Bibliography for Philosophy of Perception BETA

A. M. Quinton. 1955. ‘The Problem of Perception’. Mind 64 (253): 28–51. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2251042.

Austin, J. L., and G. J. Warnock. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon.

Ayer, A. J. 1940. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan and Co.

Bermudez, Jose Luis. 2000. ‘Naturalized Sense Data’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2653655.

Block, Ned. 1996. ‘Mental Paint and Mental Latex’. Philosophical Issues 7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1522889.

Block, Ned Joel, Owen J. Flanagan, and Güven Güzeldere. 1997. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Block, Ned, and Michael Tye. 1998. ‘Is Experiencing Just Representing?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2653766.

Byrne, Alex. 2001. ‘Intentionalism Defended’. The Philosophical Review 110 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2693675.

Child, William. 1992. ‘Vision and Experience: The Causal Theory and the Disjunctive Conception’. The Philosophical Quarterly 42 (168). https://doi.org/10.2307/2219682.

Craig, Edward and Routledge (Firm). 2003. ‘Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online’. New York, N.Y.: Routledge. 2003. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://rep.routledge.com.

Crane, Tim, and Craig French. n.d. ‘The Problem of Perception’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/.

Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

———. 1988. Perceptual Knowledge. Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d71d563c-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Dretske, Fred. 2003. ‘Experience as Representation’. Philosophical Issues 13 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1533-6077.00005.

Dretske, Fred I. 1997. Naturalizing the Mind. Vol. Jean Nicod lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/naturalizing-mind.

Fish, William and Oxford University Press. 2009. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Vol. Philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381344.001.0001.

Gangopadhyay, Nivedita, Michael Madary, Finn Spicer, and Oxford University Press. 2010. Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551118.001.0001.

Gendler, Tamar, and John Hawthorne. 2010. Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.001.0001.

Haddock, Adrian, Fiona Macpherson, and Oxford University Press. 2008a. Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001.

———. 2008b. Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001.

Harman, Gilbert. 1990. ‘The Intrinsic Quality of Experience’. Philosophical Perspectives 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214186.

Hawley, Katherine, and Fiona Macpherson. 2011. The Admissible Contents of Experience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781444343892.

Huemer, Michael. n.d. ‘Sense-Data’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sense-data/.

Jackson, Frank. 1977. Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1993. Perception: A Representative Theory. Vol. Modern revivals in philosophy. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals.

Kind, Amy. 2003. ‘What’s so Transparent about Transparency?’ Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 115 (3): 225–44. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321404.

Lewis, David. 1980. ‘Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (3): 239–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408012341251.

Logue, Heather. 2012. ‘Why Naïve Realism?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 112 (2pt2): 211–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x.

Lowe, E. J. 1996. Subjects of Experience. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2000a. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950.

———. 2000b. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950.

———. 2000c. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950.

Lycan, William. n.d. ‘Representational Theories of Consciousness’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/consciousness-representational/.

Lycan, William G. 1996. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=48459&site=ehost-live.

Macpherson, Fiona. 2003. ‘Novel Colours and the Content of Experience’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1): 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00162.

———. 2005. ‘Colour Inversion Problems for Representationalism’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1): 127–52. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040782.

Martin, M. G. F. 2004. ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 120 (1): 37–89. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321508.

Millar, Alan. 1996. ‘The Idea of Experience’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 75–90. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545229.

Moore, G. E. 1953. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. Vol. Muirhead library of philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.

Noë, Alva. 2003. ‘Causation and Perception: The Puzzle Unravelled’. Analysis 63 (2): 93–100. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3329214.

Nudds, M. 2009. ‘Recent Work in Perception: Naive Realism and Its Opponents’. Analysis 69 (2): 334–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp039.

O’Callaghan, Casey. 2012. ‘Perception’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by Keith Frankish and William Ramsey, 73–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033916.007.

Pitcher, George. 1971. A Theory of Perception. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Prinz, Jesse. 2006. ‘Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception’. Psyche 12 (1). http://journalpsyche.org/files/0xaae8.pdf.

Raffman, Diana. n.d. ‘Similarity Spaces’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-030.

Rescorla, Michael. n.d. ‘Bayesian Perceptual Psychology’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-010.

Robinson, Howard. 2001. Perception. Vol. The problems of philosophy. London: Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203164358.

Russell, Bertrand. 2009. The Problems of Philosophy. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5827/5827-h/5827-h.htm.

Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Schilpp, Paul Arthur. 1942. The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. Vol. The library of living philosophers. Evanston: Northwestern University.

Seager, William and MyiLibrary. 1999. Theories of Consciousness: An Introduction and Assessment. Vol. Philosophical issues in science. London: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=19487&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth.

Shapiro, Larry. 2007. ‘The Embodied Cognition Research Programme’. Philosophy Compass 2 (2): 338–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x.

Siegel, Susanna. 2006. ‘Which Properties Are Represented in Perception?’ In Perceptual Experience, edited by Tamar Szabo Gendler and John Hawthorne, 481–503. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0015.

Smith, A. D. 2002. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Snowdon, Paul. 1981. ‘Perception, Vision and Causation’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 175–92. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544972.

Swartz, Robert J. 1965. Perceiving, Sensing and Knowing: A Book of Readings from Twentieth-Century Sources in the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Doubleday.

Tye, Michael. 1982. ‘A Causal Analysis of Seeing’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2107488.

———. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Vol. Representation and mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/ten-problems-of-consciousness.

———. 1998. ‘Inverted Earth, Swampman, and Representationism’. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 459–77. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676158.

———. 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Vol. Representation and mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/consciousness-color-and-content.

Warnock, G. J. 1967. The Philosophy of Perception. Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

‘Whatever next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science’. 2013. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (03): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477.

Wright, Edmond Leo. 2008. The Case for Qualia. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262232661.001.0001.

Wright, Wayne. 2015. ‘Nonconceptual Content’. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception, edited by Mohan Matthen, First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.003.