Allonby v Accrington and Rossendale College [2004] IRLR 224. N.p. Print.
Arabadjieva, Kalina. ‘Another Disappointment in Strasbourg: Unite the Union v United Kingdom’. Industrial Law Journal 46.2 (2017): 289–302. Web.
Aslam and Others v Uber BV and Others [2017] IRLR 4. N.p. Print.
ASLEF v UK [2007] ECHR 184. N.p. Print.
Associated British Ports v TGWU [1989] ICR 557. N.p. Print.
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41. N.p. Print.
Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] ICR 730. N.p. Print.
Bogg, A., and K. D. Ewing. ‘The Implications of the RMT Case’. Industrial Law Journal 43.3 (2014): 221–252. Web.
Bogg, A. L. ‘Employment Relations Act 2004: Another False Dawn for Collectivism?’ Industrial Law Journal 34.1 (2005): 72–82. Web.
---. ‘Sham Self-Employment in the Supreme Court’. Industrial Law Journal 41.3 (2012): 328–345. Web.
British Airways Plc v Unite The Union [2010] EWCA Civ 669. N.p. Print.
Brodie, D. ‘Employees, Workers and the Self-Employed’. Industrial Law Journal 34.3 (2005): 253–260. Web.
Byrne Brothers Ltd v Baird [2002] ICR 667. N.p. Print.
Cable & Wireless Plc v Muscat [2006] IRLR 354. N.p. Print.
Carmichael v National Power Plc [2000] IRLR 43. N.p. Print.
Carrington v Therm-A-Stor [1983] IRLR 78. N.p. Print.
Collins, Hugh, K. D. Ewing, and Aileen McColgan. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
---. Labour Law. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1025069>.
---. Labour Law. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/labour-law/E082D42D3BA5F8C8D2DF41384F044EBF>.
Cornwall CC v Prater [2006] IRLR 362. N.p. Print.
Cotswold Developments Construction Ltd v Williams [2006] IRLR 181. N.p. Print.
Dacas v Brook St Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] IRLR 358. N.p. Print.
Davidov, G. ‘Who Is a Worker?’ Industrial Law Journal 34.1 (2005): 57–71. Web.
Davies, A.C.L. ‘Casual Workers and Continuity of Employment’. Industrial Law Journal 35.2 (2006): 196–201. Web.
Davies, P. L., and M. R. Freedland. Labour Legislation and Public Policy: A Contemporary History. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Print.
Demir and Baykara v Turkey [2008] ECHR 1345. N.p. Print.
Dewhurst v Citysprint [2017] ET. N.p. Print.
Dimbleby v NUJ [1984] 1 WLR 427. N.p. Print.
Dukes, R. ‘The Right to Strike under UK Law: Not Much More than a Slogan?: Metrobus v Unite The Union’. Industrial Law Journal 39.1 (2010): 82–91. Web.
---. ‘The Right to Strike under UK Law: Something More than a Slogan?: NURMT v SERCO, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Ltd’. Industrial Law Journal 40.3 (2011): 302–311. Web.
Dukes, Ruth. ‘Otto Kahn-Freund and Collective Laissez-Faire: An Edifice without a Keystone?’ The Modern Law Review 72.2 (2009): 220–246. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20533240>.
Dukes, Ruth, and Nicola Kountouris. ‘Pre-Strike Ballots, Picketing and Protest: Banning Industrial Action by the Back Door?’ Industrial Law Journal 45.3 (2016): 337–362. Web.
---. ‘Pre-Strike Ballots, Picketing and Protest: Banning Industrial Action by the Back Door?’ Industrial Law Journal 45.3 (2016): 337–362. Web.
Employment Relations Act 1999. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
Employment Rights Act 1996. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
Ewing, K.D. ‘The Function of Trade Unions’. Industrial Law Journal 34.1 (2005): 1–22. Web.
---. ‘The Implications of Wilson and Palmer’. Industrial Law Journal 32.1 (2003): 1–22. Web.
Ewing, K.D., and J. Hendy. ‘The Dramatic Implications of Demir and Baykara’. Industrial Law Journal 39.1 (2010): 2–51. Web.
Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton [1999] IRLR 367. N.p. Print.
Express Newspapers Ltd v Keys [1980] IRLR 247. N.p. Print.
Ferguson v John Dawson Ltd. [1976] IRLR 346. N.p. Print.
Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board [1992] ICR 221. N.p. Print.
Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. N.p. Print.
Ford Motor Co. Ltd v AUEFW [1969] 2 QB 303. N.p. Print.
Freedland, M. R., ed. The Contract of Employment. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.001.0001>.
Freedland, Mark, and Nicola Kountouris. ‘Some Reflections on the “Personal Scope” of Collective Labour Law’. Industrial Law Journal 46.1 (2017): 52–71. Web.
Gallagher v Department of Transport [1994] ICR 967 CA. N.p. Print.
Harrison v Kent [1995] ICR 434. N.p. Print.
Hellyer Brothers v McLeod [1987] 1 WLR 728. N.p. Print.
Hepple, B. ‘Back to the Future: Employment Law under the Coalition Government’. Industrial Law Journal 42.3 (2013): 203–223. Web.
James v Greenwich LBC [2008] IRLR 302. N.p. Print.
Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40. N.p. Print.
Kahn-Freund, Otto et al. Kahn-Freund’s Labour and the Law. 3rd ed. The Hamlyn lectures. London: Stevens & Sons, 1983. Web. <https://web.archive.org/web/20120119230748/http:/socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/schoolofhumanitiesandsocialsciences/law/pdfs/Labour%20and%20the%20Law.pdf>.
---. Selected Writings [of] Otto Kahn-Freund. London: Stevens & Sons, 1978. Print.
Leighton, P., and M. Wynn. ‘Classifying Employment Relationships - More Sliding Doors or a Better Regulatory Framework?’ Industrial Law Journal 40.1 (2011): 5–44. Web.
Lewis, Roy. ‘The Historical Development of Labour Law’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 14.1 (1976): 1–17. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5402395&site=ehost-live>.
MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council [2001] IRLR 7. N.p. Print.
Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security [1969] 3 All ER 732. N.p. Print.
Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co. [1978] IRLR 31. N.p. Print.
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment [1995] IRLR 461; [1997] IRLR 353. N.p. Print.
Mercury Communications v Scott-Garner [1984] ICR 74. N.p. Print.
Metrobus v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 829. N.p. Print.
Milford Haven Port Authority v Unite the Union [2010] EWCA Civ 400. N.p. Print.
Mingeley v Pennock [2004] IRLR 373. N.p. Print.
Motorola v Davidson [2001] IRLR 4. N.p. Print.
National Minimum Wage Act 1998. N.p. Print.
NUGSAT v Albury Brothers [1979] ICR 84. N.p. Print.
O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte Plc [1983] IRLR 369. N.p. Print.
Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1551). N.p. Print.
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Another v Smith [2017] Court of Appeal. N.p. Print.
Pollert, A. ‘The Unorganised Worker: The Decline in Collectivism and New Hurdles to Individual Employment Rights’. Industrial Law Journal 34.3 (2005): 217–238. Web.
Quinn v Leatham [1901] AC 495. N.p. Print.
R (on the Application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51. N.p. Print.
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497. N.p. Print.
RMT v Serco, ASLEF v London & Birmingham Railway Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 226. N.p. Print.
RMT v UK [2014] ECHR 366. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129. N.p. Print.
Simpson, B. ‘Commentary: Freedom of Association and the Right to Organize: The Failure of an Individual Rights Strategy’. Industrial Law Journal 24.3 (1995): 235–251. Web.
Smith, I. T., Aaron Baker, and Owen Warnock. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
---. Smith & Wood’s Employment Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
Stratford v Lindley [1965] AC 269. N.p. Print.
Taff Vale Railway v ASRS [1901] AC 426. N.p. Print.
The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010. N.p. Print.
The Human Rights Act 1998. N.p. Print.
The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). N.p. Print.
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
Unite the Union v UK Application No 65397/13. N.p., 3AD. Print.
Wages Act 1986. N.p. Print.
Wedderburn of Charlton, Lord. ‘Industrial Relations and the Courts’. Industrial Law Journal 9.1 (1980): 65–94. Web.
Wilson and Palmer v UK [2002] ECHR 552. N.p. Print.
Wilson v Associated Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 454. N.p. Print.
Wiltshire County Council v National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education and Guy [1980] IRLR 198. N.p. Print.
