[1]
Aaldering, L. and Van Der Pas, D.J. 2018. Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times. British Journal of Political Science. (Mar. 2018), 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795.
[2]
Aday, S. et al. 2005. Embedding the Truth. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 10, 1 (Jan. 2005), 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05275727.
[3]
Aday, S. and Devitt, J. 2001. Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 6, 2 (Mar. 2001), 52–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/108118001129172134.
[4]
Aday, S. and Livingston, S. 2008. Taking the state out of state—media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press—state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict. 1, 1 (Apr. 2008), 99–107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635207087630.
[5]
Adcock, C. 2010. The Politician, The Wife, The Citizen, and her Newspaper. Feminist Media Studies. 10, 2 (Jun. 2010), 135–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680771003672254.
[6]
Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. 2008. Twenty-first century populism: the spectre of Western European democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
[7]
Alexander, J.C. 2010. The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Ananny, M. 2019. Networked press freedom: creating infrastructures for a public right to hear. The MIT Press.
[9]
Astroturfing in China: Three Case Studies: 2016. http://blakeapm.com/.
[10]
Bachmann, I. et al. 2018. Covering Clinton (2010–2015): meaning-making strategies in US magazine covers. Feminist Media Studies. 18, 5 (Sep. 2018), 793–809. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1358204.
[11]
Baldwin-Philippi, J. 2017. The Myths of Data-Driven Campaigning. Political Communication. 34, 4 (Oct. 2017), 627–633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1372999.
[12]
Baldwin-Philippi, J. 2015. Using technology, building democracy: digital campaigning and the construction of citizenship. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Bauer, N.M. 2015. Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates. Political Psychology. 36, 6 (Dec. 2015), 691–708. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12186.
[14]
Beharrell, P. et al. 2010. Bad news: Volume 1. Routledge.
[15]
Beharrell, P. et al. 2010. Bad news: Volume 1. Routledge.
[16]
Beharrell, P. et al. 2010. Bad news: Volume 1. Routledge.
[17]
Beharrell, P. et al. 2010. Bad news: Volume 1. Routledge.
[18]
Bell, C.V. and Entman, R.M. 2011. The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 16, 4 (Oct. 2011), 548–572. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211417334.
[19]
Bell, E. 2016. Who owns the news consumer: Social media platforms or publishers? Columbia Journalism Review. (2016).
[20]
Benjamin R. Barber 1984. Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
[21]
Bennett, W.L. et al. 2006. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication. 56, 3 (Sep. 2006), 467–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x.
[22]
Bennett, W.L. et al. 2018. The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society. 21, 11 (Nov. 2018), 1655–1680. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533.
[23]
Bennett, W.L. 1990. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication. 40, 2 (Jun. 1990), 103–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x.
[24]
Bennett, W.L. and Livingston, S. 2003. Editors’ Introduction: A Semi-Independent Press: Government Control and Journalistic Autonomy in the Political Construction of News. Political Communication. 20, 4 (Oct. 2003), 359–362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244086.
[25]
Bennett, W.L. and Paletz, D.L. 1994. Taken by storm: the media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. University of Chicago Press.
[26]
Benson, R. 2014. Shaping immigration news: a French-American comparison. Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Berry, M. 2016. No alternative to austerity: how BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate. Media, Culture & Society. 38, 6 (Sep. 2016), 844–863. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715620931.
[28]
Boczkowski, P.J. and Papacharissi, Z. eds. 2018. **Trump and the media. The MIT Press.
[29]
Boczkowski, P.J. and Papacharissi, Z. eds. 2018. Trump and the media. The MIT Press.
[30]
Boczkowski, P.J. and Papacharissi, Z. eds. 2018. Trump and the media. The MIT Press.
[31]
Boden, H. 2017. In Search of Unbiased Reporting in Light of Brexit, Trump and Other Reporting Challenges in the UK and US - Shorenstein Center. (2017).
[32]
Bos, L. et al. 2011. How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Political Communication. 28, 2 (Apr. 2011), 182–206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.564605.
[33]
Bos, L. and Brants, K. 2014. Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication. 29, 6 (Dec. 2014), 703–719. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114545709.
[34]
Boykoff, M.T. and Boykoff, J.M. 2007. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum. 38, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1190–1204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008.
[35]
Brady, A.-M. ed. 2014. China’s thought management. Routledge.
[36]
Brady, A.-M. 2009. Mass Persuasion as a Means of Legitimation and China’s Popular Authoritarianism. American Behavioral Scientist. 53, 3 (Nov. 2009), 434–457. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338802.
[37]
Brady, A.-M. 2017. Plus ça change?: Media Control Under Xi Jinping. Problems of Post-Communism. 64, 3–4 (Jul. 2017), 128–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1197779.
[38]
Bruns, A. et al. eds. 2015. The Routledge companion to social media and politics. Routledge.
[39]
Bucy, E.P. and Holbert, R.L. 2011. Sourcebook for political communication research: methods, measures, and analytical techniques. Routledge.
[40]
C. Edwin Baker 2002. Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[41]
C. H. de Vreese 2007. The dynamics of referendum campaigns: an international perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
[42]
C. H. de Vreese and Holli A. Semetko 2004. Political campaigning in referendums: framing the referendum issue. Routledge.
[43]
Calhoun, C.J. 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press.
[44]
Campus, D. 2013. Women political leaders and the media. Palgrave Macmillan.
[45]
Caramani, D. ed. 2017. Comparative politics. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Carragee, K.M. and Roefs, W. 2004. The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication. 54, 2 (Jun. 2004), 214–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x.
[47]
Carroll, S.J. 2009. Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic. Politics & Gender. 5, 01 (Mar. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000014.
[48]
Chadwick, A. et al. 2010. Routledge handbook of internet politics. Routledge.
[49]
Chadwick, A. 2017. **The hybrid media system: politics and power. Oxford University Press.
[50]
Chadwick, A. and Stromer-Galley, J. eds. Special Issue Title: Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 21, 3.
[51]
Chen, Y. and Yang, D.Y. 2018. The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China.
[52]
Chong, D. and Druckman, J.N. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 10, 1 (Jun. 2007), 103–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
[53]
Ciboh, R. 2017. Journalists and Political Sources in Nigeria. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 2 (Apr. 2017), 185–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216681164.
[54]
Coleman, S. and Freelon, D. eds. 2015. Handbook of digital politics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
[55]
Cook, T.E. 2005. Governing with the news: the news media as a political institution. University of Chicago Press.
[56]
Counting Women In - Centre for Women and Democracy: http://www.cfwd.org.uk/current-projects/counting-women-in.
[57]
Craig, S.C. and Rippere, P.S. 2016. He Said, She Said: The Impact of Candidate Gender in Negative Campaigns. Politics & Gender. 12, 02 (Jun. 2016), 391–414. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000550.
[58]
Creemers, R. 2017. Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Contemporary China. 26, 103 (Jan. 2017), 85–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1206281.
[59]
Curran, J. 2002. Media and power. Routledge.
[60]
Curran, J. 2002. Media and power. Routledge.
[61]
Curran, J. and Taylor & Francis Group 2002. Media and power. Routledge.
[62]
D. C. Mutz and L. Young 2011. Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly. 75, 5 (Dec. 2011), 1018–1044. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052.
[63]
D. Stockmann and M. E. Gallagher 2011. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 4 (Apr. 2011), 436–467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010394773.
[64]
D. T. Denver 2012. Elections and voters in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.
[65]
Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini 2012. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge University Press.
[66]
David Held 1996. Models of democracy. Polity.
[67]
David M. Farrell & Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck ed. 2002. Do political campaigns matter?: campaign effects in elections and referendums. Routledge.
[68]
David Tewksbury and Jason Rittenberg 2012. News on the internet: information and citizenship in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
[69]
Dawson Books 2017. Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge.
[70]
Dekker, R. and Scholten, P. 2017. Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 2 (Apr. 2017), 202–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216688323.
[71]
Denis McQuail 1992. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Sage Publications.
[72]
Diana Carole Mutz 1998. Impersonal influence: how perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
[73]
Dimitrov, M.K. 2017. The Political Logic of Media Control in China. Problems of Post-Communism. 64, 3–4 (Jul. 2017), 121–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1318346.
[74]
Dimitrova, D.V. and Matthes, J. 2018. Social Media in Political Campaigning Around the World: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 95, 2 (Jun. 2018), 333–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018770437.
[75]
Dommett, K. and Temple, L. 2018. Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, suppl_1 (Mar. 2018), 189–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx056.
[76]
Doris A. Graber 2011. Media power in politics. CQ Press.
[77]
Downs, W.M. 2012. There Goes the Neighbourhood? The ‘Americanisation’ of Elections, with Evidence from Scotland’s Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 65, 4 (Oct. 2012), 758–777. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr034.
[78]
Dunaway, J. et al. 2013. Traits versus Issues. Political Research Quarterly. 66, 3 (Sep. 2013), 715–726. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913491464.
[79]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2016. The Internet, social media, and a changing China. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[80]
Egorov, G. et al. 2009. Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. The American Political Science Review. 103, 4 (2009), 645–668.
[81]
Elena Block 2017. The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication. 11, (2017).
[82]
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. and Wien, C. 2008. What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13, 3 (Jul. 2008), 247–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319292.
[83]
Enli, G. 2017. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication. 32, 1 (Feb. 2017), 50–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802.
[84]
Entman, R.M. 2003. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication. 20, 4 (Oct. 2003), 415–432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176.
[85]
Entman, R.M. 2007. Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication. 57, 1 (Mar. 2007), 163–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x.
[86]
Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43, 4 (Dec. 1993), 51–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
[87]
Entman, R.M. and Usher, N. 2018. Framing in a Fractured Democracy: Impacts of Digital Technology on Ideology, Power and Cascading Network Activation. Journal of Communication. 68, 2 (Apr. 2018), 298–308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx019.
[88]
Ernst, N. et al. 2018. Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics. (Dec. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430.
[89]
Escobar-Lemmon, M.C. et al. 2016. Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies. Politics & Gender. 12, 02 (Jun. 2016), 254–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000234.
[90]
Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. 2004. Comparing political communication: theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge University Press.
[91]
Fahey, A.C. 2007. French and Feminine: Hegemonic Masculinity and the Emasculation of John Kerry in the 2004 Presidential Race. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 24, 2 (Jun. 2007), 132–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701262743.
[92]
Faris, R.M. et al. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. (2017).
[93]
Fisher, J. ed. 2018. The Routledge handbook of elections, voting behavior and public opinion. Routledge.
[94]
Frank Esser, Jesper Stromback ed. 2014. Mediatization of politics: understanding the transformation of western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.
[95]
Fred S. Siebert et al. 1984. Four theories of the press. University of Illinois Press.
[96]
Freedom of the Press 2017: 2013. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2017.
[97]
Freelon, D. and Karpf, D. 2015. Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society. 18, 4 (Apr. 2015), 390–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659.
[98]
Gamson, W. and Ryan, C. 2005. Thinking about Elephants. Toward a Dialogue with George Lakoff. Public Eye Magazine. (2005).
[99]
Gamson, W.A. et al. 1992. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology. 18, (1992).
[100]
Gamson, W.A. and Modigliani, A. 1989. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 95, 1 (1989).
[101]
Garcia-Blanco, I. and Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2012. The Discursive Construction of Women Politicians in the European Press. Feminist Media Studies. 12, 3 (Sep. 2012), 422–441. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2011.615636.
[102]
Geneva Overholser, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, ed. 2005. The press. Oxford University Press.
[103]
Gibson, R.K. and McAllister, I. 2015. Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies. 63, 3 (Aug. 2015), 529–547. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107.
[104]
Gilboa, E. 2005. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 22, 1 (Feb. 2005), 27–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908429.
[105]
Goffman, E. 1986. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
[106]
Graber, Doris 2003. THE MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science. 6, 1 (2003), 139–160.
[107]
Grasseger, H. and Krogerus, M. 2017. The Data That Turned the World Upside Down. Motherboard. (2017).
[108]
Guest contribution by Jay G. Blumler: "The Fourth Age of Political Communication”: 2013. http://www.fgpk.de/en/2013/gastbeitrag-von-jay-g-blumler-the-fourth-age-of-political-communication-2/.
[109]
Guriev, S. and Treisma, D. 2015. How Modern Dictators Survive: Cooptation, Censorship, Propaganda, and Repression. CEPR discussion papers. (2015).
[110]
Hackett, R.A. 1984. Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 1, 3 (Sep. 1984), 229–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360036.
[111]
Hallin, D.C. and Mancini, P. 2012. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge University Press.
[112]
Harp, D. et al. 2016. Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Hearing Coverage: Political Competence, Authenticity, and the Persistence of the Double Bind. Women’s Studies in Communication. 39, 2 (Apr. 2016), 193–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267.
[113]
Hassid, J. 2012. Safety Valve or Pressure Cooker? Blogs in Chinese Political Life. Journal of Communication. 62, 2 (Apr. 2012), 212–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01634.x.
[114]
Hayes, D. and Lawless, J.L. 2015. A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections. Perspectives on Politics. 13, 01 (Mar. 2015), 95–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003156.
[115]
Hayes, D. and Lawless, J.L. 2016. Women on the run: gender, media, and political campaigns in a polarized era. Cambridge University Press.
[116]
Heflick, N.A. et al. 2011. From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47, 3 (May 2011), 572–581. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020.
[117]
Heflick, N.A. and Goldenberg, J.L. 2009. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45, 3 (May 2009), 598–601. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008.
[118]
Heinz Brandenburg and Marcel Van Egmond 2012. Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science. 42, 02 (Apr. 2012), 441–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000445.
[119]
Higgins, M. and McKay, F.M. 2016. Gender and the development of a political persona: The case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics. 11, 3 (Sep. 2016), 283–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.44.
[120]
HOBBS, W.R. and ROBERTS, M.E. 2018. How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information. American Political Science Review. 112, 03 (Aug. 2018), 621–636. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000084.
[121]
Holtz-Bacha, C. and Just, M.R. 2017. Routledge handbook of political advertising. Routledge.
[122]
Holtz-Bacha, C. and Just, M.R. 2017. Routledge handbook of political advertising. Routledge.
[123]
Huhe, N. et al. 2018. Creating Democratic Citizens: Political Effects of the Internet in China. Political Research Quarterly. 71, 4 (Dec. 2018), 757–771. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918764338.
[124]
Ihlen, Ø. and Thorbjørnsrud, K. 2014. Making news and influencing decisions: Three threshold cases concerning forced return of immigrants. European Journal of Communication. 29, 2 (Apr. 2014), 139–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114523149.
[125]
Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659.
[126]
Issenberg, S. 2013. The victory lab: the secret science of winning campaigns. B/D/W/Y, Broadway Books.
[127]
Iyengar, S. and Kinder, D.R. 2010. News that matters: television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
[128]
Iyengar, S. and Reeves, R. 1997. Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. SAGE Publications.
[129]
J. Curran et al. 2009. Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication. 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 5–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943.
[130]
Jagers, J. and Walgrave, S. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research. 46, 3 (May 2007), 319–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
[131]
Jamieson, K.H. 1995. Beyond the double bind: women and leadership. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Jensen, M.J. and Bang, H.P. 2017. Populism and Connectivism: An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns. Journal of Political Marketing. 16, 3–4 (Oct. 2017), 343–364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846.
[133]
Jesper Strömbäck 2005. In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies. 6, 3 (Aug. 2005), 331–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950.
[134]
John Street 2011. Mass media, politics and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
[135]
John Street 2001. Mass media, politics, and democracy. Palgrave.
[136]
JOHN ZALLER 2003. A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication. 20, 2 (Apr. 2003), 109–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211136.
[137]
Johnston, H. et al. 2005. Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
[138]
Joly, J. 2014. Do the Media Influence Foreign Aid Because or in Spite of the Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Belgian Aid Determinants. Political Communication. 31, 4 (Oct. 2014), 584–603. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.879361.
[139]
Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. 2012. From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal. 40, 1 (Feb. 2012), 1–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x.
[140]
Jungherr, A. 2016. Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 21, 3 (Jul. 2016), 358–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597.
[141]
Kahn, K.F. 1996. The political consequences of being a woman: how stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press.
[142]
Karpf, D. 2016. Analytic activism: digital listening and the new political strategy. Oxford University Press.
[143]
Karpf, D. 2017. Digital politics after Trump. Annals of the International Communication Association. 41, 2 (Apr. 2017), 198–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1316675.
[144]
Karpf, D. 2012. The MoveOn effect: the unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. Oxford University Press.
[145]
Kathleen Hall Jamieson 2000. Everything you think you know about politics-- and why you’re wrong. Basic Books.
[146]
Kavada, A. 2018. Editorial: media and the ‘populist moment’. Media, Culture & Society. 40, 5 (Jul. 2018), 742–744. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772144.
[147]
Kennamer, J.D. 1994. Public opinion, the press, and public policy. Praeger.
[148]
Kenski, K. and Jamieson, K.H. eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford University Press.
[149]
Kenski, K. and Jamieson, K.H. eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford University Press.
[150]
Kenski, K. and Jamieson, K.H. eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford University Press.
[151]
Kim, Y.M. et al. 2018. The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication. 35, 4 (Oct. 2018), 515–541. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425.
[152]
King, G. et al. 2013. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review. 107, 02 (May 2013), 326–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.
[153]
King, G. et al. 2017. How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review. 111, 03 (Aug. 2017), 484–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144.
[154]
Kingdon, J.W. 2003. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
[155]
Kittilson, M.C. and Fridkin, K. 2008. Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender. 4, 03 (Sep. 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000330.
[156]
Kleis Nielsen, R. and Ganter, S.A. 2018. Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society. 20, 4 (Apr. 2018), 1600–1617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318.
[157]
Klinger, U. and Russmann, U. 2017. "Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 14, 4 (Oct. 2017), 299–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919.
[158]
Koch-Baumgarten, S. and Voltmer, K. 2010. Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. Routledge/ECPR.
[159]
Koch-Baumgarten, S. and Voltmer, K. 2010. Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. Routledge/ECPR.
[160]
Kreiss, D. 2016. Prototype politics: technology-intense campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press.
[161]
Kreiss, D. 2016. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society. 18, 8 (Sep. 2016), 1473–1490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445.
[162]
Kreiss, D. 2012. Taking our country back: the crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford University Press.
[163]
Kreiss, D. 2017. Trump, Breitbart, and the Rejection of Multicultural Democracy – Medium. (2017).
[164]
Kreiss, D. and McGregor, S.C. 2018. Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication. 35, 2 (Apr. 2018), 155–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814.
[165]
L. Tang and H. Sampson 2012. The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society. 34, 4 (May 2012), 457–471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711436358.
[166]
Lachover, E. 2017. Signs of change in media representation of women in Israeli politics: Leading and peripheral women contenders. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. 18, 4 (Apr. 2017), 446–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915610991.
[167]
Lawrence Leduc 2002. Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research. 41, 6 (Oct. 2002), 711–732. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00027.
[168]
Lawrence, R.G. 2004. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 9, 3 (Jul. 2004), 56–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04266581.
[169]
Lawrence, R.G. 2004. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 9, 3 (Jul. 2004), 56–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04266581.
[170]
Lawrence, R.G. and Boydstun, A.E. 2017. What We Should Really Be Asking About Media Attention to Trump. Political Communication. 34, 1 (Jan. 2017), 150–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1262700.
[171]
Lawrence, R.G. and Rose, M. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[172]
Lilleker, D. et al. eds. 2016. US Election Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK.
[173]
Lilleker, D.G. et al. 2015. Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society. 18, 7 (Jul. 2015), 747–765. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679.
[174]
Lilleker, D.G. and Jackson, N.A. 2011. Political campaigning, elections and the internet: comparing the US, UK, France and Germany. Routledge.
[175]
Livingston, S. 1997. Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention - Shorenstein Center. The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy.
[176]
Lundström, R. 2013. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication. 28, 6 (Dec. 2013), 630–645. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113502737.
[177]
Lundström, R. 2013. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication. 28, 6 (Dec. 2013), 630–645. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113502737.
[178]
Lynda Lee Kaid 2004. Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[179]
Lynn Vavreck 2009. The message matters: the economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton University Press.
[180]
M. Scammell 2005. Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation.
[181]
M. Wettstein 2012. Frame Adoption in Referendum Campaigns: The Effect of News Coverage on the Public Salience of Issue Interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist. 56, 3 (Mar. 2012), 318–333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426328.
[182]
MacKinnon, R. 2011. China’s ‘Networked Authoritarianism’. Journal of Democracy. 22, 2 (2011), 32–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0033.
[183]
Magin, M. et al. 2017. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 11 (Nov. 2017), 1698–1719. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.
[184]
Magin, M. et al. 2017. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 11 (Nov. 2017), 1698–1719. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.
[185]
Magin, M. et al. 2017. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 11 (Nov. 2017), 1698–1719. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.
[186]
March, L. 2017. Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 2 (May 2017), 282–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117701753.
[187]
Mark Rice-Oxley 2018. How to spot a populist. Guardian. (Dec. 2018).
[188]
Matthes, J. and Kohring, M. 2008. The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication. 58, 2 (Jun. 2008), 258–279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x.
[189]
Mazzoleni, G. et al. 2003. The media and neo-populism: a contemporary comparative analysis. Praeger.
[190]
McGregor, S.C. et al. 2017. Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 2 (Feb. 2017), 264–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228.
[191]
McQuail, D. 1992. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Sage Publications.
[192]
Meeks, L. 2017. Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations. Politics & Gender. 13, 01 (Mar. 2017), 1–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000696.
[193]
Meeks, L. 2012. Is She "Man Enough”? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication. 62, 1 (Feb. 2012), 175–193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x.
[194]
Melenhorst, L. 2015. The Media’s Role in Lawmaking. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 20, 3 (Jul. 2015), 297–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215581924.
[195]
Meng, B. and SpringerLink (Online service) 2018. The Politics of Chinese Media: Consensus and Contestation. Palgrave Macmillan US.
[196]
Michael Schudson 1995. The power of news. Harvard University Press.
[197]
Miller, D. 1993. Official sources and `primary definition’: the case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society. 15, 3 (Jul. 1993), 385–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015003004.
[198]
Miller, M.K. and Peake, J.S. 2013. Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 4 (Oct. 2013), 482–507. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213495456.
[199]
Milne, K. 2005. Manufacturing dissent : single-issue protest, the public and the press. Demos.
[200]
Moffitt, B. and Tormey, S. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies. 62, 2 (Jun. 2014), 381–397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032.
[201]
Morozov, E. 2011. The net delusion: how not to liberate the world. Allen Lane.
[202]
Mudde, C. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. 39, 4 (Sep. 2004), 542–563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
[203]
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. 2017. Populism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[204]
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?. Cambridge University Press.
[205]
Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism?. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[206]
Murphy, J. and Devine, D. 2018. Does Media Coverage Drive Public Support for UKIP or Does Public Support for UKIP Drive Media Coverage? British Journal of Political Science. (Jul. 2018), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000145.
[207]
Murray, R. 2010. Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Praeger Publishers.
[208]
Nechushtai, E. 2018. Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure? Journalism. 19, 8 (Aug. 2018), 1043–1058. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725163.
[209]
Neilsen, R.K. 2018. The Power of Platforms. Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University. (2018).
[210]
NEWTON, K. 2006. May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45, 2 (Mar. 2006), 209–234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x.
[211]
Nielsen, R.K. 2012. Ground wars: personalized communication in political campaigns. Princeton University Press.
[212]
Nielsen, R.K. 2017. The One Thing Journalism Just Might do for Democracy. Journalism Studies. 18, 10 (Oct. 2017), 1251–1262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152.
[213]
Nielsen, R.K. 2014. Varieties of Online Gatekeeping. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2675055.
[214]
Norris, P. 2000. A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press.
[215]
Norris, P. and World Bank eds. 2010. Public sentinel: news media & governance reform. The World Bank.
[216]
Oliver, J.E. and Rahn, W.M. 2016. Rise of the. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 667, 1 (Sep. 2016), 189–206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639.
[217]
Page, B.I. and Shapiro, R.Y. 1992. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
[218]
Pan, Z. and Kosicki, G. 1993. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication. 10, 1 (1993), 55–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
[219]
Patterson, T.E. 2016. Pre-Primary News Coverage of the 2016 Presidential Race: Trump’s Rise, Sanders’ Emergence, Clinton’s Struggle - Shorenstein Centre on Media, Politics and Public Policy. (2016).
[220]
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld et al. 1965. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
[221]
Paul Manning 2001. News and news sources: a critical introduction. SAGE.
[222]
Pauwels, T. 2011. Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21, 1 (Feb. 2011), 97–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.539483.
[223]
Pearce, K.E. and Kendzior, S. 2012. Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication. 62, 2 (Apr. 2012), 283–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x.
[224]
Peidong, Y. 2018. ‘Positive Energy’: Hegemonic Intervention and Online Media Discourse in China’s Xi Jinping Era. China: An International Journal. 16, 1 (2018), 1–22.
[225]
Penney, J. 2017. Social Media and Citizen Participation in "Official” and "Unofficial” Electoral Promotion: A Structural Analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders Digital Campaign. Journal of Communication. 67, 3 (Jun. 2017), 402–423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12300.
[226]
Perloff, R.M. 2018. The dynamics of political communication: media and politics in a digital age. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[227]
Perloff, R.M. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. The dynamics of political communication: media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
[228]
Perry, S. 2005. Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France. 13, 3 (Aug. 2005), 337–352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480500177773.
[229]
Peter Lorentzen 2014. China’s Strategic Censorship. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 2 (Apr. 2014), 402–414. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12065.
[230]
Peters, C. and Broersma, M.J. eds. 2017. Rethinking journalism again: societal role and public relevance in a digital age. Routledge.
[231]
Pew Research Centre Election 2016: Campaigns as a Direct Source of News.
[232]
Pew Research Centre The Modern News Consumer.
[233]
Pew Research Centre The Modern News Consumer.
[234]
Philo, G. et al. 2013. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class. 55, 2 (Oct. 2013), 28–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396813497873.
[235]
Philo, G. et al. 2013. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class. 55, 2 (Oct. 2013), 28–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396813497873.
[236]
Pippa Norris 1999. On message: communicating the campaign. Sage.
[237]
ProQuest (Firm) 2018. Trump and the media. The MIT Press.
[238]
Qin, B. et al. 2017. Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31, 1 (2017).
[239]
Rawnsley, G.D. and Rawnsley, M.-Y.T. eds. 2018. Routledge handbook of Chinese media. Routledge.
[240]
Reese, S.D. et al. 2003. Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[241]
Reinemann, C. ed. 2014. Political communication. De Gruyter Mouton.
[242]
Reinemann, C. ed. 2014. Political communication. De Gruyter Mouton.
[243]
Repnikova, M. 2017. Media Openings and Political Transitions:                              versus. Problems of Post-Communism. 64, 3–4 (Jul. 2017), 141–151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1307118.
[244]
Repnikova, M. 2017. Media politics in China: improvising power under authoritarianism. University Printing House.
[245]
Reuter, O.J. and Szakonyi, D. 2015. Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes. British Journal of Political Science. 45, 01 (Jan. 2015), 29–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000203.
[246]
Robert Alan Dahl 1989. Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
[247]
Roberts, M.E. 2018. Censored: distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton University Press.
[248]
Roberts, M.E. and Stewart, B.M. 2014. Localization and Coordination: How Propaganda and Censorship Converge in Chinese Newspapers - Working paper.
[249]
Robinson, P. 2002. The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. Routledge.
[250]
Robinson, P. 2002. The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. Routledge.
[251]
Robinson, P. 2001. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics. European Journal of Communication. 16, 4 (Dec. 2001), 523–544. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005.
[252]
Rød, E.G. and Weidmann, N.B. 2015. Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Peace Research. 52, 3 (May 2015), 338–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314555782.
[253]
Roggeband, C. and Vliegenthart, R. 2007. Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics. 30, 3 (May 2007), 524–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276352.
[254]
Rooduijn, M. 2014. The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies. 62, 4 (Dec. 2014), 726–744. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074.
[255]
Rooduijn, M. and Pauwels, T. 2011. Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics. 34, 6 (Nov. 2011), 1272–1283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.616665.
[256]
Rose, M. and Baumgartner, F.R. 2013. Framing the Poor: Media Coverage and U.S. Poverty Policy, 1960-2008. Policy Studies Journal. 41, 1 (Feb. 2013), 22–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12001.
[257]
Ross, K. and Comrie, M. 2012. The rules of the (leadership) game: Gender, politics and news. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. 13, 8 (Nov. 2012), 969–984. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911433255.
[258]
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. et al. eds. 2017. The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
[259]
Samuel L. Popkin 1991. The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
[260]
Scammell, M. 2014. Consumer democracy: the marketing of politics. Cambridge University Press.
[261]
Schnell, K.C., Frauke 2001. Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse. Political Communication. 18, 2 (Apr. 2001), 183–213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322970.
[262]
Schuck, A.R.T. and de Vreese, C.H. 2008. Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 14, 1 (Nov. 2008), 40–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208326926.
[263]
Schudson, M. and Dawson Books 2008. Why democracies need an unlovable press. Polity Press.
[264]
Semetko, H.A. and Boomgaarden, H.G. 2007. Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 12, 4 (Oct. 2007), 154–171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07307383.
[265]
Semetko, H.A. and Scammell, M. 2012. The SAGE handbook of political communication. SAGE.
[266]
Semetko, H.A. and Valkenburg, P.M.V. 2000. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication. 50, 2 (Jun. 2000), 93–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
[267]
Semetko, H.A. and Valkenburg, P.M.V. 2000. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication. 50, 2 (Jun. 2000), 93–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
[268]
Sevenans, J. 2018. One concept, many interpretations: the media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes. European Political Science Review. 10, 02 (May 2018), 245–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000078.
[269]
Shehata, A. 2007. Facing the Muhammad Cartoons: Official Dominance and Event-Driven News in Swedish and American Elite Press. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 12, 4 (Oct. 2007), 131–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07307869.
[270]
Sides, J. and Farrell, H. 2016. The Science of Trump: Explaining the Rise of an Unlikely Candidate. The Monkey Cage.
[271]
Sloan, L. and Quan-Haase, A. 2016. The Sage handbook of social media research methods. SAGE Inc.
[272]
Smith, D. and Deacon, D. 2018. Immigration and the British news media: Continuity or change? Sociology Compass. 12, 9 (Sep. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12618.
[273]
Snow, D. and Moffitt, B. 2012. Straddling the divide: mainstream populism and conservatism in Howard’s Australia and Harper’s Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 50, 3 (Jul. 2012), 271–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2012.692922.
[274]
Starkey, G. 2007. Balance and bias in journalism: representation, regulation, and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
[275]
Stockmann, D. 2012. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press.
[276]
Stockmann, D. 2012. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press.
[277]
Stoker, G. and Hay, C. 2017. Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens. Political Studies. 65, 1 (Mar. 2017), 4–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715607511.
[278]
Strömbäck, J. and Kaid, L.L. 2008. The handbook of election news coverage around the world. Routledge.
[279]
Stromer-Galley, J. 2014. Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. Oxford University Press.
[280]
Sullivan, J. 2014. China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society. 16, 1 (Feb. 2014), 24–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472966.
[281]
Susan L. Shirk ed. 2011. Changing media, changing China. Oxford University Press.
[282]
Swanson, D.L. and Mancini, P. 1996. Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Praeger.
[283]
Tager, J. et al. 2017. Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China.
[284]
Tenscher, J. et al. 2012. Modes of professional campaigning: A four country comparison in the European parliamentary elections, 2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 17, 2 (Apr. 2012), 145–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211433839.
[285]
Tenscher, J. et al. 2016. The professionals speak: Practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication. 31, 2 (Apr. 2016), 95–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115612212.
[286]
Thesen, G. 2018. News content and populist radical right party support. The case of Denmark. Electoral Studies. 56, (Dec. 2018), 80–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.003.
[287]
Theviot, A. 2016. Towards a standardization of campaign strategies dictated by the Obama ‘model’? The case of ‘American-style’ canvassing during the 2012 French presidential election campaign. French Politics. 14, 2 (Jun. 2016), 158–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2016.7.
[288]
Thomas, M.L. and Bittner, A. eds. 2018. Mothers and others: the role of parenthood in politics. UBC Press.
[289]
Toril Aalberg and James Curran ed. 2012. How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. Routledge.
[290]
Trimble, L. et al. 2013. Is It Personal? Gendered Mediation in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian National Party Leadership Contests, 1975–2012. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 4 (Oct. 2013), 462–481. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213495455.
[291]
Trimble, L. et al. 2015. Politicizing Bodies: Hegemonic Masculinity, Heteronormativity, and Racism in News Representations of Canadian Political Party Leadership Candidates. Women’s Studies in Communication. 38, 3 (Jul. 2015), 314–330. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2015.1062836.
[292]
Trimble, L.J. (Linda J. 2017. Ms. Prime Minister: gender, media, and leadership. University of Toronto Press.
[293]
Vaccari, C. 2013. Digital politics in Western democracies: a comparative study. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[294]
Vaccari, C. 2013. From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society. 15, 1 (Feb. 2013), 109–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812457336.
[295]
Vaccari, C. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2013. Digital politics in Western democracies: a comparative study. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[296]
Valenzuela, S. and Correa, T. 2009. Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates. International Communication Gazette. 71, 3 (Apr. 2009), 203–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508100913.
[297]
Van Aelst, P. et al. 2017. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association. 41, 1 (Jan. 2017), 3–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.
[298]
Van Aelst, P. and Walgrave, S. 2016. Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites. Journal of Communication. 66, 3 (Jun. 2016), 496–518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12229.
[299]
Van Gorp, B. 2007. The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication. 57, 1 (Mar. 2007), 60–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x.
[300]
Van Gorp, B. 2005. Where is the Frame? European Journal of Communication. 20, 4 (Dec. 2005), 484–507. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253.
[301]
Vliegenthart, R. et al. 2012. Anti-Immigrant Party Support and Media Visibility: A Cross-Party, Over-Time Perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 22, 3 (Aug. 2012), 315–358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.693933.
[302]
Vliegenthart, R. and van Zoonen, L. 2011. Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication. 26, 2 (Jun. 2011), 101–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838.
[303]
de Vreese, C.H. et al. 2018. Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 23, 4 (Oct. 2018), 423–438. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035.
[304]
W. Lance Bennett and Shanto Iyengar 2008. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication. 58, 4 (Dec. 2008), 707–731. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x.
[305]
Wagner, A. et al. 2017. Gender, Competitiveness, and Candidate Visibility in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian Party Leadership Contests. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 4 (Oct. 2017), 471–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217723150.
[306]
Waisbord, S. 2018. Truth is What Happens to News. Journalism Studies. 19, 13 (Oct. 2018), 1866–1878. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881.
[307]
Walgrave, S. et al. 2008. The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 6 (Jun. 2008), 814–836. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098.
[308]
Walgrave, S. and Van Aelst, P. 2006. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication. 56, 1 (Mar. 2006), 88–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x.
[309]
Wang, H. et al. 2017. Differences within the mainland Chinese press: a quantitative analysis. Asian Journal of Communication. 27, 2 (Mar. 2017), 154–171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2016.1240818.
[310]
Ward, O. 2017. Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 1 (Jan. 2017), 43–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673195.
[311]
Ward, O. 2016. Seeing Double: Race, Gender, and Coverage of Minority Women’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives. Politics & Gender. 12, 02 (Jun. 2016), 317–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000222.
[312]
Wasburn, P.C. and Wasburn, M.H. 2011. Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society. 33, 7 (Oct. 2011), 1027–1041. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711415744.
[313]
Wells, C. et al. 2016. How Trump Drove Coverage to the Nomination: Hybrid Media Campaigning. Political Communication. 33, 4 (Oct. 2016), 669–676. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416.
[314]
West, D.M. and Brookings Institution 2018. Air wars: television advertising and social media in election campaigns, 1952-2016. SAGE/CQ Press.
[315]
Wettstein, M. et al. 2018. News Media as Gatekeepers, Critics, and Initiators of Populist Communication: How Journalists in Ten Countries Deal with the Populist Challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 23, 4 (Oct. 2018), 476–495. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218785979.
[316]
Weyland, K. 2001. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics. 34, 1 (Oct. 2001). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.
[317]
William Lockley Miller 1991. Media and voters: the audience, content and influence of press and television at the 1987 General Election. Clarendon Press.
[318]
Wirth, W. 2016. The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication — NCCR Democracy.
[319]
Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge.
[320]
Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge.
[321]
Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge.
[322]
Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. Routledge.
[323]
Wolfsfeld, G. 1997. Media and political conflict: news from the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
[324]
Women and Journalism | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/women-and-journalism.
[325]
Wood, M. et al. 2016. Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 18, 3 (Aug. 2016), 581–598. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116632182.
[326]
Wring, D. et al. eds. 2017. Political Communication in Britain. Springer International Publishing.
[327]
Xin, X. 2018. Popularizing party journalism in China in the age of social media: The case of Xinhua News Agency. Global Media and China. 3, 1 (Mar. 2018), 3–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436418768331.
[328]
Yang, G. 2014. Internet Activism & the Party-State in China. Daedalus. 143, 2 (Apr. 2014), 110–123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00276.
[329]
Yanovitzky, I. 2002. Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions. Communication Research. 29, 4 (Aug. 2002), 422–451. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004003.
[330]
Zoonen, L. van 2005. Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield.
[331]
50,000 Heck*ng Facebook Ad Variants?! – Steve Olson – Medium.
[332]
2015. American Behavioral Scientist : Special Issue Title: Framing Irregular Immigration in Western Media: Voices, Stories and Audience Impact. 59, 7 (2015).
[333]
Digital-Born and Legacy News Media on Twitter during the UK General Election.
[334]
2010. Liberation Technology. Journal of Democracy. 21, 3 (2010), 69–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0190.
[335]
2017. Political populism: a handbook, Heinisch: Christina Holtz-Bacha, Oscar Mazzoleni (eds.). Nomos.
[336]
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017.
[337]
2018. United Kingdom - Reuters Institute Digital News Report.
[338]
US Election Analysis 2016.
[339]
US Election Analysis 2016.
[340]
Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016. Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016.