1.
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press (2015).
2.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
3.
Bazeley, P.: Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies, 14. SAGE Publications, London (2020).
4.
Blaikie, N.W.H., Priest, J.: Social research: paradigms in action. Polity Press, Cambridge (2017).
5.
Coffey, A., Atkinson, P.: Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1996).
6.
Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
7.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. eds: Strategies of qualitative inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2013).
8.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. eds: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2018).
9.
Flick, U., Kardorff, E. von, Steinke, I.: A companion to qualitative research. SAGE, London (2004).
10.
George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2004).
11.
Holliday, A.: Doing & writing qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2016).
12.
King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1994).
13.
King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S., Dawson Books: Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1994).
14.
Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A.: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2015).
15.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. SAGE Publications, London (2017).
16.
Merriam, S.B., Tisdell, E.J.: Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2016).
17.
Miles, M.B.: Qualitative data analysis - international student edition: A methods sourcebook, 14. SAGE Publications, London (2019).
18.
Richards, L.: Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, 14. SAGE Publications, London (2020).
19.
Ritchie, J.: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2014).
20.
Rudestam, K.E., Newton, R.R.: Surviving your dissertation: a comprehensive guide to content and process. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California (2015).
21.
Salmons, J.E.: Doing qualitative research online. SAGE Publications Ltd, Washington, D.C. (2021).
22.
Seale, C.: Social research methods: a reader. Routledge, London (2004).
23.
Silverman, D.: Qualitative research. SAGE Publications, London (2016).
24.
Silverman, D.: Doing qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2013).
25.
Smith, J.A.: Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 14. SAGE Publications, London (2015).
26.
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press (2015).
27.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S.: A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research. 1, 5–21 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100101.
28.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
29.
Slevitch, L.: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies Compared: Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 12, 73–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2011.541810.
30.
Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L.: Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice. 39, 124–130 (2000).
31.
Mauthner, N.S., Doucet, A.: Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 37, 413–431 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002.
32.
Watt, D.: On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity. The Qualitative Report. 12, 82–101 (2007).
33.
Pillow, W.: Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 16, 175–196 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.
34.
Shenton, A.K.: Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information. 22, 63–75 (2004).
35.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
36.
Shaw, R.: Embedding Reflexivity Within Experiential Qualitative Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 7, 233–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802699092.
37.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).
38.
Ritchie, J.: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2014).
39.
Richards, D.: Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls. Politics. 16, 199–204 (1996).
40.
Anthias, F.: Where do I belong? Ethnicities. 2, 491–514 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968020020040301.
41.
Davies, K.: Knocking on doors: recruitment and enrichment in a qualitative interview‐based study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 289–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.516645.
42.
Oakley, A.: Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 50, 195–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515580253.
43.
Gareth: Reflections on interviewing elites. Area. 42, 70–75 (2010).
44.
Roulston, K., deMarrais, K., Lewis, J.B.: Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 643–668 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403252736.
45.
Ramazanoglu, C., Holland, J.: Feminist methodology: challenges and choices. Paul Chapman, London (2002).
46.
Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2005).
47.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).
48.
Allen, L.: Managing masculinity: young men’s identity work in focus groups. Qualitative Research. 5, 35–57 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105048650.
49.
Fallon, G., Brown, R.B.: Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2, 195–208 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200204.
50.
Farnsworth, J., Boon, B.: Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research. 10, 605–624 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375223.
51.
Joanne, Lynch, U., Moutray, M., O’Hagan, M.-T., Orr, J., Peake, S., Power, J.: Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland "Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 6, 1–19.
52.
Morgan, M., Gibbs, S., Maxwell, K., Britten, N.: Hearing children’s voices: methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative Research. 2, 5–20 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001636.
53.
Wengraf, T.: Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2001).
54.
Lyn: Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 4, 32–43.
55.
Stanley, C.A., Slattery, P.: Who Reveals what to whom? Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Inquiry as an Interdisciplinary, Biracial, Male/Female Research Team. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 705–728 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403253004.
56.
Warr, D.J.: "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 200–225 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412.
57.
Donaghy, J., Jokio, J., Nienhaus, A., Rodgers, D., Williams, E.: Intervention – "A Perecian Attempt to Exhaust the Glasgow Subway”, https://antipodefoundation.org/2015/09/28/exhausting-the-glasgow-subway/.
58.
Bourgois, P.: Just Another Night in a Shooting Gallery. Theory, Culture & Society. 15, 37–66 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/026327698015002002.
59.
Becker, H.S.: Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 14, 239–247 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2307/799147.
60.
Behar, R.: The vulnerable observer: anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press, Boston (1996).
61.
DeWalt, K.M., DeWalt, B.R.: Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. Rowman & Littlefield, Md, Lanham, Md (2011).
62.
Gerard Forsey, M.: Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography. 11, 558–572 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138110372587.
63.
Goffmann, E.: On Fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 18, 123–132 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001.
64.
Lumsden, K.: ‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’. Qualitative Research. 13, 3–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112439012.
65.
Lucy Pickering: Dancing my true dance: reflections on learning to express myself through ecstatic dance in Hawai’i. Anthropology Matters. 11, (2009).
66.
Robinson, L., Schulz, J.: New Avenues for Sociological Inquiry. Sociology. 43, 685–698 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509105415.
67.
Sanford, V., Angel-Ajani, A.: Engaged observer: anthropology, advocacy, and activism. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J. (2006).
68.
Vrasti, W.: The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 37, 279–301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097641.
69.
boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
70.
Karpf, D.: Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 639–661 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468.
71.
Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D., Graham, L.T.: A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, 203–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904.
72.
Digital Methods Initiative, https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiAbout.
73.
Institute of Network Cultures, http://networkcultures.org/.
74.
New Social Media, New Social Science, http://nsmnss.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html.
75.
Ackland, R.: Web social science: concepts, data and tools for social scientists in the digital age. SAGE, London (2013).
76.
Bouman, M.P.A., Drossaert, C.H.C., Pieterse, M.E.: Mark My Words: The Design of an Innovative Methodology to Detect and Analyze Interpersonal Health Conversations in Web and Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 312–326 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743394.
77.
Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., Bennato, D.: The Open Laboratory: Limits and Possibilities of Using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a Research Data Source. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 145–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743797.
78.
Highfield, T.: Talking of Many Things: Using Topical Networks to Study Discussions in Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 204–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.746894.
79.
Kozinets, R.V.: Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online. 7, 37–45 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2012.004.
80.
Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography: ethnographic research online. SAGE, London (2010).
81.
Marres, N., Weltevrede, E.: Scraping the social? Issues in real-time social research. Journal of Cultural Economy. 6, 313–335 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.
82.
Rogers, R.: Internet Research: The Question of Method—A Keynote Address from the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 7, 241–260 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003753438.
83.
Reber, B., Brossaud, C.: Digital cognitive technologies: epistemology and the knowledge economy. ISTE, London (2010).
84.
Beneito-Montagut, R.: Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research. 11, 716–735 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368.
85.
Trevisan, F., Reilly, P.: Ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive issues online: lessons from the study of British disability dissent networks. Information, Communication & Society. 17, 1131–1146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889188.
86.
Janes, J.E.: Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research. 14, 72–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315579129.
87.
Bain, A.L., Payne, W.J.: Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research. 16, 330–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115619002.
88.
Gray, D.E., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Doing research in the real world. SAGE, London (2004).
89.
Quinn, N.: Participatory action research with asylum seekers and refugees experiencing stigma and discrimination: the experience from Scotland. Disability & Society. 29, 58–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.769863.
90.
Mills, J., Birks, M. eds: Qualitative methodology: a practical guide. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
91.
Amber J.: Doing Participatory Action Research in a Multicase Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 14,.
92.
Riaño, Y.: Minga biographic workshops with highly skilled migrant women: enhancing spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research. 16, 267–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115614884.
93.
van der Riet, M.: Participatory Research and the Philosophy of Social Science. Qualitative Inquiry. 14, 546–565 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408314350.
94.
Leavy, P. ed: The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
95.
Askews & Holts Library Services: Handbook of constructionist research. The Guilford Press, New York, NY (2008).
96.
Bryant, A., Charmaz, K.: The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE, London (2007).
97.
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, London (2014).
98.
Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 14. SAGE Publications, London (2015).
99.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitive research. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (1968).
100.
Hardman, H.: The validity of a grounded theory approach to research on democratization. Qualitative Research. 13, 635–649 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112445526.
101.
Peters, I.: Too Abstract to be Feasible? Applying the Grounded Theory Method in Social Movement Research, https://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/wp247_peters.pdf, (2014).
102.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. eds: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2018).
103.
Finch, J.H.: The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory. Journal of Economic Methodology. 9, 213–234 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780210137119.
104.
Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
105.
Fairclough, N.: Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge, London (2003).
106.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).
107.
The Leader Interviews, https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/09D36EF0?bcast=115499323.
108.
Chiang, S.-Y.: ‘Well, I’m a lot of things, but I’m sure not a bigot’: Positive self-presentation in confrontational discourse on racism. Discourse & Society. 21, 273–294 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509360653.
109.
Fischer, F., Forester, J.: The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. UCL Press, London (1993).
110.
Hastings, A.: Connecting Linguistic Structures and Social Practices: a Discursive Approach to Social Policy Analysis. Journal of Social Policy. 27, 191–211.
111.
Lynn, N., Lea, S.: ‘A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid’: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society. 14, 425–452 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004002.
112.
Steinberg, M.W.: Fence Sitting for a Better View: Finding a Middle Ground Between Materialism and the Linguistic Turn in the Epistemology of History. Qualitative Inquiry. 3, 26–52 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300102.
113.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2016).
114.
Della Porta, D., Keating, M. eds: Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
115.
Flyvbjerg, B.: Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 219–245 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
116.
Fraser, A., Batchelor, S., Li, L.N.L., Whittaker, L.: City as Lens. YOUNG. 25, 235–251 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308816669642.
117.
Knill, C., Preidel, C.: Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 374–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.951066.
118.
Bennett, A., Checkel, J.T. eds: Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015).
119.
Burnham, P.: Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
120.
Checkel, J.T.: Tracing Causal Mechanisms. International Studies Review. 8, 362–370 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00598_2.x.
121.
Della Porta, D., Keating, M. eds: Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
122.
Antje Ellermann: When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration?: Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany. World Politics. 65, 491–538 (2013).
123.
Flyvbjerg, B.: Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 219–245 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
124.
Barbara Geddes: How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 2, 131–150 (1990).
125.
George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2004).
126.
Gerring, J.: Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2017).
127.
Hancock, D.R., Algozzine, R.: Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press, New York, N.Y. (2011).
128.
Knill, C., Preidel, C.: Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 374–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.951066.
129.
Lijphart, A.: The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies. 8, 158–177 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407500800203.
130.
Ragin, C.C.: The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987).
131.
Silverman, D.: Doing qualitative research. SAGE Publications, London (2017).
132.
Stake, R.E.: The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1995).
133.
Swanborn, P.G.: Case study research: what, why and how? SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2010).
134.
Van Evera, S.: Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1997).
135.
Bates, R.H.: Analytic narratives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1998).
136.
Yin, R.K.: Applications of case study research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2012).
137.
Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2009).
138.
Eatough, V., Smith, J.A.: I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: An idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 79, 115–135 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X41100.
139.
Phipps, A.: Intercultural ethics: questions of methods in language and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. 13, 10–26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2012.748787.
140.
Final thoughts, https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=106&v=cVGAxMo-kiw.
