[1]
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), and JSTOR (Organization), ‘International affairs’, 1944.
[2]
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), and William S. Hein & Company, ‘The Brown journal of world affairs’.
[3]
British International Studies Association and Cambridge University Press, ‘Review of international studies’, 1981.
[4]
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, and Thomson Gale (Firm), ‘International security’.
[6]
EBSCO Publishing (Firm), ‘Global environmental politics’, 2001.
[7]
‘Environmental politics’, 1992.
[8]
International Institute for Strategic Studies and Oxford University Press, ‘Survival’.
[9]
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies, ‘Cambridge review of international affairs’.
[10]
Taylor & Francis, ‘Contemporary politics’.
[11]
LexisNexis (Firm), ‘Politics’, 2008.
[12]
SpringerLink (Online service), ‘International politics’.
[13]
‘International feminist journal of politics’.
[14]
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom and EBSCO Publishing (Firm), ‘British journal of politics and international relations’.
[15]
‘European journal of international relations’.
[16]
Thomson Gale (Firm) and William S. Hein & Company, ‘Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations’, 1995.
[17]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization), ‘International studies quarterly’, 1967.
[18]
International Studies Association and JSTOR (Organization), ‘International studies review’.
[19]
International Studies Association, ‘Foreign policy analysis’.
[20]
London School of Economics and Political Science, ‘Millennium: journal of international studies’.
[21]
American Political Science Association and JSTOR (Organization), ‘Perspectives on politics’.
[22]
‘E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics’. [Online]. Available: https://www.e-ir.info/
[23]
‘Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas’. [Online]. Available: https://foreignpolicy.com/
[24]
‘Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs’. [Online]. Available: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
[25]
‘Duck of Minerva’. [Online]. Available: http://duckofminerva.com/
[26]
‘Political Violence at a Glance’. [Online]. Available: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
[27]
‘The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010’. [Online]. Available: https://thedisorderofthings.com/
[28]
S. Seth, ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 167–183, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811412325.
[29]
P. Darby and A. J. Paolini, ‘Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 19, no. 3, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644813
[30]
A. M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling, ‘The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism’, International Studies Review, vol. 6, no. 4, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
[31]
C. Epstein, ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’, International Theory, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 294–311, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intheory6&id=304
[32]
Ebooks Corporation Limited, Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
[33]
E. A. Henderson, ‘Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 71–92, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09557571.2012.710585.
[34]
S. Krishna, ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 26, no. 4, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645028
[35]
E. A. Henderson, ‘The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 492–510, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817694246.
[36]
D. Moffette and W. H. C. Walters, ‘Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration’, Studies in Social Justice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–110, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1630.
[37]
R. Vitalis, ‘The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 331–356, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/03058298000290020701.
[38]
R. Vitalis, White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015.
[39]
P. Owens, ‘Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and “the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved”’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 403–424, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817695880.
[40]
D. Jacquin-Berdal, A. Oros, and M. Verweij, Culture in world politics. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 1998.
[41]
L. H. M. Ling, ‘World Politics in Colour’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 473–491, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817703192.
[42]
Ebooks Corporation Limited, Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
[43]
V. Thakur, A. E. Davis, and P. Vale, ‘Imperial Mission, “Scientific” Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3–23, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817711911.
[44]
G. Chowdhry and S. Nair, Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class, vol. 16. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
[45]
J. M. Hobson, The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
[46]
J. M. Hobson and American Council of Learned Societies, The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
[47]
‘Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2’ [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/mila/42/2
[48]
‘Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2’ [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cpcs20/19/2?nav=tocList
[49]
J. M. Hobson and American Council of Learned Societies, The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
[50]
J. M. Hobson, The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
[51]
T. Barkawi and K. Stanski, Eds., Orientalism and war. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
[52]
E. W. Said, Orientalism. London: Penguin Books, 2003.
[53]
B. de Carvalho, H. Leira, and J. M. Hobson, ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 735–758, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811401459.
[54]
J. M. Hobson, ‘Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR’, Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. S1, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0260210507007413.
[55]
A. Acharya and B. Buzan, ‘Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 285–286, May 2007, doi: 10.1093/irap/lcm011.
[56]
K. Matin, ‘Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 353–377, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066111425263.
[57]
R. Vasilaki, ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–22, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0305829812451720.
[58]
M. Hall and J. M. Hobson, ‘Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist?’, International Theory, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 210–245, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1017/S1752971909990261.
[59]
S. Biswas, ‘Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–133, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/03058298070360010801.
[60]
M. Sabaratnam, ‘Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace’, Security Dialogue, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 259–278, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0967010613485870.
[61]
J. M. Hobson, ‘Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty’, International Politics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 671–690, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1057/ip.2009.22.
[62]
N. Inayatullah and D. L. Blaney, International relations and the problem of difference. New York: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203644096
[63]
K. Shaw, ‘Indigeneity and the International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 55–81, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010401.
[64]
‘Little War on the Prairie’. [Online]. Available: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie
[65]
G. S. Chakravorty, ‘Can The Subaltern Speak?’ [Online]. Available: https://archive.org/details/CanTheSubalternSpeak
[66]
Mohammed Ayoob, ‘Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism’, International Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 3, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3186462
[67]
J. A. Byrd and M. Rothberg, ‘Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies’, Interventions, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574.
[68]
C. H. Enloe, The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.
[69]
Kyle Grayson, ‘Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence’, Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961965
[70]
R. Warrior, ‘The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual’, Interventions, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–94, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1369801X.2011.545579.
[71]
G. K. Bhambra and R. Shilliam, Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[72]
S. Dingli, ‘We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 721–742, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1354066114568033.
[73]
G. C. Spivak, Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
[74]
J. Maggio, ‘“Can the Subaltern Be Heard?”: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 32, no. 4, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645229
[75]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Eds., Thinking international relations differently, vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 2012.
[76]
D. L. Blaney and A. B. Tickner, ‘Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 293–311, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817702446.
[77]
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling, ‘The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism’, International Studies Review, vol. 6, no. 4, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
[78]
L. H. M. Ling, The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[79]
S. Seth, Ed., Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
[80]
D. Chakrabarty and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference, [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=581797
[81]
S. Seth, Ed., Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
[82]
S. N. Grovogui, ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 315–338, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1354066102008003001.
[83]
S. N. Grovogui, Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law, vol. v. 3. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
[84]
K. C. Dunn and T. M. Shaw, Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2013.
[85]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
[86]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Eds., Thinking international relations differently, vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 2012.
[87]
Charles T. Call, ‘The Fallacy of the “Failed State”’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 8, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20455126
[88]
S. Dingli, ‘Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen’, Politics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 91–100, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01453.x.
[89]
J. M. Hobson, ‘Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty’, International Politics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 671–690, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1057/ip.2009.22.
[90]
T. Barkawi, ‘Decolonising war’, European Journal of International Security, vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 199–214, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1017/eis.2016.7.
[91]
Tarak Barkawi, ‘On the Pedagogy of “Small Wars”’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 80, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569291
[92]
P. Satia, ‘From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan’, New Perspectives Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 34–37, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5842.2009.01091.x.
[93]
S. Moyn, ‘Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 227–233, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1093/ejil/cht011.
[94]
T. Barkawi and K. Stanski, Eds., Orientalism and war. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
[95]
D. Gregory, The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
[96]
A. M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling, ‘Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 827–853, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/03058298050330030701.
[97]
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling, ‘Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521
[98]
T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.
[99]
Tarak Barkawi, ‘Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of “Small Wars”’, Cultural Critique, no. 58, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4140775
[100]
J. M. Hobson, ‘Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations’, International Politics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 414–430, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198.
[101]
G. Chowdhry and S. Nair, Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class, vol. 16. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
[102]
S. Krishna and Dawson Books, Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642
[103]
J. M. Hobson, ‘Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric “open economy politics” to inter-civilizational political economy’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1055–1081, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.733498.
[104]
S. Seth, Ed., Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
[105]
J. M. Hobson and American Council of Learned Societies, The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
[106]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Eds., Thinking international relations differently, vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 2012.
[107]
A. Anievas and K. Nisancioglu, ‘What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the “Rise of the West”’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 78–102, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0305829813497823.
[108]
G. Chowdhry and S. Nair, Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class, vol. 16. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
[109]
J. M. Hobson, ‘What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 147–166, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811412653.
[110]
S. Mahmood, Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04721
[111]
S. Dingli and T. N. Cooke, Eds., Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315104928
[112]
Saba Mahmood, ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 2, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
[113]
S. Mahmood, ‘Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 202–236, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
[114]
‘Interview: Saba Mahmood’. [Online]. Available: http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/
[115]
M. Eltahawy, Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2016.
[116]
L. Ahmed, A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.
[117]
L. A. Odeh, ‘Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference’, Feminist Review, no. 43, pp. 26–37, Spring 1993, doi: 10.2307/1395067.
[118]
N. A. Golley, ‘Is feminism relevant to Arab women?’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 521–536, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0143659042000191410.
[119]
J. G. Read and J. P. Bartkowski, ‘To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas’, Gender and Society, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 395–417, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/190135
[120]
F. El Guindi, ‘Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism’, Ahfad Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53–78, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A134680612/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=AONE&xid=9c6b0552
[121]
L. Abu-Lughod, ‘Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others’, American Anthropologist, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 783–790, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567256
[122]
L. Deeb, ‘Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 15, pp. S112–S126, May 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01545.x.
[123]
A. S. Ahmed and H. Donnan, Islam, globalization and postmodernity. London: Routledge, 1994.
[124]
A. Torab, ‘Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 235–252, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.2307/3034094.
[125]
F. El Guindi, Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance. Oxford: Berg, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888969
[126]
S. Bilge, ‘Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 9–28, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1080/07256860903477662.
[127]
G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebrial, and K. Nişancıoğlu, Eds., Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
[128]
J. Williams, ‘The “decolonise the curriculum” movement re-racialises knowledge’, openDemocracy, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
[129]
K. Malik, ‘Are Soas students right to “decolonise” their minds from western philosophers?’, The Guardian, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/19/soas-philosopy-decolonise-our-minds-enlightenment-white-european-kenan-malik
[130]
R. Adams, ‘British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show’, The Guardian, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jan/19/british-universities-employ-no-black-academics-in-top-roles-figures-show
[131]
N. Maldonado-Torres, ‘ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 240–270, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09502380601162548.
[132]
‘Why is My curriculum White?’ [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00131857.2015.1037227
[133]
L. Odysseos and M. Pal, ‘Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University’, International Studies Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1093/isp/ekx006.
[134]
L. Le Grange, ‘Decolonising the university curriculum’, South African Journal of Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.20853/30-2-709.
[135]
P. Gopal, ‘Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men’, The Guardian, Oct. 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/decolonise-elite-white-men-decolonising-cambridge-university-english-curriculum-literature
[136]
J. Williams, ‘The “decolonise the curriculum” movement re-racialises knowledge’, openDemocracy, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
[137]
T. Whyman, ‘Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans’, The Guardian, Jan. 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/10/soas-students-study-philosophy-africa-asia-european-pc-snowflakes
[138]
G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebrial, and K. Nişancıoğlu, Eds., Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
[139]
C. Peters, ‘Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us’, Telegraph, Oct. 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/27/left-wing-academics-helping-minority-students-force-identity/
[140]
M. Sabaratnam, ‘IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 781–803, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811404270.
[141]
L. Odysseos, ‘Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and “Being Human as Praxis”’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 447–472, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817704503.
[142]
A. B. Tickner and O. Wæver, International relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2009.
[143]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
[144]
M. Ayoob, ‘Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism’, International Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 27–48, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00263.
[145]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
[146]
A. Acharya, ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 647–659, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/isqu.12171.
[147]
A. Acharya and B. Buzan, Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge, 2010.
[148]
B. Gruffydd Jones, Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
[149]
G. Shani, ‘Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 722–734, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x.
[150]
R. Vasilaki, ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–22, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0305829812451720.
[151]
D. Shahi and G. Ascione, ‘Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: “Advaitic monism” as an alternative epistemological resource’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 313–334, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1354066115592938.
[152]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
[153]
S. Seth, Ed., Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
[154]
A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney, Eds., Thinking international relations differently, vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 2012.
[155]
L. H. M. Ling, The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[156]
S. N. Grovogui, ‘Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 425–448, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/030437540102600404.
[157]
A. M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling, Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
[158]
D. KURU, ‘Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity’, Review of International Studies, vol. 42, no. 02, pp. 351–376, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S0260210515000315.
[159]
S. Zondi, ‘Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation’, Politikon, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 16–31, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02589346.2018.1418202.
[160]
Z. G. Capan, ‘Decolonising International Relations?’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100.
[161]
J. K. Gani, ‘The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 425–446, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829817714064.
[162]
J.-M. Barreto, ‘Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto’, Transnational Legal Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.5235/TLT.3.1.1.
[163]
Siba N. Grovogui, ‘To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A268604335&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon
[164]
R. Shilliam, ‘Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 649–665, May 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811399144.
[165]
R. Shilliam, Ed., International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: Routledge, 2011.
