1
Curran J, Taylor & Francis Group. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
2
Neilsen RK. The Power of Platforms. Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University. Published Online First: 2018.https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/risj-review/lecture-power-platforms
3
United Kingdom - Reuters Institute Digital News Report. 2018.http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/united-kingdom-2018/
4
Ananny M. Networked press freedom: creating infrastructures for a public right to hear. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037747.001.0001/upso-9780262037747
5
Bell E. Who owns the news consumer: Social media platforms or publishers? Columbia Journalism Review Published Online First: 2016.https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/platforms_and_publishers_new_research_from_the_tow_center.php
6
Sloan L, Quan-Haase A. The Sage handbook of social media research methods. First edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: : SAGE Inc 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-social-media-research-methods
7
Nechushtai E. Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure? Journalism 2018;19:1043–58. doi:10.1177/1464884917725163
8
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/
9
Nielsen RK. Varieties of Online Gatekeeping. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2014. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2675055
10
Kleis Nielsen R, Ganter SA. Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society 2018;20:1600–17. doi:10.1177/1461444817701318
11
Peters C, Broersma MJ, editors. Rethinking journalism again: societal role and public relevance in a digital age. London, [England]: : Routledge 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317506416
12
Perloff RM, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The dynamics of political communication: media and politics in a digital age. New York: : Routledge 2014. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1575976
13
Pew Research Centre. The Modern News Consumer. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
14
Pew Research Centre. Election 2016: Campaigns as a Direct Source of News. http://www.journalism.org/topics/2016-election/
15
Pew Research Centre. The Modern News Consumer. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
16
Waisbord S. Truth is What Happens to News. Journalism Studies 2018;19:1866–78. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
17
Toril Aalberg and James Curran, editor. How media inform democracy: a comparative approach. New York, N.Y.: : Routledge 2012.
18
C. Edwin Baker. Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
19
Curran J. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
20
Geneva Overholser, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, editor. The press. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=84383&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
21
J. Curran, S. Iyengar, A. Brink Lund, et al. Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication 2009;24:5–26. doi:10.1177/0267323108098943
22
Graber, Doris. THE MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science 2003;6:139–60.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=10609378&site=ehost-live
23
Denis McQuail. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. London: : Sage Publications 1992.
24
Nielsen RK. The One Thing Journalism Just Might do for Democracy. Journalism Studies 2017;18:1251–62. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152
25
M. Scammell. Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation. 2005.https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Journalism%20Democracy%20%26%20Public%20Interest.pdf
26
Michael Schudson. The power of news. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1995.
27
Schudson M, Dawson Books. Why democracies need an unlovable press. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745675312
28
Frank Esser, Jesper Stromback, editor. Mediatization of politics: understanding the transformation of western democracies. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137275844
29
Fred S. Siebert, Theodore Peterson, Wilbur Schramm. Four theories of the press. Chicago, Ill: : University of Illinois Press 1984.
30
John Street. Mass media, politics and democracy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
31
Jesper Strömbäck. In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies 2005;6:331–45. doi:10.1080/14616700500131950
32
David Tewksbury, Jason Rittenberg. News on the internet: information and citizenship in the 21st century. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
33
Van Aelst P, Strömbäck J, Aalberg T, et al. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association 2017;41:3–27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
34
JOHN ZALLER. A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication 2003;20:109–30. doi:10.1080/10584600390211136
35
Benjamin R. Barber. Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984.
36
Robert Alan Dahl. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1989.
37
David Held. Models of democracy. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Polity 1996.
38
Brady A-M. Plus ça change?: Media Control Under Xi Jinping. Problems of Post-Communism 2017;64:128–40. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1197779
39
Stockmann D. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087742
40
Repnikova M. Media Openings and Political Transitions: versus. Problems of Post-Communism 2017;64:141–51. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1307118
41
King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review 2017;111:484–501. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000144
42
Roberts ME. Censored: distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton, New Jersey: : Princeton University Press 2018. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11341.html
43
Liberation Technology. Journal of Democracy 2010;21:69–83. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0190
44
Egorov G, Guriev S, Sonin K. Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. The American Political Science Review 2009;103:645–68.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27798530
45
Freedom of the Press 2017. 2013.https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2017
46
Guriev S, Treisma D. How Modern Dictators Survive: Cooptation, Censorship, Propaganda, and Repression. CEPR discussion papers Published Online First: 2015.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10454
47
Daniel C. Hallin, Paolo Mancini. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
48
Morozov E. The net delusion: how not to liberate the world. London: : Allen Lane 2011.
49
Norris P, World Bank, editors. Public sentinel: news media & governance reform. Washington, D.C.: : The World Bank 2010.
50
Pearce KE, Kendzior S. Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication 2012;62:283–98. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x
51
Reuter OJ, Szakonyi D. Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes. British Journal of Political Science 2015;45:29–51. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000203
52
Rød EG, Weidmann NB. Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Peace Research 2015;52:338–51. doi:10.1177/0022343314555782
53
Brady A-M. Mass Persuasion as a Means of Legitimation and China’s Popular Authoritarianism. American Behavioral Scientist 2009;53:434–57. doi:10.1177/0002764209338802
54
Brady A-M, editor. China’s thought management. London: : Routledge 2014.
55
Chen Y, Yang DY. The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China. 2018.https://calendar.mit.edu/event/the_impact_of_media_censorship_evidence_from_a_field_experiment_in_china#.XDN7q2ngqUk
56
Creemers R. Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Contemporary China 2017;26:85–100. doi:10.1080/10670564.2016.1206281
57
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Internet, social media, and a changing China. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4540252
58
Dimitrov MK. The Political Logic of Media Control in China. Problems of Post-Communism 2017;64:121–7. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1318346
59
Hassid J. Safety Valve or Pressure Cooker? Blogs in Chinese Political Life. Journal of Communication 2012;62:212–30. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01634.x
60
HOBBS WR, ROBERTS ME. How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information. American Political Science Review 2018;112:621–36. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000084
61
Huhe N, Tang M, Chen J. Creating Democratic Citizens: Political Effects of the Internet in China. Political Research Quarterly 2018;71:757–71. doi:10.1177/1065912918764338
62
King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review 2013;107:326–43. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014
63
Peter Lorentzen. China’s Strategic Censorship. American Journal of Political Science 2014;58:402–14. doi:10.1111/ajps.12065
64
MacKinnon R. China’s ‘Networked Authoritarianism’. Journal of Democracy 2011;22:32–46. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0033
65
Meng B, SpringerLink (Online service). The Politics of Chinese Media: Consensus and Contestation. New York: : Palgrave Macmillan US 2018. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46214-5
66
Miller BA, Gallagher M. Astroturfing in China: Three Case Studies. 2016.http://blakeapm.com/
67
Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y. Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2017;31.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44133953
68
Rawnsley GD, Rawnsley M-YT, editors. Routledge handbook of Chinese media. Paperback edition. London: : Routledge 2018.
69
Repnikova M. Media politics in China: improvising power under authoritarianism. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : University Printing House 2017.
70
Roberts ME, Stewart BM. Localization and Coordination: How Propaganda and Censorship Converge in Chinese Newspapers - Working paper. 2014.https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/~/media/Files/Research/fordcenter/text-as-data-2014/RobertsStewartPropaganda.ashx
71
Susan L. Shirk, editor. Changing media, changing China. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=602492
72
D. Stockmann, M. E. Gallagher. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies 2011;44:436–67. doi:10.1177/0010414010394773
73
Stockmann D. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087742
74
Sullivan J. China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society 2014;16:24–37. doi:10.1177/1461444812472966
75
Tager J, Glenn Bass K, Lopez S. Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China. 2017.https://pen.org/research-resources/forbidden-feeds/
76
L. Tang, H. Sampson. The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society 2012;34:457–71. doi:10.1177/0163443711436358
77
Wang H, Sparks C, Lü N, et al. Differences within the mainland Chinese press: a quantitative analysis. Asian Journal of Communication 2017;27:154–71. doi:10.1080/01292986.2016.1240818
78
Xin X. Popularizing party journalism in China in the age of social media: The case of Xinhua News Agency. Global Media and China 2018;3:3–17. doi:10.1177/2059436418768331
79
Yang G. Internet Activism & the Party-State in China. Daedalus 2014;143:110–23. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00276
80
Peidong Y. ‘Positive Energy’: Hegemonic Intervention and Online Media Discourse in China’s Xi Jinping Era. China: An International Journal 2018;16:1–22.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/688045
81
Hallin DC, Mancini P. Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
82
McQuail D. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. London: : Sage Publications 1992. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=34349f5a-ef40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
83
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
84
Berry M. No alternative to austerity: how BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate. Media, Culture & Society 2016;38:844–63. doi:10.1177/0163443715620931
85
Boden H. In Search of Unbiased Reporting in Light of Brexit, Trump and Other Reporting Challenges in the UK and US - Shorenstein Center. Published Online First: 2017.https://shorensteincenter.org/unbiased-reporting-brexit-trump-uk-us/
86
Entman RM. Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication 2007;57:163–73. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
87
Hackett RA. Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1984;1:229–59. doi:10.1080/15295038409360036
88
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, editors. The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
89
Starkey G. Balance and bias in journalism: representation, regulation, and democracy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007.
90
Aday S, Livingston S, Hebert M. Embedding the Truth. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2005;10:3–21. doi:10.1177/1081180X05275727
91
Bell CV, Entman RM. The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2011;16:548–72. doi:10.1177/1940161211417334
92
Benson R. Shaping immigration news: a French-American comparison. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press 2014.
93
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 2007;38:1190–204. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
94
Gamson WA, Modigliani A. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology 1989;95.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
95
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad news: Volume 1. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
96
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad news: Volume 1. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
97
Lawrence RG. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2004;9:56–75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04266581
98
US Election Analysis 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/us-election-analysis-2016/introduction/
99
Lundström R. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication 2013;28:630–45. doi:10.1177/0267323113502737
100
Philo G, Briant E, Donald P. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class 2013;55:28–41. doi:10.1177/0306396813497873
101
Roggeband C, Vliegenthart R. Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics 2007;30:524–48. doi:10.1080/01402380701276352
102
Rose M, Baumgartner FR. Framing the Poor: Media Coverage and U.S. Poverty Policy, 1960-2008. Policy Studies Journal 2013;41:22–53. doi:10.1111/psj.12001
103
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PMV. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication 2000;50:93–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
104
Smith D, Deacon D. Immigration and the British news media: Continuity or change? Sociology Compass 2018;12. doi:10.1111/soc4.12618
105
American Behavioral Scientist : Special Issue Title: Framing Irregular Immigration in Western Media: Voices, Stories and Audience Impact. 2015;59.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/absb/59/7
106
Van Gorp B. Where is the Frame? European Journal of Communication 2005;20:484–507. doi:10.1177/0267323105058253
107
Johnston H, Noakes JA, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Lanham, MD: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc 2005. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1322109
108
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
109
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication 2006;56:467–85. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
110
Entman RM. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication 2003;20:415–32. doi:10.1080/10584600390244176
111
Shehata A. Facing the Muhammad Cartoons: Official Dominance and Event-Driven News in Swedish and American Elite Press. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2007;12:131–53. doi:10.1177/1081180X07307869
112
Entman RM, Usher N. Framing in a Fractured Democracy: Impacts of Digital Technology on Ideology, Power and Cascading Network Activation. Journal of Communication 2018;68:298–308. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx019
113
Bennett WL. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 1990;40:103–27. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
114
Bennett WL, Livingston S. Editors’ Introduction: A Semi-Independent Press: Government Control and Journalistic Autonomy in the Political Construction of News. Political Communication 2003;20:359–62. doi:10.1080/10584600390244086
115
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, editors. The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
116
Ciboh R. Journalists and Political Sources in Nigeria. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2017;22:185–201. doi:10.1177/1940161216681164
117
Cook TE. Governing with the news: the news media as a political institution. 2nd ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005.
118
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad news: Volume 1. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
119
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad news: Volume 1. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
120
Lawrence RG. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2004;9:56–75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04266581
121
Lundström R. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication 2013;28:630–45. doi:10.1177/0267323113502737
122
Miller D. Official sources and `primary definition’: the case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society 1993;15:385–406. doi:10.1177/016344393015003004
123
Philo G, Briant E, Donald P. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class 2013;55:28–41. doi:10.1177/0306396813497873
124
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PMV. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication 2000;50:93–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
125
Carragee KM, Roefs W. The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication 2004;54:214–33. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
126
Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2007;10:103–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
127
Semetko HA, Scammell M. The SAGE handbook of political communication. London: : SAGE 2012.
128
Entman RM. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993;43:51–8. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
129
Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, et al. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology 1992;18.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083459
130
Gamson W, Ryan C. Thinking about Elephants. Toward a Dialogue with George Lakoff. Public Eye Magazine Published Online First: 2005.http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n2/gamson_elephants.html
131
Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press ed. Boston: : Northeastern University Press 1986.
132
Pan Z, Kosicki G. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 1993;10:55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
133
Perloff RM. The dynamics of political communication: media and politics in a digital age. Second edition. New York, NY: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5108778
134
Reese SD, Gandy OH, Grant AE. Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2003.
135
Van Gorp B. The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication 2007;57:60–78. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x
136
Vliegenthart R, van Zoonen L. Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication 2011;26:101–15. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
137
Bucy EP, Holbert RL. Sourcebook for political communication research: methods, measures, and analytical techniques. New York: : Routledge 2011.
138
Matthes J, Kohring M. The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication 2008;58:258–79. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
139
Murray R. Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara, Calif: : Praeger Publishers 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780313382499
140
Harp D, Loke J, Bachmann I. Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Hearing Coverage: Political Competence, Authenticity, and the Persistence of the Double Bind. Women’s Studies in Communication 2016;39:193–210. doi:10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267
141
Higgins M, McKay FM. Gender and the development of a political persona: The case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics 2016;11:283–300. doi:10.1057/bp.2015.44
142
Miller MK, Peake JS. Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2013;18:482–507. doi:10.1177/1940161213495456
143
McGregor SC, Lawrence RG, Cardona A. Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication & Society 2017;20:264–83. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228
144
Meeks L. Is She "Man Enough”? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication 2012;62:175–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x
145
Perry S. Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France 2005;13:337–52. doi:10.1080/09639480500177773
146
Ward O. Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2017;22:43–66. doi:10.1177/1940161216673195
147
Counting Women In - Centre for Women and Democracy. http://www.cfwd.org.uk/current-projects/counting-women-in
148
Women and Journalism | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/women-and-journalism
149
Aaldering L, Van Der Pas DJ. Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times. British Journal of Political Science 2018;:1–21. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000795
150
Aday S, Devitt J. Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2001;6:52–73. doi:10.1177/108118001129172134
151
Adcock C. The Politician, The Wife, The Citizen, and her Newspaper. Feminist Media Studies 2010;10:135–59. doi:10.1080/14680771003672254
152
Bachmann I, Harp D, Loke J. Covering Clinton (2010–2015): meaning-making strategies in US magazine covers. Feminist Media Studies 2018;18:793–809. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1358204
153
Bauer NM. Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates. Political Psychology 2015;36:691–708. doi:10.1111/pops.12186
154
Campus D. Women political leaders and the media. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137295545
155
Carroll SJ. Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic. Politics & Gender 2009;5. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000014
156
Craig SC, Rippere PS. He Said, She Said: The Impact of Candidate Gender in Negative Campaigns. Politics & Gender 2016;12:391–414. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000550
157
Dunaway J, Lawrence RG, Rose M, et al. Traits versus Issues. Political Research Quarterly 2013;66:715–26. doi:10.1177/1065912913491464
158
Escobar-Lemmon MC, Hoekstra V, Kang A, et al. Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies. Politics & Gender 2016;12:254–74. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000234
159
Fahey AC. French and Feminine: Hegemonic Masculinity and the Emasculation of John Kerry in the 2004 Presidential Race. Critical Studies in Media Communication 2007;24:132–50. doi:10.1080/07393180701262743
160
Calhoun CJ. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1992.
161
Garcia-Blanco I, Wahl-Jorgensen K. The Discursive Construction of Women Politicians in the European Press. Feminist Media Studies 2012;12:422–41. doi:10.1080/14680777.2011.615636
162
Hayes D, Lawless JL. A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections. Perspectives on Politics 2015;13:95–118. doi:10.1017/S1537592714003156
163
Hayes D, Lawless JL. Women on the run: gender, media, and political campaigns in a polarized era. New York NY: : Cambridge University Press 2016.
164
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009;45:598–601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
165
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL, Cooper DP, et al. From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011;47:572–81. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
166
Jamieson KH. Beyond the double bind: women and leadership. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 1995.
167
Kahn KF. The political consequences of being a woman: how stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: : Columbia University Press 1996.
168
Kittilson MC, Fridkin K. Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender 2008;4. doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330
169
Lachover E. Signs of change in media representation of women in Israeli politics: Leading and peripheral women contenders. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 2017;18:446–63. doi:10.1177/1464884915610991
170
Lawrence RG, Rose M. Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2010.
171
Ross K, Comrie M. The rules of the (leadership) game: Gender, politics and news. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 2012;13:969–84. doi:10.1177/1464884911433255
172
Meeks L. Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations. Politics & Gender 2017;13:1–25. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000696
173
Semetko HA, Boomgaarden HG. Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2007;12:154–71. doi:10.1177/1081180X07307383
174
Thomas ML, Bittner A, editors. Mothers and others: the role of parenthood in politics. Vancouver, BC: : UBC Press 2018.
175
Trimble L, Wagner A, Sampert S, et al. Is It Personal? Gendered Mediation in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian National Party Leadership Contests, 1975–2012. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2013;18:462–81. doi:10.1177/1940161213495455
176
Trimble L, Raphael D, Sampert S, et al. Politicizing Bodies: Hegemonic Masculinity, Heteronormativity, and Racism in News Representations of Canadian Political Party Leadership Candidates. Women’s Studies in Communication 2015;38:314–30. doi:10.1080/07491409.2015.1062836
177
Trimble LJ (Linda J. Ms. Prime Minister: gender, media, and leadership. Toronto, ON: : University of Toronto Press 2017.
178
Valenzuela S, Correa T. Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates. International Communication Gazette 2009;71:203–23. doi:10.1177/1748048508100913
179
Zoonen L van. Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2005.
180
Wagner A, Trimble L, Sampert S, et al. Gender, Competitiveness, and Candidate Visibility in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian Party Leadership Contests. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2017;22:471–89. doi:10.1177/1940161217723150
181
Ward O. Seeing Double: Race, Gender, and Coverage of Minority Women’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives. Politics & Gender 2016;12:317–43. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000222
182
Wasburn PC, Wasburn MH. Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society 2011;33:1027–41. doi:10.1177/0163443711415744
183
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, editors. The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
184
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
185
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, editors. **Trump and the media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
186
W. Lance Bennett, Shanto Iyengar. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication 2008;58:707–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
187
Heinz Brandenburg, Marcel Van Egmond. Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science 2012;42:441–63. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000445
188
Curran J. Media and power. London: : Routledge 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
189
D. T. Denver. Elections and voters in Britain. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
190
David M. Farrell & Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, editor. Do political campaigns matter?: campaign effects in elections and referendums. London: : Routledge 2002.
191
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News that matters: television and American opinion. Updated ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2010.
192
Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Everything you think you know about politics-- and why you’re wrong. New York: : Basic Books 2000.
193
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, Hazel Gaudet. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. 3d ed. New York: : Columbia University Press 1965.
194
Paul Manning. News and news sources: a critical introduction. London: : SAGE 2001.
195
Doris A. Graber. Media power in politics. 6th ed. Washington, DC: : CQ Press 2011.
196
William Lockley Miller. Media and voters: the audience, content and influence of press and television at the 1987 General Election. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1991.
197
Diana Carole Mutz. Impersonal influence: how perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
198
D. C. Mutz, L. Young. Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly 2011;75:1018–44. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr052
199
NEWTON K. May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research 2006;45:209–34. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x
200
Pippa Norris. On message: communicating the campaign. London: : Sage 1999.
201
Samuel L. Popkin. The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. 2nd ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
202
John Street. Mass media, politics, and democracy. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
203
Lynn Vavreck. The message matters: the economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: : Princeton University Press 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400830480
204
Lynda Lee Kaid. Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004.
205
Lawrence Leduc. Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research 2002;41:711–32. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00027
206
Schuck ART, de Vreese CH. Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008;14:40–66. doi:10.1177/1940161208326926
207
C. H. de Vreese, Holli A. Semetko. Political campaigning in referendums: framing the referendum issue. London: : Routledge 2004.
208
C. H. de Vreese. The dynamics of referendum campaigns: an international perspective. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230591189
209
M. Wettstein. Frame Adoption in Referendum Campaigns: The Effect of News Coverage on the Public Salience of Issue Interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist 2012;56:318–33. doi:10.1177/0002764211426328
210
Chadwick A. **The hybrid media system: politics and power. Second edition. New York: : Oxford University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
211
Grasseger H, Krogerus M. The Data That Turned the World Upside Down. Motherboard Published Online First: 2017.https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9vvn/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win
212
Baldwin-Philippi J. The Myths of Data-Driven Campaigning. Political Communication 2017;34:627–33. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1372999
213
50,000 Heck*ng Facebook Ad Variants?! – Steve Olson – Medium. https://medium.com/@steveolson/50-000-heck-ng-facebook-ad-variants-31eed233ac4a
214
Chadwick A, Howard PN, Dawson Books. Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: : Routledge 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203962541
215
Vaccari C, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Digital politics in Western democracies: a comparative study. Baltimore, Maryland: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=3318750
216
Klinger U, Russmann U. "Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2017;14:299–313. doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
217
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, et al. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 2017;20:1698–719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
218
Theviot A. Towards a standardization of campaign strategies dictated by the Obama ‘model’? The case of ‘American-style’ canvassing during the 2012 French presidential election campaign. French Politics 2016;14:158–77. doi:10.1057/fp.2016.7
219
Digital-Born and Legacy News Media on Twitter during the UK General Election. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Digital-Born%20and%20Legacy%20News%20Media%20UK%20Factsheet.pdf
220
Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016. Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journal/41253/14/2
221
Jungherr A. Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2016;21:358–77. doi:10.1177/1940161216642597
222
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, et al. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 2017;20:1698–719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
223
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, et al. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 2017;20:1698–719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
224
Dommett K, Temple L. Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs 2018;71:189–202. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx056
225
Wring D, Mortimore R, Atkinson S, editors. Political Communication in Britain. Cham: : Springer International Publishing 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40934-4
226
Holtz-Bacha C, Just MR. Routledge handbook of political advertising. New York, NY: : Routledge 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315694504
227
Alexander JC. The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. New York: : Oxford University Press 2010. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744466.001.0001
228
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, editors. Trump and the media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
229
Enli G. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication 2017;32:50–61. doi:10.1177/0267323116682802
230
Karpf D. Digital politics after Trump. Annals of the International Communication Association 2017;41:198–207. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1316675
231
Faris RM, Roberts H, Etling B, et al. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Published Online First: 2017.https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/mediacloud
232
Issenberg S. The victory lab: the secret science of winning campaigns. First paperback edition. New York: : B/D/W/Y, Broadway Books 2013.
233
Kim YM, Hsu J, Neiman D, et al. The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication 2018;35:515–41. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425
234
Kreiss D, McGregor SC. Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication 2018;35:155–77. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
235
Kreiss D. Trump, Breitbart, and the Rejection of Multicultural Democracy – Medium. Published Online First: 2017.https://medium.com/@dkreiss/trump-breitbart-and-the-rejection-of-multicultural-democracy-90f3f776bebd
236
Lawrence RG, Boydstun AE. What We Should Really Be Asking About Media Attention to Trump. Political Communication 2017;34:150–3. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1262700
237
Lilleker D, Jackson D, Thorsen E, et al., editors. US Election Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/
238
Patterson TE. Pre-Primary News Coverage of the 2016 Presidential Race: Trump’s Rise, Sanders’ Emergence, Clinton’s Struggle - Shorenstein Centre on Media, Politics and Public Policy. Published Online First: 2016.https://shorensteincenter.org/pre-primary-news-coverage-2016-trump-clinton-sanders
239
Penney J. Social Media and Citizen Participation in "Official” and "Unofficial” Electoral Promotion: A Structural Analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders Digital Campaign. Journal of Communication 2017;67:402–23. doi:10.1111/jcom.12300
240
Sides J, Farrell H. The Science of Trump: Explaining the Rise of an Unlikely Candidate. The Monkey Cage 2016. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Trump-Explaining-Unlikely-Candidate-ebook/dp/B01IL9DTG8
241
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, editors. Trump and the media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
242
Wells C, Shah DV, Pevehouse JC, et al. How Trump Drove Coverage to the Nomination: Hybrid Media Campaigning. Political Communication 2016;33:669–76. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416
243
Blumler JG. Guest contribution by Jay G. Blumler: "The Fourth Age of Political Communication”. 2013.http://www.fgpk.de/en/2013/gastbeitrag-von-jay-g-blumler-the-fourth-age-of-political-communication-2/
244
Downs WM. There Goes the Neighbourhood? The ‘Americanisation’ of Elections, with Evidence from Scotland’s Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 2012;65:758–77. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr034
245
Caramani D, editor. Comparative politics. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
246
Esser F, Pfetsch B. Comparing political communication: theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
247
Holtz-Bacha C, Just MR. Routledge handbook of political advertising. New York, NY: : Routledge 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315694504
248
Norris P. A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
249
Scammell M. Consumer democracy: the marketing of politics. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046107
250
Strömbäck J, Kaid LL. The handbook of election news coverage around the world. New York: : Routledge 2008.
251
Reinemann C, editor. Political communication. Berlin: : De Gruyter Mouton 2014.
252
Swanson DL, Mancini P. Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Westport, Conn: : Praeger 1996.
253
Tenscher J, Mykkänen J, Moring T. Modes of professional campaigning: A four country comparison in the European parliamentary elections, 2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2012;17:145–68. doi:10.1177/1940161211433839
254
Tenscher J, Koc-Michalska K, Lilleker DG, et al. The professionals speak: Practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication 2016;31:95–119. doi:10.1177/0267323115612212
255
West DM, Brookings Institution. Air wars: television advertising and social media in election campaigns, 1952-2016. 7 edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE/CQ Press 2018.
256
Baldwin-Philippi J. Using technology, building democracy: digital campaigning and the construction of citizenship. New York: : Oxford University Press 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231910.001.0001
257
Bennett WL, Segerberg A, Knüpfer CB. The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society 2018;21:1655–80. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
258
Bruns A, Enli G, Skogerbø E, et al., editors. The Routledge companion to social media and politics. London: : Routledge 2015. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4218813
259
Chadwick A, Stromer-Galley J, editors. Special Issue Title: Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics;21.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/hijb/21/3
260
Dimitrova DV, Matthes J. Social Media in Political Campaigning Around the World: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2018;95:333–42. doi:10.1177/1077699018770437
261
Freelon D, Karpf D. Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society 2015;18:390–406. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659
262
Gibson RK, McAllister I. Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies 2015;63:529–47. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12107
263
Karpf D. The MoveOn effect: the unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. New York: : Oxford University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898367.001.0001
264
Karpf D. Analytic activism: digital listening and the new political strategy. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190266127.001.0001
265
Kreiss D. Taking our country back: the crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: : Oxford University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782536.001.0001
266
Coleman S, Freelon D, editors. Handbook of digital politics. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2015.
267
Kreiss D. Prototype politics: technology-intense campaigning and the data of democracy. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001
268
Kreiss D. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society 2016;18:1473–90. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445
269
Lilleker DG, Jackson NA. Political campaigning, elections and the internet: comparing the US, UK, France and Germany. London: : Routledge 2011.
270
Lilleker DG, Tenscher J, Štětka V. Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society 2015;18:747–65. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679
271
Nielsen RK. Ground wars: personalized communication in political campaigns. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2012.
272
Stromer-Galley J. Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York: : Oxford University Press 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731930.001.0001
273
Vaccari C. From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society 2013;15:109–27. doi:10.1177/1461444812457336
274
Vaccari C. Digital politics in Western democracies: a comparative study. Baltimore, Maryland: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=3318750
275
Fisher J, editor. The Routledge handbook of elections, voting behavior and public opinion. London, [England]: : Routledge 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315712390
276
Dawson Books. Populist political communication in Europe. New York, NY: : Routledge 2017. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315623016
277
US Election Analysis 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/us-election-analysis-2016/introduction/
278
Mark Rice-Oxley. How to spot a populist. Guardian Published Online First: 3 December 2018.https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/dec/03/what-is-populism-trump-farage-orban-bolsonaro
279
Ernst N, Esser F, Blassnig S, et al. Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics Published Online First: 22 December 2018. doi:10.1177/1940161218819430
280
Wettstein M, Esser F, Schulz A, et al. News Media as Gatekeepers, Critics, and Initiators of Populist Communication: How Journalists in Ten Countries Deal with the Populist Challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2018;23:476–95. doi:10.1177/1940161218785979
281
Albertazzi D, McDonnell D. Twenty-first century populism: the spectre of Western European democracy. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
282
Elena Block. The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication 2017;11.https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5820
283
Bos L, van der Brug W, de Vreese C. How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Political Communication 2011;28:182–206. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
284
Bos L, Brants K. Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication 2014;29:703–19. doi:10.1177/0267323114545709
285
de Vreese CH, Esser F, Aalberg T, et al. Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2018;23:423–38. doi:10.1177/1940161218790035
286
Jagers J, Walgrave S. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 2007;46:319–45. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
287
Jensen MJ, Bang HP. Populism and Connectivism: An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns. Journal of Political Marketing 2017;16:343–64. doi:10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846
288
Kavada A. Editorial: media and the ‘populist moment’. Media, Culture & Society 2018;40:742–4. doi:10.1177/0163443718772144
289
ProQuest (Firm). Trump and the media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
290
Mazzoleni G, Stewart J, Horsfield B. The media and neo-populism: a contemporary comparative analysis. Westport, Conn: : Praeger 2003.
291
Murphy J, Devine D. Does Media Coverage Drive Public Support for UKIP or Does Public Support for UKIP Drive Media Coverage? British Journal of Political Science 2018;:1–18. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000145
292
Rooduijn M. The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies 2014;62:726–44. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12074
293
Thesen G. News content and populist radical right party support. The case of Denmark. Electoral Studies 2018;56:80–9. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.003
294
Vliegenthart R, Boomgaarden HG, Van Spanje J. Anti-Immigrant Party Support and Media Visibility: A Cross-Party, Over-Time Perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 2012;22:315–58. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.693933
295
Wirth W. The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication — NCCR Democracy. 2016.http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/wp88
296
Wood M, Corbett J, Flinders M. Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2016;18:581–98. doi:10.1177/1369148116632182
297
Political populism: a handbook, Heinisch: Christina Holtz-Bacha, Oscar Mazzoleni (eds.). 1st edition. Baden-Baden: : Nomos 2017.
298
Inglehart R, Norris P. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2016. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2818659
299
Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart PA, Ochoa Espejo P, et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
300
Müller J-W. What is populism? Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2016.
301
March L. Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2017;19:282–303. doi:10.1177/1369148117701753
302
Moffitt B, Tormey S. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 2014;62:381–97. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032
303
Mudde C. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 2004;39:542–63. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
304
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365
305
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York: : Oxford University Press 2017.
306
Oliver JE, Rahn WM. Rise of the. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2016;667:189–206. doi:10.1177/0002716216662639
307
Pauwels T. Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 2011;21:97–119. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
308
Rooduijn M, Pauwels T. Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics 2011;34:1272–83. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665
309
Snow D, Moffitt B. Straddling the divide: mainstream populism and conservatism in Howard’s Australia and Harper’s Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 2012;50:271–92. doi:10.1080/14662043.2012.692922
310
Stoker G, Hay C. Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens. Political Studies 2017;65:4–23. doi:10.1177/0032321715607511
311
Weyland K. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 2001;34. doi:10.2307/422412
312
Sevenans J. One concept, many interpretations: the media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes. European Political Science Review 2018;10:245–65. doi:10.1017/S1755773917000078
313
Wolfsfeld G. Making sense of media and politics: five principles in political communication. New York: : Routledge 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
314
Dekker R, Scholten P. Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2017;22:202–22. doi:10.1177/1940161216688323
315
Elmelund-Præstekær C, Wien C. What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2008;13:247–66. doi:10.1177/1940161208319292
316
Ihlen Ø, Thorbjørnsrud K. Making news and influencing decisions: Three threshold cases concerning forced return of immigrants. European Journal of Communication 2014;29:139–52. doi:10.1177/0267323114523149
317
Melenhorst L. The Media’s Role in Lawmaking. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2015;20:297–316. doi:10.1177/1940161215581924
318
Milne K. Manufacturing dissent : single-issue protest, the public and the press. Demos 2005. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/manufacturingdissent.pdf
319
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics. European Journal of Communication 2001;16:523–44. doi:10.1177/0267323101016004005
320
Aday S, Livingston S. Taking the state out of state—media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press—state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict 2008;1:99–107. doi:10.1177/1750635207087630
321
Reinemann C, editor. Political communication. Berlin: : De Gruyter Mouton 2014.
322
Van Aelst P, Walgrave S. Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites. Journal of Communication 2016;66:496–518. doi:10.1111/jcom.12229
323
Iyengar S, Reeves R. Do the media govern?: politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE Publications 1997.
324
Schnell KC Frauke. Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse. Political Communication 2001;18:183–213. doi:10.1080/105846001750322970
325
Joly J. Do the Media Influence Foreign Aid Because or in Spite of the Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Belgian Aid Determinants. Political Communication 2014;31:584–603. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.879361
326
Jones BD, Baumgartner FR. From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal 2012;40:1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
327
Kennamer JD. Public opinion, the press, and public policy. Paperback ed. Westport, Conn: : Praeger 1994.
328
Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: : Longman 2003.
329
Koch-Baumgarten S, Voltmer K. Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. London: : Routledge/ECPR 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=257161&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
330
Koch-Baumgarten S, Voltmer K. Public policy and mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. London: : Routledge/ECPR 2010.
331
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1992.
332
Walgrave S, Soroka S, Nuytemans M. The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power. Comparative Political Studies 2008;41:814–36. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
333
Walgrave S, Van Aelst P. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication 2006;56:88–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
334
Yanovitzky I. Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions. Communication Research 2002;29:422–51. doi:10.1177/0093650202029004003
335
Bennett WL, Paletz DL. Taken by storm: the media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1994.
336
Gilboa E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication 2005;22:27–44. doi:10.1080/10584600590908429
337
Livingston S. Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention - Shorenstein Center. 1997;Research Paper R-18.https://shorensteincenter.org/clarifying-the-cnn-effect-media-effects-and-military-intervention/
338
Robinson P. The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. London: : Routledge 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=10716&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
339
Robinson P. The CNN effect: the myth of news foreign policy and intervention. New York: : Routledge 2002.
340
Wolfsfeld G. Media and political conflict: news from the Middle East. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
