1.
Crane, T., French, C.: The Problem of Perception. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
2.
O’Callaghan, C.: Perception. In: Frankish, K. and Ramsey, W. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science. pp. 73–91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033916.007.
3.
Lowe, E.J.: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
4.
Lowe, E.J.: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
5.
Huemer, M.: Sense-Data. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
6.
Craig, E., Routledge (Firm): Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy online, http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://rep.routledge.com.
7.
Russell, B.: The Problems of Philosophy. (2009).
8.
Moore, G.E.: Some main problems of philosophy. Allen & Unwin, London (1953).
9.
Ayer, A.J.: The foundations of empirical knowledge. Macmillan and Co, London (1940).
10.
Jackson, F.: Perception: a representative theory. Gregg Revivals, Aldershot (1993).
11.
Robinson, H.: Perception. Routledge, London (2001).
12.
Bermudez, J.L.: Naturalized Sense Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 61, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/2653655.
13.
Ryle, G.: The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London (1949).
14.
Austin, J.L., Warnock, G.J.: Sense and sensibilia. Clarendon, Oxford (1962).
15.
Pitcher, G.: A theory of perception. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1971).
16.
A. M. Quinton: The Problem of Perception. Mind. 64, 28–51 (1955).
17.
Swartz, R.J.: Perceiving, sensing and knowing: a book of readings from twentieth-century sources in the philosophy of perception. Doubleday, New York (1965).
18.
Schilpp, P.A.: The philosophy of G.E. Moore. Northwestern University, Evanston (1942).
19.
Dancy, J.: An introduction to contemporary epistemology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (1985).
20.
Jackson, F.: Perception: a representative theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977).
21.
Lowe, E.J.: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
22.
Warnock, G.J.: The Philosophy of perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1967).
23.
Lewis, D.: Veridical hallucination and prosthetic vision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 58, 239–249 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408012341251.
24.
Lowe, E.J.: Subjects of experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).
25.
Tye, M.: A Causal Analysis of Seeing. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 42, (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/2107488.
26.
Noë, A.: Causation and Perception: The Puzzle Unravelled. Analysis. 63, 93–100 (2003).
27.
Lycan, W.: Representational Theories of Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive.
28.
Seager, W., MyiLibrary: Theories of consciousness: an introduction and assessment. Routledge, London (1999).
29.
Dretske, F.: Experience as Representation. Philosophical Issues. 13, 67–82 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1533-6077.00005.
30.
Harman, G.: The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives. 4, (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2214186.
31.
Tye, M.: Inverted Earth, Swampman, and Representationism. Philosophical Perspectives. 12, 459–477 (1998).
32.
Dretske, F.I.: Naturalizing the mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1997).
33.
Lycan, W.G.: Consciousness and experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1996).
34.
Tye, M.: Ten problems of consciousness: a representational theory of the phenomenal mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1995).
35.
Tye, M.: Consciousness, color, and content. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2000).
36.
Byrne, A.: Intentionalism Defended. The Philosophical Review. 110, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2693675.
37.
Block, N.J., Flanagan, O.J., Güzeldere, G.: The nature of consciousness: philosophical debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1997).
38.
Block, N.: Mental Paint and Mental Latex. Philosophical Issues. 7, (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/1522889.
39.
Block, N., Tye, M.: Is Experiencing Just Representing? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 58, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2653766.
40.
Kind, A.: What’s so Transparent about Transparency? Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 115, 225–244 (2003).
41.
Macpherson, F.: Colour Inversion Problems for Representationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 70, 127–152 (2005).
42.
Macpherson, F.: Novel Colours and the Content of Experience. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 84, 43–66 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00162.
43.
Wright, E.L.: The case for qualia. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2008).
44.
Wright, W.: Nonconceptual Content. In: Matthen, M. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.003.
45.
Smith, A.D.: The problem of perception. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2002).
46.
Siegel, S.: Which Properties are Represented in Perception? In: Gendler, T.S. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.) Perceptual Experience. pp. 481–503. Oxford University Press (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0015.
47.
Hawley, K., Macpherson, F.: The admissible contents of experience. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2011).
48.
Haddock, A., Macpherson, F., Oxford University Press: Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
49.
Dancy, J.: Perceptual knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988).
50.
Snowdon, P.: Perception, Vision and Causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 81, 175–192 (1981).
51.
Martin, M.G.F.: The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 120, 37–89 (2004).
52.
Fish, W., Oxford University Press: Perception, hallucination, and illusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
53.
Child, W.: Vision and Experience: The Causal theory and the Disjunctive Conception. The Philosophical Quarterly. 42, (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2219682.
54.
Millar, A.: The Idea of Experience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 96, 75–90 (1996).
55.
Gendler, T., Hawthorne, J.: Perceptual experience. Clarendon, Oxford (2010).
56.
Logue, H.: Why Naïve Realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback). 112, 211–237 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x.
57.
Nudds, M.: Recent Work in Perception: Naive Realism and its Opponents. Analysis. 69, 334–346 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp039.
58.
Haddock, A., Macpherson, F., Oxford University Press: Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
59.
Shapiro, L.: The Embodied Cognition Research Programme. Philosophy Compass. 2, 338–346 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x.
60.
Gangopadhyay, N., Madary, M., Spicer, F., Oxford University Press: Perception, action, and consciousness: sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
61.
Prinz, J.: Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception. Psyche. 12, (2006).
62.
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 36, 181–204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477.
63.
Raffman, D.: Similarity Spaces. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception.
64.
Rescorla, M.: Bayesian Perceptual Psychology. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception.