[1]
Abelson, D.E. 2014. Old world, new world: the evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs. 90, 1 (Jan. 2014), 125–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12099.
[2]
Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, P. 2001. Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour’s ‘Third Way’ in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Studies. 49, 2 (Jun. 2001), 249–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00312.
[3]
Agathangelou, A.M. and Ling, L.H.M. 2004. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 3 (2004), 517–538.
[4]
Alden, C. and Aran, A. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Routledge.
[5]
Allison, G.T. 1969. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review. 63, 3 (1969), 689–718.
[6]
Allison, G.T. and Zelikow, P. 1999. Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Longman.
[7]
American Political Science Association and JSTOR (Organization) 2003. Perspectives on politics. (2003).
[8]
Arnold Wolfers 1952. ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly. 67, 4 (1952), 481–502.
[9]
Baehr, P.R. and Castermans-Holleman, M.C. 2004. The role of human rights in foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
[10]
Barnett, M. 1999. Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations. 5, 1 (Mar. 1999), 5–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005001001.
[11]
Baum, M.A. 2002. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review. 96, 1 (2002), 91–109.
[12]
Baylis, J. et al. 2011. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Beard, C.A. and Smith, G.H.E. 1934. The idea of national interest: an analytical study in American foreign policy. Macmillan.
[14]
Beardsworth, R. 2011. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Polity Press.
[15]
Beitz, C.R. 1999. Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press.
[16]
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs et al. International security.
[17]
Bendor, J. and Hammond, T.H. 1992. Rethinking Allison’s Models. The American Political Science Review. 86, 2 (1992), 301–322.
[18]
Benhabib, S. 2004. The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Bennett, D.S. and Nordstrom, T. 2000. Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44, 1 (2000), 33–61.
[20]
Berejikian, J.D. 2002. Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations. Political Psychology. 23, 4 (2002), 759–786.
[21]
Betts, R.K. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. 73, 6.
[22]
Bevir, M. and Daddow, O. 2015. Interpreting foreign policy: National, comparative and regional studies. International Relations. 29, 3 (Sep. 2015), 273–287. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600930.
[23]
Bjereld, U. and Ekengren, A.-M. 1999. Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden. International Studies Quarterly. 43, 3 (Sep. 1999), 503–518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00132.
[24]
Blanton, S.L. 1996. Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador. International Studies Quarterly. 40, 1 (1996), 23–44.
[25]
Brawley, M.R. 1997. Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997), 633–653.
[26]
British International Studies Association and Cambridge University Press 1981. Review of international studies. (1981).
[27]
Brooks, S.G. 2013. Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace. International Organization. 67, 04 (Oct. 2013), 863–888. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000283.
[28]
Brown, M.E. et al. 1996. Debating the democratic peace. MIT Press.
[29]
Buckler, S. 1993. Dirty hands: the problem of political morality. Avebury.
[30]
Bulley, D. 2010. The politics of ethical foreign policy: A responsibility to protect whom? European Journal of International Relations. 16, 3 (Sep. 2010), 441–461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109350051.
[31]
Burchill, S. 2005. The national interest in international relations theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
[32]
Busby, J.W. 2010. Moral movements and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Buzan, B. et al. 1998. Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub.
[34]
Campbell, D. 1998. National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. University of Minnesota Press.
[35]
Campbell, D. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Manchester University Press.
[36]
Cederman, L.-E. 2001. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review. 95, 1 (2001), 15–31.
[37]
Chandler, D. 2004. Culture Wars and International Intervention: An ‘Inside/Out’ View of the Decline of National Interest. International politics. 41, (2004), 354–374.
[38]
Checkel, J.T. and Moravcsik, A. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics. 2, 2 (Jun. 2001), 219–249. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002002004.
[39]
Chollet, D. and Lindberg, T. 2007. A moral core for U.S. foreign policy. Policy Review. 2007, 2007 (2007).
[40]
Clinton, W.D. 1986. The National Interest: Normative Foundations. The Review of Politics. 48, 04 (Sep. 1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500039656.
[41]
Clinton, W.D. 1994. The two faces of national interest. Louisiana State University Press.
[42]
Cole, P. 2000. Philosophies of exclusion: liberal political theory and immigration. Edinburgh University Press.
[43]
Cornish, P. and Dorman, A. 2009. National defence in the age of austerity. International Affairs. 85, 4 (Jul. 2009), 733–753. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00825.x.
[44]
Cornish, P. and Dorman, A.M. 2012. Smart muddling through: rethinking UK national strategy beyond Afghanistan. International Affairs. 88, 2 (Mar. 2012), 213–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01067.x.
[45]
Cowhey, P.F. 1993. Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization. 47, 2 (1993), 299–326.
[46]
Croft, S. 2006. Culture, crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge University Press.
[47]
Daddow, O. 2015. Constructing a ‘great’ role for Britain in an age of austerity: Interpreting coalition foreign policy, 2010-2015. International Relations. 29, 3 (Sep. 2015), 303–318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600931.
[48]
Debrix, F. 2008. Tabloid terror: war, culture, and geopolitics. Routledge.
[49]
Destler, I.M. 1974. Presidents, bureaucrats, and foreign policy: the politics of organizational reform. Princeton University Press.
[50]
Dixon, P. 2000. Britain’s ‘Vietnam Syndrome’? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies. 26, 1 (2000), 99–121.
[51]
Doty, R.L. 1996. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. University of Minnesota Press.
[52]
Duffield, J.S. 1999. Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization. 53, 4 (1999), 765–803.
[53]
Dyson, S.B. 2009. Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 30, 1 (2009), 33–48.
[54]
Edmunds, T. 2012. British civil-military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs. 88, 2 (Mar. 2012), 265–282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01070.x.
[55]
Edmunds, T. 2014. Complexity, strategy and the national interest. International Affairs. 90, 3 (May 2014), 525–539. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12125.
[56]
Eytan, G. et al. 2016. Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect. Review of International Studies. (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600005X.
[57]
Farrell, T. 2002. Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review. 4, 1 (2002), 49–72.
[58]
Fearon, J.D. 1998. Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annual Review of Political Science. 1, 1 (Jun. 1998), 289–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289.
[59]
Fearon, J.D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization. 49, 3 (1995), 379–414.
[60]
Fierke, K.M. 2014. Who is my neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a global ethic of care. European Journal of International Relations. 20, 3 (Sep. 2014), 787–809. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113497490.
[61]
Finnemore, M. 1996. National interests in international society. Cornell University Press.
[62]
Finnemore, M. 1996. National interests in international society. Cornell University Press.
[63]
Finnemore, M. 2003. The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force. Cornell University Press.
[64]
Fisher, K. 2015. Security, identity and British counterterrorism policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
[65]
Fitz‐Gerald, A.M. 2008. A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges. Defence Studies. 8, 1 (Mar. 2008), 4–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14702430701823933.
[66]
Forsberg, T. 2006. Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality. Cooperation and Conflict. 41, 3 (Sep. 2006), 235–260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706066558.
[67]
Foyle, D.C. 2004. Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 16, 3 (Sep. 2004), 269–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh025.
[68]
Foyle, D.C. 1997. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 1 (Mar. 1997), 141–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00036.
[69]
Gallie, W.B. 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 56, (1956), 167–198.
[70]
Garrison, J.A. 2003. Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium. International Studies Review. 5, 2 (2003), 155–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020011.
[71]
Gartzke, E. 1999. War Is in the Error Term. International Organization. 53, 3 (1999), 567–587.
[72]
Gaskarth, J. 2006. Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2, 4 (Oct. 2006), 325–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00034.x.
[73]
Gaskarth, J. 2014. Strategizing Britain’s role in the world. International Affairs. 90, 3 (May 2014), 559–581. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12127.
[74]
Gaubatz, K.T. 1996. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization. 50, 1 (1996), 109–139.
[75]
Gaubatz, K.T. 1995. Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad. World Politics. 47, 4 (1995), 534–554.
[76]
Gelpi, C. 1997. Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 41, 2 (1997), 255–282.
[77]
George, A.L. 1969. The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly. 13, 2 (1969), 190–222.
[78]
Gilboa, E. 2005. Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect. International Studies Perspectives. 6, 3 (Aug. 2005), 325–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00211.x.
[79]
Gilmore, J. 2014. The uncertain merger of values and interests in UK foreign policy. International Affairs. 90, 3 (May 2014), 541–557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12126.
[80]
Goddard, S.E. 2015. The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39. Security Studies. 24, 1 (Jan. 2015), 95–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1001216.
[81]
Goddard, S.E. and Krebs, R.R. 2015. Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies. 24, 1 (Jan. 2015), 5–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198.
[82]
Goldgeier, J.M. and Tetlock, P.E. 2001. Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 4, 1 (Jun. 2001), 67–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67.
[83]
Gowa, J. 1998. Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization. 52, 2 (1998), 307–324.
[84]
Gribble, R. et al. 2015. British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics. 35, 2 (Jun. 2015), 128–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12073.
[85]
Grodsky, B. 2014. Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Post-Communism. 56, 2 (Dec. 2014), 43–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216560204.
[86]
Hall, T.H. 2011. We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies. 20, 4 (Oct. 2011), 521–555. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.625771.
[87]
Halperin, M.H. et al. 1974. Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. The Brookings Institution.
[88]
Hansen, L. 2006. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.
[89]
Hayes, J. 2015. Constructing national security: U.S. relations with China and India. Cambridge University Press.
[90]
Herman, E.S. and Chomsky, N. 1994. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. Vintage.
[91]
Hermann, M.G. et al. 2001. Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. International Studies Review. 3, 2 (Sep. 2001), 83–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00235.
[92]
Hermann, M.G. and Hermann, C.F. 1989. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 4 (1989), 361–387.
[93]
Hermann, M.G. and Preston, T. 1994. Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements. Political Psychology. 15, 1 (1994), 75–96.
[94]
Herring, E. and Robinson, P. 2014. Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD. Political Science Quarterly. 129, 4 (Dec. 2014), 551–584. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12252.
[95]
Herring, E. and Robinson, P. 2003. Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies. 29, 4 (2003), 553–568.
[96]
Hibbing, J.R. 2013. Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 11, 02 (Jun. 2013), 475–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713000923.
[97]
Hildebrandt, T. et al. 2013. The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology. Foreign Policy Analysis. 9, 3 (Jul. 2013), 243–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00189.x.
[98]
Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
[99]
Hill, K.A. 1993. The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa. International Studies Quarterly. 37, 2 (1993), 195–214.
[100]
Hiscox, M.J. 2002. International trade and political conflict: commerce, coalitions, and mobility. Princeton University Press.
[101]
Hixson, W.L. 1998. Parting the curtain: propaganda, culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Macmillan Press.
[102]
Holland, J. 2013. Selling the War on Terror: foreign policy discourses after 9/11. Routledge.
[103]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1986. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science. 16, 3 (1986), 269–286.
[104]
Holmes, M. 2015. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly. (May 2015), n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12201.
[105]
Holmes, M. 2013. The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organization. 67, 04 (Oct. 2013), 829–861. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000234.
[106]
Hopf, T. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 1 (1998), 171–200.
[107]
Horowitz, M.C. and Stam, A.C. 2014. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization. 68, 03 (2014), 527–559. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000046.
[108]
Houghton, D.P. 2007. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 1 (Jan. 2007), 24–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x.
[109]
Hudson, V.M. 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1, 1 (Feb. 2005), 1–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.
[110]
Hudson, V.M. 2014. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
[111]
Hudson, V.M. and Vore, C.S. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review. 39, 2 (1995), 209–238.
[112]
Hurwitz, J. et al. 1993. Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly. 37, 3 (1993), 245–270.
[113]
Hymans, J.E.C. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press.
[114]
International Institute for Strategic Studies and Oxford University Press Survival.
[115]
International Studies Association 2005. Foreign policy analysis. (2005).
[116]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization) 1967. International studies quarterly. (1967).
[117]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization) International studies review.
[118]
Jackson, P.T. 2006. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. University of Michigan Press.
[119]
Jackson, R. 2005. Writing the war on terrorism: language, politics, and counter-terrorism. Manchester University Press.
[120]
James, P. and Zhang, E. 2005. Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1, 1 (Feb. 2005), 31–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00002.x.
[121]
Janis, I.L. 1982. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
[122]
Jelena Subotić 2016. Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change. Foreign Policy Analysis. 12, 4 (2016), 610–627. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12089.
[123]
Jentleson, B.W. 1992. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly. 36, 1 (1992), 49–73.
[124]
Jentleson, B.W. and Britton, R.L. 1998. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 42, 4 (1998), 395–417.
[125]
Jervis, R. 1983. Deterrence and Perception. International Security. 7, 3 (1983), 3–30.
[126]
Jervis, R. 1968. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics. 20, 3 (1968), 454–479.
[127]
Jonathan Mercer 2010. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization. 64, 01 (Jan. 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990221.
[128]
Juliet Kaarbo 2003. Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review. 5, 2 (Jun. 2003), 155–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.5020012.
[129]
Kaarbo, J. 2013. Coalition politics and cabinet decision making: a comparative analysis of foreign policy choices. University of Michigan Press.
[130]
Kaarbo, J. 1997. Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology. 18, 3 (1997), 553–581.
[131]
Kaarbo, J. and Cantir, C. 2013. Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict. 48, 4 (Dec. 2013), 465–483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713482815.
[132]
Kaufmann, C. 2004. Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War. International Security. 29, 1 (2004), 5–48.
[133]
Kennan, G.F. 1985. Morality and Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 64, 2 (1985).
[134]
Kettell, S. 2013. Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 15, 2 (May 2013), 263–279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00531.x.
[135]
Krasner, S.D. 1972. Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy. 7 (1972), 159–179.
[136]
Krebs, R.R. 2015. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization. 69, 04 (2015), 809–845. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000181.
[137]
Krebs, R.R. 2015. Narrative and the making of US national security. Cambridge University Press.
[138]
Krebs, R.R. 2015. Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War. Security Studies. 24, 1 (Jan. 2015), 131–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1001215.
[139]
Krebs, R.R. and Lobasz, J.K. 2007. Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq. Security Studies. 16, 3 (Aug. 2007), 409–451. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410701547881.
[140]
Kull, S. et al. 2004. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly. 118, 4 (2004), 569–598.
[141]
Kuperman, A.J. 2008. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly. 52, 1 (2008), 49–80.
[142]
Lake, D.A. and Powell, R. 1999. Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton University Press.
[143]
Larsen, H. 1997. Foreign policy and discourse analysis: France, Britain, and Europe. Routledge/LSE.
[144]
Lawler, P. 2005. The Good State: In Praise of ‘Classical’ Internationalism. Review of International Studies. 31, 3 (2005), 427–449.
[145]
Leeds, B.A. and Davis, D.R. 1997. Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 41, 6 (1997), 814–834.
[146]
Levy, J.S. 1986. Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly. 30, 2 (1986), 193–222.
[147]
Levy, J.S. 2008. Preventive War and Democratic Politics. International Studies Quarterly. 52, 1 (2008), 1–24.
[148]
Levy, J.S. 1997. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 1 (1997), 87–112.
[149]
LexisNexis (Firm) 2008. Politics. (2008).
[150]
Lieberthal, K.G. and Lampton, D.M. 1992. Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China. University of California Press.
[151]
Little, R. and Wickham-Jones, M. 2000. New Labour’s foreign policy: a new moral crusade? Manchester University Press.
[152]
London School of Economics and Political Science Millennium: journal of international studies.
[153]
Maoz, Z. 1997. The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall? International Security. 22, 1 (1997), 162–198.
[154]
Maoz, Z. and Russett, B. 1993. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review. 87, 3 (1993), 624–638.
[155]
Mapel, D.R. and Nardin, T. 1992. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[156]
Marsh, C. and Fraser, C. 1989. Public opinion and nuclear weapons. Macmillan.
[157]
Marsh, K. 2014. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 3 (Jul. 2014), 265–288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12000.
[158]
Martin, L.L. 1999. The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security. 24, 2 (Oct. 1999), 74–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560158.
[159]
Mazrui, A.A. 1996. Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 72, 3 (1996), 493–506.
[160]
McCourt, D.M. 2014. Britain and world power since 1945: constructing a nation’s role in international politics. The University of Michigan Press.
[161]
McDermott, R. 2014. The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents. Foreign Policy Analysis. 10, 4 (Oct. 2014), 313–327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12009.
[162]
Mearsheimer, J. and Walt, S. The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books. 28, 6.
[163]
Mercer, J. 2013. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization. 67, 02 (Apr. 2013), 221–252. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000015.
[164]
Mercer, J. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization. 59, 01 (Jan. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050058.
[165]
Milner, H. 1988. Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade. World Politics. 40, 3 (1988), 350–376.
[166]
Mintz, A. 2004. How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 48, 1 (Feb. 2004), 3–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703261056.
[167]
Mintz, A. and DeRouen, K.R. 2010. Understanding foreign policy decision making. Cambridge University Press.
[168]
Mor, B.D. 1998. Conflict in world politics: advances in the study of crisis, war and peace. Macmillan.
[169]
Moravcsik, A. 1999. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 6, 4 (Jan. 1999), 669–681. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343531.
[170]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1982. In defense of the national interest: a critical examination of American foreign policy. University Press of America.
[171]
Morris, J. 2011. How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 13, 3 (Aug. 2011), 326–347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x.
[172]
Nabers, D. 2009. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis. 5, 2 (Apr. 2009), 191–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x.
[173]
Narizny, K. 2003. The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39. International Security. 27, 4 (2003), 184–219.
[174]
Nincic, M. 1999. The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics. 61, 01 (Dec. 1999). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500028126.
[175]
Nyman, J. 2014. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 43, 1 (Sep. 2014), 43–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814525495.
[176]
Oakes, A. 2006. Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands. Security Studies. 15, 3 (Sep. 2006), 431–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410601028354.
[177]
Oakes, A. 2012. Diversionary war: domestic unrest and international conflict. Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press.
[178]
Ole R. Holsti 1992. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly. 36, 4 (1992), 439–466.
[179]
O’Neill, B. 2001. Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 45, 4 (2001), 617–640.
[180]
de Orellana, P. 2015. Struggles over identity in diplomacy: ‘Commie terrorists’ contra ‘imperialists’ in Western Sahara. International Relations. 29, 4 (Dec. 2015), 477–499. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815571620.
[181]
Ostermann, F. 2015. The end of ambivalence and the triumph of pragmatism? Franco-British defence cooperation and European and Atlantic defence policy traditions. International Relations. 29, 3 (Sep. 2015), 334–347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600937.
[182]
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom and EBSCO Publishing (Firm) 1999. British journal of politics and international relations. (1999).
[183]
Ray, J.L. 1998. Democracy and international conflict: an evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. University of South Carolina Press.
[184]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[185]
Rhodes, E. 1994. Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy. World Politics. 47, 1 (1994), 1–41.
[186]
Richards, D. et al. 1993. Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 37, 3 (Sep. 1993), 504–535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037003005.
[187]
Risse-Kappen, T. 1991. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics. 43, 4 (1991), 479–512.
[188]
Robert M. Entman 2004. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
[189]
Robinson, P. et al. 2010. Pockets of resistance: British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Manchester University Press.
[190]
Robinson, P. et al. eds. 2016. Routledge handbook of media, conflict and security. Routledge.
[191]
Rogowski, R. 1987. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review. 81, 4 (1987), 1121–1137.
[192]
Rose McDermott 2004. Political psychology in international relations. University of Michigan Press.
[193]
Royal Institute of International Affairs et al. 1944. International affairs. (1944).
[194]
Russett, B.M. and Oneal, J.R. 2001. Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. Norton.
[195]
Schmidt, B.C. and Williams, M.C. 2008. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies. 17, 2 (May 2008), 191–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098990.
[196]
Schweller, R.L. 1992. Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics. 44, 2 (1992), 235–269.
[197]
Sears, D.O. et al. 2013. The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press.
[198]
Sinno, A.H. 2008. Organizations at war in Afghanistan and beyond. Cornell University Press.
[199]
Sjöstedt, R. 2007. The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis. 3, 3 (Jul. 2007), 233–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x.
[200]
Slater, J. 2002. Ideology vs. The national interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security Studies. 12, 1 (Oct. 2002), 164–206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410212120006.
[201]
Smith, K.E. and Lights, M. 2001. Ethics and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
[202]
Smith, S. et al. eds. 2016. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[203]
Smith, S. et al. eds. 2016. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press.
[204]
Smith, S. 1985. Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 61, 1 (1985), 9–25.
[205]
Snow, D.M. and Brown, E. 1994. Puzzle palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. foreign and defense policy-making in the 1990s. St. Martin’s Press.
[206]
Snyder, J. 2004. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy. 145 (2004), 52–62.
[207]
Sobel, R. 2001. The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam: constraining the colossus. Oxford University Press.
[208]
Solingen, E. Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now. International Security. 39, 1, 44–70.
[209]
Solomon, T. 2015. The politics of subjectivity in American foreign policy discourses. University of Michigan Press.
[210]
Sprecher, C. and DeRouen, K. 2005. The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998. Foreign Policy Analysis. 1, 1 (Feb. 2005), 121–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00006.x.
[211]
Strong, J. 2014. Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. (Jul. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12055.
[212]
Trubowitz, P. 1992. Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly. 36, 2 (1992), 173–190.
[213]
Valenta, J. 1979. The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Political Science Quarterly. 94, 1 (1979), 55–76.
[214]
Vanderbush, W. 2009. Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 5, 3 (Jul. 2009), 287–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00094.x.
[215]
Walker, S.G. et al. 2011. Rethinking foreign policy analysis: states, leaders, and the microfoundations of behavioral international relations. Routledge.
[216]
Walter Carlsnaes 1992. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly. 36, 3 (1992), 245–270.
[217]
Walzer, M. 2006. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.
[218]
Weber, C. 2006. Imagining America at war: morality, politics, and film. Routledge.
[219]
Wehner, L.E. and Thies, C.G. 2014. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. 16, 3 (Sep. 2014), 411–436. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12149.
[220]
Welch, D.A. 1992. The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security. 17, 2 (1992), 112–146.
[221]
Weldes, J. 1996. Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations. 2, 3 (1996), 275–318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003001.
[222]
Williams, M.C. 2005. What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory. European Journal of International Relations. 11, 3 (2005), 307–337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105055482.
[223]
Cambridge review of international affairs.
[224]
Contemporary politics.
[225]
European journal of international relations.
[226]
2013. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[227]
International feminist journal of politics.
[228]
1996. International politics. (1996).
[229]
International studies perspectives.
