1
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. 1944.
2
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs.
3
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. 1981.
4
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, et al. International security.
6
EBSCO Publishing (Firm). Global environmental politics. 2001.
7
Environmental politics. 1992.
8
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival.
9
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies. Cambridge review of international affairs.
10
Taylor & Francis. Contemporary politics.
11
LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. 2008.
12
SpringerLink (Online service). International politics.
13
International feminist journal of politics.
14
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations.
15
European journal of international relations.
16
Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. 1995.
17
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. 1967.
18
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review.
19
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis.
20
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies.
21
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics.
22
E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics. https://www.e-ir.info/
23
Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas. https://foreignpolicy.com/
24
Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
25
Duck of Minerva. http://duckofminerva.com/
26
Political Violence at a Glance. http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010. https://thedisorderofthings.com/
28
Seth S. Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;40:167–83. doi:10.1177/0305829811412325
29
Darby P, Paolini AJ. Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 1994;19.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644813
30
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review 2004;6.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
31
Epstein C. The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction. International Theory 2014;6:294–311.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intheory6&id=304
32
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
33
Henderson EA. Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2013;26:71–92. doi:10.1080/09557571.2012.710585
34
Krishna S. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 2001;26.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645028
35
Henderson EA. The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:492–510. doi:10.1177/0305829817694246
36
Moffette D, Walters WHC. Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration. Studies in Social Justice 2018;12:92–110. doi:10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1630
37
Vitalis R. The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2000;29:331–56. doi:10.1177/03058298000290020701
38
Vitalis R. White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2015.
39
Owens P. Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:403–24. doi:10.1177/0305829817695880
40
Jacquin-Berdal D, Oros A, Verweij M. Culture in world politics. Houndmills: : Macmillan Press 1998.
41
Ling LHM. World Politics in Colour. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:473–91. doi:10.1177/0305829817703192
42
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
43
Thakur V, Davis AE, Vale P. Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;46:3–23. doi:10.1177/0305829817711911
44
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. London: : Routledge 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
45
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
46
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
47
Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/mila/42/2
48
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cpcs20/19/2?nav=tocList
49
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
50
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
51
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
52
Said EW. Orientalism. London: : Penguin Books 2003.
53
de Carvalho B, Leira H, Hobson JM. The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;39:735–58. doi:10.1177/0305829811401459
54
Hobson JM. Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies 2007;33. doi:10.1017/S0260210507007413
55
Acharya A, Buzan B. Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 2007;7:285–6. doi:10.1093/irap/lcm011
56
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 2013;19:353–77. doi:10.1177/1354066111425263
57
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2012;41:3–22. doi:10.1177/0305829812451720
58
Hall M, Hobson JM. Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist? International Theory 2010;2:210–45. doi:10.1017/S1752971909990261
59
Biswas S. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2007;36:117–33. doi:10.1177/03058298070360010801
60
Sabaratnam M. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue 2013;44:259–78. doi:10.1177/0967010613485870
61
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics 2009;46:671–90. doi:10.1057/ip.2009.22
62
Inayatullah N, Blaney DL. International relations and the problem of difference. New York: : Routledge 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203644096
63
Shaw K. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2002;31:55–81. doi:10.1177/03058298020310010401
64
Little War on the Prairie. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie
65
Chakravorty GS. Can The Subaltern Speak? https://archive.org/details/CanTheSubalternSpeak
66
Mohammed Ayoob. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review 2002;4.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3186462
67
Byrd JA, Rothberg M. Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies. Interventions 2011;13:1–12. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574
68
Enloe CH. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2004.
69
Kyle Grayson. Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence. Review of International Studies 2010;36.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961965
70
Warrior R. The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual. Interventions 2011;13:85–94. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2011.545579
71
Bhambra GK, Shilliam R. Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
72
Dingli S. We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 2015;21:721–42. doi:10.1177/1354066114568033
73
Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. New York: : Columbia University Press 2010.
74
J. Maggio. ‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 2007;32.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645229
75
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: : Routledge 2012.
76
Blaney DL, Tickner AB. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:293–311. doi:10.1177/0305829817702446
77
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review 2004;6.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
78
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: : Routledge, taylor & Francis Group 2014.
79
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: : Routledge 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
80
Chakrabarty D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=581797
81
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: : Routledge 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
82
Grovogui SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations 2002;8:315–38. doi:10.1177/1354066102008003001
83
Grovogui SN. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. Minneapolis, Minn: : University of Minnesota Press 1996.
84
Dunn KC, Shaw TM. Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave 2013.
85
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2013.
86
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: : Routledge 2012.
87
Charles T. Call. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly 2008;29.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20455126
88
Dingli S. Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen. Politics 2013;33:91–100. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01453.x
89
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics 2009;46:671–90. doi:10.1057/ip.2009.22
90
Barkawi T. Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security 2016;1:199–214. doi:10.1017/eis.2016.7
91
Tarak Barkawi. On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 2004;80.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569291
92
Satia P. From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan. New Perspectives Quarterly 2009;26:34–7. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5842.2009.01091.x
93
Moyn S. Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law 2013;24:227–33. doi:10.1093/ejil/cht011
94
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
95
Gregory D. The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 2004.
96
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2005;33:827–53. doi:10.1177/03058298050330030701
97
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly 2004;48.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521
98
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2001.
99
Tarak Barkawi. Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of ‘Small Wars’. Cultural Critique Published Online First: 2004.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4140775
100
Hobson JM. Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. International Politics 2007;44:414–30. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198
101
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. London: : Routledge 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
102
Krishna S, Dawson Books. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham, Maryland: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642
103
Hobson JM. Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy 2013;20:1055–81. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.733498
104
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: : Routledge 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
105
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
106
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: : Routledge 2012.
107
Anievas A, Nisancioglu K. What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2013;42:78–102. doi:10.1177/0305829813497823
108
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. London: : Routledge 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
109
Hobson JM. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;40:147–66. doi:10.1177/0305829811412653
110
Mahmood S. Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04721
111
Dingli S, Cooke TN, editors. Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315104928
112
Saba Mahmood. Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology 2001;16.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
113
Mahmood S. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology 2001;16:202–36.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
114
Interview: Saba Mahmood. http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/
115
Eltahawy M. Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. London: : Weidenfeld & Nicolson 2016.
116
Ahmed L. A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. New Haven, CT: : Yale University Press 2011.
117
Odeh LA. Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference. Feminist Review 1993;:26–37. doi:10.2307/1395067
118
Golley NA. Is feminism relevant to Arab women? Third World Quarterly 2004;25:521–36. doi:10.1080/0143659042000191410
119
Read JG, Bartkowski JP. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society 2000;14:395–417.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/190135
120
El Guindi F. Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism. Ahfad Journal 2005;22:53–78.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A134680612/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=AONE&xid=9c6b0552
121
Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist 2002;104:783–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567256
122
Deeb L. Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2009;15:S112–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01545.x
123
Ahmed AS, Donnan H. Islam, globalization and postmodernity. London: : Routledge 1994.
124
Torab A. Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1996;2:235–52. doi:10.2307/3034094
125
El Guindi F. Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance. Oxford: : Berg 1999. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888969
126
Bilge S. Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies 2010;31:9–28. doi:10.1080/07256860903477662
127
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university. London: : Pluto Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
128
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy Published Online First: 2017.https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
129
Malik K. Are Soas students right to ‘decolonise’ their minds from western philosophers? The Guardian Published Online First: 2017.https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/19/soas-philosopy-decolonise-our-minds-enlightenment-white-european-kenan-malik
130
Adams R. British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show. The Guardian Published Online First: 2017.https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jan/19/british-universities-employ-no-black-academics-in-top-roles-figures-show
131
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies 2007;21:240–70. doi:10.1080/09502380601162548
132
Why is My curriculum White? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00131857.2015.1037227
133
Odysseos L, Pal M. Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University. International Studies Perspectives 2018;19:1–26. doi:10.1093/isp/ekx006
134
Le Grange L. Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education 2016;30:1–12. doi:10.20853/30-2-709
135
Gopal P. Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. The Guardian Published Online First: 27 October 2017.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/decolonise-elite-white-men-decolonising-cambridge-university-english-curriculum-literature
136
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy Published Online First: 2017.https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
137
Whyman T. Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans. The Guardian Published Online First: 10 January 2017.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/10/soas-students-study-philosophy-africa-asia-european-pc-snowflakes
138
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university. London: : Pluto Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
139
Peters C. Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us. Telegraph Published Online First: 27 October 2017.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/27/left-wing-academics-helping-minority-students-force-identity/
140
Sabaratnam M. IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;39:781–803. doi:10.1177/0305829811404270
141
Odysseos L. Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and ‘Being Human as Praxis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:447–72. doi:10.1177/0305829817704503
142
Tickner AB, Wæver O. International relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2009.
143
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2013.
144
Ayoob M. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review 2002;4:27–48. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00263
145
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2013.
146
Acharya A. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly 2014;58:647–59. doi:10.1111/isqu.12171
147
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: : Routledge 2010.
148
Gruffydd Jones B. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2006.
149
Shani G. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review 2008;10:722–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x
150
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2012;41:3–22. doi:10.1177/0305829812451720
151
Shahi D, Ascione G. Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations 2016;22:313–34. doi:10.1177/1354066115592938
152
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2013.
153
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: : Routledge 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
154
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: : Routledge 2012.
155
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: : Routledge, taylor & Francis Group 2014.
156
Grovogui SN. Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 2001;26:425–48. doi:10.1177/030437540102600404
157
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. London: : Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group 2009.
158
KURU D. Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity. Review of International Studies 2016;42:351–76. doi:10.1017/S0260210515000315
159
Zondi S. Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation. Politikon 2018;45:16–31. doi:10.1080/02589346.2018.1418202
160
Capan ZG. Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly 2017;38:1–15. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100
161
Gani JK. The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2017;45:425–46. doi:10.1177/0305829817714064
162
Barreto J-M. Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto. Transnational Legal Theory 2012;3:1–29. doi:10.5235/TLT.3.1.1
163
Siba N. Grovogui. To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studieshttps://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A268604335&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon
164
Shilliam R. Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2011;39:649–65. doi:10.1177/0305829811399144
165
Shilliam R, editor. International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: : Routledge 2011.
