1
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. Published Online First: 2005.
2
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. Published Online First: 1944.
3
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. Published Online First: 1999.
4
European journal of international relations.
5
Cambridge review of international affairs.
6
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Published Online First: 1981.
7
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, et al. International security.
9
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival.
10
Contemporary politics.
11
LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. Published Online First: 2008.
12
International politics. 1996.
13
International feminist journal of politics.
14
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. Published Online First: 1967.
15
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review.
16
International studies perspectives.
17
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies.
18
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics. Published Online First: 2003.
19
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
20
Juliet Kaarbo. Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review. 2003;5:155–202. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.5020012
21
Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1:1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
22
Walter Carlsnaes. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36:245–70.
23
Snyder J. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy. 2004;52–62.
24
Garrison JA. Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium. International Studies Review. 2003;5:155–202. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.5020011
25
Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2013.
26
Hudson VM, Vore CS. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review. 1995;39:209–38.
27
Mintz A, DeRouen KR. Understanding foreign policy decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
28
Walker SG, Malici A, Schafer M. Rethinking foreign policy analysis: states, leaders, and the microfoundations of behavioral international relations. New York, N.Y.: Routledge 2011.
29
Arnold Wolfers. ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly. 1952;67:481–502.
30
Slater J. Ideology vs. The national interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security Studies. 2002;12:164–206. doi: 10.1080/09636410212120006
31
Williams MC. What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory. European Journal of International Relations. 2005;11:307–37. doi: 10.1177/1354066105055482
32
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations. 1996;2:275–318. doi: 10.1177/1354066196002003001
33
Burchill S. The national interest in international relations theory. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
34
Chandler D. Culture Wars and International Intervention: An ‘Inside/Out’ View of the Decline of National Interest. International politics. 2004;41:354–74.
35
Gilmore J. The uncertain merger of values and interests in UK foreign policy. International Affairs. 2014;90:541–57. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12126
36
Morgenthau HJ. In defense of the national interest: a critical examination of American foreign policy. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America 1982.
37
Beard CA, Smith GHE. The idea of national interest: an analytical study in American foreign policy. New York: Macmillan 1934.
38
Clinton WD. The two faces of national interest. Baton Rouge, La: Louisiana State University Press 1994.
39
Edmunds T. Complexity, strategy and the national interest. International Affairs. 2014;90:525–39. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12125
40
Gaskarth J. Strategizing Britain’s role in the world. International Affairs. 2014;90:559–81. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12127
41
Morris J. How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011;13:326–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x
42
Clinton WD. The National Interest: Normative Foundations. The Review of Politics. 1986;48. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500039656
43
Cornish P, Dorman A. National defence in the age of austerity. International Affairs. 2009;85:733–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00825.x
44
Cornish P, Dorman AM. Smart muddling through: rethinking UK national strategy beyond Afghanistan. International Affairs. 2012;88:213–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01067.x
45
Edmunds T. British civil-military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs. 2012;88:265–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01070.x
46
Fitz‐Gerald AM. A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges. Defence Studies. 2008;8:4–25. doi: 10.1080/14702430701823933
47
Gallie WB. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956;56:167–98.
48
Finnemore M. National interests in international society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1996.
49
Hollis M, Smith S. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science. 1986;16:269–86.
50
Lake DA, Powell R. Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1999.
51
Fearon JD. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization. 1995;49:379–414.
52
Gartzke E. War Is in the Error Term. International Organization. 1999;53:567–87.
53
Kaarbo J, Cantir C. Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict. 2013;48:465–83. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482815
54
Martin LL. The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security. 1999;24:74–83. doi: 10.1162/016228899560158
55
Nincic M. The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics. 1999;61. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500028126
56
Risse-Kappen T. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics. 1991;43:479–512.
57
Oakes A. Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands. Security Studies. 2006;15:431–63. doi: 10.1080/09636410601028354
58
Maoz Z, Russett B. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review. 1993;87:624–38.
59
Levy JS. Preventive War and Democratic Politics. International Studies Quarterly. 2008;52:1–24.
60
Brown ME, Lynn-Jones SM, Miller SE. Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 1996.
61
Cowhey PF. Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization. 1993;47:299–326.
62
Oakes A. Diversionary war: domestic unrest and international conflict. Stanford, California: Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press 2012.
63
Strong J. Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. Published Online First: July 2014. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.12055
64
Bennett DS, Nordstrom T. Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000;44:33–61.
65
Leeds BA, Davis DR. Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1997;41:814–34.
66
Richards D, Morgan TC, Wilson RK, et al. Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1993;37:504–35. doi: 10.1177/0022002793037003005
67
Mor BD. Conflict in world politics: advances in the study of crisis, war and peace. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1998.
68
Gelpi C. Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1997;41:255–82.
69
Sprecher C, DeRouen K. The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1:121–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00006.x
70
Ray JL. Democracy and international conflict: an evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. 1st pbk. ed. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press 1998.
71
Cederman L-E. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review. 2001;95:15–31.
72
Russett BM, Oneal JR. Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. 1st ed. New York, NY: Norton 2001.
73
Maoz Z. The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall? International Security. 1997;22:162–98.
74
Gaubatz KT. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization. 1996;50:109–39.
75
Schweller RL. Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics. 1992;44:235–69.
76
Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan 2003.
77
Allison GT. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review. 1969;63:689–718.
78
Narizny K. The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39. International Security. 2003;27:184–219.
79
Marsh K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10:265–88. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12000
80
Sinno AH. Organizations at war in Afghanistan and beyond. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 2008.
81
Solingen E. Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now. International Security. ;39:44–70.
82
Levy JS. Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly. 1986;30:193–222.
83
Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2014.
84
Allison GT, Zelikow P. Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Longman 1999.
85
Bendor J, Hammond TH. Rethinking Allison’s Models. The American Political Science Review. 1992;86:301–22.
86
Krasner SD. Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy. 1972;159–79.
87
Destler IM. Presidents, bureaucrats, and foreign policy: the politics of organizational reform. 1st Prinston pbk. ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1974.
88
Halperin MH, Clapp P, Kanter A. Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution 1974.
89
Kaarbo J. Coalition politics and cabinet decision making: a comparative analysis of foreign policy choices. First paperback edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2013.
90
Grodsky B. Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Post-Communism. 2014;56:43–57. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216560204
91
Welch DA. The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security. 1992;17:112–46.
92
Smith S. Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1985;61:9–25.
93
Snow DM, Brown E. Puzzle palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. foreign and defense policy-making in the 1990s. New York: St. Martin’s Press 1994.
94
Lieberthal KG, Lampton DM. Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China. Berkeley: University of California Press 1992.
95
Rhodes E. Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy. World Politics. 1994;47:1–41.
96
Valenta J. The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Political Science Quarterly. 1979;94:55–76.
97
Brooks SG. Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace. International Organization. 2013;67:863–88. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000283
98
Abelson DE. Old world, new world: the evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs. 2014;90:125–42. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12099
99
Alden C, Aran A. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: Routledge 2012.
100
Vanderbush W. Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2009;5:287–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00094.x
101
Mearsheimer J, Walt S. The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books. ;28.
102
Trubowitz P. Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36:173–90.
103
Hiscox MJ. International trade and political conflict: commerce, coalitions, and mobility. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2002.
104
Brawley MR. Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:633–53.
105
Milner H. Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade. World Politics. 1988;40:350–76.
106
Rogowski R. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review. 1987;81:1121–37.
107
Fearon JD. Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annual Review of Political Science. 1998;1:289–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289
108
Sears DO, Huddy L, Levy JS. The Oxford handbook of political psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press 2013.
109
Janis IL. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Second edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning 1982.
110
Levy JS. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:87–112.
111
Mercer J. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization. 2005;59. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050058
112
Hermann MG, Preston T, Korany B, et al. Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. International Studies Review. 2001;3:83–131. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00235
113
Kaarbo J. Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology. 1997;18:553–81.
114
Hermann MG, Hermann CF. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly. 1989;33:361–87.
115
Hermann MG, Preston T. Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements. Political Psychology. 1994;15:75–96.
116
James P, Zhang E. Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1:31–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00002.x
117
Mintz A. How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2004;48:3–13. doi: 10.1177/0022002703261056
118
Goldgeier JM, Tetlock PE. Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001;4:67–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67
119
Jervis R. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics. 1968;20:454–79.
120
Jervis R. Deterrence and Perception. International Security. 1983;7:3–30.
121
George AL. The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly. 1969;13:190–222.
122
O’Neill B. Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 2001;45:617–40.
123
Blanton SL. Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador. International Studies Quarterly. 1996;40:23–44.
124
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
125
Hymans JEC. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
126
Hall TH. We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies. 2011;20:521–55. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2011.625771
127
Holmes M. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly. 2015;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12201
128
Dyson SB. Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 2009;30:33–48.
129
Jonathan Mercer. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization. 2010;64. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309990221
130
Mercer J. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization. 2013;67:221–52. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000015
131
Hibbing JR. Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 2013;11:475–89. doi: 10.1017/S1537592713000923
132
Holmes M. The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organization. 2013;67:829–61. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000234
133
Horowitz MC, Stam AC. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization. 2014;68:527–59. doi: 10.1017/S0020818314000046
134
Rose McDermott. Political psychology in international relations. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press 2004.
135
McDermott R. The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10:313–27. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12009
136
Forsberg T. Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality. Cooperation and Conflict. 2006;41:235–60. doi: 10.1177/0010836706066558
137
Berejikian JD. Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations. Political Psychology. 2002;23:759–86.
138
Robert M. Entman. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press 2004.
139
Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. London: Vintage 1994.
140
Robinson P, Goddard P, Parry K, et al. Pockets of resistance: British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2010.
141
Gribble R, Wessley S, Klein S, et al. British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics. 2015;35:128–50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12073
142
Robinson P, Seib PM, Fröhlich R, editors. Routledge handbook of media, conflict and security. New York, NY: Routledge 2016.
143
Eytan G, Robinson P, Miklian J, et al. Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect. Review of International Studies. Published Online First: 2016. doi: 10.1017/S026021051600005X
144
Herring E, Robinson P. Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD. Political Science Quarterly. 2014;129:551–84. doi: 10.1002/polq.12252
145
Hildebrandt T, Hillebrecht C, Holm PM, et al. The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9:243–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00189.x
146
Dixon P. Britain’s ‘Vietnam Syndrome’? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:99–121.
147
Ole R. Holsti. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36:439–66.
148
Gilboa E. Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect. International Studies Perspectives. 2005;6:325–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00211.x
149
Foyle DC. Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2004;16:269–94. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh025
150
Sobel R. The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam: constraining the colossus. New York: Oxford University Press 2001.
151
Bjereld U, Ekengren A-M. Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden. International Studies Quarterly. 1999;43:503–18. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00132
152
Hurwitz J, Peffley M, Seligson MA. Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly. 1993;37:245–70.
153
Baum MA. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96:91–109.
154
Kull S, Ramsay C, Lewis E. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly. 2004;118:569–98.
155
Foyle DC. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:141–70. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00036
156
Kaufmann C. Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War. International Security. 2004;29:5–48.
157
Gaubatz KT. Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad. World Politics. 1995;47:534–54.
158
Gowa J. Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization. 1998;52:307–24.
159
Herring E, Robinson P. Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies. 2003;29:553–68.
160
Hill KA. The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa. International Studies Quarterly. 1993;37:195–214.
161
Hixson WL. Parting the curtain: propaganda, culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Houndmills: Macmillan Press 1998.
162
Jentleson BW. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36:49–73.
163
Jentleson BW, Britton RL. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1998;42:395–417.
164
Marsh C, Fraser C. Public opinion and nuclear weapons. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan 1989.
165
Mazrui AA. Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1996;72:493–506.
166
Houghton DP. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3:24–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x
167
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Routledge 2006.
168
Gaskarth J. Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2:325–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00034.x
169
Campbell D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Revised edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1998.
170
Doty RL. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1996.
171
Sjöstedt R. The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3:233–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x
172
Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J. Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Pub 1998.
173
Larsen H. Foreign policy and discourse analysis: France, Britain, and Europe. London: Routledge/LSE 1997.
174
Farrell T. Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review. 2002;4:49–72.
175
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23:171–200.
176
Finnemore M. The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2003.
177
Finnemore M. National interests in international society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1996.
178
Wehner LE, Thies CG. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. 2014;16:411–36. doi: 10.1111/misr.12149
179
Moravcsik A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 1999;6:669–81. doi: 10.1080/135017699343531
180
Checkel JT, Moravcsik A. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics. 2001;2:219–49. doi: 10.1177/1465116501002002004
181
Duffield JS. Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization. 1999;53:765–803.
182
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48:517–38.
183
Barnett M. Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5:5–36. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005001001
184
Daddow O. Constructing a ‘great’ role for Britain in an age of austerity: Interpreting coalition foreign policy, 2010-2015. International Relations. 2015;29:303–18. doi: 10.1177/0047117815600931
185
Fisher K. Security, identity and British counterterrorism policy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2015.
186
Goddard SE, Krebs RR. Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies. 2015;24:5–36. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198
187
Jelena Subotić. Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2016;12:610–27. doi: 10.1111/fpa.12089
188
Bevir M, Daddow O. Interpreting foreign policy: National, comparative and regional studies. International Relations. 2015;29:273–87. doi: 10.1177/0047117815600930
189
Solomon T. The politics of subjectivity in American foreign policy discourses. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2015.
190
McCourt DM. Britain and world power since 1945: constructing a nation’s role in international politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press 2014.
191
Hayes J. Constructing national security: U.S. relations with China and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015.
192
Krebs RR. Narrative and the making of US national security. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 2015.
193
Kettell S. Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2013;15:263–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00531.x
194
Goddard SE. The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39. Security Studies. 2015;24:95–130. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2015.1001216
195
Krebs RR. Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War. Security Studies. 2015;24:131–70. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2015.1001215
196
Krebs RR. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization. 2015;69:809–45. doi: 10.1017/S0020818315000181
197
Krebs RR, Lobasz JK. Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq. Security Studies. 2007;16:409–51. doi: 10.1080/09636410701547881
198
de Orellana P. Struggles over identity in diplomacy: ‘Commie terrorists’ contra ‘imperialists’ in Western Sahara. International Relations. 2015;29:477–99. doi: 10.1177/0047117815571620
199
Ostermann F. The end of ambivalence and the triumph of pragmatism? Franco-British defence cooperation and European and Atlantic defence policy traditions. International Relations. 2015;29:334–47. doi: 10.1177/0047117815600937
200
Holland J. Selling the War on Terror: foreign policy discourses after 9/11. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge 2013.
201
Schmidt BC, Williams MC. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies. 2008;17:191–220. doi: 10.1080/09636410802098990
202
Jackson PT. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2006.
203
Nyman J. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2014;43:43–65. doi: 10.1177/0305829814525495
204
Croft S. Culture, crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
205
Debrix F. Tabloid terror: war, culture, and geopolitics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2008.
206
Jackson R. Writing the war on terrorism: language, politics, and counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2005.
207
Nabers D. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2009;5:191–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x
208
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
209
Smith KE, Lights M. Ethics and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
210
Bulley D. The politics of ethical foreign policy: A responsibility to protect whom? European Journal of International Relations. 2010;16:441–61. doi: 10.1177/1354066109350051
211
Kennan GF. Morality and Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 1985;64.
212
Busby JW. Moral movements and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
213
Lawler P. The Good State: In Praise of ‘Classical’ Internationalism. Review of International Studies. 2005;31:427–49.
214
Kuperman AJ. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly. 2008;52:49–80.
215
Beitz CR. Political theory and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1999.
216
Walzer M. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books 2006.
217
Abrahamsen R, Williams P. Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour’s ‘Third Way’ in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Studies. 2001;49:249–64. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00312
218
Little R, Wickham-Jones M. New Labour’s foreign policy: a new moral crusade? Manchester: Manchester University Press 2000.
219
Fierke KM. Who is my neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a global ethic of care. European Journal of International Relations. 2014;20:787–809. doi: 10.1177/1354066113497490
220
Baehr PR, Castermans-Holleman MC. The role of human rights in foreign policy. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2004.
221
Buckler S. Dirty hands: the problem of political morality. Aldershot, Hants: Avebury 1993.
222
Campbell D. National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press 1998.
223
Cole P. Philosophies of exclusion: liberal political theory and immigration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2000.
224
Benhabib S. The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
225
Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. ;73.
226
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity Press 2011.
227
Weber C. Imagining America at war: morality, politics, and film. London, New York: Routledge 2006.
228
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
229
Chollet D, Lindberg T. A moral core for U.S. foreign policy. Policy Review. 2007;2007.
230
Mapel DR, Nardin T. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
