A. M. Quinton. ‘The Problem of Perception’. Mind 64.253 (1955): 28–51. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2251042>.
Austin, J. L., and G. J. Warnock. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962. Print.
Ayer, A. J. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan and Co, 1940. Print.
Bermudez, Jose Luis. ‘Naturalized Sense Data’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61.2 (2000): n. pag. Web.
Block, Ned. ‘Mental Paint and Mental Latex’. Philosophical Issues 7 (1996): n. pag. Web.
Block, Ned Joel, Owen J. Flanagan, and Güven Güzeldere. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1997. Print.
Block, Ned, and Michael Tye. ‘Is Experiencing Just Representing?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58.3 (1998): n. pag. Web.
Byrne, Alex. ‘Intentionalism Defended’. The Philosophical Review 110.2 (2001): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2693675>.
Child, William. ‘Vision and Experience: The Causal Theory and the Disjunctive Conception’. The Philosophical Quarterly 42.168 (1992): n. pag. Web.
Craig, Edward and Routledge (Firm). ‘Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online’. Routledge, 2003. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://rep.routledge.com>.
Crane, Tim, and Craig French. ‘The Problem of Perception’. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy n. pag. Web. <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/>.
Dancy, Jonathan. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1985. Print.
---. Perceptual Knowledge. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d71d563c-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.
Dretske, Fred. ‘Experience as Representation’. Philosophical Issues 13.1 (2003): 67–82. Web.
Dretske, Fred I. Naturalizing the Mind. Jean Nicod lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1997. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/naturalizing-mind>.
Fish, William and Oxford University Press. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381344.001.0001>.
Gangopadhyay, Nivedita et al. Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551118.001.0001>.
Gendler, Tamar, and John Hawthorne. Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon, 2010. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.001.0001>.
Haddock, Adrian, Fiona Macpherson, and Oxford University Press. Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001>.
---. Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.001.0001>.
Harman, Gilbert. ‘The Intrinsic Quality of Experience’. Philosophical Perspectives 4 (1990): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214186>.
Hawley, Katherine, and Fiona Macpherson. The Admissible Contents of Experience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781444343892>.
Huemer, Michael. ‘Sense-Data’. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy n. pag. Web. <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sense-data/>.
Jackson, Frank. Perception: A Representative Theory. Modern revivals in philosophy. Aldershot: Gregg Revivals, 1993. Print.
---. Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. Print.
Kind, Amy. ‘What’s so Transparent about Transparency?’ Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 115.3 (2003): 225–244. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321404>.
Lewis, David. ‘Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58.3 (1980): 239–249. Web.
Logue, Heather. ‘Why Naïve Realism?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 112.2pt2 (2012): 211–237. Web.
Lowe, E. J. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950>.
---. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950>.
---. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=201950>.
---. Subjects of Experience. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Print.
Lycan, William. ‘Representational Theories of Consciousness’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive n. pag. Web. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/consciousness-representational/>.
Lycan, William G. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=48459&amp;site=ehost-live>.
Macpherson, Fiona. ‘Colour Inversion Problems for Representationalism’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70.1 (2005): 127–152. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040782>.
---. ‘Novel Colours and the Content of Experience’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84.1 (2003): 43–66. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0114.00162/abstract>.
Martin, M. G. F. ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 120.1 (2004): 37–89. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4321508>.
Millar, Alan. ‘The Idea of Experience’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1996): 75–90. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545229>.
Moore, G. E. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. Muirhead library of philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1953. Print.
Noë, Alva. ‘Causation and Perception: The Puzzle Unravelled’. Analysis 63.2 (2003): 93–100. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3329214>.
Nudds, M. ‘Recent Work in Perception: Naive Realism and Its Opponents’. Analysis 69.2 (2009): 334–346. Web.
O’Callaghan, Casey. ‘Perception’. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science. Ed. Keith Frankish and William Ramsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 73–91. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033916>.
Pitcher, George. A Theory of Perception. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971. Print.
Prinz, Jesse. ‘Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception’. Psyche 12.1 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://journalpsyche.org/files/0xaae8.pdf>.
Raffman, Diana. ‘Similarity Spaces’. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. N.p. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-030>.
Rescorla, Michael. ‘Bayesian Perceptual Psychology’. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. N.p. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199600472-e-010>.
Robinson, Howard. Perception. The problems of philosophy. London: Routledge, 2001. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203164358>.
Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. N.p., 2009. Web. <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5827/5827-h/5827-h.htm>.
Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949. Print.
Schilpp, Paul Arthur. The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. The library of living philosophers. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1942. Print.
Seager, William and MyiLibrary. Theories of Consciousness: An Introduction and Assessment. Philosophical issues in science. London: Routledge, 1999. Web. <http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=19487&amp;entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Shapiro, Larry. ‘The Embodied Cognition Research Programme’. Philosophy Compass 2.2 (2007): 338–346. Web.
Siegel, Susanna. ‘Which Properties Are Represented in Perception?’ Perceptual Experience. Ed. Tamar Szabo Gendler and John Hawthorne. Oxford University Press, 2006. 481–503. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.001.0001/acprof-9780199289769-chapter-15>.
Smith, A. D. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2002. Print.
Snowdon, Paul. ‘Perception, Vision and Causation’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81 (1981): 175–192. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544972>.
Swartz, Robert J. Perceiving, Sensing and Knowing: A Book of Readings from Twentieth-Century Sources in the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Doubleday, 1965. Print.
Tye, Michael. ‘A Causal Analysis of Seeing’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42.3 (1982): n. pag. Web.
---. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Representation and mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2000. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/consciousness-color-and-content>.
---. ‘Inverted Earth, Swampman, and Representationism’. Philosophical Perspectives 12 (1998): 459–477. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676158>.
---. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Representation and mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1995. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://cognet.mit.edu/book/ten-problems-of-consciousness>.
Warnock, G. J. The Philosophy of Perception. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967. Print.
‘Whatever next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36.03 (2013): 181–204. Web.
Wright, Edmond Leo. The Case for Qualia. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262232661.001.0001>.
Wright, Wayne. ‘Nonconceptual Content’. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Ed. Mohan Matthen. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.001.0001>.