agathangelou, A. M., & Ling, L. H. M. (2004). Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly, 48(3), 517–538. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521

Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2012). Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.

Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 689–718. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1954423

Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed). Longman.

American Political Science Association & JSTOR (Organization). (2003). Perspectives on politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2203859

Arnold Wolfers. (1952). ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67(4), 481–502. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138

Baehr, P. R., & Castermans-Holleman, M. C. (2004). The role of human rights in foreign policy (Third edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Barnett, M. (1999). Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005001001

Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117812

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (5th ed). Oxford University Press.

Beard, C. A., & Smith, G. H. E. (1934). The idea of national interest: an analytical study in American foreign policy. Macmillan.

Beardsworth, R. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Polity Press.

Beitz, C. R. (1999). Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press.

Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Project MUSE., & Thomson Gale (Firm). (n.d.). International security. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200670

Bendor, J., & Hammond, T. H. (1992). Rethinking Allison’s Models. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 301–322. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964222

Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens: Vol. Series: The John Robert Seeley lectures. Cambridge University Press.

Bennett, D. S., & Nordstrom, T. (2000). Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(1), 33–61. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174621

Berejikian, J. D. (2002). Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations. Political Psychology, 23(4), 759–786. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792366

Betts, R. K. (n.d.). The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs, 73(6). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290286683/abstract/C39C5610F46A4868PQ/1?accountid=14540

Bevir, M., & Daddow, O. (2015). Interpreting foreign policy: National, comparative and regional studies. International Relations, 29(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600930

Bjereld, U., & Ekengren, A.-M. (1999). Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden. International Studies Quarterly, 43(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00132

Blanton, S. L. (1996). Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador. International Studies Quarterly, 40(1), 23–44. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600930

Brawley, M. R. (1997). Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 633–653. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600856

British International Studies Association & Cambridge University Press. (1981). Review of international studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204860

Brooks, S. G. (2013). Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace. International Organization, 67(04), 863–888. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000283

Brown, M. E., Lynn-Jones, S. M., & Miller, S. E. (1996). Debating the democratic peace: Vol. Series: International security readers. MIT Press.

Buckler, S. (1993). Dirty hands: the problem of political morality: Vol. Series: Avebury series in philosophy. Avebury.

Bulley, D. (2010). The politics of ethical foreign policy: A responsibility to protect whom? European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350051

Burchill, S. (2005). The national interest in international relations theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Busby, J. W. (2010). Moral movements and foreign policy: Vol. Series: Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub.

Cambridge review of international affairs. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228528

Campbell, D. (1998). National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. University of Minnesota Press.

Campbell, D. & Ebooks Corporation Limited. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Revised edition). Manchester University Press. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310792

Cederman, L.-E. (2001). Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review, 95(1), 15–31. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117626

Chandler, D. (2004). Culture Wars and International Intervention: An ‘Inside/Out’ View of the Decline of National Interest. International Politics, 41, 354–374.

Checkel, J. T., & Moravcsik, A. (2001). A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics, 2(2), 219–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002002004

Chollet, D., & Lindberg, T. (2007). A moral core for U.S. foreign policy. Policy Review, 2007(2007). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172911420/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=858d2035

Clinton, W. D. (1986). The National Interest: Normative Foundations. The Review of Politics, 48(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500039656

Clinton, W. D. (1994). The two faces of national interest: Vol. Series: Political traditions in foreign policy series. Louisiana State University Press.

Cole, P. (2000). Philosophies of exclusion: liberal political theory and immigration. Edinburgh University Press.

Contemporary politics. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228615

Cornish, P., & Dorman, A. (2009). National defence in the age of austerity. International Affairs, 85(4), 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00825.x

Cornish, P., & Dorman, A. M. (2012). Smart muddling through: rethinking UK national strategy beyond Afghanistan. International Affairs, 88(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01067.x

Cowhey, P. F. (1993). Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization, 47(2), 299–326. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706892

Croft, S. (2006). Culture, crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge University Press.

Daddow, O. (2015). Constructing a ‘great’ role for Britain in an age of austerity: Interpreting coalition foreign policy, 2010-2015. International Relations, 29(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600931

de Orellana, P. (2015). Struggles over identity in diplomacy: ‘Commie terrorists’ contra ‘imperialists’ in Western Sahara. International Relations, 29(4), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815571620

Debrix, F. (2008). Tabloid terror: war, culture, and geopolitics. Routledge.

Destler, I. M. (1974). Presidents, bureaucrats, and foreign policy: the politics of organizational reform: Vol. Series: Princeton paperbacks (1st Prinston pbk. ed). Princeton University Press.

Dixon, P. (2000). Britain’s ‘Vietnam Syndrome’? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies, 26(1), 99–121. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097658

Doty, R. L. (1996). Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations: Vol. Series: Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). University of Minnesota Press.

Duffield, J. S. (1999). Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization, 53(4), 765–803. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601309

Dyson, S. B. (2009). Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 30(1), 33–48. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445174

Edmunds, T. (2012). British civil-military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs, 88(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01070.x

Edmunds, T. (2014). Complexity, strategy and the national interest. International Affairs, 90(3), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12125

European journal of international relations. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199017

Eytan, G., Robinson, P., Miklian, J., & Gabrielsen Jumbert, M. (2016). Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect. Review of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600005X

Farrell, T. (2002). Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review, 4(1), 49–72. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186274

Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903

Fearon, J. D. (1998). Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289

Fierke, K. M. (2014). Who is my neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a global ethic of care. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497490

Finnemore, M. (1996a). National interests in international society: Vol. Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.

Finnemore, M. (1996b). National interests in international society: Vol. Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.

Finnemore, M. (2003). The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force: Vol. Series: Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press.

Fisher, K. (2015). Security, identity and British counterterrorism policy: Vol. New security challenges series. Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137524225

Fitz‐Gerald, A. M. (2008). A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges. Defence Studies, 8(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702430701823933

Forsberg, T. (2006). Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706066558

Foyle, D. C. (1997). Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable. International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00036

Foyle, D. C. (2004). Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(3), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh025

Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562

Garrison, J. A. (2003). Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium. International Studies Review, 5(2), 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020011

Gartzke, E. (1999). War Is in the Error Term. International Organization, 53(3), 567–587. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601290

Gaskarth, J. (2006). Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00034.x

Gaskarth, J. (2014). Strategizing Britain’s role in the world. International Affairs, 90(3), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12127

Gaubatz, K. T. (1995). Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad. World Politics, 47(4), 534–554. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950701

Gaubatz, K. T. (1996). Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization, 50(1), 109–139. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707000

Gelpi, C. (1997). Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 255–282. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174373

George, A. L. (1969). The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 190–222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3013944

Gilboa, E. (2005). Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect. International Studies Perspectives, 6(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00211.x

Gilmore, J. (2014). The uncertain merger of values and interests in UK foreign policy. International Affairs, 90(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12126

Goddard, S. E. (2015). The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39. Security Studies, 24(1), 95–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1001216

Goddard, S. E., & Krebs, R. R. (2015). Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies, 24(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198

Goldgeier, J. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67

Gowa, J. (1998). Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization, 52(2), 307–324. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601277

Gribble, R., Wessley, S., Klein, S., Alexander, D. A., Dandeker, C., & Fear, N. T. (2015). British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics, 35(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12073

Grodsky, B. (2014). Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Post-Communism, 56(2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216560204

Hall, T. H. (2011). We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies, 20(4), 521–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.625771

Halperin, M. H., Clapp, P., & Kanter, A. (1974). Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. The Brookings Institution.

Handbook of international relations (2nd ed). (2013). SAGE.

Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war: Vol. Series: New international relations. Routledge. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=200689

Hayes, J. (2015). Constructing national security: U.S. relations with China and India. Cambridge University Press.

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1994). Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media: Vol. Vintage original. Vintage.

Hermann, M. G., & Hermann, C. F. (1989). Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 361–387. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600518

Hermann, M. G., & Preston, T. (1994). Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements. Political Psychology, 15(1), 75–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3791440

Hermann, M. G., Preston, T., Korany, B., & Shaw, T. M. (2001). Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. International Studies Review, 3(2), 83–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00235

Herring, E., & Robinson, P. (2003). Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies, 29(4), 553–568. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097876

Herring, E., & Robinson, P. (2014). Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD. Political Science Quarterly, 129(4), 551–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12252

Hibbing, J. R. (2013). Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 11(02), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713000923

Hildebrandt, T., Hillebrecht, C., Holm, P. M., & Pevehouse, J. (2013). The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology. Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00189.x

Hill, C. (2003). The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.

Hill, K. A. (1993). The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa. International Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 195–214. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600768

Hiscox, M. J. (2002). International trade and political conflict: commerce, coalitions, and mobility. Princeton University Press.

Hixson, W. L. (1998). Parting the curtain: propaganda, culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Macmillan Press.

Holland, J. (2013). Selling the War on Terror: foreign policy discourses after 9/11: Vol. Series: Critical terrorism studies. Routledge.

Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1986). Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 269–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/193813

Holmes, M. (2013). The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organization, 67(04), 829–861. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000234

Holmes, M. (2015). Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12201

Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267

Horowitz, M. C., & Stam, A. C. (2014). How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization, 68(03), 527–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000046

Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x

Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x

Hudson, V. M. (2014). Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory (Second edition). Rowman & Littlefield.

Hudson, V. M., & Vore, C. S. (1995). Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2), 209–238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/222751

Hurwitz, J., Peffley, M., & Seligson, M. A. (1993). Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 245–270. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600808

Hymans, J. E. C. (2006). The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491412

International feminist journal of politics. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200360

International Institute for Strategic Studies & Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Survival. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2205588

International politics. (1996).

International Studies Association. (2005). Foreign policy analysis. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2244344

International Studies Association & JSTOR (Organization). (n.d.). International studies review. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200680

International Studies Association & JSTOR (Organization). (1967). International studies quarterly. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200679

International studies perspectives. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2928675

Jackson, P. T. (2006). Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. University of Michigan Press.

Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: language, politics, and counter-terrorism: Vol. Series: New approaches to conflict analysis. Manchester University Press.

James, P., & Zhang, E. (2005). Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00002.x

Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (Second edition). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Jelena Subotić. (2016). Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), 610–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12089

Jentleson, B. W. (1992). The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 49–73. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600916

Jentleson, B. W., & Britton, R. L. (1998). Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(4), 395–417. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174436

Jervis, R. (1968). Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics, 20(3), 454–479. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009777

Jervis, R. (1983). Deterrence and Perception. International Security, 7(3), 3–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538549

Jonathan Mercer. (2010). Emotional Beliefs. International Organization, 64(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990221

Juliet Kaarbo. (2003). Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review, 5(2), 155–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020012

Kaarbo, J. (1997). Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology, 18(3), 553–581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792101

Kaarbo, J. (2013). Coalition politics and cabinet decision making: a comparative analysis of foreign policy choices (First paperback edition). University of Michigan Press.

Kaarbo, J., & Cantir, C. (2013). Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713482815

Kaufmann, C. (2004). Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War. International Security, 29(1), 5–48. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137546

Kennan, G. F. (1985). Morality and Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, 64(2). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290258825/fulltextPDF?accountid=14540

Kettell, S. (2013). Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 15(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00531.x

Krasner, S. D. (1972). Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy, 7, 159–179. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147761

Krebs, R. R. (2015a). How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization, 69(04), 809–845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000181

Krebs, R. R. (2015b). Narrative and the making of US national security: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Krebs, R. R. (2015c). Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War. Security Studies, 24(1), 131–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1001215

Krebs, R. R., & Lobasz, J. K. (2007). Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq. Security Studies, 16(3), 409–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410701547881

Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2004). Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035697

Kuperman, A. J. (2008). The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 49–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29734224

Lake, D. A., & Powell, R. (1999). Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton University Press.

Larsen, H. (1997). Foreign policy and discourse analysis: France, Britain, and Europe: Vol. Series: Routledge advances in international relations and politics. Routledge/LSE. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1138282

Lawler, P. (2005). The Good State: In Praise of ‘Classical’ Internationalism. Review of International Studies, 31(3), 427–449. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072083

Leeds, B. A., & Davis, D. R. (1997). Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6), 814–834. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174432

Levy, J. S. (1986). Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 193–222. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600676

Levy, J. S. (1997). Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 87–112. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600908

Levy, J. S. (2008). Preventive War and Democratic Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 1–24. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734222

LexisNexis (Firm). (2008). Politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3072814

Lieberthal, K. G., & Lampton, D. M. (1992). Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China: Vol. Series: Studies on China. University of California Press.

Little, R., & Wickham-Jones, M. (2000). New Labour’s foreign policy: a new moral crusade? Manchester University Press.

London School of Economics and Political Science. (n.d.). Millennium: journal of international studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2289212

Maoz, Z. (1997). The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall? International Security, 22(1), 162–198. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539333

Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938740

Mapel, D. R., & Nardin, T. (1992). Traditions of international ethics: Vol. Series: Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Marsh, C., & Fraser, C. (1989). Public opinion and nuclear weapons. Macmillan.

Marsh, K. (2014). Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12000

Martin, L. L. (1999). The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security, 24(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560158

Mazrui, A. A. (1996). Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 72(3), 493–506. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625553

McCourt, D. M. (2014). Britain and world power since 1945: constructing a nation’s role in international politics: Vol. Configurations. The University of Michigan Press.

McDermott, R. (2014). The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(4), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12009

Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (n.d.). The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books, 28(6). https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby

Mercer, J. (2005). Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization, 59(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050058

Mercer, J. (2013). Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization, 67(02), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000015

Milner, H. (1988). Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade. World Politics, 40(3), 350–376. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010217

Mintz, A. (2004). How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703261056

Mintz, A., & DeRouen, K. R. (2010). Understanding foreign policy decision making. Cambridge University Press.

Mor, B. D. (1998). Conflict in world politics: advances in the study of crisis, war and peace: Vol. Series: Advances in political science (F. P. Harvey, Ed.). Macmillan.

Moravcsik, A. (1999). ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343531

Morgenthau, H. J. (1982). In defense of the national interest: a critical examination of American foreign policy. University Press of America.

Morris, J. (2011). How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13(3), 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x

Nabers, D. (2009). Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis, 5(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x

Narizny, K. (2003). The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39. International Security, 27(4), 184–219. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137608

Nincic, M. (1999). The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics, 61(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500028126

Nyman, J. (2014). ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 43(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814525495

Oakes, A. (2006). Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands. Security Studies, 15(3), 431–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410601028354

Oakes, A. (2012). Diversionary war: domestic unrest and international conflict. Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press.

Ole R. Holsti. (1992). Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 439–466. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600734

O’Neill, B. (2001). Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 617–640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096063

Ostermann, F. (2015). The end of ambivalence and the triumph of pragmatism? Franco-British defence cooperation and European and Atlantic defence policy traditions. International Relations, 29(3), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600937

Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom & EBSCO Publishing (Firm). (1999). British journal of politics and international relations. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196849

Ray, J. L. (1998). Democracy and international conflict: an evaluation of the  democratic peace proposition: Vol. Series: Studies in international relations (1st pbk. ed). University of South Carolina Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. The Oxford handbooks of political science [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001

Rhodes, E. (1994). Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy. World Politics, 47(1), 1–41. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950678

Richards, D., Morgan, T. C., Wilson, R. K., Schwebach, V. L., & Young, G. D. (1993). Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(3), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037003005

Risse-Kappen, T. (1991). Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics, 43(4), 479–512. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010534

Robert M. Entman. (2004). Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy: Vol. Series: Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. University of Chicago Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780226210735

Robinson, P., Goddard, P., Parry, K., Murray, C., Taylor, P. M., & Askews & Holts Library Services. (2010). Pockets of resistance: British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Manchester University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781847794727

Robinson, P., Seib, P. M., & Fröhlich, R. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge handbook of media, conflict and security. Routledge.

Rogowski, R. (1987). Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1121–1137. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962581

Rose McDermott. (2004). Political psychology in international relations: Vol. Series: Analytical perspectives on politics. University of Michigan Press.

Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), & JSTOR (Organization). (1944). International affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200321

Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations (1st ed). Norton.

Schmidt, B. C., & Williams, M. C. (2008). The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies, 17(2), 191–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098990

Schweller, R. L. (1992). Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics, 44(2), 235–269. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010448

Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Levy, J. S. (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001

Security studies. (n.d.). https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2229313

Sinno, A. H. (2008). Organizations at war in Afghanistan and beyond. Cornell University Press.

Sjöstedt, R. (2007). The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(3), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x

Slater, J. (2002). Ideology vs. The national interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security Studies, 12(1), 164–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410212120006

Smith, K. E., & Lights, M. (2001). Ethics and foreign policy: Vol. Series: LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge University Press. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=202006

Smith, S. (1985). Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 61(1), 9–25. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2619777

Smith, S., Hadfield, A., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2016a). Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Smith, S., Hadfield, A., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2016b). Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Snow, D. M., & Brown, E. (1994). Puzzle palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. foreign and defense policy-making in the 1990s. St. Martin’s Press.

Snyder, J. (2004). One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy, 145, 52–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4152944

Sobel, R. (2001). The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam: constraining the colossus. Oxford University Press.

Solingen, E. (n.d.). Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now. International Security, 39(1), 44–70. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ins/summary/v039/39.1.solingen.html

Solomon, T. (2015). The politics of subjectivity in American foreign policy discourses: Vol. Configurations: critical studies of world politics. University of Michigan Press.

Sprecher, C., & DeRouen, K. (2005). The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00006.x

Strong, J. (2014). Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12055

Trubowitz, P. (1992). Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600880

Valenta, J. (1979). The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Political Science Quarterly, 94(1), 55–76. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150156

Vanderbush, W. (2009). Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis, 5(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00094.x

Walker, S. G., Malici, A., & Schafer, M. (2011). Rethinking foreign policy analysis: states, leaders, and the microfoundations of behavioral international relations. Routledge.

Walter Carlsnaes. (1992). The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 245–270. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600772

Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed). Basic Books.

Weber, C. (2006). Imagining America at war: morality, politics, and film. Routledge.

Wehner, L. E., & Thies, C. G. (2014). Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review, 16(3), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12149

Welch, D. A. (1992). The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security, 17(2), 112–146. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170

Weldes, J. (1996). Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 275–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003001

Williams, M. C. (2005). What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 11(3), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105055482