[1]
Calhoun, Craig J., Contemporary sociological theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[2]
Baert, Patrick and Silva, Filipe Carreira da, Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
[3]
Callinicos, Alex, Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: Polity Press, 1999.
[4]
Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher, An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.
[5]
Layder, Derek, Understanding social theory, 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2006.
[6]
J. Scott, Social theory: central issues in sociology. London: SAGE Publications, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
[7]
Seidman, Steven, Contested knowledge: social theory today, 4th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub, 2008.
[8]
Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry, Handbook of social theory. London: Sage, 2001.
[9]
B. Chivers, M. Shoolbred, and ProQuest (Firm), A student’s guide to presentations: making your presentation count. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910
[10]
Calhoun, Craig J., Contemporary sociological theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[11]
A. L. Stinchcombe, ‘Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers’, The American Sociologist, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 1982 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490
[12]
Marshall, Barbara L. and Witz, Anne, Engendering the social: feminist encounters with sociological theory. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344
[13]
Barrett, Michèle and Phillips, Anne, Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.
[14]
S. Burton, ‘The Monstrous “White Theory Boy”: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 20, no. 3, 2015, doi: 10.5153/sro.3746.
[15]
Callinicos, Alex, Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: Polity Press, 1999.
[16]
G. da Col et al., ‘Why do we read the classics?’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–38, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.14318/hau7.3.002.
[17]
N. G. Schiller, ‘Positioning theory: An introduction’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 16, no. 2–3, pp. 133–145, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1463499616663792.
[18]
Gouldner, Alvin W., For sociology: renewal and critique in sociology today. London: Allen Lane, 1973.
[19]
D. Graeber, Possibilities: essays on hierarchy, rebellion, and desire. Oakland, Calif: AK Press, 2007.
[20]
C. Guillaumin, Racism, sexism, power and ideology, vol. Critical studies in racism and migration. London: Routledge, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0
[21]
Harrison, Faye Venetia and Association of Black Anthropologists, Decolonizing anthropology: moving further toward an anthropology of liberation, 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association, 1997.
[22]
A. R. How, ‘Hermeneutics and the “classic” problem in the human sciences’, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 47–63, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0952695111405277.
[23]
Inglis, David and Thorpe, Christopher, An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.
[24]
Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie, Contemporary feminist theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
[25]
C. W. Mills, The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661
[26]
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Feminism without borders: decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
[27]
Patel, Sujata, The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions, vol. Sage studies in international sociology. London: SAGE, 2010.
[28]
J. Scott, Social theory: central issues in sociology. London: SAGE Publications, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
[29]
Seidman, Steven, Queer theory/sociology, vol. Twentieth-century social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1996.
[30]
K. Dowding, ‘Why should we care about the definition of power?’, Journal of Political Power, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–135, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.661917.
[31]
J. Hearn, ‘What’s wrong with domination?’, Journal of Power, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–49, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/17540290801943406.
[32]
S. Lukes and British Sociological Association, Power: a radical view, 2nd ed., Expanded. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503
[33]
Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’, Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–25 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060
[34]
Bourdieu, Pierre, Bourdieu, Pierre, and Thompson, John B., Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity, 1991.
[35]
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul, Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
[36]
Eribon, Didier, Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber, 1992.
[37]
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, Miller, Peter, and Foucault, Michel, The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[38]
Foucault, Michel and Gordon, Colin, Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980.
[39]
M. Haugaard, ‘Power: A “family resemblance” concept’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 419–438, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1367549410377152.
[40]
Hearn, Jonathan, Theorizing power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
[41]
J. Hearn, ‘On the social evolution of power to/over’, Journal of Political Power, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–191, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2014.927963.
[42]
T. LEMKE, ‘An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 43–64, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.
[43]
T. Lemke, ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique’, Rethinking Marxism, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 49–64, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1080/089356902101242288.
[44]
J. Lever, ‘Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory’, Sociology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 86–101, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0038038510387193.
[45]
Macey, David, The lives of Michel Foucault. London: Hutchinson, 1993.
[46]
T. Menge, ‘The role of power in social explanation’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22–38, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1368431017714426.
[47]
Foucault, Michel and Rabinow, Paul, The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991.
[48]
N. Rose, P. O’Malley, and M. Valverde, ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 83–104, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900.
[49]
Russell, Bertrand, Power: a new social analysis. London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.
[50]
C. J. Calhoun, Contemporary sociological theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[51]
Smith, Dorothy E., The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge, vol. The Northeastern series in feminist theory. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press, 1990.
[52]
Smith, Dorothy E., Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people, vol. The gender lens series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2005.
[53]
P. Sulkunen, ‘Agency and power: The contractual illusion’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 495–510, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1367549410377156.
[54]
‘Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization’, Theory, Culture & Society [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6
[55]
K. Vintges, ‘Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 283–298, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1350506812443476.
[56]
G. Wickham, ‘Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 596–614, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00372.x.
[57]
M. Hammersley, ‘Should Social Science Be Critical?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 175–195, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0048393105275279.
[58]
D. Fassin, ‘The endurance of critique’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 4–29, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1463499616688157.
[59]
A. Sayer, ‘Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science?’, Current Sociology, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 767–786, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0011392109342205.
[60]
N. G. Schiller, J. Eckert, and S. Reyna, ‘Debate on the nature and significance of Critique’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 261–261, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1463499617710992.
[61]
M. Basaure, ‘An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 361–381, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1368431011412350.
[62]
P. Blokker, ‘Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 251–261, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1368431011412344.
[63]
B. de S. Santos, Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies, vol. v. 3. London: Verso, 2008.
[64]
T. Boland, ‘Towards an anthropology of critique: The modern experience of liminality and crisis’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 222–239, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1463499613496731.
[65]
L. Boltanski, On critique: a sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551
[66]
W. Brown and ProQuest (Firm), Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457
[67]
Callinicos, Alex, The resources of critique. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
[68]
J. Fabiani, ‘Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De la critique. Precis de sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (pbk)’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 401–406, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1368431011412352.
[69]
‘Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016)’ [Online]. Available: https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2
[70]
B. Latour, ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–248, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1086/421123.
[71]
S. B. Ortner, ‘Dark anthropology and its others’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–73, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.14318/hau6.1.004.
[72]
A. Sayer, Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: Policy Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
[73]
Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue, Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Ebooks Corporation Limited, 1993 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
[74]
S. Susen and B. S. Turner, Eds., The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’, vol. Key issues in modern sociology. London: Anthem Press, 2014.
[75]
éZiézek, Slavoj, The ticklish subject: an essay in political ontology, vol. Wo es war. London: Verso, 1999.
[76]
K. Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, no. 1 [Online]. Available: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
[77]
P. Hill Collins and S. Bilge, Intersectionality, vol. Key Concepts Series. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012
[78]
S. Walby, Globalization and inequalities: complexities and contested modernities. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319
[79]
F. Anthias, ‘Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis’, Ethnicities, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1468796812463547.
[80]
S. Bilge, ‘INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE’, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 405–424, 2013, doi: 10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
[81]
A. Bohrer, ‘Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography’, Historical Materialism, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 46–74, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1163/1569206X-00001617.
[82]
A. Brah and A. Phoenix, ‘Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 75–86, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8
[83]
M. Carbin and S. Edenheim, ‘The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language?’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 233–248, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1350506813484723.
[84]
Patricia Hill Collins, ‘It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation’, Hypatia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 62–82, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699
[85]
K. Crenshaw, ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’, Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
[86]
K. Davis, ‘Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful’, Feminist Theory, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–85, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1464700108086364.
[87]
F. Dupuis-Deri, ‘Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry’, Anarchist Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist
[88]
‘Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality’, European Journal of Women’s Studies [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality
[89]
L. Gordon, ‘“Intersectionality”, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist’, Gender & History, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 340–357, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1468-0424.12211.
[90]
A.-M. Hancock, Intersectionality: an intellectual history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001
[91]
D. Juteau-Lee, ‘Introduction: (Re)constructing the categories of “race” and “sex”: the work of a precursor’, in Racism, sexism, power and ideology, vol. Critical studies in racism and migration, London: Routledge, 1995.
[92]
S. Lawler, ‘White like them: Whiteness and anachronistic space in representations of the English white working class’, Ethnicities, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 409–426, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1468796812448019.
[93]
L. McCall, ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1771–1800, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1086/426800.
[94]
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’, Feminist Review, no. 30, pp. 61–88, 1988 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054
[95]
A. Phoenix, ‘Intersectionality’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 187–192, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1350506806065751.
[96]
M. Romero, Introducing intersectionality. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452
[97]
S. Salem, ‘Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1350506816643999.
[98]
M. Verloo, ‘Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 211–228, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1350506806065753.
[99]
Walby, Sylvia, Patriarchy at work: patriarchal and capitalist relations in employment. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell, 1986.
[100]
S. Walby, J. Armstrong, and S. Strid, ‘Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory’, Sociology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 224–240, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0038038511416164.
[101]
P. Werbner, ‘Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between “intersectionality” and “multiple identities”’, Ethnicities, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 401–419, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1468796813483728.
[102]
N. Yuval-Davis, ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–209, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1350506806065752.
[103]
W. L. Goldfrank, ‘Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method’, Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.5195/jwsr.2000.223.
[104]
Sassen, Saskia, Sociology of globalization, vol. Contemporary societies. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[105]
I. M. Wallerstein and D. Boyarin, World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861
[106]
C. J. Calhoun, Contemporary sociological theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[107]
Arrighi, Giovanni, The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times, New and Updated ed. London: Verso, 2010.
[108]
M. Blim, ‘Capitalisms in Late Modernity’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25–38, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.25.
[109]
B. de S. Santos, Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies, vol. v. 3. London: Verso, 2008.
[110]
R. Brenner, ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’, New Left Review, no. 104, pp. 25–92 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism
[111]
Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas, ‘The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–65, 1988 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412
[112]
A. G. Frank and American Council of Learned Societies, ReOrient: global economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038
[113]
H. Gülalp, ‘Frank and Wallerstein revisited: A contribution to Brenner’s critique’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 169–188, Jan. 1981, doi: 10.1080/00472338185390131.
[114]
S. P. Hier, ‘The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory’, Race & Class, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 69–86, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1177/0306396801423004.
[115]
W. G. Martin, ‘Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective’, Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.5195/jwsr.2000.222.
[116]
J. W. Moore, ‘The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism’, Theory and Society, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 307–377, 2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1024404620759.
[117]
L. Poncelet, ‘Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis’, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–97, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731
[118]
W. I. Robinson, ‘Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal’, International Sociology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 723–745, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0268580910393372.
[119]
Review by: Theda Skocpol, ‘Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1075–1090, 1977 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814
[120]
I. Wallerstein, ‘Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines’, Current Anthropology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 453–465, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1086/375868.
[121]
I. Wallerstein, ‘Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised’, International Sociology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 524–528, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0268580912445532.
[122]
Wolf, Eric R. and Silverman, Sydel, Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2001.
[123]
R. Connell, Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120
[124]
G. K. Bhambra, Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
[125]
S. Patel, ‘Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges’, Current Sociology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 603–613, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0011392114524514.
[126]
B. Aulenbacher, H. Lutz, and B. Riegraf, ‘Introduction: Towards a global sociology of care and care work’, Current Sociology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 495–502, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0011392118765245.
[127]
G. K. Bhambra, ‘Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology’, Sociology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 960–966, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0038038516647683.
[128]
G. K. Bhambra and B. de S. Santos, ‘Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology’, Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0038038516674665.
[129]
B. de S. Santos, Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies, vol. v. 3. London: Verso, 2008.
[130]
M. Burawoy, ‘Challenges for a Global Sociology’, Contexts, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 36–41, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1525/ctx.2009.8.4.36.
[131]
M. Burawoy, ‘The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines’, Sociology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 949–959, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0038038516629901.
[132]
R. W. Connell, ‘Why Is Classical Theory Classical?’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1511–1557, May 1997, doi: 10.1086/231125.
[133]
R. Connell, F. Collyer, J. Maia, and R. Morrell, ‘Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices’, International Sociology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21–37, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0268580916676913.
[134]
S. Patel, The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: SAGE, 2010.
[135]
J. Go, Ed., Decentering social theory, vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
[136]
D. Della Faille and N. McLaughlin, ‘Sociology’s Global Challenge’, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 485–495, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485
[137]
R. N. Jacobs and E. Townsley, ‘On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology’, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 497–520, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497
[138]
R. Munck, ‘Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 233–249, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10767-016-9223-9.
[139]
Gregory Sandstrom, ‘The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie’, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 607–630, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607
[140]
D. Sohoni and M. Petrovic, ‘Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum’, Teaching Sociology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 287–300, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545
[141]
P. Sorokin, ‘“Global sociology” in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives’, Current Sociology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 41–59, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0011392115601462.
[142]
Pavel Sorokin, ‘Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision’, Filosofija. Sociologija, no. 4, pp. 323–330 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183
[143]
P. Sorokin, ‘Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–42, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1360780417743873.
[144]
F. Welz, ‘100 Years of Indian Sociology’, International Sociology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 635–655, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0268580909339270.
[145]
W. Mignolo and C. E. Walsh, On decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779
[146]
A. Quijano, ‘COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 168–178, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601164353.
[147]
M. Savransky, ‘A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality’, Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 11–26, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0038038516656983.
[148]
G. K. Bhambra, Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
[149]
B. de S. Santos, Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies, vol. v. 3. London: Verso, 2008.
[150]
E. Dussel, ‘Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures)’, boundary 2, vol. 20, no. 3, Autumn 1993, doi: 10.2307/303341.
[151]
A. Escobar, ‘WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 179–210, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162506.
[152]
R. Grosfoguel, ‘THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 211–223, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162514.
[153]
N. Maldonado-Torres, ‘ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 240–270, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162548.
[154]
W. D. Mignolo, ‘The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 57–96, Jan. 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745
[155]
W. D. Mignolo, ‘Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 155–167, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162498.
[156]
W. D. Mignolo, ‘DELINKING’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 449–514, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162647.
[157]
W. D. Mignolo, ‘Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality’, Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, vol. 43, pp. 38–45 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552
[158]
S. J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’, History Compass, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 485–496, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1111/hic3.12264.
[159]
A. Quijano, ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’, International Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 215–232, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/0268580900015002005.
[160]
A. Sitas, ‘Rethinking Africa’s sociological project’, Current Sociology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 457–471, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0011392114524505.
[161]
R. VÁZQUEZ, ‘Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence’, Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 27–44, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01387.x.
[162]
C. Walsh, ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 224–239, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162530.
[163]
Catherine E. Walsh, ‘The (Re)articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge’, Nepantla: Views from South, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 61–97, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948
[164]
M. F. Weiner, ‘Decolonial sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s foundational theoretical and methodological contributions’, Sociology Compass, vol. 12, no. 8, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1111/soc4.12601.
[165]
S. Wynter, ‘Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument’, CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–337, 2003, doi: 10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
[166]
A. M. Bauer and M. Bhan, Climate without nature: a critical anthropology of the anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633
[167]
T. W. Luke, ‘Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 80–94, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1368431016647971.
[168]
J. W. Moore, Ed., Anthropocene or capitalocene?: nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland, California: PM Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[169]
R. E. Barrios, ‘What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 151–166, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635.
[170]
C. Bonneuil, J.-B. Fressoz, and D. Fernbach, The shock of the anthropocene: the Earth, history, and us, Paperback edition. London: Verso, 2017.
[171]
G. Bowden, ‘An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene’, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 48–68, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cars.12138.
[172]
D. Chakrabarty, ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 197–222, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1086/596640.
[173]
D. Chernilo, ‘The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–60, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1368431016651874.
[174]
N. Clark, ‘Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene’, The Sociological Review, vol. 62, no. 1_suppl, pp. 19–37, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12122.
[175]
P. J. Crutzen and E. F. Stoermer, ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, vol. 41, pp. 17–18 [Online]. Available: http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf
[176]
G. Delanty and A. Mota, ‘Governing the Anthropocene’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–38, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1368431016668535.
[177]
J. M. Ferguson, ‘Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges’, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 189–196, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2018.1456559.
[178]
R. A. Grusin, Ed., Anthropocene feminism. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552
[179]
C. Hann, ‘The Anthropocene and anthropology’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 183–196, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1368431016649362.
[180]
D. Haraway, N. Ishikawa, S. F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A. L. Tsing, and N. Bubandt, ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’, Ethnos, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 535–564, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
[181]
L. Head, Hope and grief in the anthropocene: re-conceptualising human-nature relations, Paperback edition. London: Routledge, 2018.
[182]
G. Hecht, ‘Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 109–141, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.14506/ca33.1.05.
[183]
A. Hornborg, ‘Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene’, Reviews in Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 2–3, pp. 61–77, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00938157.2017.1343023.
[184]
B. Latour, ‘Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene’, New Literary History, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2014, doi: 10.1353/nlh.2014.0003.
[185]
A. Moore, ‘Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 27–46, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12332.
[186]
G. Palsson et al., ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 28, pp. 3–13, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.
[187]
R. Patel and J. W. Moore, A history of the world in seven cheap things. University of California Press: Oakland, California, 2017.
[188]
A. L. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt, Eds., Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.
[189]
L. Whitworth, ‘Goodbye Gauley Mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene’, Feminist Theory, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1464700118788684.
[190]
‘Are we now living in the Anthropocene?’, GSA Today, vol. 18, no. 2, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf
[191]
B. Morris, Anthropology, ecology, and anarchism: a Brian Morris reader. Oakland, California: PM Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827
[192]
H. High, ‘Anthropology and anarchy: Romance, horror or science fiction?’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 93–108, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0308275X12438426.
[193]
C. Macdonald, ‘The Anthropology of Anarchy’, Indian Journal of Human Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–66, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0973703020120103.
[194]
R. Kinna, Anarchism: a beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182
[195]
P. H. Marshall, Demanding the impossible: a history of anarchism : be realistic! Demand the impossible! Chicago, IL: PM Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618
[196]
C. Ward, Anarchism: a very short introduction, vol. 116. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[197]
H. B. Barclay and A. Comfort, People without government: an anthropology of anarchy, Completely revised edition. London: Kahn & Averill, 1990.
[198]
H. B. Barclay, Culture and anarchism. London: Freedom Press, 1997.
[199]
C. M. Hann, Socialism: ideals, ideologies, and local practice, vol. 31. London: Routledge, 1993.
[200]
A. Barnard, ‘Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan’, Social evolution and history, vol. 3, no. 1 [Online]. Available: https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/
[201]
N. Buier, ‘The promise of an anarchist anthropology: the three burials of the anarchist project -’, Studia ubb sociologia, vol. LIX, no. 1, pp. 73–90, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603
[202]
D. Graeber, ‘The new anarchists’, New Left Review, vol. 13, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists
[203]
D. Graeber, Fragments of an anarchist anthropology, vol. 14. Chicago, Il: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC, 2004.
[204]
D. Graeber, Debt: the first 5,000 years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House, 2011.
[205]
D. Graeber, ‘Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–128, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.14318/hau2.2.007.
[206]
D. GRAEBER, ‘Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 73–88, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.14318/hau4.3.007.
[207]
D. Graeber, The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House, 2015.
[208]
N. Kadir, The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.
[209]
D. Kalb, ‘Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology’, Focaal, vol. 2014, no. 69, pp. 113–134, doi: https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690108. [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/focaal/2014/69/focaal690108.xml
[210]
S. Nugent, ‘Anarchism out West: Some reflections on sources’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 206–216, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0308275X12437860.
[211]
J. Reinecke, ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London’, Organization Studies, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1299–1321, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0170840618759815.
[212]
A. Robinson and S. Tormey, ‘Beyond the state: Anthropology and “actually-existing-anarchism”’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0308275X12438779.
[213]
F. Schulze, ‘Flirting with anarchism: Class, state, and anthropology’, Focaal, vol. 2013, no. 66, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.3167/fcl.2013.660111.
[214]
J. C. Scott, Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
[215]
N. Ssorin-Chaikov, ‘Writing power: An anarchist anthropologist in the looking glass of critical theory’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 189–205, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0308275X12439486.
[216]
H. GUSTERSON, ‘From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 209–214, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12469.
[217]
P. K. Jones, ‘Insights from the infamous’, European Journal of Social Theory, May 2018, doi: 10.1177/1368431018772507.
[218]
G. Ionescu and E. Gellner, Populism: its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1970 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[219]
P. Worsley, The third world. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1964.
[220]
S. Arat-Koç, ‘Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing “culture”: “White” vs. “Black Turks” and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey’, Dialectical Anthropology, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2.
[221]
A. C. BALTHAZAR, ‘Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 220–224, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12471.
[222]
G. K. Bhambra, ‘Brexit, Trump, and “methodological whiteness”: on the misrecognition of race and class’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, pp. S214–S232, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
[223]
B. Bonikowski, ‘Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, pp. S181–S213, 8AD, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12325. [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12325
[224]
R. Brubaker, ‘Why populism?’, Theory and Society, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 357–385, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7.
[225]
J. EDWARDS, A. HAUGERUD, and S. PARIKH, ‘Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195–200, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12467.
[226]
G. EVANS, ‘Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 215–219, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12470.
[227]
E. Fassin, Populism Left and Right. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC, 2018.
[228]
M. Garrido, ‘Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 647–685, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1086/694076.
[229]
S. Gökarıksel, ‘The ends of revolution: capitalist de-democratization and nationalist populism in the east of Europe’, Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 207–224, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10624-017-9464-7.
[230]
S. Green et al., ‘Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology’, Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 478–502, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12331.
[231]
R. S. Jansen, ‘Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism’, Sociological Theory, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 75–96, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x.
[232]
C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, and P. Ostiguy, Eds., The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
[233]
D. M. KNIGHT, ‘Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 237–242, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12474.
[234]
I. KOCH, ‘What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 225–230, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12472.
[235]
E. Laclau, On populist reason. London: Verso, 2007.
[236]
C. McGRANAHAN, ‘An anthropology of lying: Trump and the political sociality of moral outrage’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 243–248, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12475.
[237]
C. Mouffe, For a left populism. London: Verso, 2018.
[238]
C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Populism: a very short introduction, vol. 510. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[239]
J.-W. Müller, What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
[240]
P. Pierson, ‘American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, pp. S105–S119, 8AD, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12323. [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12323
[241]
K. Powell, ‘Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution’, Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 225–240, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.
[242]
J. ROSA and Y. BONILLA, ‘Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 201–208, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12468.
[243]
S. Shields, ‘Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and its Alternatives’, Critical Sociology, vol. 41, no. 4–5, pp. 659–678, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0896920513501349.
[244]
C. J. WALLEY, ‘Trump’s election and the "white working class”: What we missed’, American Ethnologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 231–236, May 2017, doi: 10.1111/amet.12473.
[245]
I. Onwuzuruigbo, ‘Indigenising Eurocentric sociology: The “captive mind” and five decades of sociology in Nigeria’, Current Sociology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 831–848, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0011392117704242.
[246]
Z. B. Simon, ‘The limits of Anthropocene narratives’, European Journal of Social Theory, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1368431018799256.
[247]
S. L. Lewis and M. Maslin, The human planet: how we created the anthropocene, vol. 20. UK: Pelican, 2018.
[248]
E. C. Ellis, Anthropocene: a very short introduction, First edition., vol. 558. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[249]
Y. Stavrakakis and A. Jäger, ‘Accomplishments and limitations of the “new” mainstream in contemporary populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 547–565, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1368431017723337.
[250]
C. Degnen and K. Tyler, ‘Amongst the disciplines: Anthropology, sociology, intersection and intersectionality’, The Sociological Review, vol. 65, no. 1_suppl, pp. 35–53, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0081176917693508.
[251]
E. Swyngedouw and H. Ernstson, ‘Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 3–30, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0263276418757314.
[252]
J. Herkman, ‘Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries’, Acta Sociologica, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 341–355, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0001699317737816.
[253]
R. Collins, ‘A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1558–1564, May 1997, doi: 10.1086/231126.
[254]
A. F. Conty, ‘The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene’, Theory, Culture & Society, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0263276418802891.
[255]
S. Salem, ‘Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 403–418, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1350506816643999.
[256]
M. LUGONES, ‘Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System’, Hypatia, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 186–219, Feb. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x.
[257]
LUGONES, MARÍA, ‘Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish)’, Tabula Rasa, no. 9, pp. 73–102, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006
[258]
M. LUGONES, ‘Toward a Decolonial Feminism’, Hypatia, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 742–759, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.
[259]
B. de S. Santos, Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876
[260]
J. Go, ‘Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work’, Sociological Theory, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–74, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0735275113477082.
[261]
W. Steffen, J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. McNeill, ‘The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 369, no. 1938, pp. 842–867, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
[262]
M. Freeden, ‘After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813.
[263]
B. Cannon, ‘Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis’, New Political Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 477–496, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187.
[264]
A. Elmgren, ‘The double-edged sword: the political appropriation of the concept of populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 320–341, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13569317.2018.1502940.
[265]
D. Gamper Sachse, ‘Ambivalences of populism: The case of Catalan independentism’, Social Science Information, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0539018418811685.
[266]
A. Deem, ‘Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement’, Theory, Culture & Society, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0263276418807002.
[267]
H. Askola, ‘Wind from the North, don’t go forth? Gender equality and the rise of populist nationalism in Finland’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54–69, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1350506817748341.
[268]
K. Ilmonen, ‘Identity politics revisited: On Audre Lorde, intersectionality, and mobilizing writing styles’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7–22, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1350506817702410.
[269]
P. Bourdieu, ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’, Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, Spring 1989, doi: 10.2307/202060.
[270]
M. Foucault, G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[271]
D. E. Smith, The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990.
[272]
C. J. Calhoun, Contemporary sociological theory, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[273]
N. G. Schiller, J. Eckert, and S. Reyna, ‘Debate on the nature and significance of Critique’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 261–261, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1463499617710992.
[274]
A. Sayer, Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: Policy Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
[275]
Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue, Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1993 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
[276]
A. Cronin and A. King, ‘Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults’, Sociology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 876–892, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0038038510375738.
[277]
U. Zander, L. Zander, S. Gaffney, and J. Olsson, ‘Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 457–466, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.011.
[278]
C. Levine-Rasky, ‘Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness’, Social Identities, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 239–253, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13504630.2011.558377.
[279]
W. A. Dunaway and D. A. Clelland, ‘Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality’, Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 399–464, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.5195/JWSR.2017.598.
[280]
SpringerLink (Online Service), Understanding the dynamics of global inequality: social exclusion, power shift, and structural changes. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6
[281]
G. Ilie, ‘Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis’, Revista de Stiinte Politice, no. 41, pp. 232–240, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540
[282]
J. Go, Ed., Decentering social theory, vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
[283]
J. Go, Ed., Decentering social theory, vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
[284]
J. Go, Ed., Decentering social theory, vol. volume 25. Bingley: Emerald, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
[285]
S. J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, ‘Decoloniality as the Future of Africa’, History Compass, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 485–496, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1111/hic3.12264.
[286]
A. Quijano, ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America’, International Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 215–232, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/0268580900015002005.
[287]
C. Walsh, ‘SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 224–239, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162530.
[288]
D. Chakrabarty, ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 197–222, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1086/596640.
[289]
D. Haraway, N. Ishikawa, S. F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A. L. Tsing, and N. Bubandt, ‘Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene’, Ethnos, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 535–564, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
[290]
G. Palsson et al., ‘Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 28, pp. 3–13, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004.
[291]
N. Kadir, The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.
[292]
J. Reinecke, ‘Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London’, Organization Studies, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1299–1321, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0170840618759815.
[293]
A. Robinson and S. Tormey, ‘Beyond the state: Anthropology and “actually-existing-anarchism”’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0308275X12438779.
[294]
S. Green et al., ‘Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology’, Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 478–502, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12331.
[295]
P. Pierson, ‘American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, pp. S105–S119, 8AD, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12323. [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12323
[296]
K. Powell, ‘Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution’, Dialectical Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 225–240, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10624-017-9469-2.
