1.
Curran J, Taylor & Francis Group. Media and Power. Routledge; 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
2.
Neilsen RK. The Power of Platforms. Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University. Published online 2018. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/risj-review/lecture-power-platforms
3.
United Kingdom - Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Published online 2018. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2018/united-kingdom-2018/
4.
Ananny M. Networked Press Freedom: Creating Infrastructures for a Public Right to Hear. The MIT Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037747.001.0001/upso-9780262037747
5.
Bell E. Who owns the news consumer: Social media platforms or publishers? Columbia Journalism Review. Published online 2016. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/platforms_and_publishers_new_research_from_the_tow_center.php
6.
Sloan L, Quan-Haase A. The Sage Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. First edition. SAGE Inc; 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-social-media-research-methods
7.
Nechushtai E. Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure? Journalism. 2018;19(8):1043-1058. doi:10.1177/1464884917725163
8.
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/
9.
Nielsen RK. Varieties of Online Gatekeeping. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2014. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2675055
10.
Kleis Nielsen R, Ganter SA. Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society. 2018;20(4):1600-1617. doi:10.1177/1461444817701318
11.
Peters C, Broersma MJ, eds. Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal Role and Public Relevance in a Digital Age. Routledge; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317506416
12.
Perloff RM, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. Routledge; 2014. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1575976
13.
Pew Research Centre. The Modern News Consumer. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
14.
Pew Research Centre. Election 2016: Campaigns as a Direct Source of News. http://www.journalism.org/topics/2016-election/
15.
Pew Research Centre. The Modern News Consumer. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
16.
Waisbord S. Truth is What Happens to News. Journalism Studies. 2018;19(13):1866-1878. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
17.
Toril Aalberg and James Curran, ed. How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. Vol Series: Routledge new developments in communication and society research. Routledge; 2012.
18.
C. Edwin Baker. Media, Markets, and Democracy. Vol Series: Communication, society, and politics. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
19.
Curran J. Media and Power. Routledge; 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
20.
Geneva Overholser, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, ed. The Press. Vol Series: Institutions of American democracy series. Oxford University Press; 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=84383&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
21.
J. Curran, S. Iyengar, A. Brink Lund, I. Salovaara-Moring. Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication. 2009;24(1):5-26. doi:10.1177/0267323108098943
22.
Graber, Doris. THE MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science. 2003;6(1):139-160. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=10609378&site=ehost-live
23.
Denis McQuail. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Sage Publications; 1992.
24.
Nielsen RK. The One Thing Journalism Just Might do for Democracy. Journalism Studies. 2017;18(10):1251-1262. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152
25.
M. Scammell. Rethinking the Media’s Duties to Democracy: watchdog, information and representation. Published online 2005. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Journalism%20Democracy%20%26%20Public%20Interest.pdf
26.
Michael Schudson. The Power of News. Harvard University Press; 1995.
27.
Schudson M, Dawson Books. Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Polity Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745675312
28.
Frank Esser, Jesper Stromback, ed. Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137275844
29.
Fred S. Siebert, Theodore Peterson, Wilbur Schramm. Four Theories of the Press. University of Illinois Press; 1984.
30.
John Street. Mass Media, Politics and Democracy. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
31.
Jesper Strömbäck. In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies. 2005;6(3):331-345. doi:10.1080/14616700500131950
32.
David Tewksbury, Jason Rittenberg. News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century. Vol Series: Oxford studies in digital politics. Oxford University Press; 2012.
33.
Van Aelst P, Strömbäck J, Aalberg T, et al. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association. 2017;41(1):3-27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
34.
JOHN ZALLER. A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication. 2003;20(2):109-130. doi:10.1080/10584600390211136
35.
Benjamin R. Barber. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press; 1984.
36.
Robert Alan Dahl. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press; 1989.
37.
David Held. Models of Democracy. 2nd ed. Polity; 1996.
38.
Brady AM. Plus ça change?: Media Control Under Xi Jinping. Problems of Post-Communism. 2017;64(3-4):128-140. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1197779
39.
Stockmann D. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087742
40.
Repnikova M. Media Openings and Political Transitions:                              versus. Problems of Post-Communism. 2017;64(3-4):141-151. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1307118
41.
King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review. 2017;111(03):484-501. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000144
42.
Roberts ME. Censored: Distraction and Diversion inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton University Press; 2018. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11341.html
43.
Liberation Technology. Journal of Democracy. 2010;21(3):69-83. doi:10.1353/jod.0.0190
44.
Egorov G, Guriev S, Sonin K. Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. The American Political Science Review. 2009;103(4):645-668. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27798530
45.
Freedom of the Press 2017. Published 2013. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2017
46.
Guriev S, Treisma D. How Modern Dictators Survive: Cooptation, Censorship, Propaganda, and Repression. CEPR discussion papers. Published online 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10454
47.
Daniel C. Hallin, Paolo Mancini. Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Vol Series: Communication, society and politics. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
48.
Morozov E. The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. Allen Lane; 2011.
49.
Norris P, World Bank, eds. Public Sentinel: News Media & Governance Reform. The World Bank; 2010.
50.
Pearce KE, Kendzior S. Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication. 2012;62(2):283-298. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x
51.
Reuter OJ, Szakonyi D. Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes. British Journal of Political Science. 2015;45(01):29-51. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000203
52.
Rød EG, Weidmann NB. Empowering activists or autocrats? The Internet in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Peace Research. 2015;52(3):338-351. doi:10.1177/0022343314555782
53.
Brady AM. Mass Persuasion as a Means of Legitimation and China’s Popular Authoritarianism. American Behavioral Scientist. 2009;53(3):434-457. doi:10.1177/0002764209338802
54.
Brady AM, ed. China’s Thought Management. Vol 40. Routledge; 2014.
55.
Chen Y, Yang DY. The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China. Published online 2018. https://calendar.mit.edu/event/the_impact_of_media_censorship_evidence_from_a_field_experiment_in_china#.XDN7q2ngqUk
56.
Creemers R. Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Contemporary China. 2017;26(103):85-100. doi:10.1080/10670564.2016.1206281
57.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Internet, Social Media, and a Changing China. (deLisle J, Goldstein A, Yang G, eds.). University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4540252
58.
Dimitrov MK. The Political Logic of Media Control in China. Problems of Post-Communism. 2017;64(3-4):121-127. doi:10.1080/10758216.2017.1318346
59.
Hassid J. Safety Valve or Pressure Cooker? Blogs in Chinese Political Life. Journal of Communication. 2012;62(2):212-230. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01634.x
60.
HOBBS WR, ROBERTS ME. How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information. American Political Science Review. 2018;112(03):621-636. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000084
61.
Huhe N, Tang M, Chen J. Creating Democratic Citizens: Political Effects of the Internet in China. Political Research Quarterly. 2018;71(4):757-771. doi:10.1177/1065912918764338
62.
King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review. 2013;107(02):326-343. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014
63.
Peter Lorentzen. China’s Strategic Censorship. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58(2):402-414. doi:10.1111/ajps.12065
64.
MacKinnon R. China’s ‘Networked Authoritarianism’. Journal of Democracy. 2011;22(2):32-46. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0033
65.
Meng B, SpringerLink (Online service). The Politics of Chinese Media: Consensus and Contestation. Palgrave Macmillan US; 2018. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46214-5
66.
Miller BA, Gallagher M. Astroturfing in China: Three Case Studies. Published 2016. http://blakeapm.com/
67.
Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y. Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017;31(1). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44133953
68.
Rawnsley GD, Rawnsley MYT, eds. Routledge Handbook of Chinese Media. Paperback edition. Routledge; 2018.
69.
Repnikova M. Media Politics in China: Improvising Power under Authoritarianism. University Printing House; 2017.
70.
Roberts ME, Stewart BM. Localization and Coordination: How Propaganda and Censorship Converge in Chinese Newspapers - Working paper. Published online 2014. https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/~/media/Files/Research/fordcenter/text-as-data-2014/RobertsStewartPropaganda.ashx
71.
Susan L. Shirk, ed. Changing Media, Changing China. Oxford University Press; 2011. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=602492
72.
D. Stockmann, M. E. Gallagher. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies. 2011;44(4):436-467. doi:10.1177/0010414010394773
73.
Stockmann D. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087742
74.
Sullivan J. China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society. 2014;16(1):24-37. doi:10.1177/1461444812472966
75.
Tager J, Glenn Bass K, Lopez S. Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China. Published online 2017. https://pen.org/research-resources/forbidden-feeds/
76.
L. Tang, H. Sampson. The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society. 2012;34(4):457-471. doi:10.1177/0163443711436358
77.
Wang H, Sparks C, Lü N, Huang Y. Differences within the mainland Chinese press: a quantitative analysis. Asian Journal of Communication. 2017;27(2):154-171. doi:10.1080/01292986.2016.1240818
78.
Xin X. Popularizing party journalism in China in the age of social media: The case of Xinhua News Agency. Global Media and China. 2018;3(1):3-17. doi:10.1177/2059436418768331
79.
Yang G. Internet Activism & the Party-State in China. Daedalus. 2014;143(2):110-123. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00276
80.
Peidong Y. ‘Positive Energy’: Hegemonic Intervention and Online Media Discourse in China’s Xi Jinping Era. China: An International Journal. 2018;16(1):1-22. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/688045
81.
Hallin DC, Mancini P. Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
82.
McQuail D. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Sage Publications; 1992. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=34349f5a-ef40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
83.
Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Routledge; 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
84.
Berry M. No alternative to austerity: how BBC broadcast news reported the deficit debate. Media, Culture & Society. 2016;38(6):844-863. doi:10.1177/0163443715620931
85.
Boden H. In Search of Unbiased Reporting in Light of Brexit, Trump and Other Reporting Challenges in the UK and US - Shorenstein Center. Published online 2017. https://shorensteincenter.org/unbiased-reporting-brexit-trump-uk-us/
86.
Entman RM. Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication. 2007;57(1):163-173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
87.
Hackett RA. Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 1984;1(3):229-259. doi:10.1080/15295038409360036
88.
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
89.
Starkey G. Balance and Bias in Journalism: Representation, Regulation, and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
90.
Aday S, Livingston S, Hebert M. Embedding the Truth. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2005;10(1):3-21. doi:10.1177/1081180X05275727
91.
Bell CV, Entman RM. The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2011;16(4):548-572. doi:10.1177/1940161211417334
92.
Benson R. Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
93.
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum. 2007;38(6):1190-1204. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
94.
Gamson WA, Modigliani A. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 1989;95(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
95.
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad News: Volume 1. Routledge; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
96.
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad News: Volume 1. Routledge; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
97.
Lawrence RG. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2004;9(3):56-75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04266581
98.
US Election Analysis 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/us-election-analysis-2016/introduction/
99.
Lundström R. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication. 2013;28(6):630-645. doi:10.1177/0267323113502737
100.
Philo G, Briant E, Donald P. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class. 2013;55(2):28-41. doi:10.1177/0306396813497873
101.
Roggeband C, Vliegenthart R. Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics. 2007;30(3):524-548. doi:10.1080/01402380701276352
102.
Rose M, Baumgartner FR. Framing the Poor: Media Coverage and U.S. Poverty Policy, 1960-2008. Policy Studies Journal. 2013;41(1):22-53. doi:10.1111/psj.12001
103.
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PMV. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication. 2000;50(2):93-109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
104.
Smith D, Deacon D. Immigration and the British news media: Continuity or change? Sociology Compass. 2018;12(9). doi:10.1111/soc4.12618
105.
American Behavioral Scientist : Special Issue Title: Framing Irregular Immigration in Western Media: Voices, Stories and Audience Impact. 2015;59(7). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/absb/59/7
106.
Van Gorp B. Where is the Frame? European Journal of Communication. 2005;20(4):484-507. doi:10.1177/0267323105058253
107.
Johnston H, Noakes JA, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc; 2005. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1322109
108.
Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Routledge; 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
109.
Bennett WL, Lawrence RG, Livingston S. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal. Journal of Communication. 2006;56(3):467-485. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
110.
Entman RM. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication. 2003;20(4):415-432. doi:10.1080/10584600390244176
111.
Shehata A. Facing the Muhammad Cartoons: Official Dominance and Event-Driven News in Swedish and American Elite Press. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2007;12(4):131-153. doi:10.1177/1081180X07307869
112.
Entman RM, Usher N. Framing in a Fractured Democracy: Impacts of Digital Technology on Ideology, Power and Cascading Network Activation. Journal of Communication. 2018;68(2):298-308. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx019
113.
Bennett WL. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication. 1990;40(2):103-127. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
114.
Bennett WL, Livingston S. Editors’ Introduction: A Semi-Independent Press: Government Control and Journalistic Autonomy in the Political Construction of News. Political Communication. 2003;20(4):359-362. doi:10.1080/10584600390244086
115.
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
116.
Ciboh R. Journalists and Political Sources in Nigeria. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2017;22(2):185-201. doi:10.1177/1940161216681164
117.
Cook TE. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press; 2005.
118.
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad News: Volume 1. Routledge; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
119.
Beharrell P, Hoggart R, Glasgow Media Group. Bad News: Volume 1. Routledge; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=455480
120.
Lawrence RG. Framing Obesity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2004;9(3):56-75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04266581
121.
Lundström R. Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication. 2013;28(6):630-645. doi:10.1177/0267323113502737
122.
Miller D. Official sources and `primary definition’: the case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society. 1993;15(3):385-406. doi:10.1177/016344393015003004
123.
Philo G, Briant E, Donald P. The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class. 2013;55(2):28-41. doi:10.1177/0306396813497873
124.
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PMV. Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication. 2000;50(2):93-109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
125.
Carragee KM, Roefs W. The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication. 2004;54(2):214-233. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
126.
Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science. 2007;10(1):103-126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
127.
Semetko HA, Scammell M. The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication. SAGE; 2012.
128.
Entman RM. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 1993;43(4):51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
129.
Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology. 1992;18. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083459
130.
Gamson W, Ryan C. Thinking about Elephants. Toward a Dialogue with George Lakoff. Public Eye Magazine. Published online 2005. http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n2/gamson_elephants.html
131.
Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press ed. Northeastern University Press; 1986.
132.
Pan Z, Kosicki G. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication. 1993;10(1):55-75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
133.
Perloff RM. The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. Second edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5108778
134.
Reese SD, Gandy OH, Grant AE. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
135.
Van Gorp B. The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication. 2007;57(1):60-78. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x
136.
Vliegenthart R, van Zoonen L. Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication. 2011;26(2):101-115. doi:10.1177/0267323111404838
137.
Bucy EP, Holbert RL. Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. Routledge; 2011.
138.
Matthes J, Kohring M. The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication. 2008;58(2):258-279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
139.
Murray R. Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office. Praeger Publishers; 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780313382499
140.
Harp D, Loke J, Bachmann I. Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Hearing Coverage: Political Competence, Authenticity, and the Persistence of the Double Bind. Women’s Studies in Communication. 2016;39(2):193-210. doi:10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267
141.
Higgins M, McKay FM. Gender and the development of a political persona: The case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics. 2016;11(3):283-300. doi:10.1057/bp.2015.44
142.
Miller MK, Peake JS. Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2013;18(4):482-507. doi:10.1177/1940161213495456
143.
McGregor SC, Lawrence RG, Cardona A. Personalization, gender, and social media: gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication & Society. 2017;20(2):264-283. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228
144.
Meeks L. Is She "Man Enough”? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication. 2012;62(1):175-193. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x
145.
Perry S. Gender Difference in French PoliticalCommunication: From Handicap to Asset? Modern & Contemporary France. 2005;13(3):337-352. doi:10.1080/09639480500177773
146.
Ward O. Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2017;22(1):43-66. doi:10.1177/1940161216673195
147.
Counting Women In - Centre for Women and Democracy. http://www.cfwd.org.uk/current-projects/counting-women-in
148.
Women and Journalism | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/women-and-journalism
149.
Aaldering L, Van Der Pas DJ. Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times. British Journal of Political Science. Published online 5 March 2018:1-21. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000795
150.
Aday S, Devitt J. Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2001;6(2):52-73. doi:10.1177/108118001129172134
151.
Adcock C. The Politician, The Wife, The Citizen, and her Newspaper. Feminist Media Studies. 2010;10(2):135-159. doi:10.1080/14680771003672254
152.
Bachmann I, Harp D, Loke J. Covering Clinton (2010–2015): meaning-making strategies in US magazine covers. Feminist Media Studies. 2018;18(5):793-809. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1358204
153.
Bauer NM. Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates. Political Psychology. 2015;36(6):691-708. doi:10.1111/pops.12186
154.
Campus D. Women Political Leaders and the Media. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137295545
155.
Carroll SJ. Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic. Politics & Gender. 2009;5(01). doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000014
156.
Craig SC, Rippere PS. He Said, She Said: The Impact of Candidate Gender in Negative Campaigns. Politics & Gender. 2016;12(02):391-414. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000550
157.
Dunaway J, Lawrence RG, Rose M, Weber CR. Traits versus Issues. Political Research Quarterly. 2013;66(3):715-726. doi:10.1177/1065912913491464
158.
Escobar-Lemmon MC, Hoekstra V, Kang A, Kittilson MC. Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies. Politics & Gender. 2016;12(02):254-274. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000234
159.
Fahey AC. French and Feminine: Hegemonic Masculinity and the Emasculation of John Kerry in the 2004 Presidential Race. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2007;24(2):132-150. doi:10.1080/07393180701262743
160.
Calhoun CJ. Habermas and the Public Sphere. MIT Press; 1992.
161.
Garcia-Blanco I, Wahl-Jorgensen K. The Discursive Construction of Women Politicians in the European Press. Feminist Media Studies. 2012;12(3):422-441. doi:10.1080/14680777.2011.615636
162.
Hayes D, Lawless JL. A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections. Perspectives on Politics. 2015;13(01):95-118. doi:10.1017/S1537592714003156
163.
Hayes D, Lawless JL. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. Cambridge University Press; 2016.
164.
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009;45(3):598-601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
165.
Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL, Cooper DP, Puvia E. From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011;47(3):572-581. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
166.
Jamieson KH. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford University Press; 1995.
167.
Kahn KF. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. Columbia University Press; 1996.
168.
Kittilson MC, Fridkin K. Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender. 2008;4(03). doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330
169.
Lachover E. Signs of change in media representation of women in Israeli politics: Leading and peripheral women contenders. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. 2017;18(4):446-463. doi:10.1177/1464884915610991
170.
Lawrence RG, Rose M. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2010.
171.
Ross K, Comrie M. The rules of the (leadership) game: Gender, politics and news. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. 2012;13(8):969-984. doi:10.1177/1464884911433255
172.
Meeks L. Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations. Politics & Gender. 2017;13(01):1-25. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000696
173.
Semetko HA, Boomgaarden HG. Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was Gender an Issue? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2007;12(4):154-171. doi:10.1177/1081180X07307383
174.
Thomas ML, Bittner A, eds. Mothers and Others: The Role of Parenthood in Politics. UBC Press; 2018.
175.
Trimble L, Wagner A, Sampert S, Raphael D, Gerrits B. Is It Personal? Gendered Mediation in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian National Party Leadership Contests, 1975–2012. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2013;18(4):462-481. doi:10.1177/1940161213495455
176.
Trimble L, Raphael D, Sampert S, Wagner A, Gerrits B. Politicizing Bodies: Hegemonic Masculinity, Heteronormativity, and Racism in News Representations of Canadian Political Party Leadership Candidates. Women’s Studies in Communication. 2015;38(3):314-330. doi:10.1080/07491409.2015.1062836
177.
Trimble LJ (Linda J. Ms. Prime Minister: Gender, Media, and Leadership. University of Toronto Press; 2017.
178.
Valenzuela S, Correa T. Press Coverage and Public Opinion On Women Candidates. International Communication Gazette. 2009;71(3):203-223. doi:10.1177/1748048508100913
179.
Zoonen L van. Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Rowman & Littlefield; 2005.
180.
Wagner A, Trimble L, Sampert S, Gerrits B. Gender, Competitiveness, and Candidate Visibility in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian Party Leadership Contests. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2017;22(4):471-489. doi:10.1177/1940161217723150
181.
Ward O. Seeing Double: Race, Gender, and Coverage of Minority Women’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives. Politics & Gender. 2016;12(02):317-343. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000222
182.
Wasburn PC, Wasburn MH. Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33(7):1027-1041. doi:10.1177/0163443711415744
183.
Kenski K, Jamieson KH, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001
184.
Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Routledge; 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
185.
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, eds. **Trump and the Media. The MIT Press; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
186.
W. Lance Bennett, Shanto Iyengar. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication. 2008;58(4):707-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
187.
Heinz Brandenburg, Marcel Van Egmond. Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science. 2012;42(02):441-463. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000445
188.
Curran J. Media and Power. Routledge; 2002. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203417744
189.
D. T. Denver. Elections and Voters in Britain. Vol Series: Contemporary Political Studies. 3rd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
190.
David M. Farrell & Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, ed. Do Political Campaigns Matter?: Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. Routledge; 2002.
191.
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Updated ed. University of Chicago Press; 2010.
192.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Everything You Think You Know about Politics-- and Why You’re Wrong. Basic Books; 2000.
193.
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, Hazel Gaudet. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 3d ed. Columbia University Press; 1965.
194.
Paul Manning. News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction. SAGE; 2001.
195.
Doris A. Graber. Media Power in Politics. 6th ed. CQ Press; 2011.
196.
William Lockley Miller. Media and Voters: The Audience, Content and Influence of Press and Television at the 1987 General Election. Clarendon Press; 1991.
197.
Diana Carole Mutz. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Vol Series: Cambridge studies in political psychology and public opinion. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
198.
D. C. Mutz, L. Young. Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ca Change? Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011;75(5):1018-1044. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr052
199.
NEWTON K. May the weak force be with you: The power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45(2):209-234. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x
200.
Pippa Norris. On Message: Communicating the Campaign. Sage; 1999.
201.
Samuel L. Popkin. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press; 1991.
202.
John Street. Mass Media, Politics, and Democracy. Palgrave; 2001.
203.
Lynn Vavreck. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton University Press; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400830480
204.
Lynda Lee Kaid. Handbook of Political Communication Research. Vol Series: LEA’s communication series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
205.
Lawrence Leduc. Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research. 2002;41(6):711-732. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00027
206.
Schuck ART, de Vreese CH. Reversed Mobilization in Referendum Campaigns: How Positive News Framing Can Mobilize the Skeptics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2008;14(1):40-66. doi:10.1177/1940161208326926
207.
C. H. de Vreese, Holli A. Semetko. Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. Vol Series: Routledge research in political communication. Routledge; 2004.
208.
C. H. de Vreese. The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230591189
209.
M. Wettstein. Frame Adoption in Referendum Campaigns: The Effect of News Coverage on the Public Salience of Issue Interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56(3):318-333. doi:10.1177/0002764211426328
210.
Chadwick A. **The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
211.
Grasseger H, Krogerus M. The Data That Turned the World Upside Down. Motherboard. Published online 2017. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9vvn/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win
212.
Baldwin-Philippi J. The Myths of Data-Driven Campaigning. Political Communication. 2017;34(4):627-633. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1372999
213.
50,000 Heck*ng Facebook Ad Variants?! – Steve Olson – Medium. https://medium.com/@steveolson/50-000-heck-ng-facebook-ad-variants-31eed233ac4a
214.
Chadwick A, Howard PN, Dawson Books. Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Routledge; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203962541
215.
Vaccari C, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=3318750
216.
Klinger U, Russmann U. "Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2017;14(4):299-313. doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1369919
217.
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, Russmann U. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 2017;20(11):1698-1719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
218.
Theviot A. Towards a standardization of campaign strategies dictated by the Obama ‘model’? The case of ‘American-style’ canvassing during the 2012 French presidential election campaign. French Politics. 2016;14(2):158-177. doi:10.1057/fp.2016.7
219.
Digital-Born and Legacy News Media on Twitter during the UK General Election. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Digital-Born%20and%20Legacy%20News%20Media%20UK%20Factsheet.pdf
220.
Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016. Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2016. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journal/41253/14/2
221.
Jungherr A. Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2016;21(3):358-377. doi:10.1177/1940161216642597
222.
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, Russmann U. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 2017;20(11):1698-1719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
223.
Magin M, Podschuweit N, Haßler J, Russmann U. Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society. 2017;20(11):1698-1719. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
224.
Dommett K, Temple L. Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 2018;71(suppl_1):189-202. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx056
225.
Wring D, Mortimore R, Atkinson S, eds. Political Communication in Britain. Springer International Publishing; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40934-4
226.
Holtz-Bacha C, Just MR. Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising. Routledge; 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315694504
227.
Alexander JC. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. Oxford University Press; 2010. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744466.001.0001
228.
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, eds. Trump and the Media. The MIT Press; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
229.
Enli G. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication. 2017;32(1):50-61. doi:10.1177/0267323116682802
230.
Karpf D. Digital politics after Trump. Annals of the International Communication Association. 2017;41(2):198-207. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1316675
231.
Faris RM, Roberts H, Etling B, Bourassa N, Zuckerman E, Benkler Y. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Published online 2017. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/mediacloud
232.
Issenberg S. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. First paperback edition. B/D/W/Y, Broadway Books; 2013.
233.
Kim YM, Hsu J, Neiman D, et al. The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication. 2018;35(4):515-541. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425
234.
Kreiss D, McGregor SC. Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication. 2018;35(2):155-177. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
235.
Kreiss D. Trump, Breitbart, and the Rejection of Multicultural Democracy – Medium. Published online 2017. https://medium.com/@dkreiss/trump-breitbart-and-the-rejection-of-multicultural-democracy-90f3f776bebd
236.
Lawrence RG, Boydstun AE. What We Should Really Be Asking About Media Attention to Trump. Political Communication. 2017;34(1):150-153. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1262700
237.
Lilleker D, Jackson D, Thorsen E, Veneti A, eds. US Election Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK; 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/
238.
Patterson TE. Pre-Primary News Coverage of the 2016 Presidential Race: Trump’s Rise, Sanders’ Emergence, Clinton’s Struggle - Shorenstein Centre on Media, Politics and Public Policy. Published online 2016. https://shorensteincenter.org/pre-primary-news-coverage-2016-trump-clinton-sanders
239.
Penney J. Social Media and Citizen Participation in "Official” and "Unofficial” Electoral Promotion: A Structural Analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders Digital Campaign. Journal of Communication. 2017;67(3):402-423. doi:10.1111/jcom.12300
240.
Sides J, Farrell H. The Science of Trump: Explaining the Rise of an Unlikely Candidate. The Monkey Cage; 2016. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Trump-Explaining-Unlikely-Candidate-ebook/dp/B01IL9DTG8
241.
Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, eds. Trump and the Media. The MIT Press; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
242.
Wells C, Shah DV, Pevehouse JC, et al. How Trump Drove Coverage to the Nomination: Hybrid Media Campaigning. Political Communication. 2016;33(4):669-676. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416
243.
Blumler JG. Guest contribution by Jay G. Blumler: "The Fourth Age of Political Communication”. Published 2013. http://www.fgpk.de/en/2013/gastbeitrag-von-jay-g-blumler-the-fourth-age-of-political-communication-2/
244.
Downs WM. There Goes the Neighbourhood? The ‘Americanisation’ of Elections, with Evidence from Scotland’s Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 2012;65(4):758-777. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr034
245.
Caramani D, ed. Comparative Politics. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
246.
Esser F, Pfetsch B. Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
247.
Holtz-Bacha C, Just MR. Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising. Routledge; 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315694504
248.
Norris P. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
249.
Scammell M. Consumer Democracy: The Marketing of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046107
250.
Strömbäck J, Kaid LL. The Handbook of Election News Coverage around the World. Routledge; 2008.
251.
Reinemann C, ed. Political Communication. Vol volume 18. De Gruyter Mouton; 2014.
252.
Swanson DL, Mancini P. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Praeger; 1996.
253.
Tenscher J, Mykkänen J, Moring T. Modes of professional campaigning: A four country comparison in the European parliamentary elections, 2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2012;17(2):145-168. doi:10.1177/1940161211433839
254.
Tenscher J, Koc-Michalska K, Lilleker DG, et al. The professionals speak: Practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication. 2016;31(2):95-119. doi:10.1177/0267323115612212
255.
West DM, Brookings Institution. Air Wars: Television Advertising and Social Media in Election Campaigns, 1952-2016. 7 edition. SAGE/CQ Press; 2018.
256.
Baldwin-Philippi J. Using Technology, Building Democracy: Digital Campaigning and the Construction of Citizenship. Oxford University Press; 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231910.001.0001
257.
Bennett WL, Segerberg A, Knüpfer CB. The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society. 2018;21(11):1655-1680. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
258.
Bruns A, Enli G, Skogerbø E, Larsson AO, Christensen C, eds. The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. Routledge; 2015. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4218813
259.
Chadwick A, Stromer-Galley J, eds. Special Issue Title: Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Election Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 21(3). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/hijb/21/3
260.
Dimitrova DV, Matthes J. Social Media in Political Campaigning Around the World: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2018;95(2):333-342. doi:10.1177/1077699018770437
261.
Freelon D, Karpf D. Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society. 2015;18(4):390-406. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659
262.
Gibson RK, McAllister I. Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies. 2015;63(3):529-547. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12107
263.
Karpf D. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. Oxford University Press; 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898367.001.0001
264.
Karpf D. Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. Oxford University Press; 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190266127.001.0001
265.
Kreiss D. Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford University Press; 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782536.001.0001
266.
Coleman S, Freelon D, eds. Handbook of Digital Politics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; 2015.
267.
Kreiss D. Prototype Politics: Technology-Intense Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001
268.
Kreiss D. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society. 2016;18(8):1473-1490. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445
269.
Lilleker DG, Jackson NA. Political Campaigning, Elections and the Internet: Comparing the US, UK, France and Germany. Vol 4. Routledge; 2011.
270.
Lilleker DG, Tenscher J, Štětka V. Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society. 2015;18(7):747-765. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.993679
271.
Nielsen RK. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton University Press; 2012.
272.
Stromer-Galley J. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. Oxford University Press; 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731930.001.0001
273.
Vaccari C. From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns. New Media & Society. 2013;15(1):109-127. doi:10.1177/1461444812457336
274.
Vaccari C. Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=3318750
275.
Fisher J, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315712390
276.
Dawson Books. Populist Political Communication in Europe. Vol 1. (Aalberg T, Esser F, Strömbäck J, Vreese CH de, eds.). Routledge; 2017. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315623016
277.
US Election Analysis 2016. http://www.electionanalysis2016.us/us-election-analysis-2016/introduction/
278.
Mark Rice-Oxley. How to spot a populist. Guardian. Published online 3 December 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/dec/03/what-is-populism-trump-farage-orban-bolsonaro
279.
Ernst N, Esser F, Blassnig S, Engesser S. Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Published online 22 December 2018. doi:10.1177/1940161218819430
280.
Wettstein M, Esser F, Schulz A, Wirz DS, Wirth W. News Media as Gatekeepers, Critics, and Initiators of Populist Communication: How Journalists in Ten Countries Deal with the Populist Challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2018;23(4):476-495. doi:10.1177/1940161218785979
281.
Albertazzi D, McDonnell D. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
282.
Elena Block. The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication. 2017;11. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5820
283.
Bos L, van der Brug W, de Vreese C. How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Political Communication. 2011;28(2):182-206. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
284.
Bos L, Brants K. Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication. 2014;29(6):703-719. doi:10.1177/0267323114545709
285.
de Vreese CH, Esser F, Aalberg T, Reinemann C, Stanyer J. Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2018;23(4):423-438. doi:10.1177/1940161218790035
286.
Jagers J, Walgrave S. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research. 2007;46(3):319-345. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
287.
Jensen MJ, Bang HP. Populism and Connectivism: An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns. Journal of Political Marketing. 2017;16(3-4):343-364. doi:10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846
288.
Kavada A. Editorial: media and the ‘populist moment’. Media, Culture & Society. 2018;40(5):742-744. doi:10.1177/0163443718772144
289.
ProQuest (Firm). Trump and the Media. (Boczkowski PJ, Papacharissi Z, eds.). The MIT Press; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5326880
290.
Mazzoleni G, Stewart J, Horsfield B. The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Praeger; 2003.
291.
Murphy J, Devine D. Does Media Coverage Drive Public Support for UKIP or Does Public Support for UKIP Drive Media Coverage? British Journal of Political Science. Published online 31 July 2018:1-18. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000145
292.
Rooduijn M. The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies. 2014;62(4):726-744. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12074
293.
Thesen G. News content and populist radical right party support. The case of Denmark. Electoral Studies. 2018;56:80-89. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.003
294.
Vliegenthart R, Boomgaarden HG, Van Spanje J. Anti-Immigrant Party Support and Media Visibility: A Cross-Party, Over-Time Perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2012;22(3):315-358. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.693933
295.
Wirth W. The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication — NCCR Democracy. Published online 2016. http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/wp88
296.
Wood M, Corbett J, Flinders M. Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2016;18(3):581-598. doi:10.1177/1369148116632182
297.
Political Populism: A Handbook, Heinisch: Christina Holtz-Bacha, Oscar Mazzoleni (Eds.). Vol Band 3. 1st edition. Nomos; 2017.
298.
Inglehart R, Norris P. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2016. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2818659
299.
Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart PA, Ochoa Espejo P, Ostiguy P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
300.
Müller JW. What Is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016.
301.
March L. Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2017;19(2):282-303. doi:10.1177/1369148117701753
302.
Moffitt B, Tormey S. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies. 2014;62(2):381-397. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032
303.
Mudde C. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. 2004;39(4):542-563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
304.
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge University Press; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365
305.
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 510. Oxford University Press; 2017.
306.
Oliver JE, Rahn WM. Rise of the. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2016;667(1):189-206. doi:10.1177/0002716216662639
307.
Pauwels T. Measuring Populism: A Quantitative Text Analysis of Party Literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2011;21(1):97-119. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
308.
Rooduijn M, Pauwels T. Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics. 2011;34(6):1272-1283. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665
309.
Snow D, Moffitt B. Straddling the divide: mainstream populism and conservatism in Howard’s Australia and Harper’s Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2012;50(3):271-292. doi:10.1080/14662043.2012.692922
310.
Stoker G, Hay C. Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens. Political Studies. 2017;65(1):4-23. doi:10.1177/0032321715607511
311.
Weyland K. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics. 2001;34(1). doi:10.2307/422412
312.
Sevenans J. One concept, many interpretations: the media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes. European Political Science Review. 2018;10(02):245-265. doi:10.1017/S1755773917000078
313.
Wolfsfeld G. Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. Routledge; 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203839874
314.
Dekker R, Scholten P. Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2017;22(2):202-222. doi:10.1177/1940161216688323
315.
Elmelund-Præstekær C, Wien C. What’s the Fuss About? The Interplay of Media Hypes and Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2008;13(3):247-266. doi:10.1177/1940161208319292
316.
Ihlen Ø, Thorbjørnsrud K. Making news and influencing decisions: Three threshold cases concerning forced return of immigrants. European Journal of Communication. 2014;29(2):139-152. doi:10.1177/0267323114523149
317.
Melenhorst L. The Media’s Role in Lawmaking. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2015;20(3):297-316. doi:10.1177/1940161215581924
318.
Milne K. Manufacturing Dissent : Single-Issue Protest, the Public and the Press. Demos; 2005. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/manufacturingdissent.pdf
319.
Robinson P. Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics. European Journal of Communication. 2001;16(4):523-544. doi:10.1177/0267323101016004005
320.
Aday S, Livingston S. Taking the state out of state—media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press—state dynamic. Media, War & Conflict. 2008;1(1):99-107. doi:10.1177/1750635207087630
321.
Reinemann C, ed. Political Communication. Vol volume 18. De Gruyter Mouton; 2014.
322.
Van Aelst P, Walgrave S. Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites. Journal of Communication. 2016;66(3):496-518. doi:10.1111/jcom.12229
323.
Iyengar S, Reeves R. Do the Media Govern?: Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America. SAGE Publications; 1997.
324.
Schnell KC Frauke. Assessing the Democratic Debate: How the News Media Frame Elite Policy Discourse. Political Communication. 2001;18(2):183-213. doi:10.1080/105846001750322970
325.
Joly J. Do the Media Influence Foreign Aid Because or in Spite of the Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Belgian Aid Determinants. Political Communication. 2014;31(4):584-603. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.879361
326.
Jones BD, Baumgartner FR. From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal. 2012;40(1):1-20. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
327.
Kennamer JD. Public Opinion, the Press, and Public Policy. Paperback ed. Praeger; 1994.
328.
Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. Longman; 2003.
329.
Koch-Baumgarten S, Voltmer K. Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making. Vol 66. Routledge/ECPR; 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=257161&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
330.
Koch-Baumgarten S, Voltmer K. Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making. Vol 66. Routledge/ECPR; 2010.
331.
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. University of Chicago Press; 1992.
332.
Walgrave S, Soroka S, Nuytemans M. The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power. Comparative Political Studies. 2008;41(6):814-836. doi:10.1177/0010414006299098
333.
Walgrave S, Van Aelst P. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication. 2006;56(1):88-109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
334.
Yanovitzky I. Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions. Communication Research. 2002;29(4):422-451. doi:10.1177/0093650202029004003
335.
Bennett WL, Paletz DL. Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. University of Chicago Press; 1994.
336.
Gilboa E. The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations. Political Communication. 2005;22(1):27-44. doi:10.1080/10584600590908429
337.
Livingston S. Clarifying the CNN Effect: An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention - Shorenstein Center. 1997;Research Paper R-18. https://shorensteincenter.org/clarifying-the-cnn-effect-media-effects-and-military-intervention/
338.
Robinson P. The CNN Effect: The Myth of News Foreign Policy and Intervention. Routledge; 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=10716&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
339.
Robinson P. The CNN Effect: The Myth of News Foreign Policy and Intervention. Routledge; 2002.
340.
Wolfsfeld G. Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge University Press; 1997.