[1]
Abu-Lughod, L. 2002. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist. 104, 3 (2002), 783–790.
[2]
Acharya, A. 2014. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly. 58, 4 (Dec. 2014), 647–659. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171.
[3]
Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. 2010. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge.
[4]
Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. 2007. Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 7, 3 (May 2007), 285–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm011.
[5]
Adams, R. 2017. British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show. The Guardian. (2017).
[6]
Agathangelou, A.M. and Ling, L.H.M. 2005. Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, 3 (Jun. 2005), 827–853. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030701.
[7]
Agathangelou, A.M. and Ling, L.H.M. 2004. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review. 6, 4 (2004).
[8]
Agathangelou, A.M. and Ling, L.H.M. 2009. Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
[9]
Ahmed, A.S. and Donnan, H. 1994. Islam, globalization and postmodernity. Routledge.
[10]
Ahmed, L. 2011. A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. Yale University Press.
[11]
American Political Science Association and JSTOR (Organization) Perspectives on politics.
[12]
Anievas, A. and Nisancioglu, K. 2013. What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 42, 1 (Sep. 2013), 78–102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813497823.
[13]
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling 2004. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 3 (2004).
[14]
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling 2004. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review. 6, 4 (2004).
[15]
Ayoob, M. 2002. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review. 4, 3 (Jan. 2002), 27–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00263.
[16]
Barkawi, T. 2016. Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security. 1, 02 (Jul. 2016), 199–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2016.7.
[17]
Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. 2001. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[18]
Barkawi, T. and Stanski, K. eds. 2014. Orientalism and war. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Barkawi, T. and Stanski, K. eds. 2014. Orientalism and war. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Barreto, J.-M. 2012. Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto. Transnational Legal Theory. 3, 1 (Nov. 2012), 1–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5235/TLT.3.1.1.
[21]
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs et al. International security.
[22]
Bhambra, G.K. et al. eds. 2018. Decolonising the university. Pluto Press.
[23]
Bhambra, G.K. et al. eds. 2018. Decolonising the university. Pluto Press.
[24]
Bhambra, G.K. and Shilliam, R. 2009. Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Palgrave Macmillan.
[25]
Bilge, S. 2010. Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 31, 1 (Feb. 2010), 9–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860903477662.
[26]
Biswas, S. 2007. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 36, 1 (Dec. 2007), 117–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010801.
[27]
Blaney, D.L. and Tickner, A.B. 2017. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 293–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817702446.
[28]
British International Studies Association and Cambridge University Press 1981. Review of international studies. (1981).
[29]
Byrd, J.A. and Rothberg, M. 2011. Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies. Interventions. 13, 1 (Mar. 2011), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574.
[30]
Capan, Z.G. 2017. Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly. 38, 1 (Jan. 2017), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100.
[31]
de Carvalho, B. et al. 2011. The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 3 (May 2011), 735–758. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811401459.
[32]
Chakrabarty, D. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2008. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
[33]
Chakravorty, G.S. Can The Subaltern Speak?
[34]
Charles T. Call 2008. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly. 29, 8 (2008).
[35]
Chowdhry, G. and Nair, S. 2004. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge.
[36]
Chowdhry, G. and Nair, S. 2004. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge.
[37]
Chowdhry, G. and Nair, S. 2004. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge.
[38]
Darby, P. and Paolini, A.J. 1994. Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 19, 3 (1994).
[39]
Deeb, L. 2009. Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 15, (May 2009), S112–S126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01545.x.
[40]
Dingli, S. 2013. Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen. Politics. 33, 2 (Jun. 2013), 91–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01453.x.
[41]
Dingli, S. 2015. We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations. 21, 4 (Dec. 2015), 721–742. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114568033.
[42]
Dingli, S. and Cooke, T.N. eds. 2019. Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity. Routledge.
[43]
Duck of Minerva: http://duckofminerva.com/.
[44]
Dunn, K.C. and Shaw, T.M. 2013. Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Palgrave.
[45]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2015. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[46]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2015. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[47]
EBSCO Publishing (Firm) 2001. Global environmental politics. (2001).
[48]
E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics: https://www.e-ir.info/.
[49]
El Guindi, F. 2005. Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism. Ahfad Journal. 22, 1 (2005), 53–78.
[50]
El Guindi, F. 1999. Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance. Berg.
[51]
Eltahawy, M. 2016. Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[52]
Enloe, C.H. 2004. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. University of California Press.
[53]
Epstein, C. 2014. The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction. International Theory. 6, 2 (2014), 294–311.
[54]
Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/.
[55]
Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas: https://foreignpolicy.com/.
[56]
Gani, J.K. 2017. The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 425–446. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817714064.
[57]
Golley, N.A. 2004. Is feminism relevant to Arab women? Third World Quarterly. 25, 3 (Mar. 2004), 521–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000191410.
[58]
Gopal, P. 2017. Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. The Guardian. (Oct. 2017).
[59]
Gregory, D. 2004. The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Blackwell Publishing.
[60]
Grovogui, S.N. 2001. Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, 4 (Oct. 2001), 425–448. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600404.
[61]
Grovogui, S.N. 2002. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 8, 3 (Sep. 2002), 315–338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.
[62]
Grovogui, S.N. 1996. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. University of Minnesota Press.
[63]
Gruffydd Jones, B. 2006. Decolonizing international relations. Rowman & Littlefield.
[64]
Hall, M. and Hobson, J.M. 2010. Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist? International Theory. 2, 02 (Jul. 2010), 210–245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909990261.
[65]
Henderson, E.A. 2013. Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 26, 1 (Mar. 2013), 71–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.710585.
[66]
Henderson, E.A. 2017. The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 492–510. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817694246.
[67]
Hobson, J.M. 2007. Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies. 33, S1 (Apr. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007413.
[68]
Hobson, J.M. 2013. Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 5 (Oct. 2013), 1055–1081. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.733498.
[69]
Hobson, J.M. 2009. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 46, 6 (Nov. 2009), 671–690. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.22.
[70]
Hobson, J.M. 2009. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 46, 6 (Nov. 2009), 671–690. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.22.
[71]
Hobson, J.M. 2007. Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. International Politics. 44, 4 (Jul. 2007), 414–430. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198.
[72]
Hobson, J.M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press.
[73]
Hobson, J.M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press.
[74]
Hobson, J.M. 2011. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 40, 1 (Sep. 2011), 147–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412653.
[75]
Hobson, J.M. and American Council of Learned Societies 2004. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press.
[76]
Hobson, J.M. and American Council of Learned Societies 2004. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press.
[77]
Hobson, J.M. and American Council of Learned Societies 2004. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press.
[78]
Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D.L. 2004. International relations and the problem of difference. Routledge.
[79]
International Institute for Strategic Studies and Oxford University Press Survival.
[80]
International Studies Association Foreign policy analysis.
[81]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization) 1967. International studies quarterly. (1967).
[82]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization) International studies review.
[83]
Interview: Saba Mahmood: http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/.
[84]
J. Maggio 2007. ‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 32, 4 (2007).
[85]
Jacquin-Berdal, D. et al. 1998. Culture in world politics. Macmillan Press.
[86]
Krishna, S. 2001. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, 4 (2001).
[87]
Krishna, S. and Dawson Books 2009. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
[88]
KURU, D. 2016. Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity. Review of International Studies. 42, 02 (Apr. 2016), 351–376. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000315.
[89]
Kyle Grayson 2010. Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence. Review of International Studies. 36, 4 (2010).
[90]
Le Grange, L. 2016. Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education. 30, 2 (Jun. 2016), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20853/30-2-709.
[91]
LexisNexis (Firm) 2008. Politics. (2008).
[92]
Ling, L.H.M. 2014. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge, taylor & Francis Group.
[93]
Ling, L.H.M. 2014. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge, taylor & Francis Group.
[94]
Ling, L.H.M. 2017. World Politics in Colour. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 473–491. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817703192.
[95]
Little War on the Prairie: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie.
[96]
London School of Economics and Political Science Millennium: journal of international studies.
[97]
Mahmood, S. 2001. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology. 16, 2 (2001), 202–236.
[98]
Mahmood, S. 2005. Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
[99]
Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 21, 2–3 (Mar. 2007), 240–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.
[100]
Malik, K. 2017. Are Soas students right to ‘decolonise’ their minds from western philosophers? The Guardian. (2017).
[101]
Matin, K. 2013. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 19, 2 (Jun. 2013), 353–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.
[102]
Moffette, D. and Walters, W.H.C. 2018. Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration. Studies in Social Justice. 12, 1 (Jul. 2018), 92–110. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1630.
[103]
Mohammed Ayoob 2002. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review. 4, 3 (2002).
[104]
Moyn, S. 2013. Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 24, 1 (Feb. 2013), 227–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht011.
[105]
Odeh, L.A. 1993. Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference. Feminist Review. 43 (Spring 1993), 26–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1395067.
[106]
Odysseos, L. 2017. Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and ‘Being Human as Praxis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 447–472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817704503.
[107]
Odysseos, L. and Pal, M. 2018. Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University. International Studies Perspectives. 19, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekx006.
[108]
Owens, P. 2017. Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 3 (Jun. 2017), 403–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817695880.
[109]
Peters, C. 2017. Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us. Telegraph. (Oct. 2017).
[110]
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom and EBSCO Publishing (Firm) British journal of politics and international relations.
[111]
Political Violence at a Glance: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/.
[112]
Read, J.G. and Bartkowski, J.P. 2000. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society. 14, 3 (2000), 395–417.
[113]
Royal Institute of International Affairs et al. 1944. International affairs. (1944).
[114]
Saba Mahmood 2001. Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology. 16, 2 (2001).
[115]
Sabaratnam, M. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 44, 3 (Jun. 2013), 259–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485870.
[116]
Sabaratnam, M. 2011. IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 3 (May 2011), 781–803. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811404270.
[117]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin Books.
[118]
Satia, P. 2009. From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan. New Perspectives Quarterly. 26, 3 (Jun. 2009), 34–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2009.01091.x.
[119]
Seth, S. ed. 2013. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[120]
Seth, S. ed. 2013. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[121]
Seth, S. ed. 2013. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[122]
Seth, S. ed. 2013. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[123]
Seth, S. 2011. Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 40, 1 (Sep. 2011), 167–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325.
[124]
Shahi, D. and Ascione, G. 2016. Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations. 22, 2 (Jun. 2016), 313–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115592938.
[125]
Shani, G. 2008. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 10, 4 (Dec. 2008), 722–734. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x.
[126]
Shaw, K. 2002. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 31, 1 (Jan. 2002), 55–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010401.
[127]
Shilliam, R. 2011. Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 3 (May 2011), 649–665. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811399144.
[128]
Shilliam, R. ed. 2011. International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. Routledge.
[129]
Siba N. Grovogui To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies.
[130]
Spivak, G.C. 2010. Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. Columbia University Press.
[131]
SpringerLink (Online service) International politics.
[132]
Tarak Barkawi 2004. Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of ‘Small Wars’. Cultural Critique. 58 (2004).
[133]
Tarak Barkawi 2004. On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 80, 1 (2004).
[134]
Taylor & Francis Contemporary politics.
[135]
Thakur, V. et al. 2017. Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 46, 1 (Sep. 2017), 3–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817711911.
[136]
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010: https://thedisorderofthings.com/.
[137]
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University) et al. The Brown journal of world affairs.
[138]
Thomson Gale (Firm) and William S. Hein & Company 1995. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. (1995).
[139]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. 2013. Claiming the international. Routledge.
[140]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. 2013. Claiming the international. Routledge.
[141]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. 2013. Claiming the international. Routledge.
[142]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. 2013. Claiming the international. Routledge.
[143]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. eds. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. Routledge.
[144]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. eds. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. Routledge.
[145]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. eds. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. Routledge.
[146]
Tickner, A.B. and Blaney, D.L. eds. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. Routledge.
[147]
Tickner, A.B. and Wæver, O. 2009. International relations scholarship around the world. Routledge.
[148]
Torab, A. 1996. Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2, 2 (Jun. 1996), 235–252. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3034094.
[149]
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies Cambridge review of international affairs.
[150]
Vasilaki, R. 2012. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41, 1 (Sep. 2012), 3–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.
[151]
Vasilaki, R. 2012. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41, 1 (Sep. 2012), 3–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.
[152]
Vitalis, R. 2000. The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 29, 2 (Jun. 2000), 331–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020701.
[153]
Vitalis, R. 2015. White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Cornell University Press.
[154]
Warrior, R. 2011. The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual. Interventions. 13, 1 (Mar. 2011), 85–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545579.
[155]
Whyman, T. 2017. Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans. The Guardian. (Jan. 2017).
[156]
Williams, J. 2017. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy. (2017).
[157]
Williams, J. 2017. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy. (2017).
[158]
Zondi, S. 2018. Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation. Politikon. 45, 1 (Jan. 2018), 16–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1418202.
[159]
1992. Environmental politics. (1992).
[160]
European journal of international relations.
[161]
International feminist journal of politics.
[162]
Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2.
[163]
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2.
[165]
Why is My curriculum White?
