Abelson, Donald E. ‘Old World, New World: The Evolution and Influence of Foreign Affairs Think-Tanks’. International Affairs 90.1 (2014): 125–142. Web.
Abrahamsen, Rita, and Paul Williams. ‘Ethics and Foreign Policy: The Antinomies of New Labour’s “Third Way” in Sub-Saharan Africa’. Political Studies 49.2 (2001): 249–264. Web.
Agathangelou, Anna M., and L. H. M. Ling. ‘Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11’. International Studies Quarterly 48.3 (2004): 517–538. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521>.
Alden, Chris, and Amnon Aran. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.
Allison, Graham T. ‘Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis’. The American Political Science Review 63.3 (1969): 689–718. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1954423>.
Allison, Graham T., and Philip Zelikow. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Longman, 1999. Print.
American Political Science Association and JSTOR (Organization). ‘Perspectives on Politics’. (2003): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2203859>.
Arnold Wolfers. ‘“National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol’. Political Science Quarterly 67.4 (1952): 481–502. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138>.
Baehr, P. R., and Monique C. Castermans-Holleman. The Role of Human Rights in Foreign Policy. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. Print.
Barnett, M. ‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo’. European Journal of International Relations 5.1 (1999): 5–36. Web.
Baum, Matthew A. ‘Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public’. The American Political Science Review 96.1 (2002): 91–109. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117812>.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
Beard, Charles Austin, and George H. E. Smith. The Idea of National Interest: An Analytical Study in American Foreign Policy. New York: Macmillan, 1934. Print.
Beardsworth, Richard. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011. Print.
Beitz, Charles R. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. Print.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs et al. ‘International Security’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200670>.
Bendor, Jonathan, and Thomas H. Hammond. ‘Rethinking Allison’s Models’. The American Political Science Review 86.2 (1992): 301–322. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964222>.
Benhabib, Seyla. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Series: The John Robert Seeley lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Timothy Nordstrom. ‘Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 44.1 (2000): 33–61. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174621>.
Berejikian, Jeffrey D. ‘Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations’. Political Psychology 23.4 (2002): 759–786. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792366>.
Betts, Richard K. ‘The Delusion of Impartial Intervention’. Foreign Affairs 73.6 n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290286683/abstract/C39C5610F46A4868PQ/1?accountid=14540>.
Bevir, M., and O. Daddow. ‘Interpreting Foreign Policy: National, Comparative and Regional Studies’. International Relations 29.3 (2015): 273–287. Web.
Bjereld, Ulf, and Ann-Marie Ekengren. ‘Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden’. International Studies Quarterly 43.3 (1999): 503–518. Web.
Blanton, Shannon Lindsey. ‘Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador’. International Studies Quarterly 40.1 (1996): 23–44. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600930>.
Brawley, Mark R. ‘Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany’. International Studies Quarterly 41.4 (1997): 633–653. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600856>.
British International Studies Association and Cambridge University Press. ‘Review of International Studies’. (1981): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204860>.
Brooks, Stephen G. ‘Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace’. International Organization 67.04 (2013): 863–888. Web.
Brown, Michael E., Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller. Debating the Democratic Peace. Series: International security readers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996. Print.
Buckler, Steve. Dirty Hands: The Problem of Political Morality. Series: Avebury series in philosophy. Aldershot, Hants: Avebury, 1993. Print.
Bulley, D. ‘The Politics of Ethical Foreign Policy: A Responsibility to Protect Whom?’ European Journal of International Relations 16.3 (2010): 441–461. Web.
Burchill, Scott. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.
Busby, Joshua W. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy. Series: Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Pub, 1998. Print.
‘Cambridge Review of International Affairs’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228528>.
Campbell, David. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998. Print.
Campbell, David and Ebooks Corporation Limited. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Revised edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. Web. <http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310792>.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. ‘Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process’. The American Political Science Review 95.1 (2001): 15–31. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117626>.
Chandler, David. ‘Culture Wars and International Intervention: An “Inside/Out” View of the Decline of National Interest’. International politics 41 (2004): 354–374. Print.
Checkel, J. T., and A. Moravcsik. ‘A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies?’ European Union Politics 2.2 (2001): 219–249. Web.
Chollet, Derek, and Tod Lindberg. ‘A Moral Core for U.S. Foreign Policy’. Policy Review 2007.2007 (2007): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172911420/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=858d2035>.
Clinton, W. David. ‘The National Interest: Normative Foundations’. The Review of Politics 48.04 (1986): n. pag. Web.
---. The Two Faces of National Interest. Series: Political traditions in foreign policy series. Baton Rouge, La: Louisiana State University Press, 1994. Print.
Cole, Phillip. Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. Print.
‘Contemporary Politics’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228615>.
Cornish, Paul, and Andrew Dorman. ‘National Defence in the Age of Austerity’. International Affairs 85.4 (2009): 733–753. Web.
Cornish, Paul, and Andrew M. Dorman. ‘Smart Muddling through: Rethinking UK National Strategy beyond Afghanistan’. International Affairs 88.2 (2012): 213–222. Web.
Cowhey, Peter F. ‘Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States’. International Organization 47.2 (1993): 299–326. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706892>.
Croft, Stuart. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.
Daddow, O. ‘Constructing a “great” Role for Britain in an Age of Austerity: Interpreting Coalition Foreign Policy, 2010-2015’. International Relations 29.3 (2015): 303–318. Web.
de Orellana, P. ‘Struggles over Identity in Diplomacy: “Commie Terrorists” Contra “Imperialists” in Western Sahara’. International Relations 29.4 (2015): 477–499. Web.
Debrix, François. Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2008. Print.
Destler, I. M. Presidents, Bureaucrats, and Foreign Policy: The Politics of Organizational Reform. 1st Prinston pbk. ed. Series: Princeton paperbacks. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974. Print.
Dixon, Paul. ‘Britain’s “Vietnam Syndrome”? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia’. Review of International Studies 26.1 (2000): 99–121. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097658>.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Series: Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Print.
Duffield, John S. ‘Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism’. International Organization 53.4 (1999): 765–803. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601309>.
Dyson, Stephen Benedict. ‘Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking’. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 30.1 (2009): 33–48. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445174>.
Edmunds, Timothy. ‘British Civil-Military Relations and the Problem of Risk’. International Affairs 88.2 (2012): 265–282. Web.
---. ‘Complexity, Strategy and the National Interest’. International Affairs 90.3 (2014): 525–539. Web.
‘European Journal of International Relations’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199017>.
Eytan, G. et al. ‘Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect’. Review of International Studies (2016): n. pag. Web.
Farrell, Theo. ‘Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program’. International Studies Review 4.1 (2002): 49–72. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186274>.
Fearon, James D. ‘Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations’. Annual Review of Political Science 1.1 (1998): 289–313. Web.
---. ‘Rationalist Explanations for War’. International Organization 49.3 (1995): 379–414. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903>.
Fierke, K. M. ‘Who Is My Neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a Global Ethic of Care’. European Journal of International Relations 20.3 (2014): 787–809. Web.
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996. Print.
---. National Interests in International Society. Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996. Print.
---. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Series: Cornell studies in security affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003. Print.
Fisher, Kathryn. Security, Identity and British Counterterrorism Policy. New security challenges series. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137524225>.
Fitz‐Gerald, Ann M. ‘A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges’. Defence Studies 8.1 (2008): 4–25. Web.
Forsberg, T. ‘Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality’. Cooperation and Conflict 41.3 (2006): 235–260. Web.
Foyle, D. C. ‘Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16.3 (2004): 269–294. Web.
Foyle, Douglas C. ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable’. International Studies Quarterly 41.1 (1997): 141–170. Web.
Gallie, W. B. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–198. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562>.
Garrison, Jean A. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium’. International Studies Review 5.2 (2003): 155–202. Web.
Gartzke, Erik. ‘War Is in the Error Term’. International Organization 53.3 (1999): 567–587. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601290>.
Gaskarth, Jamie. ‘Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy’. Foreign Policy Analysis 2.4 (2006): 325–341. Web.
---. ‘Strategizing Britain’s Role in the World’. International Affairs 90.3 (2014): 559–581. Web.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations’. International Organization 50.1 (1996): 109–139. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707000>.
---. ‘Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad’. World Politics 47.4 (1995): 534–554. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950701>.
Gelpi, Christopher. ‘Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41.2 (1997): 255–282. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174373>.
George, Alexander L. ‘The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making’. International Studies Quarterly 13.2 (1969): 190–222. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3013944>.
Gilboa, Eytan. ‘Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect’. International Studies Perspectives 6.3 (2005): 325–341. Web.
Gilmore, Jonathan. ‘The Uncertain Merger of Values and Interests in UK Foreign Policy’. International Affairs 90.3 (2014): 541–557. Web.
Goddard, Stacie E. ‘The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39’. Security Studies 24.1 (2015): 95–130. Web.
Goddard, Stacie E., and Ronald R. Krebs. ‘Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy’. Security Studies 24.1 (2015): 5–36. Web.
Goldgeier, J. M., and P. E. Tetlock. ‘Psychology and International Relations Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science 4.1 (2001): 67–92. Web.
Gowa, Joanne. ‘Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad’. International Organization 52.2 (1998): 307–324. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601277>.
Gribble, Rachael et al. ‘British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan’. Politics 35.2 (2015): 128–150. Web.
Grodsky, Brian. ‘Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space’. Problems of Post-Communism 56.2 (2014): 43–57. Web.
Hall, Todd H. ‘We Will Not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger’. Security Studies 20.4 (2011): 521–555. Web.
Halperin, Morton H., Priscilla Clapp, and Arnold Kanter. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1974. Print.
Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE, 2013. Print.
Hansen, Lene. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Series: New international relations. London: Routledge, 2006. Web. <http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=200689>.
Hayes, Jarrod. Constructing National Security: U.S. Relations with China and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Print.
Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Vintage original. London: Vintage, 1994. Print.
Hermann, Margaret G. et al. ‘Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals’. International Studies Review 3.2 (2001): 83–131. Web.
Hermann, Margaret G., and Charles F. Hermann. ‘Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry’. International Studies Quarterly 33.4 (1989): 361–387. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600518>.
Hermann, Margaret G., and Thomas Preston. ‘Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements’. Political Psychology 15.1 (1994): 75–96. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3791440>.
Herring, Eric, and Piers Robinson. ‘Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD’. Political Science Quarterly 129.4 (2014): 551–584. Web.
---. ‘Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy’. Review of International Studies 29.4 (2003): 553–568. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097876>.
Hibbing, John R. ‘Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics’. Perspectives on Politics 11.02 (2013): 475–489. Web.
Hildebrandt, Timothy et al. ‘The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology’. Foreign Policy Analysis 9.3 (2013): 243–266. Web.
Hill, Christopher. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003. Print.
Hill, Kevin A. ‘The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa’. International Studies Quarterly 37.2 (1993): 195–214. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600768>.
Hiscox, Michael J. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2002. Print.
Hixson, Walter L. Parting the Curtain: Propaganda, Culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 1998. Print.
Holland, Jack. Selling the War on Terror: Foreign Policy Discourses after 9/11. Series: Critical terrorism studies. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2013. Print.
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. ‘Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making’. British Journal of Political Science 16.3 (1986): 269–286. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/193813>.
Holmes, Marcus. ‘Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics’. International Studies Quarterly (2015): n/a-n/a. Web.
---. ‘The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions’. International Organization 67.04 (2013): 829–861. Web.
Hopf, Ted. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23.1 (1998): 171–200. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267>.
Horowitz, Michael C., and Allan C. Stam. ‘How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders’. International Organization 68.03 (2014): 527–559. Web.
Houghton, David Patrick. ‘Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach’. Foreign Policy Analysis 3.1 (2007): 24–45. Web.
Hudson, Valerie M. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’. Foreign Policy Analysis 1.1 (2005): 1–30. Web.
---. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. Print.
Hudson, Valerie M., and Christopher S. Vore. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’. Mershon International Studies Review 39.2 (1995): 209–238. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/222751>.
Hurwitz, Jon, Mark Peffley, and Mitchell A. Seligson. ‘Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica’. International Studies Quarterly 37.3 (1993): 245–270. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600808>.
Hymans, Jacques E. C. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491412>.
‘International Feminist Journal of Politics’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200360>.
International Institute for Strategic Studies and Oxford University Press. ‘Survival’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2205588>.
‘International Politics’. (1996): n. pag. Print.
International Studies Association. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis’. (2005): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2244344>.
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization). ‘International Studies Quarterly’. (1967): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200679>.
---. ‘International Studies Review’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200680>.
‘International Studies Perspectives’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2928675>.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006. Print.
Jackson, Richard. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-Terrorism. Series: New approaches to conflict analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005. Print.
James, Patrick, and Enyu Zhang. ‘Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996’. Foreign Policy Analysis 1.1 (2005): 31–54. Web.
Janis, Irving L. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Second edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 1982. Print.
Jelena Subotić. ‘Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change’. Foreign Policy Analysis 12.4 (2016): 610–627. Web.
Jentleson, Bruce W. ‘The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force’. International Studies Quarterly 36.1 (1992): 49–73. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600916>.
Jentleson, Bruce W., and Rebecca L. Britton. ‘Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 42.4 (1998): 395–417. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174436>.
Jervis, Robert. ‘Deterrence and Perception’. International Security 7.3 (1983): 3–30. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538549>.
---. ‘Hypotheses on Misperception’. World Politics 20.3 (1968): 454–479. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009777>.
Jonathan Mercer. ‘Emotional Beliefs’. International Organization 64.01 (2010): n. pag. Web.
Juliet Kaarbo. ‘Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas’. International Studies Review 5.2 (2003): 155–202. Web.
Kaarbo, J., and C. Cantir. ‘Role Conflict in Recent Wars: Danish and Dutch Debates over Iraq and Afghanistan’. Cooperation and Conflict 48.4 (2013): 465–483. Web.
Kaarbo, Juliet. Coalition Politics and Cabinet Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy Choices. First paperback edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013. Print.
---. ‘Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research’. Political Psychology 18.3 (1997): 553–581. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792101>.
Kaufmann, Chaim. ‘Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War’. International Security 29.1 (2004): 5–48. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137546>.
Kennan, George F. ‘Morality and Foreign Policy’. Foreign Affairs 64.2 (1985): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290258825/fulltextPDF?accountid=14540>.
Kettell, Steven. ‘Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 15.2 (2013): 263–279. Web.
Krasner, Stephen D. ‘Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland)’. Foreign Policy 7 (1972): 159–179. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147761>.
Krebs, Ronald R. ‘How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus’. International Organization 69.04 (2015): 809–845. Web.
---. Narrative and the Making of US National Security. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Print.
---. ‘Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War’. Security Studies 24.1 (2015): 131–170. Web.
Krebs, Ronald R., and Jennifer K. Lobasz. ‘Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq’. Security Studies 16.3 (2007): 409–451. Web.
Kull, Steven, Clay Ramsay, and Evan Lewis. ‘Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War’. Political Science Quarterly 118.4 (2004): 569–598. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035697>.
Kuperman, Alan J. ‘The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans’. International Studies Quarterly 52.1 (2008): 49–80. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/29734224>.
Lake, David A., and Robert Powell. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. Print.
Larsen, Henrik. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain, and Europe. Series: Routledge advances in international relations and politics. London: Routledge/LSE, 1997. Web. <http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1138282>.
Lawler, Peter. ‘The Good State: In Praise of “Classical” Internationalism’. Review of International Studies 31.3 (2005): 427–449. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072083>.
Leeds, Brett Ashley, and David R. Davis. ‘Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes’. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41.6 (1997): 814–834. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174432>.
Levy, Jack S. ‘Organizational Routines and the Causes of War’. International Studies Quarterly 30.2 (1986): 193–222. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600676>.
---. ‘Preventive War and Democratic Politics’. International Studies Quarterly 52.1 (2008): 1–24. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734222>.
---. ‘Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations’. International Studies Quarterly 41.1 (1997): 87–112. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600908>.
LexisNexis (Firm). ‘Politics’. (2008): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3072814>.
Lieberthal, Kenneth G., and David M. Lampton. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Series: Studies on China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. Print.
Little, Richard, and Mark Wickham-Jones. New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade? Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Print.
London School of Economics and Political Science. ‘Millennium: Journal of International Studies’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2289212>.
Maoz, Zeev. ‘The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall?’ International Security 22.1 (1997): 162–198. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539333>.
Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. ‘Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986’. The American Political Science Review 87.3 (1993): 624–638. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938740>.
Mapel, David R., and Terry Nardin. Traditions of International Ethics. Series: Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Print.
Marsh, Catherine, and Colin Fraser. Public Opinion and Nuclear Weapons. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989. Print.
Marsh, Kevin. ‘Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10.3 (2014): 265–288. Web.
Martin, Lisa L. ‘The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism’. International Security 24.2 (1999): 74–83. Web.
Mazrui, Ali A. ‘Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 72.3 (1996): 493–506. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625553>.
McCourt, David M. Britain and World Power since 1945: Constructing a Nation’s Role in International Politics. Configurations. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2014. Print.
McDermott, Rose. ‘The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents’. Foreign Policy Analysis 10.4 (2014): 313–327. Web.
Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. ‘The Israel Lobby’. London Review of Books 28.6 n. pag. Web. <https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby>.
Mercer, Jonathan. ‘Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War’. International Organization 67.02 (2013): 221–252. Web.
---. ‘Rationality and Psychology in International Politics’. International Organization 59.01 (2005): n. pag. Web.
Milner, Helen. ‘Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade’. World Politics 40.3 (1988): 350–376. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010217>.
Mintz, A. ‘How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48.1 (2004): 3–13. Web.
Mintz, Alex, and Karl R. DeRouen. Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print.
Mor, Ben D. Conflict in World Politics: Advances in the Study of Crisis, War and Peace. Ed. Frank P. Harvey. Series: Advances in political science. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998. Print.
Moravcsik, Andrew. ‘“Is Something Rotten in the State of Denmark?” Constructivism and European Integration’. Journal of European Public Policy 6.4 (1999): 669–681. Web.
Morgenthau, Hans J. In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1982. Print.
Morris, Justin. ‘How Great Is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 13.3 (2011): 326–347. Web.
Nabers, Dirk. ‘Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001’. Foreign Policy Analysis 5.2 (2009): 191–214. Web.
Narizny, Kevin. ‘The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39’. International Security 27.4 (2003): 184–219. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137608>.
Nincic, Miroslav. ‘The National Interest and Its Interpretation’. The Review of Politics 61.01 (1999): n. pag. Web.
Nyman, J. ‘“Red Storm Ahead”: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 43.1 (2014): 43–65. Web.
Oakes, Amy. ‘Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands’. Security Studies 15.3 (2006): 431–463. Web.
---. Diversionary War: Domestic Unrest and International Conflict. Stanford, California: Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2012. Print.
Ole R. Holsti. ‘Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates’. International Studies Quarterly 36.4 (1992): 439–466. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600734>.
O’Neill, Barry. ‘Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory’. International Studies Quarterly 45.4 (2001): 617–640. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096063>.
Ostermann, F. ‘The End of Ambivalence and the Triumph of Pragmatism? Franco-British Defence Cooperation and European and Atlantic Defence Policy Traditions’. International Relations 29.3 (2015): 334–347. Web.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom and EBSCO Publishing (Firm). ‘British Journal of Politics and International Relations’. (1999): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196849>.
Ray, James Lee. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. 1st pbk. ed. Series: Studies in international relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998. Print.
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001>.
Rhodes, Edward. ‘Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy’. World Politics 47.1 (1994): 1–41. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950678>.
Richards, D. et al. ‘Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37.3 (1993): 504–535. Web.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. ‘Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies’. World Politics 43.4 (1991): 479–512. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010534>.
Robert M. Entman. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Series: Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2004. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780226210735>.
Robinson, Piers et al. Pockets of Resistance: British News Media, War and Theory in the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781847794727>.
Robinson, Piers, Philip M. Seib, and Romy Fröhlich, eds. Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict and Security. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016. Print.
Rogowski, Ronald. ‘Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade’. The American Political Science Review 81.4 (1987): 1121–1137. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962581>.
Rose McDermott. Political Psychology in International Relations. Series: Analytical perspectives on politics. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press, 2004. Print.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), and JSTOR (Organization). ‘International Affairs’. (1944): n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200321>.
Russett, Bruce M., and John R. Oneal. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. 1st ed. New York, NY: Norton, 2001. Print.
Schmidt, Brian C., and Michael C. Williams. ‘The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists’. Security Studies 17.2 (2008): 191–220. Web.
Schweller, Randall L. ‘Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?’ World Politics 44.2 (1992): 235–269. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010448>.
Sears, David O., Leonie Huddy, and Jack S. Levy. The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001>.
‘Security Studies’. n. pag. Web. <https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2229313>.
Sinno, Abdulkader H. Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2008. Print.
Sjöstedt, Roxanna. ‘The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine.’ Foreign Policy Analysis 3.3 (2007): 233–254. Web.
Slater, Jerome. ‘Ideology vs. The National Interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. Policy in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict’. Security Studies 12.1 (2002): 164–206. Web.
Smith, Karen E., and Margot Lights. Ethics and Foreign Policy. Series: LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Web. <http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=202006>.
Smith, Steve. ‘Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 61.1 (1985): 9–25. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2619777>.
Smith, Steve, Amelia Hadfield, and Timothy Dunne, eds. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.
---, eds. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.
Snow, Donald M., and Eugene Brown. Puzzle Palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy-Making in the 1990s. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994. Print.
Snyder, Jack. ‘One World, Rival Theories’. Foreign Policy 145 (2004): 52–62. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4152944>.
Sobel, Richard. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
Solingen, Etel. ‘Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now’. International Security 39.1 44–70. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ins/summary/v039/39.1.solingen.html>.
Solomon, Ty. The Politics of Subjectivity in American Foreign Policy Discourses. Configurations: critical studies of world politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. Print.
Sprecher, Christopher, and Karl DeRouen. ‘The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998’. Foreign Policy Analysis 1.1 (2005): 121–141. Web.
Strong, James. ‘Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations (2014): n. pag. Web.
Trubowitz, Peter. ‘Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict’. International Studies Quarterly 36.2 (1992): 173–190. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600880>.
Valenta, Jiri. ‘The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia’. Political Science Quarterly 94.1 (1979): 55–76. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150156>.
Vanderbush, Walt. ‘Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq’. Foreign Policy Analysis 5.3 (2009): 287–306. Web.
Walker, Stephen G., Akan Malici, and Mark Schafer. Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relations. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, 2011. Print.
Walter Carlsnaes. ‘The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis’. International Studies Quarterly 36.3 (1992): 245–270. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600772>.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2006. Print.
Weber, Cynthia. Imagining America at War: Morality, Politics, and Film. London, New York: Routledge, 2006. Print.
Wehner, Leslie E., and Cameron G. Thies. ‘Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles’. International Studies Review 16.3 (2014): 411–436. Web.
Welch, David A. ‘The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect’. International Security 17.2 (1992): 112–146. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170>.
Weldes, J. ‘Constructing National Interests’. European Journal of International Relations 2.3 (1996): 275–318. Web.
Williams, M. C. ‘What Is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory’. European Journal of International Relations 11.3 (2005): 307–337. Web.
