1.
Charles, M., Pecorari, D., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Introducing English for academic purposes. Routledge, London (2016).
2.
Hyland, K.: English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken, New Jersey (2006).
3.
Alexander, O., Argent, S., Spencer, J.: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading (2008).
4.
Jordan, R.R.: English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
5.
Hyland, K., Shaw, P. eds: The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge Handbooks Online, London (2016).
6.
BALEAP Competency Framework for  Teachers of English for  Academic Purposes, https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf.
7.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes, http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.
8.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading, http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm.
9.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).
10.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S. eds: The handbook of English for specific purposes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chicester, West Sussex (2013).
11.
Hall, G.: The Routledge handbook of English language teaching. Routledge Handbooks Online, London (2016).
12.
Ding, A., Bruce, I., Dawson Books: The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2017).
13.
Blaj-Ward, L., SpringerLink (Online service): Language Learning and Use in English-Medium Higher Education. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017).
14.
Boyle, J., Ramsay, S.: Writing for science students. Palgrave, London (2017).
15.
Jordan, R.R.: English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 22, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001483X.
16.
Hyland, K., Hamp-Lyons, L.: EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 1, 1–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4.
17.
Flowerdew, J., Peacock, M. eds: Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
18.
Pennington, M.C., Richards, J.C.: Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal. 47, 5–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219.
19.
Coffin, C., Donohue, J.P.: Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11, 64–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004.
20.
Lea, M.R., Street, B.V.: Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23, 157–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
21.
Watson Todd, R.: EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2, 147–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6.
22.
Wingate, U.: Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching. 1–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264.
23.
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., Saint Martin, M. de, Baudelot, C., Vincent, G.: Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professional power. Polity, Cambridge (1994).
24.
Ding, A., Bruce, I., Dawson Books: The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2017).
25.
West, R.: Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching. 27, (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800007527.
26.
Jordan, R.R.: English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
27.
LEA, MARY R.STREET, BRIAN V.: Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23,.
28.
Hyland, K.: English for academic purposes. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken, New Jersey (2006).
29.
Duff, P.A.: Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 30, 169–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000048.
30.
Benson, P.: Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 40, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958.
31.
Humphreys, G., Wyatt, M.: Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal. 68, 52–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct056.
32.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes, http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.
33.
Ellis, G., Sinclair, B.: Learning to learn English: a course in learner training : learner’s book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989).
34.
Cottrell, Stella: The study skills handbook. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
35.
Tudor, I.: Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal. 47, 22–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.22.
36.
Brown, J.D., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge, London (2016).
37.
Basturkmen, H.: Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2010).
38.
Wingate, U.: Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education. 11, 457–469 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268.
39.
Ursula Wingate: Academic Literacy and Student Diversity. (2015).
40.
Kettle, M.: International student engagement in higher education: transforming practices, pedagogies and participation. Multilingual Matters, Bristol (2017).
41.
Neumann, R., Parry, S., Becher, T.: Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education. 27, 405–417 (2002).
42.
Hyland, K., Bondi, M. eds: Academic discourse across disciplines. Peter Lang AG, Bern, Switzerland (2006).
43.
LearnEnglish | British Council | Genre Families, https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/.
44.
Gardner, S., Nesi, H.: A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. Applied Linguistics. 34, 25–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams024.
45.
A.W., B.: Teaching in a Digital Age.
46.
Neumann, R.: Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 26, 135–146 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071.
47.
Swales, J.M.: Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
48.
Uhrig, K.: Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 31, 127–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001.
49.
Bruce, I.: Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 28, 105–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005.
50.
Durrant, P.: Discipline and Level Specificity in University Students’ Written Vocabulary. Applied Linguistics. 35, 328–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt016.
51.
Peter Samuels: Promoting Learning Development as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. (2013).
52.
Gardner, D., Davies, M.: A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics. 35, 305–327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015.
53.
Becher, T.: Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 6, 109–122 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078112331379362.
54.
Becher, T.: The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 19, 151–161 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007.
55.
Biglan, A.: The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57, 195–203 (1973).
56.
Becher, T.: Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham (1989).
57.
Woodward-Kron, R.: More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7, 234–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004.
58.
Nesi, H., Gardner, S.: Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
59.
Flowerdew, J., Costley, T. eds: Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. Routledge, London (2017).
60.
Ding, A.: What’s disciplinary epistemology got to do with EAP? | Teaching EAP, https://teachingeap.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/whats-disciplinary-epistemology-got-to-do-with-eap/.
61.
Chazal, E. de, McCarter, S.: Oxford EAP: a course in English for academic purposes, Upper-intermediate/B2. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
62.
Swales, J.M., Feak, C.B.: Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich (2012).
63.
Manning, A.: English for language and linguistics in higher education studies: Course book. Garnet Education, Reading (2008).
64.
McMahon, P.: Group work: work together for academic success. Collins EAP, London (2013).
65.
Alexander, O., Argent, S., Spencer, J.: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading (2008).
66.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10,.
67.
Peacock, M., Flowerdew, J.: Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
68.
Swales, J.M., Feak, C.B.: Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich (2012).
69.
Hyland, K.: English for academic purposes. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken, New Jersey (2006).
70.
Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991).
71.
Hunston, S.: Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
72.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Askews & Holts Library Services: Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
73.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M.: Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly. 36, (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359.
74.
Academic Word List | School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies | Victoria University of Wellington, http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/.
75.
Helen Basturkmen, Author Vitae: Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. 21, 233–242 (2002).
76.
Weissberg, B.: The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 12, 23–35 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J.
77.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English),.
78.
Hyland, K., Shaw, P. eds: The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge Handbooks Online, London (2016).
79.
Charles, M., Pecorari, D., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Introducing English for academic purposes. Routledge, London (2016).
80.
Aguilar, M.: The peer seminar, a spoken research process genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 3, 55–72 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00043-2.
81.
Walsh, S.: Analyzing university spoken interaction: a CL/CA approach. Applying Corpus Linguistics. Applying Corpus Linguistics. 16, (2011).
82.
Ferris, D.: Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 32, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587585.
83.
Morita, N.: Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 34, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587953.
84.
Lynch, T.: Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal. 61, 311–320 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm050.
85.
Anderson, K., Lynch, T., Maclean, J.: Study speaking: a course in spoken English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
86.
Badger, R., White, G.: A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 54, 153–160 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
87.
Nesi, H., Gardner, S.: Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
88.
Coffin, C., Curry, M.J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T.M., Swann, J., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Teaching academic writing: a toolkit for higher education. Routledge, London (2003).
89.
Writing for a Purpose, http://www.uefap.com/writingforapurpose/.
90.
Wingate, U., Andon, N., Cogo, A.: Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education. 12, 69–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387814.
91.
Flowerdew, L.: Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal. 54, 369–378 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369.
92.
Astorga, M.C.: Teaching Academic Writing in the EFL Context: Redesigning Pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 2, 251–267 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701670089.
93.
Hyland, K.: Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12, 17–29 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.
94.
Bruce, I.: Syllabus design for general EAP writing courses: A cognitive approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 239–256 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.001.
95.
Cheng, A.: Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes. 25, 76–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.002.
96.
Charles, M., Pecorari, D., Hunston, S. eds: Academic writing: at the interface of corpus and discourse. Continuum, London (2009).
97.
Pecorari, D.: Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berks (2013).
98.
Hyland, Ken: Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Longman, Harlow (2000).
99.
Flowerdew, J., Costley, T.: Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2016).
100.
Hyland, K.: Teaching and researching writing. Routledge, New York (2016).
101.
Swales, J.M.: Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
102.
Hunston, S.: Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
103.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Askews & Holts Library Services: Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
104.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M.: Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly. 36, (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359.
105.
Hyland, K., Sancho Guinda, C. eds: Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
106.
Paul, R: Critical Thinking Movement: 3 Waves, http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-movement-3-waves/856.
107.
Moore, T.J.: Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development. 30, 261–274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501328.
108.
Davies, M., Barnett, R.: The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2015).
109.
Hyland, K., Sancho Guinda, C. eds: Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
110.
Thompson, C.: Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal. 11, 15–20 (2011).
111.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8,.
112.
Atkinson, D.: A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 31, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975.
113.
Davidson, B.W.: Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 32, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587906.
114.
Alexander, O., Argent, S., Spencer, J.: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading (2008).
115.
Brown, J.D., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge, London (2016).
116.
Basturkmen, H.: Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2010).
117.
Benesch, S.: Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 30, (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931.
118.
Biggs, J.B., Tang, C.S., Society for Research into Higher Education, Ebooks Corporation Limited: Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2011).
119.
Tomlinson, B.: Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2013).
120.
Manning, A.: Assessing EAP: theory and practice in assessment literacy. Garnet Education, Reading (2016).
121.
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment, https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf.
122.
BALEAP Guidelines on English Language Tests for University Entry, https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/BALEAP_Guidelines_on_English_Language_Tests_for_University_AGM_v19_May_2012.pdf.
123.
Weir, C.J.: Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2005).
124.
Horowitz, D.M.: What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 20, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294.
125.
Banerjee, J., Wall, D.: Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5, 50–69 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003.
126.
Cooper, A., Bikowski, D.: Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 6, 206–221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008.
127.
Green, B.A., Andrade, M.S.: Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9, 322–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003.
128.
Green, B.A., Andrade, M.S.: Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9, 322–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003.
129.
Woodrow, L.: Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge, London (2018).
130.
Woodrow, L.: Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge, London (2018).