1.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods [Internet]. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/242728
2.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research [Internet]. Leavy P, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
3.
Bazeley P. Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies, 14 [Internet]. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2020. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23ac155bb504edcba24c4
4.
Blaikie NWH, Priest J. Social research: paradigms in action. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017.
5.
Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications; 1996.
6.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Fourth edition, International student edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.
7.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2013.
8.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Fifth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
9.
Flick U, Kardorff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: SAGE; 2004.
10.
George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2004.
11.
Holliday A. Doing & writing qualitative research. Third edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.
12.
King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research [Internet]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1994. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400821211
13.
King G, Keohane RO, Verba S, Dawson Books. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research [Internet]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1994. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400821211
14.
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
15.
Mason J. Qualitative researching [Internet]. 3rd edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2017. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f56323b3b6d6d6499f453df
16.
Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation [Internet]. Fourth edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2016. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781119003656
17.
Miles MB. Qualitative data analysis - international student edition: A methods sourcebook, 14 [Internet]. 4th edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2019. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f56033c6d79536ec4fbb942
18.
Richards L. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, 14 [Internet]. 4th edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2020. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23ae1411afc4c80b3fb9c
19.
Ritchie J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
20.
Rudestam KE, Newton RR. Surviving your dissertation: a comprehensive guide to content and process. Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication; 2015.
21.
Salmons JE. Doing qualitative research online [Internet]. 2nd edition. Washington, D.C.: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021. Available from: https://app.talis.com/textbooks/9781529766608
22.
Seale C. Social research methods: a reader. London: Routledge; 2004.
23.
Silverman D. Qualitative research [Internet]. 5th edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2016. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5fd23bf555bb504edcba24d6
24.
Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 4th ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE; 2013.
25.
Smith JA. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 14 [Internet]. 3rd edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2015. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f563147eb45501780cc3b39
26.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods [Internet]. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/242728
27.
Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S. A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research. 2001 Apr;1(1):5–21.
28.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research [Internet]. Leavy P, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
29.
Slevitch L. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies Compared: Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 2011 Feb;12(1):73–81.
30.
Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.; 2000;39(3):124–130. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477543
31.
Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 2003 Aug;37(3):413–431.
32.
Watt D. On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity. The Qualitative Report [Internet]. 2007;12(1):82–101. Available from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss1/5/
33.
Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2003 Mar;16(2):175–196.
34.
Shenton AK. Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information. 2004;22(2):63–75.
35.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research [Internet]. Leavy P, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
36.
Shaw R. Embedding Reflexivity Within Experiential Qualitative Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2010 Aug 26;7(3):233–243.
37.
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
38.
Ritchie J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
39.
Richards D. Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls. Politics [Internet]. 1996 Sept;16(3):199–204. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00039.x/epdf
40.
Anthias F. Where do I belong? Ethnicities. 2002;2(4):491–514.
41.
Davies K. Knocking on doors: recruitment and enrichment in a qualitative interview‐based study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011;14(4):289–300.
42.
Oakley A. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 2016;50(1):195–213.
43.
Gareth. Reflections on interviewing elites. Area [Internet]. Wiley; 2010;42(1):70–75. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27801441
44.
Roulston K, deMarrais K, Lewis JB. Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry. 2003;9(4):643–668.
45.
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist methodology: challenges and choices. London: Paul Chapman; 2002.
46.
Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2005.
47.
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
48.
Allen L. Managing masculinity: young men’s identity work in focus groups. Qualitative Research. 2005;5(1):35–57.
49.
Fallon G, Brown RB. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2002;2(2):195–208.
50.
Farnsworth J, Boon B. Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research. 2010;10(5):605–624.
51.
Joanne, Lynch U, Moutray M, O’Hagan MT, Orr J, Peake S, Power J. Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland "Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [Internet]. 6(4):1–19. Available from: https://doaj.org/article/0998064f5d544f5083fe6af28a54b583
52.
Morgan M, Gibbs S, Maxwell K, Britten N. Hearing children’s voices: methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative Research. 2002;2(1):5–20.
53.
Wengraf T. Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2001.
54.
Lyn. Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [Internet]. 4(2):32–43. Available from: https://doaj.org/article/8e4526768ae84e3bb72b69f8f645c0c4
55.
Stanley CA, Slattery P. Who Reveals what to whom? Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Inquiry as an Interdisciplinary, Biracial, Male/Female Research Team. Qualitative Inquiry. 2003;9(5):705–728.
56.
Warr DJ. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005;11(2):200–225.
57.
Donaghy J, Jokio J, Nienhaus A, Rodgers D, Williams E. Intervention – "A Perecian Attempt to Exhaust the Glasgow Subway” [Internet]. Available from: https://antipodefoundation.org/2015/09/28/exhausting-the-glasgow-subway/
58.
Bourgois P. Just Another Night in a Shooting Gallery. Theory, Culture & Society. 1998;15(2):37–66.
59.
Becker HS. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 1967;14(3):239–247.
60.
Behar R. The vulnerable observer: anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press; 1996.
61.
DeWalt KM, DeWalt BR. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, Md; 2011.
62.
Gerard Forsey M. Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography. 2010;11(4):558–572.
63.
Goffmann E. On Fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 1989;18(2):123–132.
64.
Lumsden K. ‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(1):3–18.
65.
Lucy Pickering. Dancing my true dance: reflections on learning to express myself through ecstatic dance in Hawai’i. Anthropology Matters [Internet]. 2009;11(1). Available from: https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/29/48
66.
Robinson L, Schulz J. New Avenues for Sociological Inquiry. Sociology. 2009;43(4):685–698.
67.
Sanford V, Angel-Ajani A. Engaged observer: anthropology, advocacy, and activism. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 2006.
68.
Vrasti W. The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2008;37(2):279–301.
69.
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):662–679.
70.
Karpf D. Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):639–661.
71.
Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT. A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(3):203–220.
72.
Digital Methods Initiative [Internet]. Available from: https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiAbout
73.
Institute of Network Cultures [Internet]. Available from: http://networkcultures.org/
74.
New Social Media, New Social Science [Internet]. Available from: http://nsmnss.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html
75.
Ackland R. Web social science: concepts, data and tools for social scientists in the digital age. London: SAGE; 2013.
76.
Bouman MPA, Drossaert CHC, Pieterse ME. Mark My Words: The Design of an Innovative Methodology to Detect and Analyze Interpersonal Health Conversations in Web and Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3–4):312–326.
77.
Giglietto F, Rossi L, Bennato D. The Open Laboratory: Limits and Possibilities of Using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a Research Data Source. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3–4):145–159.
78.
Highfield T. Talking of Many Things: Using Topical Networks to Study Discussions in Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2012;30(3–4):204–218.
79.
Kozinets RV. Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online. 2012;7(1):37–45.
80.
Kozinets RV. Netnography: ethnographic research online. London: SAGE; 2010.
81.
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Issues in real-time social research. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2013;6(3):313–335.
82.
Rogers R. Internet Research: The Question of Method—A Keynote Address from the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2010;7(2–3):241–260.
83.
Reber B, Brossaud C. Digital cognitive technologies: epistemology and the knowledge economy. London: ISTE; 2010.
84.
Beneito-Montagut R. Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research. 2011;11(6):716–735.
85.
Trevisan F, Reilly P. Ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive issues online: lessons from the study of British disability dissent networks. Information, Communication & Society. 2014;17(9):1131–1146.
86.
Janes JE. Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research. 2016;14(1):72–87.
87.
Bain AL, Payne WJ. Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research. 2016;16(3):330–340.
88.
Gray DE, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Doing research in the real world [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2004. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=354875
89.
Quinn N. Participatory action research with asylum seekers and refugees experiencing stigma and discrimination: the experience from Scotland. Disability & Society. 2014;29(1):58–70.
90.
Mills J, Birks M, editors. Qualitative methodology: a practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
91.
Amber J. Doing Participatory Action Research in a Multicase Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [Internet]. 14(5). Available from: https://doaj.org/article/8d1648778535466f8ec81c6f91fe6a28
92.
Riaño Y. Minga biographic workshops with highly skilled migrant women: enhancing spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research. 2016;16(3):267–279.
93.
van der Riet M. Participatory Research and the Philosophy of Social Science. Qualitative Inquiry. 2008;14(4):546–565.
94.
Leavy P, editor. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1657789
95.
Askews & Holts Library Services. Handbook of constructionist research [Internet]. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, editors. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781593858537
96.
Bryant A, Charmaz K. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Pbk. ed. London: SAGE; 2007.
97.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory [Internet]. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2014. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f562b353b6d6d6499f453bf
98.
Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 14 [Internet]. 4th edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2015. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f5619006d79536ec4fbb9ab
99.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitive research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1968.
100.
Hardman H. The validity of a grounded theory approach to research on democratization. Qualitative Research. 2013;13(6):635–649.
101.
Peters I. Too Abstract to be Feasible? Applying the Grounded Theory Method in Social Movement Research [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/wp247_peters.pdf
102.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Fifth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
103.
Finch JH. The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory. Journal of Economic Methodology. 2002;9(2):213–234.
104.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Fourth edition, International student edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.
105.
Fairclough N. Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2003. Available from: http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203697078
106.
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
107.
The Leader Interviews [Internet]. BBC1 London; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/09D36EF0?bcast=115499323
108.
Chiang SY. ‘Well, I’m a lot of things, but I’m sure not a bigot’: Positive self-presentation in confrontational discourse on racism. Discourse & Society. 2010;21(3):273–294.
109.
Fischer F, Forester J. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL Press; 1993.
110.
Hastings A. Connecting Linguistic Structures and Social Practices: a Discursive Approach to Social Policy Analysis. Journal of Social Policy [Internet]. 27(2):191–211. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www-cambridge-org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/connecting-linguistic-structures-and-social-practices-a-discursive-approach-to-social-policy-analysis/890AD709B06420D680C76144824C0C21
111.
Lynn N, Lea S. ‘A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid’: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society. 2003;14(4):425–452.
112.
Steinberg MW. Fence Sitting for a Better View: Finding a Middle Ground Between Materialism and the Linguistic Turn in the Epistemology of History. Qualitative Inquiry. 1997;3(1):26–52.
113.
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
114.
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107200159
115.
Flyvbjerg B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006 Apr;12(2):219–245.
116.
Fraser A, Batchelor S, Li LNL, Whittaker L. City as Lens. YOUNG. 2017;25(3):235–251.
117.
Knill C, Preidel C. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22(3):374–390.
118.
Bennett A, Checkel JT, editors. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
119.
Burnham P. Research methods in politics. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
120.
Checkel JT. Tracing Causal Mechanisms. International Studies Review. 2006;8(2):362–370.
121.
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107200159
122.
Antje Ellermann. When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration?: Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany. World Politics [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2013;65(3):491–538. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/515524
123.
Flyvbjerg B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2006 Apr;12(2):219–245.
124.
Barbara Geddes. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1990;2:131–150. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23317768
125.
George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2004.
126.
Gerring J. Case study research: principles and practices. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
127.
Hancock DR, Algozzine R. Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press; 2011.
128.
Knill C, Preidel C. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22(3):374–390.
129.
Lijphart A. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies. 1975;8(2):158–177.
130.
Ragin CC. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1987.
131.
Silverman D. Doing qualitative research [Internet]. 5th edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2017. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f561a6d3f2b343bc876568f
132.
Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1995.
133.
Swanborn PG. Case study research: what, why and how? Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE; 2010.
134.
Van Evera S. Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1997.
135.
Bates RH. Analytic narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1998.
136.
Yin RK. Applications of case study research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2012.
137.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2009.
138.
Eatough V, Smith JA. I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: An idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2006;79(1):115–135.
139.
Phipps A. Intercultural ethics: questions of methods in language and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. 2013;13(1):10–26.
140.
Final thoughts [Internet]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=106&v=cVGAxMo-kiw
