[1]
Academic Word List | School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies | Victoria University of Wellington: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/.
[2]
Aguilar, M. 2004. The peer seminar, a spoken research process genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 3, 1 (Jan. 2004), 55–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00043-2.
[3]
Alexander, O. et al. 2008. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd.
[4]
Alexander, O. et al. 2008. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd.
[5]
Alexander, O. et al. 2008. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd.
[6]
Anderson, K. et al. 2004. Study speaking: a course in spoken English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Astorga, M.C. 2007. Teaching Academic Writing in the EFL Context: Redesigning Pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 2, 4 (Nov. 2007), 251–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701670089.
[8]
Atkinson, D. 1997. A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 31, 1 (Spring 1997). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975.
[9]
A.W., B. Teaching in a Digital Age.
[10]
Badger, R. and White, G. 2000. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 54, 2 (Apr. 2000), 153–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
[11]
Banerjee, J. and Wall, D. 2006. Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5, 1 (Jan. 2006), 50–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003.
[12]
Basturkmen, H. 2010. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
[13]
Basturkmen, H. 2010. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
[14]
Becher, T. 1989. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
[15]
Becher, T. 1994. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 19, 2 (Jan. 1994), 151–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007.
[16]
Becher, T. 1981. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 6, 2 (Jan. 1981), 109–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078112331379362.
[17]
Benesch, S. 1996. Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 30, 4 (Winter 1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931.
[18]
Benson, P. 2007. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 40, 01 (Jan. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958.
[19]
Biber, D. et al. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
[20]
Biber, D. et al. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Biber, D. et al. 2002. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly. 36, 1 (Spring 2002). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359.
[22]
Biber, D. et al. 2002. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly. 36, 1 (Spring 2002). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359.
[23]
Biggs, J.B. et al. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
[24]
Biglan, A. 1973. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57, 3 (1973), 195–203.
[25]
Blaj-Ward, L. and SpringerLink (Online service) 2017. Language Learning and Use in English-Medium Higher Education. Springer International Publishing.
[26]
Bourdieu, P. et al. 1994. Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professional power. Polity.
[27]
Boyle, J. and Ramsay, S. 2017. Writing for science students. Palgrave.
[28]
Brown, J.D. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2016. Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
[29]
Brown, J.D. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2016. Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
[30]
Bruce, I. 2009. Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 28, 2 (2009), 105–124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005.
[31]
Bruce, I. 2005. Syllabus design for general EAP writing courses: A cognitive approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 3 (Jul. 2005), 239–256. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.001.
[32]
Charles, M. et al. eds. 2009. Academic writing: at the interface of corpus and discourse. Continuum.
[33]
Charles, M. et al. 2016. Introducing English for academic purposes. Routledge.
[34]
Charles, M. et al. 2016. Introducing English for academic purposes. Routledge.
[35]
Chazal, E. de and McCarter, S. 2012. Oxford EAP: a course in English for academic purposes, Upper-intermediate/B2. Oxford University Press.
[36]
Cheng, A. 2006. Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes. 25, 1 (Jan. 2006), 76–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.002.
[37]
Coffin, C. et al. 2003. Teaching academic writing: a toolkit for higher education. Routledge.
[38]
Coffin, C. and Donohue, J.P. 2012. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11, 1 (Mar. 2012), 64–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004.
[39]
Cooper, A. and Bikowski, D. 2007. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 6, 3 (Jul. 2007), 206–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008.
[40]
Cottrell, Stella 2013. The study skills handbook. Palgrave Macmillan.
[41]
Critical Thinking Movement: 3 Waves: 2011. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-movement-3-waves/856.
[42]
Davidson, B.W. 1998. Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 32, 1 (Spring 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587906.
[43]
Davies, M. and Barnett, R. 2015. The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.
[44]
Ding, A. et al. 2017. The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Palgrave Macmillan.
[45]
Ding, A. et al. 2017. The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Palgrave Macmillan.
[46]
Duff, P.A. 2010. Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 30, (Mar. 2010), 169–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000048.
[47]
Durrant, P. 2014. Discipline and Level Specificity in University Students’ Written Vocabulary. Applied Linguistics. 35, 3 (Jul. 2014), 328–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt016.
[48]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2013. Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. Routledge.
[49]
Ellis, G. and Sinclair, B. 1989. Learning to learn English: a course in learner training : learner’s book. Cambridge University Press.
[50]
Ferris, D. 1998. Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 32, 2 (Summer 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587585.
[51]
Flowerdew, J. and Costley, T. eds. 2017. Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. Routledge.
[52]
Flowerdew, J. and Costley, T. 2016. Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. Routledge.
[53]
Flowerdew, J. and Peacock, M. eds. 2005. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press.
[54]
Flowerdew, L. 2000. Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal. 54, 4 (Oct. 2000), 369–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369.
[55]
Gardner, D. and Davies, M. 2014. A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics. 35, 3 (Jul. 2014), 305–327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015.
[56]
Gardner, S. and Nesi, H. 2013. A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. Applied Linguistics. 34, 1 (Feb. 2013), 25–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams024.
[57]
Green, B.A. and Andrade, M.S. 2010. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9, 4 (Dec. 2010), 322–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003.
[58]
Green, B.A. and Andrade, M.S. 2010. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9, 4 (Dec. 2010), 322–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003.
[59]
Hall, G. 2016. The Routledge handbook of English language teaching. Routledge Handbooks Online.
[60]
Helen Basturkmen, Author Vitae 2002. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. 21, 3 (2002), 233–242.
[61]
Horowitz, D.M. 1986. What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 20, 3 (Sep. 1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294.
[62]
Humphreys, G. and Wyatt, M. 2014. Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal. 68, 1 (Jan. 2014), 52–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct056.
[63]
Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
[64]
Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Hyland, K. 2006. English for academic purposes. Taylor & Francis.
[66]
Hyland, K. 2006. English for academic purposes. Taylor & Francis.
[67]
Hyland, K. 2006. English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Taylor & Francis.
[68]
Hyland, K. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12, 1 (Feb. 2003), 17–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.
[69]
Hyland, K. 2016. Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.
[70]
Hyland, K. and Bondi, M. eds. 2006. Academic discourse across disciplines. Peter Lang AG.
[71]
Hyland, K. and Hamp-Lyons, L. 2002. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 1, 1 (Jan. 2002), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4.
[72]
Hyland, K. and Sancho Guinda, C. eds. 2012. Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan.
[73]
Hyland, K. and Sancho Guinda, C. eds. 2012. Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan.
[74]
Hyland, K. and Shaw, P. eds. 2016. The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge Handbooks Online.
[75]
Hyland, K. and Shaw, P. eds. 2016. The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge Handbooks Online.
[76]
Hyland, Ken 2000. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
[77]
Jordan, R.R. 1997. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
[78]
Jordan, R.R. 1997. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
[79]
Jordan, R.R. 1989. English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 22, 03 (Jul. 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001483X.
[80]
Kettle, M. 2017. International student engagement in higher education: transforming practices, pedagogies and participation. Multilingual Matters.
[81]
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[82]
LEA, MARY R.STREET, BRIAN V. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23, 2.
[83]
Lea, M.R. and Street, B.V. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23, 2 (Jan. 1998), 157–172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
[84]
LearnEnglish | British Council | Genre Families: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/.
[85]
Lynch, T. 2007. Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal. 61, 4 (Apr. 2007), 311–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm050.
[86]
Manning, A. 2016. Assessing EAP: theory and practice in assessment literacy. Garnet Education.
[87]
Manning, A. 2008. English for language and linguistics in higher education studies: Course book. Garnet Education.
[88]
McMahon, P. 2013. Group work: work together for academic success. Collins EAP.
[89]
Moore, T.J. 2011. Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development. 30, 3 (Jun. 2011), 261–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501328.
[90]
Morita, N. 2000. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 34, 2 (Summer 2000). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587953.
[91]
Nesi, H. and Gardner, S. 2012. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
[92]
Nesi, H. and Gardner, S. 2012. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
[93]
Neumann, R. 2001. Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 26, 2 (Jun. 2001), 135–146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071.
[94]
Neumann, R. et al. 2002. Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education. 27, 4 (2002), 405–417.
[95]
Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S. eds. 2013. The handbook of English for specific purposes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[96]
Peacock, M. and Flowerdew, J. 2001. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press.
[97]
Pecorari, D. 2013. Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Open University Press.
[98]
Pennington, M.C. and Richards, J.C. 2016. Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal. 47, 1 (Apr. 2016), 5–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219.
[99]
Peter Samuels 2013. Promoting Learning Development as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. 5 (2013).
[100]
Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
[101]
Swales, J.M. 2004. Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
[102]
Swales, J.M. and Feak, C.B. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
[103]
Swales, J.M. and Feak, C.B. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.
[104]
Thompson, C. 2011. Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal. 11, 4 (2011), 15–20.
[105]
Tomlinson, B. 2013. Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Academic.
[106]
Tudor, I. 1993. Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal. 47, 1 (Jan. 1993), 22–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.22.
[107]
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading: http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm.
[108]
Uhrig, K. 2012. Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 31, 2 (2012), 127–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001.
[109]
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes: http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.
[110]
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes: http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.
[111]
Ursula Wingate 2015. Academic Literacy and Student Diversity.
[112]
Walsh, S. 2011. Analyzing university spoken interaction: a CL/CA approach. Applying Corpus Linguistics. Applying Corpus Linguistics. 16, 3 (2011).
[113]
Watson Todd, R. 2003. EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2, 2 (Jan. 2003), 147–156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6.
[114]
Weir, C.J. 2005. Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
[115]
Weissberg, B. 1993. The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 12, 1 (Jan. 1993), 23–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J.
[116]
West, R. 1994. Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching. 27, 01 (Jan. 1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800007527.
[117]
What’s disciplinary epistemology got to do with EAP? | Teaching EAP: https://teachingeap.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/whats-disciplinary-epistemology-got-to-do-with-eap/.
[118]
Wingate, U. 2016. Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching. (Oct. 2016), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264.
[119]
Wingate, U. 2006. Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education. 11, 4 (Oct. 2006), 457–469. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268.
[120]
Wingate, U. et al. 2011. Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education. 12, 1 (Mar. 2011), 69–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387814.
[121]
Woodrow, L. 2018. Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge.
[122]
Woodrow, L. 2018. Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge.
[123]
Woodward-Kron, R. 2008. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7, 4 (Oct. 2008), 234–249. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004.
[124]
Writing for a Purpose: http://www.uefap.com/writingforapurpose/.
[125]
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment.
[126]
BALEAP Competency Framework for  Teachers of English for  Academic Purposes.
[127]
BALEAP Guidelines on English Language Tests for University Entry.
[128]
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10, 2 (Listening in EAP).
[129]
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English), 1.
[130]
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8, 2.