1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. 1944;
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs.
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. 1981;
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Thomson Gale (Firm). International security.
6.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm). Global environmental politics. 2001;
7.
Environmental politics. 1992;
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival.
9.
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies. Cambridge review of international affairs.
10.
Taylor & Francis. Contemporary politics.
11.
LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. 2008;
12.
SpringerLink (Online service). International politics.
13.
International feminist journal of politics.
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations.
15.
European journal of international relations.
16.
Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. 1995;
17.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. 1967;
18.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review.
19.
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis.
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies.
21.
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics.
22.
E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics [Internet]. Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/
23.
Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas [Internet]. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/
24.
Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs [Internet]. Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
25.
Duck of Minerva [Internet]. Available from: http://duckofminerva.com/
26.
Political Violence at a Glance [Internet]. Available from: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27.
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010 [Internet]. Available from: https://thedisorderofthings.com/
28.
Seth S. Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 Sep;40(1):167–83.
29.
Darby P, Paolini AJ. Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. 1994;19(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644813
30.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review [Internet]. 2004;6(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
31.
Epstein C. The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction. International Theory [Internet]. 2014;6(2):294–311. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intheory6&id=304
32.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line [Internet]. Anievas A, Manchanda N, Shilliam R, editors. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
33.
Henderson EA. Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2013 Mar;26(1):71–92.
34.
Krishna S. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. 2001;26(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645028
35.
Henderson EA. The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):492–510.
36.
Moffette D, Walters WHC. Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration. Studies in Social Justice. 2018 Jul 12;12(1):92–110.
37.
Vitalis R. The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2000 Jun;29(2):331–56.
38.
Vitalis R. White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2015.
39.
Owens P. Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):403–24.
40.
Jacquin-Berdal D, Oros A, Verweij M. Culture in world politics. Houndmills: Macmillan Press; 1998.
41.
Ling LHM. World Politics in Colour. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):473–91.
42.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line [Internet]. Anievas A, Manchanda N, Shilliam R, editors. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
43.
Thakur V, Davis AE, Vale P. Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Sep;46(1):3–23.
44.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. Vol. 16. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
45.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
46.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
47.
Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/mila/42/2
48.
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cpcs20/19/2?nav=tocList
49.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
50.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
51.
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
52.
Said EW. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books; 2003.
53.
de Carvalho B, Leira H, Hobson JM. The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):735–58.
54.
Hobson JM. Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies. 2007 Apr;33(S1).
55.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007 May 21;7(3):285–6.
56.
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Jun;19(2):353–77.
57.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
58.
Hall M, Hobson JM. Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist? International Theory. 2010 Jul;2(02):210–45.
59.
Biswas S. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2007 Dec;36(1):117–33.
60.
Sabaratnam M. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 2013 Jun;44(3):259–78.
61.
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 2009 Nov;46(6):671–90.
62.
Inayatullah N, Blaney DL. International relations and the problem of difference [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203644096
63.
Shaw K. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002 Jan;31(1):55–81.
64.
Little War on the Prairie [Internet]. Available from: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie
65.
Chakravorty GS. Can The Subaltern Speak? [Internet]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/CanTheSubalternSpeak
66.
Mohammed Ayoob. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review [Internet]. 2002;4(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3186462
67.
Byrd JA, Rothberg M. Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies. Interventions. 2011 Mar;13(1):1–12.
68.
Enloe CH. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004.
69.
Kyle Grayson. Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 2010;36(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961965
70.
Warrior R. The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual. Interventions. 2011 Mar;13(1):85–94.
71.
Bhambra GK, Shilliam R. Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
72.
Dingli S. We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations. 2015 Dec;21(4):721–42.
73.
Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. Morris RC, editor. New York: Columbia University Press; 2010.
74.
J. Maggio. ‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. 2007;32(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645229
75.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge; 2012.
76.
Blaney DL, Tickner AB. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):293–311.
77.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review [Internet]. 2004;6(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
78.
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
79.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
80.
Chakrabarty D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference [Internet]. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=581797
81.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
82.
Grovogui SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 2002 Sep;8(3):315–38.
83.
Grovogui SN. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. Vol. v. 3. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1996.
84.
Dunn KC, Shaw TM. Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave; 2013.
85.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
86.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge; 2012.
87.
Charles T. Call. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;29(8). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20455126
88.
Dingli S. Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen. Politics. 2013 Jun;33(2):91–100.
89.
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 2009 Nov;46(6):671–90.
90.
Barkawi T. Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security. 2016 Jul;1(02):199–214.
91.
Tarak Barkawi. On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2004;80(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569291
92.
Satia P. From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan. New Perspectives Quarterly. 2009 Jun;26(3):34–7.
93.
Moyn S. Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 2013 Feb 1;24(1):227–33.
94.
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
95.
Gregory D. The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004.
96.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005 Jun;33(3):827–53.
97.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2004;48(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521
98.
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2001.
99.
Tarak Barkawi. Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of ‘Small Wars’. Cultural Critique [Internet]. 2004;(58). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4140775
100.
Hobson JM. Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. International Politics. 2007 Jul;44(4):414–30.
101.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. Vol. 16. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
102.
Krishna S, Dawson Books. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century [Internet]. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc; 2009. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642
103.
Hobson JM. Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy. 2013 Oct;20(5):1055–81.
104.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
105.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
106.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge; 2012.
107.
Anievas A, Nisancioglu K. What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2013 Sep;42(1):78–102.
108.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. Vol. 16. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
109.
Hobson JM. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 Sep;40(1):147–66.
110.
Mahmood S. Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2005. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04721
111.
Dingli S, Cooke TN, editors. Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315104928
112.
Saba Mahmood. Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. 2001;16(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
113.
Mahmood S. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. 2001;16(2):202–36. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
114.
Interview: Saba Mahmood [Internet]. Available from: http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/
115.
Eltahawy M. Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 2016.
116.
Ahmed L. A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2011.
117.
Odeh LA. Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference. Feminist Review. 1993 Spring;(43):26–37.
118.
Golley NA. Is feminism relevant to Arab women? Third World Quarterly. 2004 Mar;25(3):521–36.
119.
Read JG, Bartkowski JP. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society [Internet]. 2000;14(3):395–417. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/190135
120.
El Guindi F. Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism. Ahfad Journal [Internet]. 2005;22(1):53–78. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A134680612/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=AONE&xid=9c6b0552
121.
Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist [Internet]. 2002;104(3):783–90. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567256
122.
Deeb L. Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2009 May;15:S112–26.
123.
Ahmed AS, Donnan H. Islam, globalization and postmodernity. London: Routledge; 1994.
124.
Torab A. Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 1996 Jun;2(2):235–52.
125.
El Guindi F. Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 1999. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888969
126.
Bilge S. Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 2010 Feb;31(1):9–28.
127.
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
128.
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
129.
Malik K. Are Soas students right to ‘decolonise’ their minds from western philosophers? The Guardian [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/19/soas-philosopy-decolonise-our-minds-enlightenment-white-european-kenan-malik
130.
Adams R. British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jan/19/british-universities-employ-no-black-academics-in-top-roles-figures-show
131.
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):240–70.
132.
Why is My curriculum White? Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00131857.2015.1037227
133.
Odysseos L, Pal M. Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University. International Studies Perspectives. 2018 Feb 1;19(1):1–26.
134.
Le Grange L. Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2016 Jun;30(2):1–12.
135.
Gopal P. Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017 Oct 27; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/decolonise-elite-white-men-decolonising-cambridge-university-english-curriculum-literature
136.
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
137.
Whyman T. Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017 Jan 10; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/10/soas-students-study-philosophy-africa-asia-european-pc-snowflakes
138.
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
139.
Peters C. Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us. Telegraph [Internet]. 2017 Oct 27; Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/27/left-wing-academics-helping-minority-students-force-identity/
140.
Sabaratnam M. IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):781–803.
141.
Odysseos L. Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and ‘Being Human as Praxis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):447–72.
142.
Tickner AB, Wæver O. International relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2009.
143.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
144.
Ayoob M. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review. 2002 Jan;4(3):27–48.
145.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
146.
Acharya A. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly. 2014 Dec;58(4):647–59.
147.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge; 2010.
148.
Gruffydd Jones B. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
149.
Shani G. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 2008 Dec;10(4):722–34.
150.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
151.
Shahi D, Ascione G. Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations. 2016 Jun;22(2):313–34.
152.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
153.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
154.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge; 2012.
155.
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
156.
Grovogui SN. Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001 Oct;26(4):425–48.
157.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2009.
158.
KURU D. Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity. Review of International Studies. 2016 Apr;42(02):351–76.
159.
Zondi S. Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation. Politikon. 2018 Jan 2;45(1):16–31.
160.
Capan ZG. Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly. 2017 Jan 2;38(1):1–15.
161.
Gani JK. The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):425–46.
162.
Barreto JM. Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto. Transnational Legal Theory. 2012 Nov 5;3(1):1–29.
163.
Siba N. Grovogui. To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A268604335&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon
164.
Shilliam R. Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):649–65.
165.
Shilliam R, editor. International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: Routledge; 2011.
