Bibliography for Politics of Foreign Policy BETA

1.

International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. Published online 2005. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2244344

2.

Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. Published online 1944. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200321

3.

Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. Published online 1999. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196849

4.

European journal of international relations. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199017

5.

Cambridge review of international affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228528

6.

British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Published online 1981. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204860

7.

Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Project MUSE., Thomson Gale (Firm). International security. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200670

8.

Security studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2229313

9.

International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2205588

10.

Contemporary politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228615

11.

LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. Published online 2008. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3072814

12.

International politics. Published online 1996.

13.

International feminist journal of politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200360

14.

International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. Published online 1967. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200679

15.

International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200680

16.

International studies perspectives. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2928675

17.

London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2289212

18.

American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics. Published online 2003. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2203859

19.

Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, eds. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.

20.

Juliet Kaarbo. Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas. International Studies Review. 2003;5(2):155-202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020012

21.

Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1(1):1-30. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x

22.

Walter Carlsnaes. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36(3):245-270. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600772

23.

Snyder J. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy. 2004;(145):52-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4152944

24.

Garrison JA. Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium. International Studies Review. 2003;5(2):155-202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020011

25.

Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2013.

26.

Hudson VM, Vore CS. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review. 1995;39(2):209-238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/222751

27.

Mintz A, DeRouen KR. Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge University Press; 2010.

28.

Walker SG, Malici A, Schafer M. Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relations. Routledge; 2011.

29.

Arnold Wolfers. ‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly. 1952;67(4):481-502. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138

30.

Slater J. Ideology vs. The national interest: Bush, Sharon, and U.S. policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security Studies. 2002;12(1):164-206. doi:10.1080/09636410212120006

31.

Williams MC. What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory. European Journal of International Relations. 2005;11(3):307-337. doi:10.1177/1354066105055482

32.

Weldes J. Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations. 1996;2(3):275-318. doi:10.1177/1354066196002003001

33.

Burchill S. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.

34.

Chandler D. Culture Wars and International Intervention: An ‘Inside/Out’ View of the Decline of National Interest. International politics. 2004;41:354-374.

35.

Gilmore J. The uncertain merger of values and interests in UK foreign policy. International Affairs. 2014;90(3):541-557. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12126

36.

Morgenthau HJ. In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. University Press of America; 1982.

37.

Beard CA, Smith GHE. The Idea of National Interest: An Analytical Study in American Foreign Policy. Macmillan; 1934.

38.

Clinton WD. The Two Faces of National Interest. Vol Series: Political traditions in foreign policy series. Louisiana State University Press; 1994.

39.

Edmunds T. Complexity, strategy and the national interest. International Affairs. 2014;90(3):525-539. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12125

40.

Gaskarth J. Strategizing Britain’s role in the world. International Affairs. 2014;90(3):559-581. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12127

41.

Morris J. How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain’s Future Global Role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011;13(3):326-347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x

42.

Clinton WD. The National Interest: Normative Foundations. The Review of Politics. 1986;48(04). doi:10.1017/S0034670500039656

43.

Cornish P, Dorman A. National defence in the age of austerity. International Affairs. 2009;85(4):733-753. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00825.x

44.

Cornish P, Dorman AM. Smart muddling through: rethinking UK national strategy beyond Afghanistan. International Affairs. 2012;88(2):213-222. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01067.x

45.

Edmunds T. British civil-military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs. 2012;88(2):265-282. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01070.x

46.

Fitz‐Gerald AM. A UK National Security Strategy: Institutional and Cultural Challenges. Defence Studies. 2008;8(1):4-25. doi:10.1080/14702430701823933

47.

Gallie WB. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956;56:167-198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562

48.

Finnemore M. National Interests in International Society. Vol Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press; 1996.

49.

Hollis M, Smith S. Roles and Reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making. British Journal of Political Science. 1986;16(3):269-286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/193813

50.

Lake DA, Powell R. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton University Press; 1999.

51.

Fearon JD. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization. 1995;49(3):379-414. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903

52.

Gartzke E. War Is in the Error Term. International Organization. 1999;53(3):567-587. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601290

53.

Kaarbo J, Cantir C. Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict. 2013;48(4):465-483. doi:10.1177/0010836713482815

54.

Martin LL. The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism. International Security. 1999;24(2):74-83. doi:10.1162/016228899560158

55.

Nincic M. The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics. 1999;61(01). doi:10.1017/S0034670500028126

56.

Risse-Kappen T. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics. 1991;43(4):479-512. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010534

57.

Oakes A. Diversionary War and Argentina’s Invasion of the Falkland Islands. Security Studies. 2006;15(3):431-463. doi:10.1080/09636410601028354

58.

Maoz Z, Russett B. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review. 1993;87(3):624-638. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938740

59.

Levy JS. Preventive War and Democratic Politics. International Studies Quarterly. 2008;52(1):1-24. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734222

60.

Brown ME, Lynn-Jones SM, Miller SE. Debating the Democratic Peace. Vol Series: International security readers. MIT Press; 1996.

61.

Cowhey PF. Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization. 1993;47(2):299-326. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706892

62.

Oakes A. Diversionary War: Domestic Unrest and International Conflict. Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press; 2012.

63.

Strong J. Why Parliament Now Decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya and Iraq. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. Published online July 2014. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12055

64.

Bennett DS, Nordstrom T. Foreign Policy Substitutability and Internal Economic Problems in Enduring Rivalries. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000;44(1):33-61. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174621

65.

Leeds BA, Davis DR. Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1997;41(6):814-834. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174432

66.

Richards D, Morgan TC, Wilson RK, Schwebach VL, Young GD. Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1993;37(3):504-535. doi:10.1177/0022002793037003005

67.

Mor BD. Conflict in World Politics: Advances in the Study of Crisis, War and Peace. Vol Series: Advances in political science. (Harvey FP, ed.). Macmillan; 1998.

68.

Gelpi C. Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1997;41(2):255-282. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174373

69.

Sprecher C, DeRouen K. The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948-1998. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1(1):121-141. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00006.x

70.

Ray JL. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the  Democratic Peace Proposition. Vol Series: Studies in international relations. 1st pbk. ed. University of South Carolina Press; 1998.

71.

Cederman LE. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review. 2001;95(1):15-31. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117626

72.

Russett BM, Oneal JR. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. 1st ed. Norton; 2001.

73.

Maoz Z. The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall? International Security. 1997;22(1):162-198. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539333

74.

Gaubatz KT. Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization. 1996;50(1):109-139. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707000

75.

Schweller RL. Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics. 1992;44(2):235-269. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010448

76.

Hill C. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave MacMillan; 2003.

77.

Allison GT. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review. 1969;63(3):689-718. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1954423

78.

Narizny K. The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitments to Europe, 1905-39. International Security. 2003;27(4):184-219. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137608

79.

Marsh K. Obama’s Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10(3):265-288. doi:10.1111/fpa.12000

80.

Sinno AH. Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond. Cornell University Press; 2008.

81.

Solingen E. Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now. International Security. 39(1):44-70. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ins/summary/v039/39.1.solingen.html

82.

Levy JS. Organizational Routines and the Causes of War. International Studies Quarterly. 1986;30(2):193-222. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600676

83.

Hudson VM. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Second edition. Rowman & Littlefield; 2014.

84.

Allison GT, Zelikow P. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. Longman; 1999.

85.

Bendor J, Hammond TH. Rethinking Allison’s Models. The American Political Science Review. 1992;86(2):301-322. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964222

86.

Krasner SD. Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland). Foreign Policy. 1972;(7):159-179. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147761

87.

Destler IM. Presidents, Bureaucrats, and Foreign Policy: The Politics of Organizational Reform. Vol Series: Princeton paperbacks. 1st Prinston pbk. ed. Princeton University Press; 1974.

88.

Halperin MH, Clapp P, Kanter A. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. The Brookings Institution; 1974.

89.

Kaarbo J. Coalition Politics and Cabinet Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy Choices. First paperback edition. University of Michigan Press; 2013.

90.

Grodsky B. Lessons (Not) Learned: A New Look at Bureaucratic Politics and U.S. Foreign Policy-Making in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Post-Communism. 2014;56(2):43-57. doi:10.2753/PPC1075-8216560204

91.

Welch DA. The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security. 1992;17(2):112-146. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170

92.

Smith S. Policy Preferences and Bureaucratic Position: The Case of the American Hostage Rescue Mission. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1985;61(1):9-25. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2619777

93.

Snow DM, Brown E. Puzzle Palaces and Foggy Bottom: U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy-Making in the 1990s. St. Martin’s Press; 1994.

94.

Lieberthal KG, Lampton DM. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Vol Series: Studies on China. University of California Press; 1992.

95.

Rhodes E. Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter?: Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the U.S. Navy. World Politics. 1994;47(1):1-41. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950678

96.

Valenta J. The Bureaucratic Politics Paradigm and the Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Political Science Quarterly. 1979;94(1):55-76. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150156

97.

Brooks SG. Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace. International Organization. 2013;67(04):863-888. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000283

98.

Abelson DE. Old world, new world: the evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs. 2014;90(1):125-142. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12099

99.

Alden C, Aran A. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Routledge; 2012.

100.

Vanderbush W. Exiles and the Marketing of U.S. Policy toward Cuba and Iraq. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2009;5(3):287-306. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00094.x

101.

Mearsheimer J, Walt S. The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books. 28(6). https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby

102.

Trubowitz P. Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36(2):173-190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600880

103.

Hiscox MJ. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton University Press; 2002.

104.

Brawley MR. Factoral or Sectoral Conflict? Partially Mobile Factors and the Politics of Trade in Imperial Germany. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(4):633-653. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600856

105.

Milner H. Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade. World Politics. 1988;40(3):350-376. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010217

106.

Rogowski R. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. The American Political Science Review. 1987;81(4):1121-1137. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962581

107.

Fearon JD. Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations. Annual Review of Political Science. 1998;1(1):289-313. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289

108.

Sears DO, Huddy L, Levy JS. The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001

109.

Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Second edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 1982.

110.

Levy JS. Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(1):87-112. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600908

111.

Mercer J. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization. 2005;59(01). doi:10.1017/S0020818305050058

112.

Hermann MG, Preston T, Korany B, Shaw TM. Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. International Studies Review. 2001;3(2):83-131. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00235

113.

Kaarbo J. Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology. 1997;18(3):553-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792101

114.

Hermann MG, Hermann CF. Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry. International Studies Quarterly. 1989;33(4):361-387. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600518

115.

Hermann MG, Preston T. Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements. Political Psychology. 1994;15(1):75-96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3791440

116.

James P, Zhang E. Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950-1996. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2005;1(1):31-54. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00002.x

117.

Mintz A. How Do Leaders Make Decisions?: A Poliheuristic Perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2004;48(1):3-13. doi:10.1177/0022002703261056

118.

Goldgeier JM, Tetlock PE. Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001;4(1):67-92. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67

119.

Jervis R. Hypotheses on Misperception. World Politics. 1968;20(3):454-479. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009777

120.

Jervis R. Deterrence and Perception. International Security. 1983;7(3):3-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538549

121.

George AL. The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly. 1969;13(2):190-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3013944

122.

O’Neill B. Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 2001;45(4):617-640. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096063

123.

Blanton SL. Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador. International Studies Quarterly. 1996;40(1):23-44. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600930

124.

Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, eds. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.

125.

Hymans JEC. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491412

126.

Hall TH. We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies. 2011;20(4):521-555. doi:10.1080/09636412.2011.625771

127.

Holmes M. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly. Published online May 2015:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/isqu.12201

128.

Dyson SB. Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 2009;30(1):33-48. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445174

129.

Jonathan Mercer. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization. 2010;64(01). doi:10.1017/S0020818309990221

130.

Mercer J. Emotion and Strategy in the Korean War. International Organization. 2013;67(02):221-252. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000015

131.

Hibbing JR. Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 2013;11(02):475-489. doi:10.1017/S1537592713000923

132.

Holmes M. The Force of Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Mirror Neurons and the Problem of Intentions. International Organization. 2013;67(04):829-861. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000234

133.

Horowitz MC, Stam AC. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization. 2014;68(03):527-559. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000046

134.

Rose McDermott. Political Psychology in International Relations. Vol Series: Analytical perspectives on politics. University of Michigan Press; 2004.

135.

McDermott R. The Biological Bases for Aggressiveness and Nonaggressiveness in Presidents. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2014;10(4):313-327. doi:10.1111/fpa.12009

136.

Forsberg T. Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions and Rationality. Cooperation and Conflict. 2006;41(3):235-260. doi:10.1177/0010836706066558

137.

Berejikian JD. Model Building with Prospect Theory: A Cognitive Approach to International Relations. Political Psychology. 2002;23(4):759-786. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792366

138.

Robert M. Entman. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Vol Series: Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. University of Chicago Press; 2004. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780226210735

139.

Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Vol Vintage original. Vintage; 1994.

140.

Robinson P, Goddard P, Parry K, Murray C, Taylor PM, Askews & Holts Library Services. Pockets of Resistance: British News Media, War and Theory in the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Manchester University Press; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781847794727

141.

Gribble R, Wessley S, Klein S, Alexander DA, Dandeker C, Fear NT. British Public Opinion after a Decade of War: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics. 2015;35(2):128-150. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12073

142.

Robinson P, Seib PM, Fröhlich R, eds. Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict and Security. Routledge; 2016.

143.

Eytan G, Robinson P, Miklian J, Gabrielsen Jumbert M. Moving Media and Conflict Studies beyond the CNN Effect. Review of International Studies. Published online 2016. doi:10.1017/S026021051600005X

144.

Herring E, Robinson P. Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD. Political Science Quarterly. 2014;129(4):551-584. doi:10.1002/polq.12252

145.

Hildebrandt T, Hillebrecht C, Holm PM, Pevehouse J. The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2013;9(3):243-266. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00189.x

146.

Dixon P. Britain’s ‘Vietnam Syndrome’? Public Opinion and British Military Intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(1):99-121. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097658

147.

Ole R. Holsti. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36(4):439-466. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600734

148.

Gilboa E. Global Television News and Foreign Policy: Debating the CNN Effect. International Studies Perspectives. 2005;6(3):325-341. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00211.x

149.

Foyle DC. Leading the Public To War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2004;16(3):269-294. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh025

150.

Sobel R. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. Oxford University Press; 2001.

151.

Bjereld U, Ekengren AM. Foreign Policy Dimensions: A Comparison Between the United States and Sweden. International Studies Quarterly. 1999;43(3):503-518. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00132

152.

Hurwitz J, Peffley M, Seligson MA. Foreign Policy Belief Systems in Comparative Perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly. 1993;37(3):245-270. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600808

153.

Baum MA. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96(1):91-109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117812

154.

Kull S, Ramsay C, Lewis E. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly. 2004;118(4):569-598. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035697

155.

Foyle DC. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(1):141-170. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00036

156.

Kaufmann C. Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War. International Security. 2004;29(1):5-48. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137546

157.

Gaubatz KT. Intervention and Intransitivity: Public Opinion, Social Choice, and the Use of Military Force Abroad. World Politics. 1995;47(4):534-554. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950701

158.

Gowa J. Politics at the Water’s Edge: Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization. 1998;52(2):307-324. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601277

159.

Herring E, Robinson P. Too Polemical or Too Critical? Chomsky on the Study of the News Media and US Foreign Policy. Review of International Studies. 2003;29(4):553-568. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097876

160.

Hill KA. The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes toward South Africa. International Studies Quarterly. 1993;37(2):195-214. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600768

161.

Hixson WL. Parting the Curtain: Propaganda, Culture, and the Cold War, 1945-61. Macmillan Press; 1998.

162.

Jentleson BW. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly. 1992;36(1):49-73. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600916

163.

Jentleson BW, Britton RL. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1998;42(4):395-417. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/174436

164.

Marsh C, Fraser C. Public Opinion and Nuclear Weapons. Macmillan; 1989.

165.

Mazrui AA. Between the Crescent and the Star-Spangled Banner: American Muslims and US Foreign Policy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1996;72(3):493-506. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625553

166.

Houghton DP. Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3(1):24-45. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00040.x

167.

Hansen L. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Vol Series: New international relations. Routledge; 2006. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=200689

168.

Gaskarth J. Discourses and Ethics: The Social Construction of British Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2006;2(4):325-341. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00034.x

169.

Campbell D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Revised edition. Manchester University Press; 1998. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310792

170.

Doty RL. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Vol Series: Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). University of Minnesota Press; 1996.

171.

Sjöstedt R. The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2007;3(3):233-254. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00049.x

172.

Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub; 1998.

173.

Larsen H. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain, and Europe. Vol Series: Routledge advances in international relations and politics. Routledge/LSE; 1997. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1138282

174.

Farrell T. Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program. International Studies Review. 2002;4(1):49-72. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186274

175.

Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23(1):171-200. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267

176.

Finnemore M. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Vol Series: Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press; 2003.

177.

Finnemore M. National Interests in International Society. Vol Series: Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press; 1996.

178.

Wehner LE, Thies CG. Role Theory, Narratives, and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review. 2014;16(3):411-436. doi:10.1111/misr.12149

179.

Moravcsik A. ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 1999;6(4):669-681. doi:10.1080/135017699343531

180.

Checkel JT, Moravcsik A. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics. 2001;2(2):219-249. doi:10.1177/1465116501002002004

181.

Duffield JS. Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism. International Organization. 1999;53(4):765-803. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601309

182.

Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48(3):517-538. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521

183.

Barnett M. Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5(1):5-36. doi:10.1177/1354066199005001001

184.

Daddow O. Constructing a ‘great’ role for Britain in an age of austerity: Interpreting coalition foreign policy, 2010-2015. International Relations. 2015;29(3):303-318. doi:10.1177/0047117815600931

185.

Fisher K. Security, Identity and British Counterterrorism Policy. Vol New security challenges series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137524225

186.

Goddard SE, Krebs RR. Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy. Security Studies. 2015;24(1):5-36. doi:10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198

187.

Jelena Subotić. Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2016;12(4):610-627. doi:10.1111/fpa.12089

188.

Bevir M, Daddow O. Interpreting foreign policy: National, comparative and regional studies. International Relations. 2015;29(3):273-287. doi:10.1177/0047117815600930

189.

Solomon T. The Politics of Subjectivity in American Foreign Policy Discourses. Vol Configurations: critical studies of world politics. University of Michigan Press; 2015.

190.

McCourt DM. Britain and World Power since 1945: Constructing a Nation’s Role in International Politics. Vol Configurations. The University of Michigan Press; 2014.

191.

Hayes J. Constructing National Security: U.S. Relations with China and India. Cambridge University Press; 2015.

192.

Krebs RR. Narrative and the Making of US National Security. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2015.

193.

Kettell S. Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2013;15(2):263-279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00531.x

194.

Goddard SE. The Rhetoric of Appeasement: Hitler’s Legitimation and British Foreign Policy, 1938–39. Security Studies. 2015;24(1):95-130. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1001216

195.

Krebs RR. Tell Me a Story: FDR, Narrative, and the Making of the Second World War. Security Studies. 2015;24(1):131-170. doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1001215

196.

Krebs RR. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization. 2015;69(04):809-845. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000181

197.

Krebs RR, Lobasz JK. Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq. Security Studies. 2007;16(3):409-451. doi:10.1080/09636410701547881

198.

de Orellana P. Struggles over identity in diplomacy: ‘Commie terrorists’ contra ‘imperialists’ in Western Sahara. International Relations. 2015;29(4):477-499. doi:10.1177/0047117815571620

199.

Ostermann F. The end of ambivalence and the triumph of pragmatism? Franco-British defence cooperation and European and Atlantic defence policy traditions. International Relations. 2015;29(3):334-347. doi:10.1177/0047117815600937

200.

Holland J. Selling the War on Terror: Foreign Policy Discourses after 9/11. Vol Series: Critical terrorism studies. Routledge; 2013.

201.

Schmidt BC, Williams MC. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies. 2008;17(2):191-220. doi:10.1080/09636410802098990

202.

Jackson PT. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. University of Michigan Press; 2006.

203.

Nyman J. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US-China Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2014;43(1):43-65. doi:10.1177/0305829814525495

204.

Croft S. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge University Press; 2006.

205.

Debrix F. Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. Routledge; 2008.

206.

Jackson R. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-Terrorism. Vol Series: New approaches to conflict analysis. Manchester University Press; 2005.

207.

Nabers D. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2009;5(2):191-214. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x

208.

Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001

209.

Smith KE, Lights M. Ethics and Foreign Policy. Vol Series: LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge University Press; 2001. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=202006

210.

Bulley D. The politics of ethical foreign policy: A responsibility to protect whom? European Journal of International Relations. 2010;16(3):441-461. doi:10.1177/1354066109350051

211.

Kennan GF. Morality and Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. 1985;64(2). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290258825/fulltextPDF?accountid=14540

212.

Busby JW. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy. Vol Series: Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2010.

213.

Lawler P. The Good State: In Praise of ‘Classical’ Internationalism. Review of International Studies. 2005;31(3):427-449. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072083

214.

Kuperman AJ. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly. 2008;52(1):49-80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29734224

215.

Beitz CR. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton University Press; 1999.

216.

Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 4th ed. Basic Books; 2006.

217.

Abrahamsen R, Williams P. Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour’s ‘Third Way’ in Sub-Saharan Africa. Political Studies. 2001;49(2):249-264. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00312

218.

Little R, Wickham-Jones M. New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade? Manchester University Press; 2000.

219.

Fierke KM. Who is my neighbour? Memories of the Holocaust/al Nakba and a global ethic of care. European Journal of International Relations. 2014;20(3):787-809. doi:10.1177/1354066113497490

220.

Baehr PR, Castermans-Holleman MC. The Role of Human Rights in Foreign Policy. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.

221.

Buckler S. Dirty Hands: The Problem of Political Morality. Vol Series: Avebury series in philosophy. Avebury; 1993.

222.

Campbell D. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. University of Minnesota Press; 1998.

223.

Cole P. Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh University Press; 2000.

224.

Benhabib S. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Vol Series: The John Robert Seeley lectures. Cambridge University Press; 2004.

225.

Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. 73(6). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290286683/abstract/C39C5610F46A4868PQ/1?accountid=14540

226.

Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Polity Press; 2011.

227.

Weber C. Imagining America at War: Morality, Politics, and Film. Routledge; 2006.

228.

Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.

229.

Chollet D, Lindberg T. A moral core for U.S. foreign policy. Policy Review. 2007;2007(2007). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172911420/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=858d2035

230.

Mapel DR, Nardin T. Traditions of International Ethics. Vol Series: Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1992.