1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization): International affairs. (1944).
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: The Brown journal of world affairs.
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press: Review of international studies. (1981).
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Thomson Gale (Firm): International security.
6.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm): Global environmental politics. (2001).
7.
Environmental politics. (1992).
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press: Survival.
9.
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies: Cambridge review of international affairs.
10.
Taylor & Francis: Contemporary politics.
11.
LexisNexis (Firm): Politics. (2008).
12.
SpringerLink (Online service): International politics.
13.
International feminist journal of politics.
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm): British journal of politics and international relations.
15.
European journal of international relations.
16.
Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. (1995).
17.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization): International studies quarterly. (1967).
18.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization): International studies review.
19.
International Studies Association: Foreign policy analysis.
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science: Millennium: journal of international studies.
21.
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization): Perspectives on politics.
22.
E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics, https://www.e-ir.info/.
23.
Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas, https://foreignpolicy.com/.
24.
Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/.
25.
Duck of Minerva, http://duckofminerva.com/.
26.
Political Violence at a Glance, http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/.
27.
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010, https://thedisorderofthings.com/.
28.
Seth, S.: Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 40, 167–183 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325.
29.
Darby, P., Paolini, A.J.: Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 19, (1994).
30.
Agathangelou, A.M., Ling, L.H.M.: The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review. 6, (2004).
31.
Epstein, C.: The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction. International Theory. 6, 294–311 (2014).
32.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2015).
33.
Henderson, E.A.: Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 26, 71–92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.710585.
34.
Krishna, S.: Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, (2001).
35.
Henderson, E.A.: The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 492–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817694246.
36.
Moffette, D., Walters, W.H.C.: Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration. Studies in Social Justice. 12, 92–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1630.
37.
Vitalis, R.: The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 29, 331–356 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020701.
38.
Vitalis, R.: White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2015).
39.
Owens, P.: Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 403–424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817695880.
40.
Jacquin-Berdal, D., Oros, A., Verweij, M.: Culture in world politics. Macmillan Press, Houndmills (1998).
41.
Ling, L.H.M.: World Politics in Colour. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 473–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817703192.
42.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2015).
43.
Thakur, V., Davis, A.E., Vale, P.: Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 46, 3–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817711911.
44.
Chowdhry, G., Nair, S.: Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge, London (2004).
45.
Hobson, J.M.: The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
46.
Hobson, J.M., American Council of Learned Societies: The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004).
47.
Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2.
48.
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2.
49.
Hobson, J.M., American Council of Learned Societies: The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004).
50.
Hobson, J.M.: The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
51.
Barkawi, T., Stanski, K. eds: Orientalism and war. Oxford University Press, New York (2014).
52.
Said, E.W.: Orientalism. Penguin Books, London (2003).
53.
de Carvalho, B., Leira, H., Hobson, J.M.: The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 735–758 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811401459.
54.
Hobson, J.M.: Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies. 33, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007413.
55.
Acharya, A., Buzan, B.: Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 7, 285–286 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm011.
56.
Matin, K.: Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 19, 353–377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.
57.
Vasilaki, R.: Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41, 3–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.
58.
Hall, M., Hobson, J.M.: Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist? International Theory. 2, 210–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909990261.
59.
Biswas, S.: Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 36, 117–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010801.
60.
Sabaratnam, M.: Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 44, 259–278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485870.
61.
Hobson, J.M.: Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 46, 671–690 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.22.
62.
Inayatullah, N., Blaney, D.L.: International relations and the problem of difference. Routledge, New York (2004).
63.
Shaw, K.: Indigeneity and the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 31, 55–81 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010401.
64.
Little War on the Prairie, https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie.
65.
Chakravorty, G.S.: Can The Subaltern Speak?, https://archive.org/details/CanTheSubalternSpeak.
66.
Mohammed Ayoob: Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review. 4, (2002).
67.
Byrd, J.A., Rothberg, M.: Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies. Interventions. 13, 1–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574.
68.
Enloe, C.H.: The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. University of California Press, Berkeley (2004).
69.
Kyle Grayson: Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence. Review of International Studies. 36, (2010).
70.
Warrior, R.: The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual. Interventions. 13, 85–94 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545579.
71.
Bhambra, G.K., Shilliam, R.: Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
72.
Dingli, S.: We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations. 21, 721–742 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114568033.
73.
Spivak, G.C.: Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. Columbia University Press, New York (2010).
74.
J. Maggio: ‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 32, (2007).
75.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L. eds: Thinking international relations differently. Routledge, New York (2012).
76.
Blaney, D.L., Tickner, A.B.: Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 293–311 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817702446.
77.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling: The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review. 6, (2004).
78.
Ling, L.H.M.: The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge, taylor & Francis Group, London (2014).
79.
Seth, S. ed: Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2013).
80.
Chakrabarty, D., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2008).
81.
Seth, S. ed: Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2013).
82.
Grovogui, S.N.: Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 8, 315–338 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.
83.
Grovogui, S.N.: Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn (1996).
84.
Dunn, K.C., Shaw, T.M.: Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Palgrave, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2013).
85.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L.: Claiming the international. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
86.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L. eds: Thinking international relations differently. Routledge, New York (2012).
87.
Charles T. Call: The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly. 29, (2008).
88.
Dingli, S.: Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen. Politics. 33, 91–100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01453.x.
89.
Hobson, J.M.: Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 46, 671–690 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.22.
90.
Barkawi, T.: Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security. 1, 199–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2016.7.
91.
Tarak Barkawi: On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 80, (2004).
92.
Satia, P.: From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan. New Perspectives Quarterly. 26, 34–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2009.01091.x.
93.
Moyn, S.: Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 24, 227–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht011.
94.
Barkawi, T., Stanski, K. eds: Orientalism and war. Oxford University Press, New York (2014).
95.
Gregory, D.: The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2004).
96.
Agathangelou, A.M., Ling, L.H.M.: Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, 827–853 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030701.
97.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling: Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 48, (2004).
98.
Barkawi, T., Laffey, M.: Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2001).
99.
Tarak Barkawi: Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of ‘Small Wars’. Cultural Critique. (2004).
100.
Hobson, J.M.: Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. International Politics. 44, 414–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198.
101.
Chowdhry, G., Nair, S.: Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge, London (2004).
102.
Krishna, S., Dawson Books: Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, Lanham, Maryland (2009).
103.
Hobson, J.M.: Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy. 20, 1055–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.733498.
104.
Seth, S. ed: Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2013).
105.
Hobson, J.M., American Council of Learned Societies: The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004).
106.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L. eds: Thinking international relations differently. Routledge, New York (2012).
107.
Anievas, A., Nisancioglu, K.: What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 42, 78–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813497823.
108.
Chowdhry, G., Nair, S.: Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge, London (2004).
109.
Hobson, J.M.: What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 40, 147–166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412653.
110.
Mahmood, S.: Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2005).
111.
Dingli, S., Cooke, T.N. eds: Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2019).
112.
Saba Mahmood: Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology. 16, (2001).
113.
Mahmood, S.: Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology. 16, 202–236 (2001).
114.
Interview: Saba Mahmood, http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/.
115.
Eltahawy, M.: Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (2016).
116.
Ahmed, L.: A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2011).
117.
Odeh, L.A.: Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference. Feminist Review. 26–37 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/1395067.
118.
Golley, N.A.: Is feminism relevant to Arab women? Third World Quarterly. 25, 521–536 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000191410.
119.
Read, J.G., Bartkowski, J.P.: To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society. 14, 395–417 (2000).
120.
El Guindi, F.: Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism. Ahfad Journal. 22, 53–78 (2005).
121.
Abu-Lughod, L.: Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist. 104, 783–790 (2002).
122.
Deeb, L.: Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 15, S112–S126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01545.x.
123.
Ahmed, A.S., Donnan, H.: Islam, globalization and postmodernity. Routledge, London (1994).
124.
Torab, A.: Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2, 235–252 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/3034094.
125.
El Guindi, F.: Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance. Berg, Oxford (1999).
126.
Bilge, S.: Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 31, 9–28 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860903477662.
127.
Bhambra, G.K., Gebrial, D., Nişancıoğlu, K. eds: Decolonising the university. Pluto Press, London (2018).
128.
Williams, J.: The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy. (2017).
129.
Malik, K.: Are Soas students right to ‘decolonise’ their minds from western philosophers? The Guardian. (2017).
130.
Adams, R.: British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show. The Guardian. (2017).
131.
Maldonado-Torres, N.: ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 21, 240–270 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548.
132.
Why is My curriculum White?
133.
Odysseos, L., Pal, M.: Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University. International Studies Perspectives. 19, 1–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekx006.
134.
Le Grange, L.: Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education. 30, 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20853/30-2-709.
135.
Gopal, P.: Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. The Guardian. (2017).
136.
Williams, J.: The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy. (2017).
137.
Whyman, T.: Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans. The Guardian. (2017).
138.
Bhambra, G.K., Gebrial, D., Nişancıoğlu, K. eds: Decolonising the university. Pluto Press, London (2018).
139.
Peters, C.: Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us. Telegraph. (2017).
140.
Sabaratnam, M.: IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 781–803 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811404270.
141.
Odysseos, L.: Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and ‘Being Human as Praxis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 447–472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817704503.
142.
Tickner, A.B., Wæver, O.: International relations scholarship around the world. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2009).
143.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L.: Claiming the international. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
144.
Ayoob, M.: Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review. 4, 27–48 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00263.
145.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L.: Claiming the international. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
146.
Acharya, A.: Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly. 58, 647–659 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171.
147.
Acharya, A., Buzan, B.: Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge, New York (2010).
148.
Gruffydd Jones, B.: Decolonizing international relations. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2006).
149.
Shani, G.: Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 10, 722–734 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00828.x.
150.
Vasilaki, R.: Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41, 3–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.
151.
Shahi, D., Ascione, G.: Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations. 22, 313–334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115592938.
152.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L.: Claiming the international. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
153.
Seth, S. ed: Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2013).
154.
Tickner, A.B., Blaney, D.L. eds: Thinking international relations differently. Routledge, New York (2012).
155.
Ling, L.H.M.: The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge, taylor & Francis Group, London (2014).
156.
Grovogui, S.N.: Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, 425–448 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600404.
157.
Agathangelou, A.M., Ling, L.H.M.: Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, London (2009).
158.
KURU, D.: Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity. Review of International Studies. 42, 351–376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000315.
159.
Zondi, S.: Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation. Politikon. 45, 16–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1418202.
160.
Capan, Z.G.: Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly. 38, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100.
161.
Gani, J.K.: The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 45, 425–446 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817714064.
162.
Barreto, J.-M.: Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto. Transnational Legal Theory. 3, 1–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5235/TLT.3.1.1.
163.
Siba N. Grovogui: To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies.
164.
Shilliam, R.: Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 39, 649–665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811399144.
165.
Shilliam, R. ed: International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. Routledge, London (2011).
