1.
Crane T, French C. The Problem of Perception. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Internet]. [Stanford, Calif.]: Stanford University; Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/
2.
O’Callaghan C. Perception. In: Frankish K, Ramsey W, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 73–91. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033916
3.
Lowe EJ. An introduction to the philosophy of mind [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950
4.
Lowe EJ. An introduction to the philosophy of mind [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950
5.
Huemer M. Sense-Data. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy [Internet]. [Stanford, Calif.]: Stanford University; Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sense-data/
6.
Craig E, Routledge (Firm). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy online [Internet]. New York, N.Y.: Routledge; 2003. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://rep.routledge.com
7.
Russell B. The Problems of Philosophy [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5827/5827-h/5827-h.htm
8.
Moore GE. Some main problems of philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin; 1953.
9.
Ayer AJ. The foundations of empirical knowledge. London: Macmillan and Co; 1940.
10.
Jackson F. Perception: a representative theory. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals; 1993.
11.
Robinson H. Perception [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2001. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203164358
12.
Bermudez JL. Naturalized Sense Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2000 Sep;61(2).
13.
Ryle G. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson; 1949.
14.
Austin JL, Warnock GJ. Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon; 1962.
15.
Pitcher G. A theory of perception. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1971.
16.
A. M. Quinton. The Problem of Perception. Mind [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1955;64(253):28–51. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2251042
17.
Swartz RJ. Perceiving, sensing and knowing: a book of readings from twentieth-century sources in the philosophy of perception. New York: Doubleday; 1965.
18.
Schilpp PA. The philosophy of G.E. Moore. Evanston: Northwestern University; 1942.
19.
Dancy J. An introduction to contemporary epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1985.
20.
Jackson F. Perception: a representative theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.
21.
Lowe EJ. An introduction to the philosophy of mind [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950
22.
Warnock GJ. The Philosophy of perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1967.
23.
Lewis D. Veridical hallucination and prosthetic vision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1980 Sep;58(3):239–249.
24.
Lowe EJ. Subjects of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
25.
Tye M. A Causal Analysis of Seeing. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1982 Mar;42(3).
26.
Noë A. Causation and Perception: The Puzzle Unravelled. Analysis [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2003;63(2):93–100. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3329214
27.
Lycan W. Representational Theories of Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive [Internet]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/consciousness-representational/
28.
Seager W, MyiLibrary. Theories of consciousness: an introduction and assessment [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=19487&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
29.
Dretske F. Experience as Representation. Philosophical Issues. 2003 Oct;13(1):67–82.
30.
Harman G. The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. 1990;4. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214186
31.
Tye M. Inverted Earth, Swampman, and Representationism. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. Ridgeview Publishing Company; 1998;12:459–477. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676158
32.
Dretske FI. Naturalizing the mind [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 1997. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/naturalizing-mind
33.
Lycan WG. Consciousness and experience [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1996. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=48459&site=ehost-live
34.
Tye M. Ten problems of consciousness: a representational theory of the phenomenal mind [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 1995. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/ten-problems-of-consciousness
35.
Tye M. Consciousness, color, and content [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2000. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/consciousness-color-and-content
36.
Byrne A. Intentionalism Defended. The Philosophical Review [Internet]. 2001 Apr;110(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2693675
37.
Block NJ, Flanagan OJ, Güzeldere G. The nature of consciousness: philosophical debates. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1997.
38.
Block N. Mental Paint and Mental Latex. Philosophical Issues. 1996;7.
39.
Block N, Tye M. Is Experiencing Just Representing? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1998 Sep;58(3).
40.
Kind A. What’s so Transparent about Transparency? Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition [Internet]. Springer; 2003;115(3):225–244. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321404
41.
Macpherson F. Colour Inversion Problems for Representationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research [Internet]. International Phenomenological Society; 2005;70(1):127–152. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040782
42.
Macpherson F. Novel Colours and the Content of Experience. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly [Internet]. 2003 Mar;84(1):43–66. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0114.00162/abstract
43.
Wright EL. The case for qualia [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2008. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262232661.001.0001
44.
Wright W. Nonconceptual Content. In: Matthen M, editor. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception [Internet]. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001
45.
Smith AD. The problem of perception. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2002.
46.
Siegel S. Which Properties are Represented in Perception? In: Gendler TS, Hawthorne J, editors. Perceptual Experience [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 481–503. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.001.0001/acprof-9780199289769-chapter-15
47.
Hawley K, Macpherson F. The admissible contents of experience [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781444343892
48.
Haddock A, Macpherson F, Oxford University Press. Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001
49.
Dancy J. Perceptual knowledge [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d71d563c-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
50.
Snowdon P. Perception, Vision and Causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society [Internet]. Wiley; 1981;81:175–192. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544972
51.
Martin MGF. The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition [Internet]. Springer; 2004;120(1):37–89. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321508
52.
Fish W, Oxford University Press. Perception, hallucination, and illusion [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381344.001.0001
53.
Child W. Vision and Experience: The Causal theory and the Disjunctive Conception. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1992 Jul;42(168).
54.
Millar A. The Idea of Experience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society [Internet]. Wiley; 1996;96:75–90. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545229
55.
Gendler T, Hawthorne J. Perceptual experience [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 2010. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.001.0001
56.
Logue H. Why Naïve Realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback). 2012 Jul;112(2pt2):211–237.
57.
Nudds M. Recent Work in Perception: Naive Realism and its Opponents. Analysis. 2009 Apr 1;69(2):334–346.
58.
Haddock A, Macpherson F, Oxford University Press. Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001
59.
Shapiro L. The Embodied Cognition Research Programme. Philosophy Compass. 2007 Mar;2(2):338–346.
60.
Gangopadhyay N, Madary M, Spicer F, Oxford University Press. Perception, action, and consciousness: sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551118.001.0001
61.
Prinz J. Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception. Psyche [Internet]. 2006;12(1). Available from: http://journalpsyche.org/files/0xaae8.pdf
62.
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013 Jun;36(03):181–204.
63.
Raffman D. Similarity Spaces. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-030
64.
Rescorla M. Bayesian Perceptual Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-010
