1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1944;
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs. Providence, RI: Brown Journal of World Affairs;
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Kent, England: Butterworths; 1981;
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Thomson Gale (Firm). International security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press;
5.
Security studies. London: Frank Cass;
6.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm). Global environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001;
7.
Environmental politics. London, England: Frank Cass; 1992;
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press;
9.
University of Cambridge. Centre of International Studies. Cambridge review of international affairs. [Cambridge]: [Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge];
10.
Taylor & Francis. Contemporary politics. London: Carfax Pub;
11.
LexisNexis (Firm). Politics. Plainsboro, N.J.: Political World Communications; 2008;
12.
SpringerLink (Online service). International politics. [Dordrecht]: Kluwer Academic Publishers;
13.
International feminist journal of politics. London, UK: Routledge;
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers;
15.
European journal of international relations. London: Sage Publications;
16.
Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc; 1995;
17.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies quarterly. Detroit, Mich: Wayne State University Press; 1967;
18.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization). International studies review. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers;
19.
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. [Oxford]: Blackwell Pub;
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies. [London]: London School of Economics;
21.
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press;
22.
E-International Relations — the world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics [Internet]. Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/
23.
Foreign Policy – the Global Magazine of News and Ideas [Internet]. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/
24.
Foreign Affairs Magazine: analysis and debate of foreign policy, geopolitics and global affairs [Internet]. Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
25.
Duck of Minerva [Internet]. Available from: http://duckofminerva.com/
26.
Political Violence at a Glance [Internet]. Available from: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27.
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010 [Internet]. Available from: https://thedisorderofthings.com/
28.
Seth S. Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 Sep;40(1):167–183.
29.
Darby P, Paolini AJ. Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994;19(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644813
30.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review [Internet]. Wiley; 2004;6(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
31.
Epstein C. The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction. International Theory [Internet]. 2014;6(2):294–311. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intheory6&id=304
32.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line [Internet]. Anievas A, Manchanda N, Shilliam R, editors. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
33.
Henderson EA. Hidden in plain sight: racism in international relations theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2013 Mar;26(1):71–92.
34.
Krishna S. Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2001;26(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645028
35.
Henderson EA. The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):492–510.
36.
Moffette D, Walters WHC. Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration. Studies in Social Justice. 2018 Jul 12;12(1):92–110.
37.
Vitalis R. The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2000 Jun;29(2):331–356.
38.
Vitalis R. White world order, black power politics: the birth of American international relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2015.
39.
Owens P. Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):403–424.
40.
Jacquin-Berdal D, Oros A, Verweij M. Culture in world politics. Houndmills: Macmillan Press; 1998.
41.
Ling LHM. World Politics in Colour. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):473–491.
42.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Race and racism in international relations: confronting the global colour line [Internet]. Anievas A, Manchanda N, Shilliam R, editors. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1829364
43.
Thakur V, Davis AE, Vale P. Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: an Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Sep;46(1):3–23.
44.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
45.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
46.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
47.
Millennium (2014) vol.42, no.2. Sage Publishing; Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/mila/42/2
48.
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 2. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cpcs20/19/2?nav=tocList
49.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
50.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
51.
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
52.
Said EW. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books; 2003.
53.
de Carvalho B, Leira H, Hobson JM. The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):735–758.
54.
Hobson JM. Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies. 2007 Apr;33(S1).
55.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007 May 21;7(3):285–286.
56.
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Jun;19(2):353–377.
57.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
58.
Hall M, Hobson JM. Liberal International theory: Eurocentric but not always Imperialist? International Theory. 2010 Jul;2(02):210–245.
59.
Biswas S. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2007 Dec;36(1):117–133.
60.
Sabaratnam M. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 2013 Jun;44(3):259–278.
61.
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 2009 Nov;46(6):671–690.
62.
Inayatullah N, Blaney DL. International relations and the problem of difference [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203644096
63.
Shaw K. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002 Jan;31(1):55–81.
64.
Little War on the Prairie [Internet]. Available from: https://www.thisamericanlife.org/479/little-war-on-the-prairie
65.
Chakravorty GS. Can The Subaltern Speak? [Internet]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/CanTheSubalternSpeak
66.
Mohammed Ayoob. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review [Internet]. Wiley; 2002;4(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3186462
67.
Byrd JA, Rothberg M. Between subalternity and indigeneity: Critical categories for postcolonial studies. Interventions. 2011 Mar;13(1):1–12.
68.
Enloe CH. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004.
69.
Kyle Grayson. Dissidence, Richard K. Ashley, and the politics of silence. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2010;36(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961965
70.
Warrior R. The subaltern can dance, and so sometimes can the intellectual. Interventions. 2011 Mar;13(1):85–94.
71.
Bhambra GK, Shilliam R. Silencing human rights: critical engagements with a contested project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
72.
Dingli S. We need to talk about silence: Re-examining silence in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations. 2015 Dec;21(4):721–742.
73.
Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak?: reflections on the history of an idea. Morris RC, editor. New York: Columbia University Press; 2010.
74.
J. Maggio. ‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2007;32(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645229
75.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: Routledge; 2012.
76.
Blaney DL, Tickner AB. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):293–311.
77.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review [Internet]. Wiley; 2004;6(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699724
78.
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
79.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
80.
Chakrabarty D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference [Internet]. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=581797
81.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
82.
Grovogui SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 2002 Sep;8(3):315–338.
83.
Grovogui SN. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press; 1996.
84.
Dunn KC, Shaw TM. Africa’s challenge to international relations theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave; 2013.
85.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
86.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: Routledge; 2012.
87.
Charles T. Call. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.; 2008;29(8). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20455126
88.
Dingli S. Is the Failed State Thesis Analytically Useful? The Case of Yemen. Politics. 2013 Jun;33(2):91–100.
89.
Hobson JM. Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics. 2009 Nov;46(6):671–690.
90.
Barkawi T. Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security. 2016 Jul;1(02):199–214.
91.
Tarak Barkawi. On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2004;80(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3569291
92.
Satia P. From Colonial Air Attacks to Drones in Pakistan. New Perspectives Quarterly. 2009 Jun;26(3):34–37.
93.
Moyn S. Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 2013 Feb 1;24(1):227–233.
94.
Barkawi T, Stanski K, editors. Orientalism and war [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199327782.001.0001
95.
Gregory D. The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004.
96.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Power and Play through Poisies: Reconstructing Self and Other in the 9/11 Commission Report. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005 Jun;33(3):827–853.
97.
Anna M. Agathangelou and L. H. M. Ling. Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. Wiley; 2004;48(3). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693521
98.
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2001.
99.
Tarak Barkawi. Globalization, Culture, and War: On the Popular Mediation of ‘Small Wars’. Cultural Critique [Internet]. University of Minnesota Press; 2004;(58). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4140775
100.
Hobson JM. Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. International Politics. 2007 Jul;44(4):414–430.
101.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
102.
Krishna S, Dawson Books. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century [Internet]. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc; 2009. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642
103.
Hobson JM. Part 2 – Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International Political Economy. 2013 Oct;20(5):1055–1081.
104.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
105.
Hobson JM, American Council of Learned Societies. The Eastern origins of Western civilisation [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31054
106.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: Routledge; 2012.
107.
Anievas A, Nisancioglu K. What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2013 Sep;42(1):78–102.
108.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203166345
109.
Hobson JM. What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 Sep;40(1):147–166.
110.
Mahmood S. Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2005. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04721
111.
Dingli S, Cooke TN, editors. Political silence: meanings, functions and ambiguity [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315104928
112.
Saba Mahmood. Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. Wiley; 2001;16(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
113.
Mahmood S. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. Wiley; 2001;16(2):202–236. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
114.
Interview: Saba Mahmood [Internet]. Available from: http://thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/
115.
Eltahawy M. Headscarves and hymens: why the Middle East needs a sexual revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 2016.
116.
Ahmed L. A quiet revolution: the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2011.
117.
Odeh LA. Post-colonial feminism and the veil: Thinking the difference. Feminist Review. 1993 Spring;(43):26–37.
118.
Golley NA. Is feminism relevant to Arab women? Third World Quarterly. 2004 Mar;25(3):521–536.
119.
Read JG, Bartkowski JP. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000;14(3):395–417. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/190135
120.
El Guindi F. Gendered resistance, feminist veiling, Islamic feminism. Ahfad Journal [Internet]. 2005;22(1):53–78. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A134680612/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=AONE&xid=9c6b0552
121.
Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others. American Anthropologist [Internet]. Wiley; 2002;104(3):783–790. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3567256
122.
Deeb L. Piety politics and the role of a transnational feminist analysis. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2009 May;15:S112–S126.
123.
Ahmed AS, Donnan H. Islam, globalization and postmodernity. London: Routledge; 1994.
124.
Torab A. Piety as gendered agency: a study of jalaseh ritual discourse in an urban neighbourhood in Iran. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 1996 Jun;2(2):235–252.
125.
El Guindi F. Veil: modesty, privacy and resistance [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 1999. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/9781847888969
126.
Bilge S. Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 2010 Feb;31(1):9–28.
127.
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
128.
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
129.
Malik K. Are Soas students right to ‘decolonise’ their minds from western philosophers? The Guardian [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/19/soas-philosopy-decolonise-our-minds-enlightenment-white-european-kenan-malik
130.
Adams R. British universities employ no black academics in top roles, figures show. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jan/19/british-universities-employ-no-black-academics-in-top-roles-figures-show
131.
Maldonado-Torres N. ON THE COLONIALITY OF BEING. Cultural Studies. 2007 Mar;21(2–3):240–270.
132.
Why is My curriculum White? Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00131857.2015.1037227
133.
Odysseos L, Pal M. Toward Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Other-Regardedness, and Self-Formation in the Neoliberal University. International Studies Perspectives. 2018 Feb 1;19(1):1–26.
134.
Le Grange L. Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2016 Jun;30(2):1–12.
135.
Gopal P. Yes, we must decolonise: our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017 Oct 27; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/decolonise-elite-white-men-decolonising-cambridge-university-english-curriculum-literature
136.
Williams J. The ‘decolonise the curriculum’ movement re-racialises knowledge. openDemocracy [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/joanna-williams/decolonise-curriculum-movement-re-racialises-knowledge
137.
Whyman T. Soas students have a point. Philosophy degrees should look beyond white Europeans. The Guardian [Internet]. 2017 Jan 10; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/10/soas-students-study-philosophy-africa-asia-european-pc-snowflakes
138.
Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nişancıoğlu K, editors. Decolonising the university [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5493110
139.
Peters C. Left-wing academics are helping a minority of students to force their identity politics on the rest of us. Telegraph [Internet]. 2017 Oct 27; Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/27/left-wing-academics-helping-minority-students-force-identity/
140.
Sabaratnam M. IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):781–803.
141.
Odysseos L. Prolegomena to Any Future Decolonial Ethics: Coloniality, Poetics and ‘Being Human as Praxis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):447–472.
142.
Tickner AB, Wæver O. International relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2009.
143.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
144.
Ayoob M. Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review. 2002 Jan;4(3):27–48.
145.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
146.
Acharya A. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly. 2014 Dec;58(4):647–659.
147.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge; 2010.
148.
Gruffydd Jones B. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
149.
Shani G. Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory. International Studies Review. 2008 Dec;10(4):722–734.
150.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
151.
Shahi D, Ascione G. Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource. European Journal of International Relations. 2016 Jun;22(2):313–334.
152.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL. Claiming the international. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2013.
153.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203073025
154.
Tickner AB, Blaney DL, editors. Thinking international relations differently. New York: Routledge; 2012.
155.
Ling LHM. The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. London: Routledge, taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
156.
Grovogui SN. Come to Africa: a hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001 Oct;26(4):425–448.
157.
Agathangelou AM, Ling LHM. Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2009.
158.
KURU D. Historicising Eurocentrism and anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity. Review of International Studies. 2016 Apr;42(02):351–376.
159.
Zondi S. Decolonising International Relations and Its Theory: A Critical Conceptual Meditation. Politikon. 2018 Jan 2;45(1):16–31.
160.
Capan ZG. Decolonising International Relations? Third World Quarterly. 2017 Jan 2;38(1):1–15.
161.
Gani JK. The Erasure of Race: Cosmopolitanism and the Illusion of Kantian Hospitality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017 Jun;45(3):425–446.
162.
Barreto JM. Decolonial Strategies and Dialogue in the Human Rights Field: A Manifesto. Transnational Legal Theory. 2012 Nov 5;3(1):1–29.
163.
Siba N. Grovogui. To the orphaned, dispossessed, and illegitimate children: human rights beyond republican and liberal traditions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A268604335&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon
164.
Shilliam R. Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue between Kant, Foucault and Glissant. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2011 May;39(3):649–665.
165.
Shilliam R, editor. International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: Routledge; 2011.
