[1]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[2]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[3]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[4]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[5]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[6]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[7]
O. Kahn-Freund, Selected writings [of] Otto Kahn-Freund. London: Stevens & Sons, 1978.
[8]
R. Lewis, ‘The historical development of labour law’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1976 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5402395&site=ehost-live
[9]
R. Dukes, ‘Otto Kahn-Freund and collective laissez-faire: an edifice without a keystone?’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 220–246, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20533240
[10]
P. L. Davies and M. R. Freedland, Labour legislation and public policy: a contemporary history, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
[11]
B. Hepple, ‘Back to the future: employment law under the Coalition Government’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 203–223, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwt009.
[12]
R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51. .
[13]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[14]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[15]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[16]
A. Pollert, ‘The unorganised worker: the decline in collectivism and new hurdles to individual employment rights’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 217–238, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwi016.
[17]
M. R. Freedland, Ed., The contract of employment, First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.001.0001
[18]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[19]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[20]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[21]
D. Brodie, ‘Employees, workers and the self-employed’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 253–260, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwi017.
[22]
A. C. L. Davies, ‘Casual workers and continuity of employment’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 196–201, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwl015.
[23]
G. Davidov, ‘Who is a worker?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57–71, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ilj/34.1.57.
[24]
P. Leighton and M. Wynn, ‘Classifying employment relationships - more sliding doors or a better regulatory framework?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–44, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwq029.
[25]
A. L. Bogg, ‘Sham self-employment in the Supreme Court’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 328–345, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dws021.
[26]
M. Freedland and N. Kountouris, ‘Some reflections on the “personal scope” of collective labour law’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 52–71, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dww041.
[27]
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. .
[28]
Employment Rights Act 1996. .
[29]
Employment Rights Act 1996. .
[30]
Employment Rights Act 1996. .
[32]
Employment Rights Act 1996. .
[33]
Byrne Brothers Ltd v Baird [2002] ICR 667. .
[34]
Allonby v Accrington and Rossendale College [2004] IRLR 224. .
[35]
Mingeley v Pennock [2004] IRLR 373. .
[36]
Cotswold Developments Construction Ltd v Williams [2006] IRLR 181. .
[37]
Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40. .
[38]
Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] ICR 730. .
[39]
National Minimum Wage Act 1998. .
[40]
The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). .
[41]
Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1551). .
[42]
Employment Relations Act 1999. .
[43]
Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security [1969] 3 All ER 732. .
[44]
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497. .
[45]
Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co. [1978] IRLR 31. .
[46]
Ferguson v John Dawson Ltd. [1976] IRLR 346. .
[47]
Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton [1999] IRLR 367. .
[48]
MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council [2001] IRLR 7. .
[49]
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41. .
[50]
Aslam and others v Uber BV and others [2017] IRLR 4. .
[51]
Dewhurst v Citysprint [2017] ET. .
[52]
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith [2017] Court of Appeal. .
[53]
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment [1995] IRLR 461; [1997] IRLR 353. .
[54]
Motorola v Davidson [2001] IRLR 4. .
[55]
Dacas v Brook St Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] IRLR 358. .
[56]
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] IRLR 354. .
[57]
James v Greenwich LBC [2008] IRLR 302. .
[58]
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] IRLR 369. .
[59]
Hellyer Brothers v McLeod [1987] 1 WLR 728. .
[60]
Carmichael v National Power Plc [2000] IRLR 43. .
[61]
Cornwall CC v Prater [2006] IRLR 362. .
[62]
Wiltshire County Council v National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education and Guy [1980] IRLR 198. .
[63]
Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. .
[64]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[65]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[66]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[67]
Unite the Union v UK Application No 65397/13. 3AD.
[68]
RMT v UK [2014] ECHR 366. .
[69]
Demir and Baykara v Turkey [2008] ECHR 1345. .
[70]
ASLEF v UK [2007] ECHR 184. .
[71]
Wilson and Palmer v UK [2002] ECHR 552. .
[72]
K. Arabadjieva, ‘Another disappointment in Strasbourg: Unite the Union v United Kingdom’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 289–302, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwx004.
[73]
A. Bogg and K. D. Ewing, ‘The implications of the RMT case’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 221–252, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwu015.
[74]
K. D. Ewing and J. Hendy, ‘The dramatic implications of Demir and Baykara’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 2–51, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwp031.
[75]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[76]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[77]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[78]
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. .
[79]
The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010. .
[80]
Harrison v Kent [1995] ICR 434. .
[81]
Wilson v Associated Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 454. .
[82]
Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board [1992] ICR 221. .
[83]
Carrington v Therm-A-Stor [1983] IRLR 78. .
[84]
Gallagher v Department of Transport [1994] ICR 967 CA. .
[85]
B. Simpson, ‘Commentary: Freedom of association and the right to organize: the failure of an individual rights strategy’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 235–251, Sep. 1995, doi: 10.1093/ilj/24.3.235.
[86]
K. D. Ewing, ‘The implications of Wilson and Palmer’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1093/ilj/32.1.1.
[87]
A. L. Bogg, ‘Employment Relations Act 2004: another false dawn for collectivism?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 72–82, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ilj/34.1.72.
[88]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[89]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[90]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[91]
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. .
[92]
Employment Relations Act 1999. .
[93]
Ford Motor Co. Ltd v AUEFW [1969] 2 QB 303. .
[94]
NUGSAT v Albury Brothers [1979] ICR 84. .
[95]
K. D. Ewing, ‘The function of trade unions’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ilj/34.1.1.
[96]
O. Kahn-Freund, P. L. Davies, M. R. Freedland, and O. Kahn-Freund, Kahn-Freund’s Labour and the law, 3rd ed., vol. The Hamlyn lectures. London: Stevens & Sons, 1983 [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20120119230748/http:/socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/schoolofhumanitiesandsocialsciences/law/pdfs/Labour%20and%20the%20Law.pdf
[97]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[98]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069
[99]
H. Collins, K. D. Ewing, and A. McColgan, Labour law, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF
[100]
R. Dukes and N. Kountouris, ‘Pre-strike ballots, picketing and protest: banning industrial action by the back door?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 337–362, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dww026.
[101]
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. .
[102]
Taff Vale Railway v ASRS [1901] AC 426. .
[103]
Quinn v Leatham [1901] AC 495. .
[104]
Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129. .
[105]
Stratford v Lindley [1965] AC 269. .
[106]
Associated British Ports v TGWU [1989] ICR 557. .
[107]
Express Newspapers Ltd v Keys [1980] IRLR 247. .
[108]
Mercury Communications v Scott-Garner [1984] ICR 74. .
[109]
Dimbleby v NUJ [1984] 1 WLR 427. .
[110]
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton, ‘Industrial relations and the courts’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65–94, 1980, doi: 10.1093/ilj/9.1.65.
[111]
I. T. Smith, A. Baker, and O. Warnock, Smith & Wood’s employment law, Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[112]
R. Dukes and N. Kountouris, ‘Pre-strike ballots, picketing and protest: banning industrial action by the back door?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 337–362, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dww026.
[113]
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. .
[114]
RMT v UK [2014] ECHR 366. .
[115]
Metrobus v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 829. .
[116]
British Airways plc v Unite The Union [2010] EWCA Civ 669. .
[117]
Milford Haven Port Authority v Unite the Union [2010] EWCA Civ 400. .
[118]
RMT v Serco, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 226. .
[119]
R. Dukes, ‘The right to strike under UK law: something more than a slogan?: NURMT v SERCO, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Ltd’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 302–311, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwr012.
[120]
R. Dukes, ‘The right to strike under UK law: not much more than a slogan?: Metrobus v Unite The Union’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 82–91, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwp029.
[121]
The Human Rights Act 1998. .
