1.
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
2.
Baert, Patrick, Silva, Filipe Carreira da. Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
3.
Callinicos, Alex. Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: Polity Press; 1999.
4.
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: Polity; 2012.
5.
Layder, Derek. Understanding social theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2006.
6.
Scott J. Social theory: central issues in sociology [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
7.
Seidman, Steven. Contested knowledge: social theory today. 4th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub; 2008.
8.
Ritzer, George, Smart, Barry. Handbook of social theory. London: Sage; 2001.
9.
Chivers B, Shoolbred M, ProQuest (Firm). A student’s guide to presentations: making your presentation count [Internet]. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=420910
10.
Calhoun, Craig J. Contemporary sociological theory [Internet]. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4edef484-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
11.
Stinchcombe AL. Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers. The American Sociologist [Internet]. American Sociological Association; 1982;17(1):2–11. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27702490
12.
Marshall, Barbara L., Witz, Anne. Engendering the social: feminist encounters with sociological theory [Internet]. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2004. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335226344
13.
Barrett, Michèle, Phillips, Anne. Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1992.
14.
Burton S. The Monstrous ‘White Theory Boy’: Symbolic Capital, Pedagogy and the Politics of Knowledge. Sociological Research Online. 2015;20(3).
15.
Callinicos, Alex. Social theory: a historical introduction. Oxford: Polity Press; 1999.
16.
Col G da, Sopranzetti C, Myers F, Piliavsky A, Jackson JL, Bonilla Y, Benton A, Stoller P. Why do we read the classics? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2017 Dec;7(3):1–38.
17.
Schiller NG. Positioning theory: An introduction. Anthropological Theory. 2016 Sep;16(2–3):133–145.
18.
Gouldner, Alvin W. For sociology: renewal and critique in sociology today. London: Allen Lane; 1973.
19.
Graeber D. Possibilities: essays on hierarchy, rebellion, and desire. Oakland, Calif: AK Press; 2007.
20.
Guillaumin C. Racism, sexism, power and ideology [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1995. Available from: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_338067_0
21.
Harrison, Faye Venetia, Association of Black Anthropologists. Decolonizing anthropology: moving further toward an anthropology of liberation. 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: Association of Black Anthropologists, American Anthropological Association; 1997.
22.
How AR. Hermeneutics and the ‘classic’ problem in the human sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 2011 May 11;24(3):47–63.
23.
Inglis, David, Thorpe, Christopher. An invitation to social theory. Cambridge: Polity; 2012.
24.
Jackson, Stevi, Jones, Jackie. Contemporary feminist theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1998.
25.
Mills CW. The sociological imagination [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=497661
26.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without borders: decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press; 2003.
27.
Patel, Sujata. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: SAGE; 2010.
28.
Scott J. Social theory: central issues in sociology [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354958
29.
Seidman, Steven. Queer theory/sociology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell; 1996.
30.
Dowding K. Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power. 2012 Apr;5(1):119–135.
31.
Hearn J. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power. 2008 Apr;1(1):37–49.
32.
Lukes S, British Sociological Association. Power: a radical view [Internet]. 2nd ed., expanded. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=296503
33.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory [Internet]. 7(1):14–25. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/202060
34.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Bourdieu, Pierre, Thompson, John B. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity; 1991.
35.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., Rabinow, Paul. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1983.
36.
Eribon, Didier. Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber; 1992.
37.
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, Miller, Peter, Foucault, Michel. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault [Internet]. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0559e969-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
38.
Foucault, Michel, Gordon, Colin. Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press; 1980.
39.
Haugaard M. Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2010 Oct 27;13(4):419–438.
40.
Hearn, Jonathan. Theorizing power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
41.
Hearn J. On the social evolution of power to/over. Journal of Political Power. 2014 May 4;7(2):175–191.
42.
LEMKE T. An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2007 Jan;8(2):43–64.
43.
Lemke T. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism. 2002 Sep;14(3):49–64.
44.
Lever J. Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory. Sociology. 2011 Feb 4;45(1):86–101.
45.
Macey, David. The lives of Michel Foucault. London: Hutchinson; 1993.
46.
Menge T. The role of power in social explanation. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018 Feb;21(1):22–38.
47.
Foucault, Michel, Rabinow, Paul. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1991.
48.
Rose N, O’Malley P, Valverde M. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2006 Dec;2(1):83–104.
49.
Russell, Bertrand. Power: a new social analysis. London: Allen & Unwin; 1938.
50.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
51.
Smith, Dorothy E. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press; 1990.
52.
Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2005.
53.
Sulkunen P. Agency and power: The contractual illusion. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2010 Oct 27;13(4):495–510.
54.
Special Issue: Elites and Power after Financialization. Theory, Culture & Society [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/34/5-6
55.
Vintges K. Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2012 Jul 25;19(3):283–298.
56.
Wickham G. Foucault, Law, and Power: A Reassessment. Journal of Law and Society. 2006 Dec;33(4):596–614.
57.
Hammersley M. Should Social Science Be Critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2005 Jun 1;35(2):175–195.
58.
Fassin D. The endurance of critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017 Mar;17(1):4–29.
59.
Sayer A. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science? Current Sociology. 2009 Nov 5;57(6):767–786.
60.
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017 Jun;17(2):261–261.
61.
Basaure M. An interview with Luc Boltanski: Criticism and the expansion of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory. 2011 Aug 8;14(3):361–381.
62.
Blokker P. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory. 2011 Aug 8;14(3):251–261.
63.
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: Verso; 2008.
64.
Boland T. Towards an anthropology of critique: The modern experience of liminality and crisis. Anthropological Theory. 2013 Sep 1;13(3):222–239.
65.
Boltanski L. On critique: a sociology of emancipation [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=1498551
66.
Brown W, ProQuest (Firm). Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=445457
67.
Callinicos, Alex. The resources of critique. Cambridge: Polity; 2006.
68.
Fabiani J. Book Review: Luc Boltanski, De la critique. Precis de sociologie de l’emancipation, Paris Gallimard, 2009, 298 p., 19,90 euros, ISBN 978-2070126569 (pbk). European Journal of Social Theory. 2011 Aug 8;14(3):401–406.
69.
Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory Vol 6, No 2 (2016). Available from: https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/issue/view/hau6.2
70.
Latour B. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 2004 Jan;30(2):225–248.
71.
Ortner SB. Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2016 Jun;6(1):47–73.
72.
Sayer A. Why we can’t afford the rich [Internet]. Bristol: Policy Press; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
73.
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology [Internet]. London: Ebooks Corporation Limited; 1993. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
74.
Susen S, Turner BS, editors. The spirit of Luc Boltanski: essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. London: Anthem Press; 2014.
75.
éZiézek, Slavoj. The ticklish subject: an essay in political ontology. London: Verso; 1999.
76.
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Andiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum [Internet]. 1989(1). Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
77.
Hill Collins P, Bilge S. Intersectionality [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4698012
78.
Walby S. Globalization and inequalities: complexities and contested modernities [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446202319
79.
Anthias F. Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities. 2013 Feb;13(1):3–19.
80.
Bilge S. INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2013;10(02):405–424.
81.
Bohrer A. Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography. Historical Materialism. 2018 Jul 30;26(2):46–74.
82.
Brah A, Phoenix A. Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies [Internet]. 2004;5(3):75–86. Available from: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8
83.
Carbin M, Edenheim S. The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2013 Aug 1;20(3):233–248.
84.
Patricia Hill Collins. It’s All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation. Hypatia [Internet]. Wiley; 1998;13(3):62–82. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810699
85.
Crenshaw K. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review [Internet]. Stanford Law Review; 1991;43(6):1241–1299. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
86.
Davis K. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory. 2008 Apr 1;9(1):67–85.
87.
Dupuis-Deri F. Is the State Part of the Matrix of Domination and Intersectionality? An Anarchist Inquiry. Anarchist Studies [Internet]. 2016;24(1). Available from: https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/anarchist-studies/24-1/is-the-state-part-of-the-matrix-of-domination-and-intersectionality-anarchist
88.
Virtual Special Issue: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/page/ejw/collections/virtual-special-issues/intersectionality
89.
Gordon L. ‘Intersectionality’, Socialist Feminism and Contemporary Activism: Musings by a Second-Wave Socialist Feminist. Gender & History. 2016 Aug;28(2):340–357.
90.
Hancock AM. Intersectionality: an intellectual history [Internet]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370368.001.0001
91.
Juteau-Lee D. Introduction: (Re)constructing the categories of ‘race’ and ‘sex’: the work of a precursor. Racism, sexism, power and ideology. London: Routledge; 1995.
92.
Lawler S. White like them: Whiteness and anachronistic space in representations of the English white working class. Ethnicities. 2012 Aug 14;12(4):409–426.
93.
McCall L. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2005 Mar;30(3):1771–1800.
94.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review [Internet]. Palgrave Macmillan Journals; 1988;(30):61–88. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1395054
95.
Phoenix A. Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006 Aug 1;13(3):187–192.
96.
Romero M. Introducing intersectionality [Internet]. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press; 2018. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5166452
97.
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2016 Apr 22;
98.
Verloo M. Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006 Aug 1;13(3):211–228.
99.
Walby, Sylvia. Patriarchy at work: patriarchal and capitalist relations in employment. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell; 1986.
100.
Walby S, Armstrong J, Strid S. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology. 2012 Apr;46(2):224–240.
101.
Werbner P. Everyday multiculturalism: Theorising the difference between ‘intersectionality’ and ‘multiple identities’. Ethnicities. 2013 Aug 1;13(4):401–419.
102.
Yuval-Davis N. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006 Aug 1;13(3):193–209.
103.
Goldfrank WL. Paradigm Regained? The Rules Of Wallersteins World-System Method. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2015 Aug 26;6(2).
104.
Sassen, Saskia. Sociology of globalization [Internet]. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Company; 2007. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=40f87e70-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
105.
Wallerstein IM, Boyarin D. World-systems analysis: an introduction [Internet]. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/GLA/detail.action?docID=3007861
106.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
107.
Arrighi, Giovanni. The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times. New and updated ed. London: Verso; 2010.
108.
Blim M. Capitalisms in Late Modernity. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2000 Oct 21;29(1):25–38.
109.
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: Verso; 2008.
110.
Brenner R. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review [Internet]. (104):25–92. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/I/104/robert-brenner-the-origins-of-capitalist-development-a-critique-of-neo-smithian-marxism
111.
Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas. The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. Wiley; 1988;32(1):47–65. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412
112.
Frank AG, American Council of Learned Societies. ReOrient: global economy in the Asian Age [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31038
113.
Gülalp H. Frank and Wallerstein revisited: A contribution to Brenner’s critique. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 1981 Jan;11(2):169–188.
114.
Hier SP. The Forgotten Architect: Cox, Wallerstein and World-System Theory. Race & Class. 2001 Jan 1;42(3):69–86.
115.
Martin WG. Still Partners and Still Dissident After All These Years? Wallerstein, World Revolutions and the World-Systems Perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2015 Aug 26;6(2).
116.
Moore JW. The Modern World-System as Environmental History? Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society. 2003;32(3):307–377.
117.
Poncelet L. Bridging Ethnography and World-Systems Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) [Internet]. 2002;25(1):47–97. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241731
118.
Robinson WI. Globalization and the sociology of Immanuel Wallerstein: A critical appraisal. International Sociology. 2011 May 26;26(6):723–745.
119.
Review by: Theda Skocpol. Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. American Journal of Sociology [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1977;82(5):1075–1090. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777814
120.
Wallerstein I. Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines. Current Anthropology. 2003 Aug;44(4):453–465.
121.
Wallerstein I. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised. International Sociology. 2012 Jul 1;27(4):524–528.
122.
Wolf, Eric R., Silverman, Sydel. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2001.
123.
Connell R. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science [Internet]. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=314120
124.
Bhambra GK. Connected sociologies [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
125.
Patel S. Afterword: Doing global sociology: Issues, problems and challenges. Current Sociology. 2014 Jul;62(4):603–613.
126.
Aulenbacher B, Lutz H, Riegraf B. Introduction: Towards a global sociology of care and care work. Current Sociology. 2018 Jul;66(4):495–502.
127.
Bhambra GK. Postcolonial Reflections on Sociology. Sociology. 2016 Oct;50(5):960–966.
128.
Bhambra GK, Santos B de S. Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology. Sociology. 2017 Feb;51(1):3–10.
129.
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: Verso; 2008.
130.
Burawoy M. Challenges for a Global Sociology. Contexts. 2009 Nov;8(4):36–41.
131.
Burawoy M. The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines. Sociology. 2016 Oct;50(5):949–959.
132.
Connell RW. Why Is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology. 1997 May;102(6):1511–1557.
133.
Connell R, Collyer F, Maia J, Morrell R. Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices. International Sociology. 2017 Jan;32(1):21–37.
134.
Patel S. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: SAGE; 2010.
135.
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory [Internet]. Bingley: Emerald; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
136.
Della Faille D, McLaughlin N. Sociology’s Global Challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie [Internet]. Canadian Journal of Sociology; 2008;33(3):485–495. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.485
137.
Jacobs RN, Townsley E. On the Communicative Geography of Global Sociology. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie [Internet]. Canadian Journal of Sociology; 2008;33(3):497–520. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.497
138.
Munck R. Global Sociology: Towards an Alternative Southern Paradigm. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 2016 Sep;29(3):233–249.
139.
Gregory Sandstrom. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. Canadian Journal of Sociology; 2008;33(3):607–630. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.3.607
140.
Sohoni D, Petrovic M. Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum. Teaching Sociology [Internet]. American Sociological Association; 2010;38(4):287–300. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27896545
141.
Sorokin P. ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives. Current Sociology. 2016 Jan;64(1):41–59.
142.
Pavel Sorokin. Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision. Filosofija Sociologija [Internet]. (4):323–330. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525183
143.
Sorokin P. Making Global Sociology in the Context of Neoliberal Domination: Challenges, Ideology and Possible Strategies. Sociological Research Online. 2018 Mar;23(1):21–42.
144.
Welz F. 100 Years of Indian Sociology. International Sociology. 2009 Sep;24(5):635–655.
145.
Mignolo W, Walsh CE. On decoloniality: concepts, analytics, praxis [Internet]. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press; 2018. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822371779
146.
Quijano A. COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):168–178.
147.
Savransky M. A Decolonial Imagination: Sociology, Anthropology and the Politics of Reality. Sociology. 2017 Feb;51(1):11–26.
148.
Bhambra GK. Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2014.
149.
Santos B de S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies. London: Verso; 2008.
150.
Dussel E. Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). boundary 2. 1993 Autumn;20(3).
151.
Escobar A. WORLDS AND KNOWLEDGES OTHERWISE. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):179–210.
152.
Grosfoguel R. THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):211–223.
153.
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):240–270.
154.
Mignolo WD. The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. South Atlantic Quarterly [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2002 Jan 1;101(1):57–96. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745
155.
Mignolo WD. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):155–167.
156.
Mignolo WD. DELINKING. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):449–514.
157.
Mignolo WD. Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry [Internet]. 43:38–45. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692552
158.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 2015 Oct;13(10):485–496.
159.
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 2000 Jun;15(2):215–232.
160.
Sitas A. Rethinking Africa’s sociological project. Current Sociology. 2014 Jul;62(4):457–471.
161.
VÁZQUEZ R. Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence. Journal of Historical Sociology. 2011 Mar;24(1):27–44.
162.
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):224–239.
163.
Catherine E. Walsh. The (Re)articulation of Political Subjectivities and Colonial Difference in Ecuador: Reflections on Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge. Nepantla: Views from South [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2002;3(1):61–97. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23948
164.
Weiner MF. Decolonial sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois’s foundational theoretical and methodological contributions. Sociology Compass. 2018 Aug;12(8).
165.
Wynter S. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument. CR: The New Centennial Review. 2003;3(3):257–337.
166.
Bauer AM, Bhan M. Climate without nature: a critical anthropology of the anthropocene [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525633
167.
Luke TW. Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017 Feb;20(1):80–94.
168.
Moore JW, editor. Anthropocene or capitalocene?: nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism [Internet]. Oakland, California: PM Press; 2016. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3ec3a5a0-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
169.
Barrios RE. What Does Catastrophe Reveal for Whom? The Anthropology of Crises and Disasters at the Onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2017 Oct 23;46(1):151–166.
170.
Bonneuil C, Fressoz JB, Fernbach D. The shock of the anthropocene: the Earth, history, and us. Paperback edition. London: Verso; 2017.
171.
Bowden G. An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie. 2017 Feb;54(1):48–68.
172.
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 2009 Jan;35(2):197–222.
173.
Chernilo D. The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017 Feb;20(1):44–60.
174.
Clark N. Geo-Politics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review. 2014 Jun;62(1_suppl):19–37.
175.
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter [Internet]. 41:17–18. Available from: http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf
176.
Delanty G, Mota A. Governing the Anthropocene. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017 Feb;20(1):9–38.
177.
Ferguson JM. Nativity Seen in the Anthropocene: Contemporary Fieldwork and Subjective Challenges. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 2018 May 27;19(3):189–196.
178.
Grusin RA, editor. Anthropocene feminism [Internet]. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4745552
179.
Hann C. The Anthropocene and anthropology. European Journal of Social Theory. 2017 Feb;20(1):183–196.
180.
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, Olwig K, Tsing AL, Bubandt N. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 2016 May 26;81(3):535–564.
181.
Head L. Hope and grief in the anthropocene: re-conceptualising human-nature relations. Paperback edition. London: Routledge; 2018.
182.
Hecht G. Interscalar Vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On Waste, Temporality, and Violence. Cultural Anthropology. 2018 Feb 28;33(1):109–141.
183.
Hornborg A. Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology. 2017 Jul 3;46(2–3):61–77.
184.
Latour B. Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History. 2014;45(1):1–18.
185.
Moore A. Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2016 Mar;22(1):27–46.
186.
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, Marks J, Avril B, Crumley C, Hackmann H, Holm P, Ingram J, Kirman A, Buendía MP, Weehuizen R. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 2013 Apr;28:3–13.
187.
Patel R, Moore JW. A history of the world in seven cheap things. University of California Press: Oakland, California; 2017.
188.
Tsing AL, Swanson H, Gan E, Bubandt N, editors. Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2017.
189.
Whitworth L. Goodbye Gauley Mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Feminist Theory. 2018 Jul 24;
190.
Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today [Internet]. 2008;18(2). Available from: https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf
191.
Morris B. Anthropology, ecology, and anarchism: a Brian Morris reader [Internet]. Oakland, California: PM Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1835827
192.
High H. Anthropology and anarchy: Romance, horror or science fiction? Critique of Anthropology. 2012 Jun;32(2):93–108.
193.
Macdonald C. The Anthropology of Anarchy. Indian Journal of Human Development. 2012 Jan;6(1):49–66.
194.
Kinna R. Anarchism: a beginner’s guide [Internet]. Oxford: Oneworld Publications; 2005. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1785182
195.
Marshall PH. Demanding the impossible: a history of anarchism : be realistic! Demand the impossible! [Internet]. Chicago, IL: PM Press; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=485618
196.
Ward C. Anarchism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
197.
Barclay HB, Comfort A. People without government: an anthropology of anarchy. Completely revised edition. London: Kahn & Averill; 1990.
198.
Barclay HB. Culture and anarchism. London: Freedom Press; 1997.
199.
Hann CM. Socialism: ideals, ideologies, and local practice. London: Routledge; 1993.
200.
Barnard A. Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan. Social evolution and history [Internet]. 3(1). Available from: https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/140496/
201.
Buier N. The promise of an anarchist anthropology: the three burials of the anarchist project -. Studia ubb sociologia [Internet]. 2014;LIX(1):73–90. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=69603
202.
Graeber D. The new anarchists. New Left Review [Internet]. 2002;13. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://newleftreview.org/II/13/david-graeber-the-new-anarchists
203.
Graeber D. Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Chicago, Il: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC; 2004.
204.
Graeber D. Debt: the first 5,000 years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House; 2011.
205.
Graeber D. Dead zones of the imagination: On violence, bureaucracy, and interpretive labor: The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2006. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2012 Sep;2(2):105–128.
206.
GRAEBER D. Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2014 Dec;4(3):73–88.
207.
Graeber D. The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House; 2015.
208.
Kadir N. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2016.
209.
Kalb D. Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology. Focaal [Internet]. 2014(69):113–134. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/focaal/2014/69/focaal690108.xml
210.
Nugent S. Anarchism out West: Some reflections on sources. Critique of Anthropology. 2012 Jun;32(2):206–216.
211.
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 2018 Mar 21;39(9):1299–1321.
212.
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 2012 Jun;32(2):143–157.
213.
Schulze F. Flirting with anarchism: Class, state, and anthropology. Focaal. 2013 Jan 1;2013(66).
214.
Scott JC. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.
215.
Ssorin-Chaikov N. Writing power: An anarchist anthropologist in the looking glass of critical theory. Critique of Anthropology. 2012 Jun;32(2):189–205.
216.
GUSTERSON H. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):209–214.
217.
Jones PK. Insights from the infamous. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018 May 31;
218.
Ionescu G, Gellner E. Populism: its meanings and national characteristics [Internet]. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1970. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d806999a-f840-e911-80cd-005056af4099
219.
Worsley P. The third world. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1964.
220.
Arat-Koç S. Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology. 2018 Mar 14;
221.
BALTHAZAR AC. Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):220–224.
222.
Bhambra GK. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology. 2017 Nov;68:S214–S232.
223.
Bonikowski B. Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 8AD;68:S181–S213. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12325
224.
Brubaker R. Why populism? Theory and Society. 2017 Nov;46(5):357–385.
225.
EDWARDS J, HAUGERUD A, PARIKH S. Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):195–200.
226.
EVANS G. Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):215–219.
227.
Fassin E. Populism Left and Right. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC; 2018.
228.
Garrido M. Why the Poor Support Populism: The Politics of Sincerity in Metro Manila. American Journal of Sociology. 2017 Nov;123(3):647–685.
229.
Gökarıksel S. The ends of revolution: capitalist de-democratization and nationalist populism in the east of Europe. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017 Sep;41(3):207–224.
230.
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, Cowan JK, Demetriou O, Koch I, Carrithers M, Andersson R, Gingrich A, Macdonald S, Açiksöz SC, Yildirim U, Eriksen TH, Shore C, Holmes DR, Herzfeld M, Strathern M, Jensen CB, Martin K, Dalakoglou D, Poulimenakos G, Jansen S, Brkovič Č, Wilson TM, Besnier N, Guinness D, Hann M, Ballinger P, Dzenovska D. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 2016 Nov;24(4):478–502.
231.
Jansen RS. Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory. 2011 Jun;29(2):75–96.
232.
Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart PA, Ochoa Espejo P, Ostiguy P, editors. The Oxford handbook of populism [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
233.
KNIGHT DM. Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):237–242.
234.
KOCH I. What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):225–230.
235.
Laclau E. On populist reason. London: Verso; 2007.
236.
McGRANAHAN C. An anthropology of lying: Trump and the political sociality of moral outrage. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):243–248.
237.
Mouffe C. For a left populism. London: Verso; 2018.
238.
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.
239.
Müller JW. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016.
240.
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 8AD;68:S105–S119. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12323
241.
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017 Sep;41(3):225–240.
242.
ROSA J, BONILLA Y. Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):201–208.
243.
Shields S. Neoliberalism Redux: Poland’s Recombinant Populism and its Alternatives. Critical Sociology. 2015 Jul;41(4–5):659–678.
244.
WALLEY CJ. Trump’s election and the "white working class”: What we missed. American Ethnologist. 2017 May;44(2):231–236.
245.
Onwuzuruigbo I. Indigenising Eurocentric sociology: The ‘captive mind’ and five decades of sociology in Nigeria. Current Sociology. 2018 Oct;66(6):831–848.
246.
Simon ZB. The limits of Anthropocene narratives. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018 Sep 18;
247.
Lewis SL, Maslin M. The human planet: how we created the anthropocene. UK: Pelican; 2018.
248.
Ellis EC. Anthropocene: a very short introduction. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
249.
Stavrakakis Y, Jäger A. Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studiesBooks: MüllerJan-Werner, What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016; MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira, Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. European Journal of Social Theory. 2018 Nov;21(4):547–565.
250.
Degnen C, Tyler K. Amongst the disciplines: Anthropology, sociology, intersection and intersectionality. The Sociological Review. 2017 Mar;65(1_suppl):35–53.
251.
Swyngedouw E, Ernstson H. Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. 2018 Nov;35(6):3–30.
252.
Herkman J. Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica. 2018 Nov;61(4):341–355.
253.
Collins R. A Sociological Guilt Trip: Comment on Connell. American Journal of Sociology. 1997 May;102(6):1558–1564.
254.
Conty AF. The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society. 2018 Oct 11;
255.
Salem S. Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2018 Nov;25(4):403–418.
256.
LUGONES M. Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System. Hypatia. 2007 Feb;22(1):186–219.
257.
LUGONES, MARÍA. Coloniality and Gender (in Spanish). Tabula Rasa [Internet]. 2008;(9):73–102. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-24892008000200006
258.
LUGONES M. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia. 2010 Oct;25(4):742–759.
259.
Santos B de S. Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315634876
260.
Go J. Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work. Sociological Theory. 2013 Mar;31(1):49–74.
261.
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2011 Mar 13;369(1938):842–867.
262.
Freeden M. After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2017 Jan 2;22(1):1–11.
263.
Cannon B. Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis. New Political Science. 2018 Jul 3;40(3):477–496.
264.
Elmgren A. The double-edged sword: the political appropriation of the concept of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2018 Sep 2;23(3):320–341.
265.
Gamper Sachse D. Ambivalences of populism: The case of Catalan independentism. Social Science Information. 2018 Nov 16;
266.
Deem A. Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement. Theory, Culture & Society. 2018 Nov 18;
267.
Askola H. Wind from the North, don’t go forth? Gender equality and the rise of populist nationalism in Finland. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2019 Feb;26(1):54–69.
268.
Ilmonen K. Identity politics revisited: On Audre Lorde, intersectionality, and mobilizing writing styles. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2019 Feb;26(1):7–22.
269.
Bourdieu P. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. 1989 Spring;7(1).
270.
Foucault M, Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
271.
Smith DE. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press; 1990.
272.
Calhoun CJ. Contemporary sociological theory. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
273.
Schiller NG, Eckert J, Reyna S. Debate on the nature and significance of Critique. Anthropological Theory. 2017 Jun;17(2):261–261.
274.
Sayer A. Why we can’t afford the rich [Internet]. Bristol: Policy Press; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1831961
275.
Stanley, Liz, Wise, Sue. Breaking out again : feminist ontology and epistemology [Internet]. London: Routledge & K. Paul; 1993. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=169541
276.
Cronin A, King A. Power, Inequality and Identification: Exploring Diversity and Intersectionality amongst Older LGB Adults. Sociology. 2010 Oct;44(5):876–892.
277.
Zander U, Zander L, Gaffney S, Olsson J. Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2010 Dec;26(4):457–466.
278.
Levine-Rasky C. Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities. 2011 Mar;17(2):239–253.
279.
Dunaway WA, Clelland DA. Moving toward Theory for the 21st Century: The Centrality of Nonwestern Semiperipheries to World Ethnic/Racial Inequality. Journal of World-Systems Research. 2017 Aug 11;23(2):399–464.
280.
SpringerLink (Online Service). Understanding the dynamics of global inequality: social exclusion, power shift, and structural changes [Internet]. Lenger A, Schumacher F, editors. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44766-6
281.
Ilie G. Applying Wallerstein’s Theory to Explain the Change of the Global Power and Economic Poles during Financial Crisis. Revista de Stiinte Politice [Internet]. 2014;(41):232–240. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524700756?accountid=14540
282.
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory [Internet]. Bingley: Emerald; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
283.
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory [Internet]. Bingley: Emerald; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
284.
Go J, editor. Decentering social theory [Internet]. Bingley: Emerald; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1341912
285.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ. Decoloniality as the Future of Africa. History Compass. 2015 Oct;13(10):485–496.
286.
Quijano A. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology. 2000 Jun;15(2):215–232.
287.
Walsh C. SHIFTING THE GEOPOLITICS OF CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):224–239.
288.
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 2009 Jan;35(2):197–222.
289.
Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, Olwig K, Tsing AL, Bubandt N. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 2016 May 26;81(3):535–564.
290.
Palsson G, Szerszynski B, Sörlin S, Marks J, Avril B, Crumley C, Hackmann H, Holm P, Ingram J, Kirman A, Buendía MP, Weehuizen R. Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 2013 Apr;28:3–13.
291.
Kadir N. The autonomous life?: paradoxes of hierarchy and authority in the squatters movement in Amsterdam. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2016.
292.
Reinecke J. Social Movements and Prefigurative Organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies. 2018 Mar 21;39(9):1299–1321.
293.
Robinson A, Tormey S. Beyond the state: Anthropology and ‘actually-existing-anarchism’. Critique of Anthropology. 2012 Jun;32(2):143–157.
294.
Green S, Gregory C, Reeves M, Cowan JK, Demetriou O, Koch I, Carrithers M, Andersson R, Gingrich A, Macdonald S, Açiksöz SC, Yildirim U, Eriksen TH, Shore C, Holmes DR, Herzfeld M, Strathern M, Jensen CB, Martin K, Dalakoglou D, Poulimenakos G, Jansen S, Brkovič Č, Wilson TM, Besnier N, Guinness D, Hann M, Ballinger P, Dzenovska D. Brexit Referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology. 2016 Nov;24(4):478–502.
295.
Pierson P. American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy. The British Journal of Sociology [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 8AD;68:S105–S119. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12323
296.
Powell K. Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution. Dialectical Anthropology. 2017 Sep;41(3):225–240.
