[1]
Ackland, R. 2013. Web social science: concepts, data and tools for social scientists in the digital age. SAGE.
[2]
Allen, L. 2005. Managing masculinity: young men’s identity work in focus groups. Qualitative Research. 5, 1 (2005), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105048650.
[3]
Amber J. Doing Participatory Action Research in a Multicase Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 14, 5.
[4]
Anthias, F. 2002. Where do I belong? Ethnicities. 2, 4 (2002), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968020020040301.
[5]
Antje Ellermann 2013. When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration?: Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany. World Politics. 65, 3 (2013), 491–538.
[6]
Askews & Holts Library Services 2008. Handbook of constructionist research. The Guilford Press.
[7]
Atkinson, P. et al. 2001. A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research. 1, 1 (Apr. 2001), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100101.
[8]
Bain, A.L. and Payne, W.J. 2016. Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research. 16, 3 (2016), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115619002.
[9]
Barbara Geddes 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 2, (1990), 131–150.
[10]
Bates, R.H. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton University Press.
[11]
Bazeley, P. 2020. Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies, 14. SAGE Publications.
[12]
Becker, H.S. 1967. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 14, 3 (1967), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/799147.
[13]
Behar, R. 1996. The vulnerable observer: anthropology that breaks your heart. Beacon Press.
[14]
Beneito-Montagut, R. 2011. Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research. 11, 6 (2011), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368.
[15]
Bennett, A. and Checkel, J.T. eds 2015. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
[16]
Blaikie, N.W.H. and Priest, J. 2017. Social research: paradigms in action. Polity Press.
[17]
Bouman, M.P.A. et al. 2012. Mark My Words: The Design of an Innovative Methodology to Detect and Analyze Interpersonal Health Conversations in Web and Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 3–4 (2012), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743394.
[18]
Bourgois, P. 1998. Just Another Night in a Shooting Gallery. Theory, Culture & Society. 15, 2 (1998), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327698015002002.
[19]
boyd, D. and Crawford, K. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 5 (2012), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
[20]
Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. 2007. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE.
[21]
Bryman, A. 2015. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
[22]
Bryman, A. 2015. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
[23]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[25]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[26]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[27]
Burnham, P. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[28]
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
[29]
Checkel, J.T. 2006. Tracing Causal Mechanisms. International Studies Review. 8, 2 (2006), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00598_2.x.
[30]
Chiang, S.-Y. 2010. ‘Well, I’m a lot of things, but I’m sure not a bigot’: Positive self-presentation in confrontational discourse on racism. Discourse & Society. 21, 3 (2010), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509360653.
[31]
Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. SAGE Publications.
[32]
Corbin, J. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 14. SAGE Publications.
[33]
Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L. 2000. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice. 39, 3 (2000), 124–130.
[34]
Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. 2018. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
[35]
Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. 2018. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
[36]
Davies, K. 2011. Knocking on doors: recruitment and enrichment in a qualitative interview‐based study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 4 (2011), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.516645.
[37]
Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. eds 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[38]
Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. eds 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[39]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. eds 2013. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[40]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. eds 2018. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[41]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. eds 2018. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[42]
DeWalt, K.M. and DeWalt, B.R. 2011. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. Rowman & Littlefield, Md.
[43]
Digital Methods Initiative: https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiAbout.
[44]
Eatough, V. and Smith, J.A. 2006. I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: An idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 79, 1 (2006), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X41100.
[45]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
[47]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
[49]
Fallon, G. and Brown, R.B. 2002. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2, 2 (2002), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200204.
[50]
Farnsworth, J. and Boon, B. 2010. Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qualitative Research. 10, 5 (2010), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375223.
[51]
Finch, J.H. 2002. The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory. Journal of Economic Methodology. 9, 2 (2002), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780210137119.
[52]
Fischer, F. and Forester, J. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. UCL Press.
[53]
Flick, U. et al. 2004. A companion to qualitative research. SAGE.
[54]
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 2 (Apr. 2006), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
[55]
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 2 (Apr. 2006), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
[56]
Fraser, A. et al. 2017. City as Lens. YOUNG. 25, 3 (2017), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308816669642.
[57]
Gareth 2010. Reflections on interviewing elites. Area. 42, 1 (2010), 70–75.
[58]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[59]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[60]
Gerard Forsey, M. 2010. Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography. 11, 4 (2010), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138110372587.
[61]
Gerring, J. 2017. Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
[62]
Giglietto, F. et al. 2012. The Open Laboratory: Limits and Possibilities of Using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a Research Data Source. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 3–4 (2012), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743797.
[63]
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1968. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitive research. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
[64]
Goffmann, E. 1989. On Fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 18, 2 (1989), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124189018002001.
[65]
Gray, D.E. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2004. Doing research in the real world. SAGE.
[66]
Hancock, D.R. and Algozzine, R. 2011. Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.
[67]
Hardman, H. 2013. The validity of a grounded theory approach to research on democratization. Qualitative Research. 13, 6 (2013), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112445526.
[68]
Hastings, A. Connecting Linguistic Structures and Social Practices: a Discursive Approach to Social Policy Analysis. Journal of Social Policy. 27, 2, 191–211.
[69]
Highfield, T. 2012. Talking of Many Things: Using Topical Networks to Study Discussions in Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30, 3–4 (2012), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.746894.
[70]
Holliday, A. 2016. Doing & writing qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[71]
Institute of Network Cultures: http://networkcultures.org/.
[72]
Intervention – "A Perecian Attempt to Exhaust the Glasgow Subway”: https://antipodefoundation.org/2015/09/28/exhausting-the-glasgow-subway/.
[73]
Janes, J.E. 2016. Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research. 14, 1 (2016), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315579129.
[74]
Joanne et al. Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland "Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 6, 4, 1–19.
[75]
Karpf, D. 2012. Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 5 (2012), 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468.
[76]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[77]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[78]
Knill, C. and Preidel, C. 2015. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 3 (2015), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.951066.
[79]
Knill, C. and Preidel, C. 2015. Institutional opportunity structures and the Catholic Church: explaining variation in the regulation of same-sex partnerships in Ireland and Italy. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 3 (2015), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.951066.
[80]
Kozinets, R.V. 2012. Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online. 7, 1 (2012), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2012.004.
[81]
Kozinets, R.V. 2010. Netnography: ethnographic research online. SAGE.
[82]
Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. 2015. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[83]
Leavy, P. ed. 2014. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
[84]
Lijphart, A. 1975. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies. 8, 2 (1975), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407500800203.
[85]
Lucy Pickering 2009. Dancing my true dance: reflections on learning to express myself through ecstatic dance in Hawai’i. Anthropology Matters. 11, 1 (2009).
[86]
Lumsden, K. 2013. ‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog’. Qualitative Research. 13, 1 (2013), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112439012.
[87]
Lyn Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 4, 2, 32–43.
[88]
Lynn, N. and Lea, S. 2003. ‘A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid’: The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society. 14, 4 (2003), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004002.
[89]
Marres, N. and Weltevrede, E. 2013. Scraping the social? Issues in real-time social research. Journal of Cultural Economy. 6, 3 (2013), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.
[90]
Mason, J. 2017. Qualitative researching. SAGE Publications.
[91]
Mauthner, N.S. and Doucet, A. 2003. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 37, 3 (Aug. 2003), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002.
[92]
Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J. 2016. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
[93]
Miles, M.B. 2019. Qualitative data analysis - international student edition: A methods sourcebook, 14. SAGE Publications.
[94]
Mills, J. and Birks, M. eds 2014. Qualitative methodology: a practical guide. SAGE.
[95]
Morgan, M. et al. 2002. Hearing children’s voices: methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative Research. 2, 1 (2002), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001636.
[96]
New Social Media, New Social Science: http://nsmnss.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html.
[97]
Oakley, A. 2016. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 50, 1 (2016), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515580253.
[98]
Peters, I. 2014. Too Abstract to be Feasible? Applying the Grounded Theory Method in Social Movement Research.
[99]
Phipps, A. 2013. Intercultural ethics: questions of methods in language and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication. 13, 1 (2013), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2012.748787.
[100]
Pillow, W. 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 16, 2 (Mar. 2003), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.
[101]
Quinn, N. 2014. Participatory action research with asylum seekers and refugees experiencing stigma and discrimination: the experience from Scotland. Disability & Society. 29, 1 (2014), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.769863.
[102]
Ragin, C.C. 1987. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies. University of California Press.
[103]
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. 2002. Feminist methodology: challenges and choices. Paul Chapman.
[104]
Reber, B. and Brossaud, C. 2010. Digital cognitive technologies: epistemology and the knowledge economy. ISTE.
[105]
Riaño, Y. 2016. Minga biographic workshops with highly skilled migrant women: enhancing spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research. 16, 3 (2016), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115614884.
[106]
Richards, D. 1996. Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls. Politics. 16, 3 (Sept. 1996), 199–204.
[107]
Richards, L. 2020. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, 14. SAGE Publications.
[108]
van der Riet, M. 2008. Participatory Research and the Philosophy of Social Science. Qualitative Inquiry. 14, 4 (2008), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408314350.
[109]
Ritchie, J. 2014. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[110]
Ritchie, J. 2014. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[111]
Robinson, L. and Schulz, J. 2009. New Avenues for Sociological Inquiry. Sociology. 43, 4 (2009), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509105415.
[112]
Rogers, R. 2010. Internet Research: The Question of Method—A Keynote Address from the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 7, 2–3 (2010), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003753438.
[113]
Roulston, K. et al. 2003. Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 4 (2003), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403252736.
[114]
Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications.
[115]
Rudestam, K.E. and Newton, R.R. 2015. Surviving your dissertation: a comprehensive guide to content and process. Sage Publication.
[116]
Salmons, J.E. 2021. Doing qualitative research online. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[117]
Sanford, V. and Angel-Ajani, A. 2006. Engaged observer: anthropology, advocacy, and activism. Rutgers University Press.
[118]
Seale, C. 2004. Social research methods: a reader. Routledge.
[119]
Shaw, R. 2010. Embedding Reflexivity Within Experiential Qualitative Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 7, 3 (Aug. 2010), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802699092.
[120]
Shenton, A.K. 2004. Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information. 22, 2 (2004), 63–75.
[121]
Silverman, D. 2013. Doing qualitative research. SAGE.
[122]
Silverman, D. 2017. Doing qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[123]
Silverman, D. 2016. Qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[124]
Slevitch, L. 2011. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies Compared: Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 12, 1 (Feb. 2011), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2011.541810.
[125]
Smith, J.A. 2015. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 14. SAGE Publications.
[126]
Stake, R.E. 1995. The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
[127]
Stanley, C.A. and Slattery, P. 2003. Who Reveals what to whom? Critical Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Inquiry as an Interdisciplinary, Biracial, Male/Female Research Team. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 5 (2003), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403253004.
[128]
Steinberg, M.W. 1997. Fence Sitting for a Better View: Finding a Middle Ground Between Materialism and the Linguistic Turn in the Epistemology of History. Qualitative Inquiry. 3, 1 (1997), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300102.
[129]
Swanborn, P.G. 2010. Case study research: what, why and how?. SAGE.
[130]
Trevisan, F. and Reilly, P. 2014. Ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive issues online: lessons from the study of British disability dissent networks. Information, Communication & Society. 17, 9 (2014), 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889188.
[131]
Van Evera, S. 1997. Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press.
[132]
Vrasti, W. 2008. The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 37, 2 (2008), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097641.
[133]
Warr, D.J. 2005. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 2 (2005), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412.
[134]
Watt, D. 2007. On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity. The Qualitative Report. 12, 1 (2007), 82–101.
[135]
Wengraf, T. 2001. Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. SAGE.
[136]
Wilson, R.E. et al. 2012. A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7, 3 (2012), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904.
[137]
Yin, R.K. 2012. Applications of case study research. SAGE.
[138]
Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: design and methods. SAGE.
[140]
The Leader Interviews. BBC1 London.
