1.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2015. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/242728
2.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Vol Oxford library of psychology. (Leavy P, ed.). Oxford University Press; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
3.
Bazeley P. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies, 14. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications; 2020. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23ac155bb504edcba24c4
4.
Blaikie NWH, Priest J. Social Research: Paradigms in Action. Polity Press; 2017.
5.
Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. SAGE Publications; 1996.
6.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Fourth edition, International student edition. SAGE; 2018.
7.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Fourth Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2013.
8.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Fifth edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
9.
Flick U, Kardorff E von, Steinke I. A Companion to Qualitative Research. SAGE; 2004.
10.
George AL, Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2004.
11.
Holliday A. Doing & Writing Qualitative Research. Third edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.
12.
King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400821211
13.
King G, Keohane RO, Verba S, Dawson Books. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400821211
14.
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
15.
Mason J. Qualitative Researching. 3rd edition. SAGE Publications; 2017. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f56323b3b6d6d6499f453df
16.
Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Vol The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Fourth edition. Jossey-Bass; 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781119003656
17.
Miles MB. Qualitative Data Analysis - International Student Edition: A Methods Sourcebook, 14. 4th edition. SAGE Publications; 2019. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f56033c6d79536ec4fbb942
18.
Richards L. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide, 14. 4th edition. SAGE Publications; 2020. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23ae1411afc4c80b3fb9c
19.
Ritchie J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
20.
Rudestam KE, Newton RR. Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Fourth edition. Sage Publication; 2015.
21.
Salmons JE. Doing Qualitative Research Online. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021. https://app.talis.com/textbooks/9781529766608
22.
Seale C. Social Research Methods: A Reader. Vol Routledge student readers. Routledge; 2004.
23.
Silverman D. Qualitative Research. 5th edition. SAGE Publications; 2016. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23bf555bb504edcba24d6
24.
Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. SAGE; 2013.
25.
Smith JA. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, 14. 3rd edition. SAGE Publications; 2015. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f563147eb45501780cc3b39
26.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2015. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/242728
27.
Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S. A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research. 2001;1(1):5-21. doi:10.1177/146879410100100101
28.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Vol Oxford library of psychology. (Leavy P, ed.). Oxford University Press; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
29.
Slevitch L. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies Compared: Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 2011;12(1):73-81. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2011.541810
30.
Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice. 2000;39(3):124-130. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477543
31.
Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 2003;37(3):413-431. doi:10.1177/00380385030373002
32.
Watt D. On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity. The Qualitative Report. 2007;12(1):82-101. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss1/5/
33.
Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2003;16(2):175-196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
34.
Shenton AK. Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information. 2004;22(2):63-75.
35.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Vol Oxford library of psychology. (Leavy P, ed.). Oxford University Press; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
36.
Shaw R. Embedding Reflexivity Within Experiential Qualitative Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2010;7(3):233-243. doi:10.1080/14780880802699092
37.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
38.
Ritchie J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
39.
Richards D. Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls. Politics. 1996;16(3):199-204. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00039.x/epdf
40.
Anthias F. Where do I belong? Ethnicities. 2002;2(4):491-514. doi:10.1177/14687968020020040301
41.
Davies K. Knocking on doors: recruitment and enrichment in a qualitative interview‐based study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011;14(4):289-300. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.516645
42.
Oakley A. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 2016;50(1):195-213. doi:10.1177/0038038515580253
43.
Gareth. Reflections on interviewing elites. Area. 2010;42(1):70-75. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27801441
44.
Roulston K, deMarrais K, Lewis JB. Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry. 2003;9(4):643-668. doi:10.1177/1077800403252736
45.
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. Paul Chapman; 2002.
46.
Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2005.
47.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
48.
Allen L. Managing masculinity: young men’s identity work in focus groups. Qualitative Research. 2005;5(1):35-57. doi:10.1177/1468794105048650
49.
Fallon G, Brown RB. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2002;2(2):195-208. doi:10.1177/146879410200200204
50.
Farnsworth J, Boon B. Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research. 2010;10(5):605-624. doi:10.1177/1468794110375223
51.
Joanne, Lynch U, Moutray M, et al. Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland "Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 6(4):1-19. https://doaj.org/article/0998064f5d544f5083fe6af28a54b583
52.
Morgan M, Gibbs S, Maxwell K, Britten N. Hearing children’s voices: methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative Research. 2002;2(1):5-20. doi:10.1177/1468794102002001636
53.
Wengraf T. Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. SAGE; 2001.
54.
Lyn. Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 4(2):32-43. https://doaj.org/article/8e4526768ae84e3bb72b69f8f645c0c4
55.
Stanley CA, Slattery P. Who Reveals what to whom? Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Inquiry as an Interdisciplinary, Biracial, Male/Female Research Team. Qualitative Inquiry. 2003;9(5):705-728. doi:10.1177/1077800403253004
56.
Warr DJ. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005;11(2):200-225. doi:10.1177/1077800404273412
57.
Donaghy J, Jokio J, Nienhaus A, Rodgers D, Williams E. Intervention – "A Perecian Attempt to Exhaust the Glasgow Subway”. https://antipodefoundation.org/2015/09/28/exhausting-the-glasgow-subway/
58.
Bourgois P. Just Another Night in a Shooting Gallery. Theory, Culture & Society. 1998;15(2):37-66. doi:10.1177/026327698015002002
59.
Becker HS. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 1967;14(3):239-247. doi:10.2307/799147
60.
Behar R. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Beacon Press; 1996.
61.
DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield, Md; 2011.
62.
Gerard Forsey M. Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography. 2010;11(4):558-572. doi:10.1177/1466138110372587
63.
Goffmann E. On Fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 1989;18(2):123-132. doi:10.1177/089124189018002001
64.
Lumsden K. ‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(1):3-18. doi:10.1177/1468794112439012
65.
Lucy Pickering. Dancing my true dance: reflections on learning to express myself through ecstatic dance in Hawai’i. Anthropology Matters. 2009;11(1). https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/29/48
66.
Robinson L, Schulz J. New Avenues for Sociological Inquiry. Sociology. 2009;43(4):685-698. doi:10.1177/0038038509105415
67.
Sanford V, Angel-Ajani A. Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, and Activism. Rutgers University Press; 2006.
68.
Vrasti W. The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2008;37(2):279-301. doi:10.1177/0305829808097641
69.
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):662-679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
70.
Karpf D. Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):639-661. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468
71.
Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT. A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(3):203-220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904
72.
Digital Methods Initiative. https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiAbout
73.
Institute of Network Cultures. http://networkcultures.org/
74.
New Social Media, New Social Science. http://nsmnss.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html
75.
Ackland R. Web Social Science: Concepts, Data and Tools for Social Scientists in the Digital Age. SAGE; 2013.
76.
Bouman MPA, Drossaert CHC, Pieterse ME. Mark My Words: The Design of an Innovative Methodology to Detect and Analyze Interpersonal Health Conversations in Web and Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3-4):312-326. doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.743394
77.
Giglietto F, Rossi L, Bennato D. The Open Laboratory: Limits and Possibilities of Using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a Research Data Source. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3-4):145-159. doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.743797
78.
Highfield T. Talking of Many Things: Using Topical Networks to Study Discussions in Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3-4):204-218. doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.746894
79.
Kozinets RV. Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online. 2012;7(1):37-45. doi:10.4256/mio.2012.004
80.
Kozinets RV. Netnography: Ethnographic Research Online. SAGE; 2010.
81.
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Issues in real-time social research. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2013;6(3):313-335. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
82.
Rogers R. Internet Research: The Question of Method—A Keynote Address from the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2010;7(2-3):241-260. doi:10.1080/19331681003753438
83.
Reber B, Brossaud C. Digital Cognitive Technologies: Epistemology and the Knowledge Economy. ISTE; 2010.
84.
Beneito-Montagut R. Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research. 2011;11(6):716-735. doi:10.1177/1468794111413368
85.
Trevisan F, Reilly P. Ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive issues online: lessons from the study of British disability dissent networks. Information, Communication & Society. 2014;17(9):1131-1146. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.889188
86.
Janes JE. Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research. 2016;14(1):72-87. doi:10.1177/1476750315579129
87.
Bain AL, Payne WJ. Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research. 2016;16(3):330-340. doi:10.1177/1468794115619002
88.
Gray DE, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Doing Research in the Real World. SAGE; 2004. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354875
89.
Quinn N. Participatory action research with asylum seekers and refugees experiencing stigma and discrimination: the experience from Scotland. Disability & Society. 2014;29(1):58-70. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.769863
90.
Mills J, Birks M, eds. Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide. SAGE; 2014.
91.
Amber J. Doing Participatory Action Research in a Multicase Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 14(5). https://doaj.org/article/8d1648778535466f8ec81c6f91fe6a28
92.
Riaño Y. Minga biographic workshops with highly skilled migrant women: enhancing spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research. 2016;16(3):267-279. doi:10.1177/1468794115614884
93.
van der Riet M. Participatory Research and the Philosophy of Social Science. Qualitative Inquiry. 2008;14(4):546-565. doi:10.1177/1077800408314350
94.
Leavy P, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Vol Oxford library of psychology. Oxford University Press; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
95.
Askews & Holts Library Services. Handbook of Constructionist Research. (Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, eds). The Guilford Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781593858537
96.
Bryant A, Charmaz K. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Pbk. ed. SAGE; 2007.
97.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications; 2014. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f562b353b6d6d6499f453bf
98.
Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 14. 4th edition. SAGE Publications; 2015. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f5619006d79536ec4fbb9ab
99.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitive Research. Vol Observations. Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1968.
100.
Hardman H. The validity of a grounded theory approach to research on democratization. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(6):635-649. doi:10.1177/1468794112445526
101.
Peters I. Too Abstract to be Feasible? Applying the Grounded Theory Method in Social Movement Research. Published online 2014. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/wp247_peters.pdf
102.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Fifth edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
103.
Finch JH. The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory. Journal of Economic Methodology. 2002;9(2):213-234. doi:10.1080/13501780210137119
104.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Fourth edition, International student edition. SAGE; 2018.
105.
Fairclough N. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge; 2003. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203697078
106.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
107.
The Leader Interviews. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/09D36EF0?bcast=115499323
108.
Chiang SY. ‘Well, I’m a lot of things, but I’m sure not a bigot’: Positive self-presentation in confrontational discourse on racism. Discourse & Society. 2010;21(3):273-294. doi:10.1177/0957926509360653
109.
Fischer F, Forester J. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. UCL Press; 1993.
110.
Hastings A. Connecting Linguistic Structures and Social Practices:      a Discursive Approach to Social Policy Analysis. Journal of Social Policy. 27(2):191-211. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www-cambridge-org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/connecting-linguistic-structures-and-social-practices-a-discursive-approach-to-social-policy-analysis/890AD709B06420D680C76144824C0C21
111.
Lynn N, Lea S. ‘A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid’: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society. 2003;14(4):425-452. doi:10.1177/0957926503014004002
112.
Steinberg MW. Fence Sitting for a Better View: Finding a Middle Ground Between Materialism and the Linguistic Turn in the Epistemology of History. Qualitative Inquiry. 1997;3(1):26-52. doi:10.1177/107780049700300102
113.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
114.
Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107200159
115.
Flyvbjerg B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006;12(2):219-245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
116.
Fraser A, Batchelor S, Li LNL, Whittaker L. City as Lens. YOUNG. 2017;25(3):235-251. doi:10.1177/1103308816669642
117.
Knill C, Preidel C. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22(3):374-390. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.951066
118.
Bennett A, Checkel JT, eds. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Vol Strategies for social inquiry. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
119.
Burnham P. Research Methods in Politics. Vol Political analysis. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
120.
Checkel JT. Tracing Causal Mechanisms. International Studies Review. 2006;8(2):362-370. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00598_2.x
121.
Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107200159
122.
Antje Ellermann. When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration?: Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany. World Politics. 2013;65(3):491-538. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/515524
123.
Flyvbjerg B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006;12(2):219-245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
124.
Barbara Geddes. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 1990;2:131-150. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23317768
125.
George AL, Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2004.
126.
Gerring J. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Vol Strategies for social inquiry. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2017.
127.
Hancock DR, Algozzine R. Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. 2nd ed. Teachers College Press; 2011.
128.
Knill C, Preidel C. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22(3):374-390. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.951066
129.
Lijphart A. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies. 1975;8(2):158-177. doi:10.1177/001041407500800203
130.
Ragin CC. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantative Strategies. University of California Press; 1987.
131.
Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. 5th edition. SAGE Publications; 2017. https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f561a6d3f2b343bc876568f
132.
Stake RE. The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications; 1995.
133.
Swanborn PG. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? SAGE; 2010.
134.
Van Evera S. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press; 1997.
135.
Bates RH. Analytic Narratives. Princeton University Press; 1998.
136.
Yin RK. Applications of Case Study Research. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2012.
137.
Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Vol Applied social research methods series. 4th ed. SAGE; 2009.
138.
Eatough V, Smith JA. I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: An idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2006;79(1):115-135. doi:10.1348/147608305X41100
139.
Phipps A. Intercultural ethics: questions of methods in language and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. 2013;13(1):10-26. doi:10.1080/14708477.2012.748787
140.
Final thoughts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=106&v=cVGAxMo-kiw