Bibliography for Politics of Foreign Policy BETA

1

International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. Published Online First: 2005.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2244344

2

Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. Published Online First: 1944.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200321

3

Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. Published Online First: 1999.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196849

4

European journal of international relations. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199017

5

Cambridge review of international affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228528

6

British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Published Online First: 1981.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204860

7

Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, et al. International security. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200670

8

Security studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2229313

9

International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2205588

10

Contemporary politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228615

11

LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. Published Online First: 2008.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3072814

12

International politics. 1996.

13

International feminist journal of politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200360

14

International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. Published Online First: 1967.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200679

15

International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200680

16

International studies perspectives. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2928675

17

London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2289212

18

American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics. Published Online First: 2003.https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2203859

19

Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.

20

Juliet Kaarbo. Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review 2003;5:155–202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020012

21

Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 2005;1:1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x

22

Walter Carlsnaes. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 1992;36:245–70.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600772

23

Snyder J. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy 2004;:52–62.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4152944

24

Garrison JA. Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium. International Studies Review 2003;5:155–202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020011

25

Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2013.

26

Hudson VM, Vore CS. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review 1995;39:209–38.https://www.jstor.org/stable/222751

27

Mintz A, DeRouen KR. Understanding foreign policy decision making. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.

28

Walker SG, Malici A, Schafer M. Rethinking foreign policy analysis: states, leaders, and the microfoundations of behavioral international relations. New York, N.Y.: : Routledge 2011.

29

Arnold Wolfers. ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly 1952;67:481–502.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138

30

Slater J. Ideology vs. The national interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security Studies 2002;12:164–206. doi:10.1080/09636410212120006

31

Williams MC. What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory. European Journal of International Relations 2005;11:307–37. doi:10.1177/1354066105055482

32

Weldes J. Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations 1996;2:275–318. doi:10.1177/1354066196002003001

33

Burchill S. The national interest in international relations theory. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.

34

Chandler D. Culture Wars and International Intervention: An ‘Inside/Out’ View of the Decline of National Interest. International politics 2004;41:354–74.

35

Gilmore J. The uncertain merger of values and interests in UK foreign policy. International Affairs 2014;90:541–57. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12126

36

Morgenthau HJ. In defense of the national interest: a critical examination of American foreign policy. Washington, D.C.: : University Press of America 1982.

37

Beard CA, Smith GHE. The idea of national interest: an analytical study in American foreign policy. New York: : Macmillan 1934.

38

Clinton WD. The two faces of national interest. Baton Rouge, La: : Louisiana State University Press 1994.

39

Edmunds T. Complexity, strategy and the national interest. International Affairs 2014;90:525–39. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12125

40

Gaskarth J. Strategizing Britain’s role in the world. International Affairs 2014;90:559–81. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12127

41

Morris J. How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2011;13:326–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x

42

Clinton WD. The National Interest: Normative Foundations. The Review of Politics 1986;48. doi:10.1017/S0034670500039656

43

Cornish P, Dorman A. National defence in the age of austerity. International Affairs 2009;85:733–53. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00825.x

44

Cornish P, Dorman AM. Smart muddling through: rethinking UK national strategy beyond Afghanistan. International Affairs 2012;88:213–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01067.x

45

Edmunds T. British civil-military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs 2012;88:265–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01070.x

46

Fitz‐Gerald AM. A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges. Defence Studies 2008;8:4–25. doi:10.1080/14702430701823933

47

Gallie WB. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1956;56:167–98.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562

48

Finnemore M. National interests in international society. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1996.

49

Hollis M, Smith S. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science 1986;16:269–86.https://www.jstor.org/stable/193813

50

Lake DA, Powell R. Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999.

51

Fearon JD. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 1995;49:379–414.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903

52

Gartzke E. War Is in the Error Term. International Organization 1999;53:567–87.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601290

53

Kaarbo J, Cantir C. Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict 2013;48:465–83. doi:10.1177/0010836713482815

54

Martin LL. The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security 1999;24:74–83. doi:10.1162/016228899560158

55

Nincic M. The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics 1999;61. doi:10.1017/S0034670500028126

56

Risse-Kappen T. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics 1991;43:479–512.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010534

57

Oakes A. Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands. Security Studies 2006;15:431–63. doi:10.1080/09636410601028354

58

Maoz Z, Russett B. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review 1993;87:624–38.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938740

59

Levy JS. Preventive War and Democratic Politics. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:1–24.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734222

60

Brown ME, Lynn-Jones SM, Miller SE. Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996.

61

Cowhey PF. Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization 1993;47:299–326.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706892

62

Oakes A. Diversionary war: domestic unrest and international conflict. Stanford, California: : Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press 2012.

63

Strong J. Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations Published Online First: July 2014. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12055

64

Bennett DS, Nordstrom T. Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2000;44:33–61.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174621

65

Leeds BA, Davis DR. Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 1997;41:814–34.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174432

66

Richards D, Morgan TC, Wilson RK, et al. Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution 1993;37:504–35. doi:10.1177/0022002793037003005

67

Mor BD. Conflict in world politics: advances in the study of crisis, war and peace. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1998.

68

Gelpi C. Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 1997;41:255–82.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174373

69

Sprecher C, DeRouen K. The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998. Foreign Policy Analysis 2005;1:121–41. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00006.x

70

Ray JL. Democracy and international conflict: an evaluation of the  democratic peace proposition. 1st pbk. ed. Columbia, SC: : University of South Carolina Press 1998.

71

Cederman L-E. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review 2001;95:15–31.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117626

72

Russett BM, Oneal JR. Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. 1st ed. New York, NY: : Norton 2001.

73

Maoz Z. The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall? International Security 1997;22:162–98.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539333

74

Gaubatz KT. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization 1996;50:109–39.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707000

75

Schweller RL. Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics 1992;44:235–69.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010448

76

Hill C. The changing politics of foreign policy. Basingstoke: : Palgrave MacMillan 2003.

77

Allison GT. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review 1969;63:689–718.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1954423

78

Narizny K. The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39. International Security 2003;27:184–219.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137608

79

Marsh K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis 2014;10:265–88. doi:10.1111/fpa.12000

80

Sinno AH. Organizations at war in Afghanistan and beyond. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 2008.

81

Solingen E. Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now. International Security;39:44–70.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ins/summary/v039/39.1.solingen.html

82

Levy JS. Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly 1986;30:193–222.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600676

83

Hudson VM. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Second edition. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield 2014.

84

Allison GT, Zelikow P. Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: : Longman 1999.

85

Bendor J, Hammond TH. Rethinking Allison’s Models. The American Political Science Review 1992;86:301–22.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964222

86

Krasner SD. Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy 1972;:159–79.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147761

87

Destler IM. Presidents, bureaucrats, and foreign policy: the politics of organizational reform. 1st Prinston pbk. ed. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1974.

88

Halperin MH, Clapp P, Kanter A. Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Washington: : The Brookings Institution 1974.

89

Kaarbo J. Coalition politics and cabinet decision making: a comparative analysis of foreign policy choices. First paperback edition. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2013.

90

Grodsky B. Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Post-Communism 2014;56:43–57. doi:10.2753/PPC1075-8216560204

91

Welch DA. The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security 1992;17:112–46.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170

92

Smith S. Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 1985;61:9–25.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2619777

93

Snow DM, Brown E. Puzzle palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. foreign and defense policy-making in the 1990s. New York: : St. Martin’s Press 1994.

94

Lieberthal KG, Lampton DM. Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1992.

95

Rhodes E. Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy. World Politics 1994;47:1–41.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950678

96

Valenta J. The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Political Science Quarterly 1979;94:55–76.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150156

97

Brooks SG. Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace. International Organization 2013;67:863–88. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000283

98

Abelson DE. Old world, new world: the evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs 2014;90:125–42. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12099

99

Alden C, Aran A. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. London: : Routledge 2012.

100

Vanderbush W. Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis 2009;5:287–306. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00094.x

101

Mearsheimer J, Walt S. The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books;28.https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby

102

Trubowitz P. Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 1992;36:173–90.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600880

103

Hiscox MJ. International trade and political conflict: commerce, coalitions, and mobility. Princeton, New Jersey: : Princeton University Press 2002.

104

Brawley MR. Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:633–53.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600856

105

Milner H. Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade. World Politics 1988;40:350–76.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010217

106

Rogowski R. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review 1987;81:1121–37.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962581

107

Fearon JD. Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annual Review of Political Science 1998;1:289–313. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289

108

Sears DO, Huddy L, Levy JS. The Oxford handbook of political psychology. 2nd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001

109

Janis IL. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Second edition. Boston: : Wadsworth Cengage Learning 1982.

110

Levy JS. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:87–112.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600908

111

Mercer J. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 2005;59. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050058

112

Hermann MG, Preston T, Korany B, et al. Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. International Studies Review 2001;3:83–131. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00235

113

Kaarbo J. Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology 1997;18:553–81.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792101

114

Hermann MG, Hermann CF. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly 1989;33:361–87.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600518

115

Hermann MG, Preston T. Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements. Political Psychology 1994;15:75–96.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3791440

116

James P, Zhang E. Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996. Foreign Policy Analysis 2005;1:31–54. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00002.x

117

Mintz A. How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2004;48:3–13. doi:10.1177/0022002703261056

118

Goldgeier JM, Tetlock PE. Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2001;4:67–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67

119

Jervis R. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics 1968;20:454–79.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009777

120

Jervis R. Deterrence and Perception. International Security 1983;7:3–30.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538549

121

George AL. The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly 1969;13:190–222.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3013944

122

O’Neill B. Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly 2001;45:617–40.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096063

123

Blanton SL. Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador. International Studies Quarterly 1996;40:23–44.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600930

124

Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.

125

Hymans JEC. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491412

126

Hall TH. We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies 2011;20:521–55. doi:10.1080/09636412.2011.625771

127

Holmes M. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 2015;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/isqu.12201

128

Dyson SB. Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 2009;30:33–48.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445174

129

Jonathan Mercer. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization 2010;64. doi:10.1017/S0020818309990221

130

Mercer J. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization 2013;67:221–52. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000015

131

Hibbing JR. Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics. Perspectives on Politics 2013;11:475–89. doi:10.1017/S1537592713000923

132

Holmes M. The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organization 2013;67:829–61. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000234

133

Horowitz MC, Stam AC. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization 2014;68:527–59. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000046

134

Rose McDermott. Political psychology in international relations. Ann Arbor, Mich: : University of Michigan Press 2004.

135

McDermott R. The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents. Foreign Policy Analysis 2014;10:313–27. doi:10.1111/fpa.12009

136

Forsberg T. Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality. Cooperation and Conflict 2006;41:235–60. doi:10.1177/0010836706066558

137

Berejikian JD. Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations. Political Psychology 2002;23:759–86.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792366

138

Robert M. Entman. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, Illinois: : University of Chicago Press 2004. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780226210735

139

Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. London: : Vintage 1994.

140

Robinson P, Goddard P, Parry K, et al. Pockets of resistance: British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781847794727

141

Gribble R, Wessley S, Klein S, et al. British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics 2015;35:128–50. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12073

142

Robinson P, Seib PM, Fröhlich R, editors. Routledge handbook of media, conflict and security. New York, NY: : Routledge 2016.

143

Eytan G, Robinson P, Miklian J, et al. Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect. Review of International Studies Published Online First: 2016. doi:10.1017/S026021051600005X

144

Herring E, Robinson P. Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD. Political Science Quarterly 2014;129:551–84. doi:10.1002/polq.12252

145

Hildebrandt T, Hillebrecht C, Holm PM, et al. The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology. Foreign Policy Analysis 2013;9:243–66. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00189.x

146

Dixon P. Britain’s ‘Vietnam Syndrome’? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies 2000;26:99–121.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097658

147

Ole R. Holsti. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly 1992;36:439–66.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600734

148

Gilboa E. Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect. International Studies Perspectives 2005;6:325–41. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00211.x

149

Foyle DC. Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2004;16:269–94. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh025

150

Sobel R. The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam: constraining the colossus. New York: : Oxford University Press 2001.

151

Bjereld U, Ekengren A-M. Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden. International Studies Quarterly 1999;43:503–18. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00132

152

Hurwitz J, Peffley M, Seligson MA. Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly 1993;37:245–70.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600808

153

Baum MA. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review 2002;96:91–109.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117812

154

Kull S, Ramsay C, Lewis E. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly 2004;118:569–98.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035697

155

Foyle DC. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:141–70. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00036

156

Kaufmann C. Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War. International Security 2004;29:5–48.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137546

157

Gaubatz KT. Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad. World Politics 1995;47:534–54.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950701

158

Gowa J. Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization 1998;52:307–24.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601277

159

Herring E, Robinson P. Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies 2003;29:553–68.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097876

160

Hill KA. The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa. International Studies Quarterly 1993;37:195–214.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600768

161

Hixson WL. Parting the curtain: propaganda, culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Houndmills: : Macmillan Press 1998.

162

Jentleson BW. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly 1992;36:49–73.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600916

163

Jentleson BW, Britton RL. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 1998;42:395–417.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174436

164

Marsh C, Fraser C. Public opinion and nuclear weapons. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Macmillan 1989.

165

Mazrui AA. Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 1996;72:493–506.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625553

166

Houghton DP. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis 2007;3:24–45. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x

167

Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: : Routledge 2006. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=200689

168

Gaskarth J. Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 2006;2:325–41. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00034.x

169

Campbell D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Revised edition. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1998. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310792

170

Doty RL. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 1996.

171

Sjöstedt R. The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis 2007;3:233–54. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x

172

Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J. Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Pub 1998.

173

Larsen H. Foreign policy and discourse analysis: France, Britain, and Europe. London: : Routledge/LSE 1997. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1138282

174

Farrell T. Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review 2002;4:49–72.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186274

175

Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 1998;23:171–200.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267

176

Finnemore M. The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2003.

177

Finnemore M. National interests in international society. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1996.

178

Wehner LE, Thies CG. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review 2014;16:411–36. doi:10.1111/misr.12149

179

Moravcsik A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 1999;6:669–81. doi:10.1080/135017699343531

180

Checkel JT, Moravcsik A. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics 2001;2:219–49. doi:10.1177/1465116501002002004

181

Duffield JS. Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization 1999;53:765–803.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601309

182

Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly 2004;48:517–38.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521

183

Barnett M. Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations 1999;5:5–36. doi:10.1177/1354066199005001001

184

Daddow O. Constructing a ‘great’ role for Britain in an age of austerity: Interpreting coalition foreign policy, 2010-2015. International Relations 2015;29:303–18. doi:10.1177/0047117815600931

185

Fisher K. Security, identity and British counterterrorism policy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2015. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137524225

186

Goddard SE, Krebs RR. Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies 2015;24:5–36. doi:10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198

187

Jelena Subotić. Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change. Foreign Policy Analysis 2016;12:610–27. doi:10.1111/fpa.12089

188

Bevir M, Daddow O. Interpreting foreign policy: National, comparative and regional studies. International Relations 2015;29:273–87. doi:10.1177/0047117815600930

189

Solomon T. The politics of subjectivity in American foreign policy discourses. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2015.

190

McCourt DM. Britain and world power since 1945: constructing a nation’s role in international politics. Ann Arbor: : The University of Michigan Press 2014.

191

Hayes J. Constructing national security: U.S. relations with China and India. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.

192

Krebs RR. Narrative and the making of US national security. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2015.

193

Kettell S. Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2013;15:263–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00531.x

194

Goddard SE. The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39. Security Studies 2015;24:95–130. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1001216

195

Krebs RR. Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War. Security Studies 2015;24:131–70. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1001215

196

Krebs RR. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization 2015;69:809–45. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000181

197

Krebs RR, Lobasz JK. Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq. Security Studies 2007;16:409–51. doi:10.1080/09636410701547881

198

de Orellana P. Struggles over identity in diplomacy: ‘Commie terrorists’ contra ‘imperialists’ in Western Sahara. International Relations 2015;29:477–99. doi:10.1177/0047117815571620

199

Ostermann F. The end of ambivalence and the triumph of pragmatism? Franco-British defence cooperation and European and Atlantic defence policy traditions. International Relations 2015;29:334–47. doi:10.1177/0047117815600937

200

Holland J. Selling the War on Terror: foreign policy discourses after 9/11. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: : Routledge 2013.

201

Schmidt BC, Williams MC. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies 2008;17:191–220. doi:10.1080/09636410802098990

202

Jackson PT. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2006.

203

Nyman J. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2014;43:43–65. doi:10.1177/0305829814525495

204

Croft S. Culture, crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.

205

Debrix F. Tabloid terror: war, culture, and geopolitics. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2008.

206

Jackson R. Writing the war on terrorism: language, politics, and counter-terrorism. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2005.

207

Nabers D. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 2009;5:191–214. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x

208

Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001

209

Smith KE, Lights M. Ethics and foreign policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=202006

210

Bulley D. The politics of ethical foreign policy: A responsibility to protect whom? European Journal of International Relations 2010;16:441–61. doi:10.1177/1354066109350051

211

Kennan GF. Morality and Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs 1985;64.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290258825/fulltextPDF?accountid=14540

212

Busby JW. Moral movements and foreign policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.

213

Lawler P. The Good State: In Praise of ‘Classical’ Internationalism. Review of International Studies 2005;31:427–49.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072083

214

Kuperman AJ. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:49–80.https://www.jstor.org/stable/29734224

215

Beitz CR. Political theory and international relations. Princeton, NJ: : Princeton University Press 1999.

216

Walzer M. Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. 4th ed. New York: : Basic Books 2006.

217

Abrahamsen R, Williams P. Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour’s ‘Third Way’ in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Studies 2001;49:249–64. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00312

218

Little R, Wickham-Jones M. New Labour’s foreign policy: a new moral crusade? Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2000.

219

Fierke KM. Who is my neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a global ethic of care. European Journal of International Relations 2014;20:787–809. doi:10.1177/1354066113497490

220

Baehr PR, Castermans-Holleman MC. The role of human rights in foreign policy. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2004.

221

Buckler S. Dirty hands: the problem of political morality. Aldershot, Hants: : Avebury 1993.

222

Campbell D. National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis, MN: : University of Minnesota Press 1998.

223

Cole P. Philosophies of exclusion: liberal political theory and immigration. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2000.

224

Benhabib S. The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.

225

Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs;73.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290286683/abstract/C39C5610F46A4868PQ/1?accountid=14540

226

Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2011.

227

Weber C. Imagining America at war: morality, politics, and film. London, New York: : Routledge 2006.

228

Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.

229

Chollet D, Lindberg T. A moral core for U.S. foreign policy. Policy Review 2007;2007.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172911420/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=858d2035

230

Mapel DR, Nardin T. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.